Maybe but that would still leave us with 3 forwards, with Vyds not being fully fit until the end of the year!ŽižkovClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:53 amI wonder if we may have received encouragement from Vydra
Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
-
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 294 times
- Has Liked: 92 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Hopefully not. Vydra belongs to an era now past. In any case he's not a goalscorer.ŽižkovClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:53 amI wonder if we may have received encouragement from Vydra
-
- Posts: 1064
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 349 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Maybe VK has been listening to Pep and we’re giving strikers a miss for a couple of seasons!Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:45 amInteresting, very very few links to a striker so far
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
-
- Posts: 3162
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 838 times
- Has Liked: 544 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
u G b ONewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:45 amInteresting, very very few links to a striker so far
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
It doesn't matter what you think... I am merely pointing out the facts to add balance to some more typical nonsense on this board...Rarely read so much utter rubbish.
Your memory of history seems somewhat clouded by your political views - so much so that you can’t even remember when the Euro final took place !
The fact is... that we have only been in the finals of major competitions outside the cartel... We have only won a major competition outside the cartel... All reports show that we have seen a massive increase in young English players included in teams since we left the cartel...
The cartel was an absolute disaster for English football!
This user liked this post: Quicknick
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
One unreliable link.
-
- Posts: 3162
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 838 times
- Has Liked: 544 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
If you say so.
-
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:32 pm
- Been Liked: 169 times
- Has Liked: 9 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Top Championship goalscorer 17/18 suggests he is a good goalscorer at this level when fit.SkiptonClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:00 amHopefully not. Vydra belongs to an era now past. In any case he's not a goalscorer.
This user liked this post: KateR
-
- Posts: 16935
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6971 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Erm, just 2 of our 5 permanent signings are English.
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
The athletic article mentions him.
-
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
- Been Liked: 372 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
- Location: Blackburn
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
He's not going to be fit until at least January, then another month to get match sharp.Mrpotatohead wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:08 amTop Championship goalscorer 17/18 suggests he is a good goalscorer at this level when fit.
I wouldn't even have offered him a deal, and I would have certainly rescinded the offer by now if I had done.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Pretty sure it’s just a rehash of that original link.
It may turn into something but right now there’s nothing concrete linking him.
-
- Posts: 2500
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1032 times
- Has Liked: 280 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Pointing out facts about the 2 finals yes.BigChaCha wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:01 amIt doesn't matter what you think... I am merely pointing out the facts to add balance to some more typical nonsense on this board...
The fact is... that we have only been in the finals of major competitions outside the cartel... We have only won a major competition outside the cartel... All reports show that we have seen a massive increase in young English players included in teams since we left the cartel...
The cartel was an absolute disaster for English football!
Spouting utter ******** about why they reached the finals is a very different matter.
Did the team that reached the euro finals not contain a number of players who broke through the various England ranks when England were in this cartel you talk about ? Was that during the period when the under 17s, under 19s, under 20s were winning trophies at world level ? Or was that all after the cartel ?
This user liked this post: Greenmile
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I wouldn't even consider Vydra for this season.
It would be like holding our for a Mike Garlick transfer arrival, it might never happen
It would be like holding our for a Mike Garlick transfer arrival, it might never happen
-
- Posts: 3162
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 838 times
- Has Liked: 544 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Hmmm.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:21 amPretty sure it’s just a rehash of that original link.
It may turn into something but right now there’s nothing concrete linking him.
Evening Standard reporter that covers Chelsea (ugbo’s former club) with 350k followers
Against Newcastleclaret93
Not sure who to believe tbh.
This user liked this post: BertiesBeehole
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
My suspicion is that Kompany will use players like Twine and O'Hare (should he sign) as the furthest forward players in his 4222. Similarly to how we set up at Shrewsbury the other night, two defensive midfielders (Cork and Cullen), two box to box midfielders in front (2 of Brownhill, Bastien, McNeil), and then two forward players (two of Twine, O'Hare, Rodriguez).
I might be reading it incorrectly, but there appears to be a strong desire to bring O'Hare in and very few links to strikers.
I might be reading it incorrectly, but there appears to be a strong desire to bring O'Hare in and very few links to strikers.
This user liked this post: AGENT_CLARET
-
- Posts: 5918
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1774 times
- Has Liked: 361 times
- Location: The Banana Stand
-
- Posts: 7182
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3607 times
- Has Liked: 1033 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Not a rumour (remember, NOT a rumour), just a thought as we clearly need a striker. This might be an insane suggestion, possibly, but here it is...
Michy Batshuayi on loan.
Belgian, will know Kompany presumably well, just been out on loan at Beskitas for the season (scored 14) and has basically lived his life out on loan since signing for Chelsea, or it feels that way. He clearly will get farmed out again, and yes, it might be batshit (HA) to suggest him as a loan in this league but - just a thought. I am not seeing many decent names available so I thought I'd throw it out there....
Michy Batshuayi on loan.
Belgian, will know Kompany presumably well, just been out on loan at Beskitas for the season (scored 14) and has basically lived his life out on loan since signing for Chelsea, or it feels that way. He clearly will get farmed out again, and yes, it might be batshit (HA) to suggest him as a loan in this league but - just a thought. I am not seeing many decent names available so I thought I'd throw it out there....
-
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
- Been Liked: 372 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
- Location: Blackburn
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Would be a pass from me. Hasn't hit decent numbers since he was at Marseille, and the wrong kind of attitude for us.jedi_master wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:41 amNot a rumour (remember, NOT a rumour), just a thought as we clearly need a striker. This might be an insane suggestion, possibly, but here it is...
Michy Batshuayi on loan.
Belgian, will know Kompany presumably well, just been out on loan at Beskitas for the season (scored 14) and has basically lived his life out on loan since signing for Chelsea, or it feels that way. He clearly will get farmed out again, and yes, it might be batshit (HA) to suggest him as a loan in this league but - just a thought. I am not seeing many decent names available so I thought I'd throw it out there....
-
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 294 times
- Has Liked: 92 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Five years ago "when fit". It really is time to move on.Mrpotatohead wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:08 amTop Championship goalscorer 17/18 suggests he is a good goalscorer at this level when fit.
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
More likely to play where brownhill and Bastien played.ksrclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:32 amMy suspicion is that Kompany will use players like Twine and O'Hare (should he sign) as the furthest forward players in his 4222. Similarly to how we set up at Shrewsbury the other night, two defensive midfielders (Cork and Cullen), two box to box midfielders in front (2 of Brownhill, Bastien, McNeil), and then two forward players (two of Twine, O'Hare, Rodriguez).
I might be reading it incorrectly, but there appears to be a strong desire to bring O'Hare in and very few links to strikers.
-
- Posts: 3162
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 838 times
- Has Liked: 544 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
And Jedi ill throw it back to you!jedi_master wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:41 amNot a rumour (remember, NOT a rumour), just a thought as we clearly need a striker. This might be an insane suggestion, possibly, but here it is...
Michy Batshuayi on loan.
Belgian, will know Kompany presumably well, just been out on loan at Beskitas for the season (scored 14) and has basically lived his life out on loan since signing for Chelsea, or it feels that way. He clearly will get farmed out again, and yes, it might be batshit (HA) to suggest him as a loan in this league but - just a thought. I am not seeing many decent names available so I thought I'd throw it out there....
Does anyone believe he’s any good?
Never been impressed personally. Seems super lightweight and my god the wages
Maybe Champ is his level though?
-
- Posts: 3179
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 1773 times
- Has Liked: 273 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Not a chance Kompany will want Vydra.ŽižkovClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:53 amI wonder if we may have received encouragement from Vydra
Wrong age and won’t be available for 6 months.
He’s gone.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Again I’m not saying it won’t happen.CharlieinNewMexico wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:32 amHmmm.
Evening Standard reporter that covers Chelsea (ugbo’s former club) with 350k followers
Against Newcastleclaret93
Not sure who to believe tbh.
I am saying we have had one unreliable link to a striker this window.
Is that not a bit concerning given it’s our least well stocked position.
-
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
- Been Liked: 372 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
- Location: Blackburn
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Hopefully not, O'Hare's shooting stats are the worst part of his game. He's at the top end for chances created and passes completed in the final third.ksrclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:32 amMy suspicion is that Kompany will use players like Twine and O'Hare (should he sign) as the furthest forward players in his 4222. Similarly to how we set up at Shrewsbury the other night, two defensive midfielders (Cork and Cullen), two box to box midfielders in front (2 of Brownhill, Bastien, McNeil), and then two forward players (two of Twine, O'Hare, Rodriguez).
I might be reading it incorrectly, but there appears to be a strong desire to bring O'Hare in and very few links to strikers.
Would much rather that they will play behind two actual strikers.
-
- Posts: 3162
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 838 times
- Has Liked: 544 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Personally I just think you’re sitting on fences right now. Any fence you can sit on to appear “in the know” or later recant on what you said. Kind of like Nixon.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:49 amAgain I’m not saying it won’t happen.
I am saying we have had one unreliable link to a striker this window.
Is that not a bit concerning given it’s our least well stocked position.
Ps. In other news Brownhill 3 assists on Friday
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Can we please not start the Brownhill stuff.CharlieinNewMexico wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:56 amPersonally I just think you’re sitting on fences right now. Any fence you can sit on to appear “in the know” or later recant on what you said. Kind of like Nixon.
You should probably just shut up.
Ps. In other news Brownhill 3 assists on Friday ( yes I know it was a friendly and yes I know it was league 1 opposition before you spout that rubbish out)
He’s crap you know.
-
- Posts: 3162
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 838 times
- Has Liked: 544 times
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Please try stick to remotely transfer stuff. Instead of trying to start fights.CharlieinNewMexico wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:56 amPersonally I just think you’re sitting on fences right now. Any fence you can sit on to appear “in the know” or later recant on what you said. Kind of like Nixon.
You should probably just shut up.
Ps. In other news Brownhill 3 assists on Friday ( yes I know it was a friendly and yes I know it was league 1 opposition before you spout that rubbish out)
He’s crap you know.
You will just end up locking another threading
-
- Posts: 3162
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 838 times
- Has Liked: 544 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I was talking about the transfer stuff. That you lay claim to have so much knowledge about.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:58 amPlease try stick to remotely transfer stuff. Instead of trying to start fights.
You will just end up locking another threading
-
- Posts: 666
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2017 2:05 am
- Been Liked: 227 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
It would be nice to get a 20 goal a season striker in but I guess that costs considerable money, if we have 3/4 guys able to score 10-15 goals a season from midfield / forward positions we’ll be fine. We have struggled for years to get goals from the midfield but all the new signings have given me hope that won’t continue this season.
These 2 users liked this post: tiger76 Suntan
-
- Posts: 3162
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 838 times
- Has Liked: 544 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
^^^^ thisbuzzclarets79 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:06 amIt would be nice to get a 20 goal a season striker in but I guess that costs considerable money, if we have 3/4 guys able to score 10-15 goals a season from midfield / forward positions we’ll be fine. We have struggled for years to get goals from the midfield but all the new signings have given me hope that won’t continue this season.
-
- Posts: 6699
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1706 times
- Has Liked: 791 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Will VK being in Portugal, slow down any further signings for a while. He seems to be the "salesman" in getting players to join
-
- Posts: 13548
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3118 times
- Has Liked: 3841 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Agreed that should be priority. I’d have previously said a wide player too. I liked the look of that Gustav Isaksen there were some tenuous links to, but we didn’t seem to play with any width vs Shrewsbury so it might be a waste.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:00 amGot to be the number 1 priority for me right now. Can’t see any of our existing strikers getting close to 20
Disagree neither Barnes or JRod would get 20 at championship level. More JRod than Barnes though. There’s 46 games and we’ll be creating a lot more chances than we have historically. Brereton nearly scored 20 pens
-
- Posts: 3150
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
- Been Liked: 1162 times
- Has Liked: 1079 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
warksclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:08 amWill VK being in Portugal, slow down any further signings for a while. He seems to be the "salesman" in getting players to join
This user liked this post: RVclaret
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I didn’t bring Brownhill up? That was you. That is directly trying to start an argument. Even this post I have highlighted is you directly trying to start an argument. Please stop as it will result in another locked threadCharlieinNewMexico wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:00 amI was talking about the transfer stuff. That you lay claim to have so much knowledge about.
I will stick to transfers after this
Last edited by Newcastleclaret93 on Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1576 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I could see our front 4 (with 2 sitting deeper) lining up something likeNewClaret wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:20 amAgreed that should be priority. I’d have previously said a wide player too. I liked the look of that Gustav Isaksen there were some tenuous links to, but we didn’t seem to play with any width vs Shrewsbury so it might be a waste.
Disagree neither Barnes or JRod would get 20 at championship level. More JRod than Barnes though. There’s 46 games and we’ll be creating a lot more chances than we have historically. Brereton nearly scored 20 pens
McNeil, OHare
Twine, Jay
That might get enough goals but still feel we need a top finisher. Because the three others will create plenty of chances
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Good point O'Hare and Twins should certainly bag a few at this level, plus Dwight if he stays will surely provide a goal threat.buzzclarets79 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:06 amIt would be nice to get a 20 goal a season striker in but I guess that costs considerable money, if we have 3/4 guys able to score 10-15 goals a season from midfield / forward positions we’ll be fine. We have struggled for years to get goals from the midfield but all the new signings have given me hope that won’t continue this season.
However I'd still prefer us to get a genuine striker if possible, be it on loan or perm, Jay might nab 10-12 over the course of the season fitness permitting, but Barnes I harbour doubts over, and Vydra isn't available right now, even if he does sign a new deal, which is by no means guaranteed.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I think we're playing down the quality of Barnes & JRod - yes they're getting on in age but both are still quality strikers and will likely be a cut above most strikers in this division. Look at the top scorers from last season and apart from 3 or 4 the rest were very, very average.tiger76 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:34 amGood point O'Hare and Twins should certainly bag a few at this level, plus Dwight if he stays will surely provide a goal threat.
However I'd still prefer us to get a genuine striker if possible, be it on loan or perm, Jay might nab 10-12 over the course of the season fitness permitting, but Barnes I harbour doubts over, and Vydra isn't available right now, even if he does sign a new deal, which is by no means guaranteed.
They could both bag 20+ easily with the type of football we're supposedly going to play.
These 3 users liked this post: burnley007 NewClaret Quicknick
-
- Posts: 2582
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 641 times
- Has Liked: 675 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
I agree, especially with the kind of service they will hopefully receive this seasonSuntan wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:48 amI think we're playing down the quality of Barnes & JRod - yes they're getting on in age but both are still quality strikers and will likely be a cut above most strikers in this division. Look at the top scorers from last season and apart from 3 or 4 the rest were very, very average.
They could both bag 20+ easily with the type of football we're supposedly going to play.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
My biggest fears over Barnes and Jay is how many games will they play over the season, they appear to be picking up niggles on a regular basis now, and given the quick turnaround in the Champ with a lot of midweek fixtures they might feel the rapid pace more than the younger members of our squad, plus neither has any pace to offer us a different dimension if we're struggling to break down massed defences.Suntan wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:48 amI think we're playing down the quality of Barnes & JRod - yes they're getting on in age but both are still quality strikers and will likely be a cut above most strikers in this division. Look at the top scorers from last season and apart from 3 or 4 the rest were very, very average.
They could both bag 20+ easily with the type of football we're supposedly going to play.
I'd love both to bag 20+, but I'll be pleasantly surprised if they do.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
He was absolutely knocking them in with Dortmund during a loan spellUpTheClaretsFCBK wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:44 amWould be a pass from me. Hasn't hit decent numbers since he was at Marseille, and the wrong kind of attitude for us.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
O'hare at Coventry training this morning
https://twitter.com/Coventry_City/statu ... 0gmKQ&s=19
https://twitter.com/Coventry_City/statu ... 0gmKQ&s=19
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
5 years ago, jesus christ, you'll be telling us to sign Gabriel Batistuta next and pointing at his figures and stats. He finished top scorer with an abnormally low amount of goals, 21 was it? I think Mitrovic just doubled that.Mrpotatohead wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:08 amTop Championship goalscorer 17/18 suggests he is a good goalscorer at this level when fit.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
3 assists is pre-season against Shrewsbury and he's suddenly Ronaldinho!!!! Is that the same amount of assists in 1 game than he got all last season? Also wake up, open your eyes, nobody said Brownhill wouldn't be decent at Championship level, he was a crap PL midfielder.CharlieinNewMexico wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:56 amPersonally I just think you’re sitting on fences right now. Any fence you can sit on to appear “in the know” or later recant on what you said. Kind of like Nixon.
Ps. In other news Brownhill 3 assists on Friday
-
- Posts: 1680
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:05 pm
- Been Liked: 648 times
- Has Liked: 102 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
4/5 years is a very long time ago in terms of professional football.Mrpotatohead wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:08 amTop Championship goalscorer 17/18 suggests he is a good goalscorer at this level when fit.
I'm certainly hoping we're targeting another forward to replace him.
We have on the books the experience of J Rod and Barnes, we don't need another ageing, injury prone forward.
I'd be very suprised if Kompany sees a future at BFC for Vydra.
-
- Posts: 10173
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
KRBFC wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:07 am3 assists is pre-season against Shrewsbury and he's suddenly Ronaldinho!!!! Is that the same amount of assists in 1 game than he got all last season? Also wake up, open your eyes, nobody said Brownhill wouldn't be decent at Championship level, he was a crap PL midfielder.
No he wasn't
-
- Posts: 5395
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1658 times
- Has Liked: 404 times
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
Jay’s only got one full season at this level in the last decade and got over 20 goals for a side worse than we should be (not bad, but worse). That was the slower Jay after his bad injuries.
Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
In your opinion, i'm allowed mine too. We were a worse side with Brownhill playing.