Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Bigvince
Posts: 2661
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 8:39 pm
Been Liked: 937 times
Has Liked: 700 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Bigvince » Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:58 am

ŽižkovClaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:53 am
I wonder if we may have received encouragement from Vydra
Maybe but that would still leave us with 3 forwards, with Vyds not being fully fit until the end of the year!

SkiptonClaret
Posts: 1375
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 294 times
Has Liked: 92 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by SkiptonClaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:00 am

ŽižkovClaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:53 am
I wonder if we may have received encouragement from Vydra
Hopefully not. Vydra belongs to an era now past. In any case he's not a goalscorer.

FeedTheArf
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 349 times
Has Liked: 151 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by FeedTheArf » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:00 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:45 am
Interesting, very very few links to a striker so far
Maybe VK has been listening to Pep and we’re giving strikers a miss for a couple of seasons!

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11123
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1576 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:00 am

NewClaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:55 am
Maybe he’s off to Southampton or not as available as suggested?

I sensed we could only secure a loan and I’d prefer a perm signing if possible.
Got to be the number 1 priority for me right now. Can’t see any of our existing strikers getting close to 20

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3162
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 838 times
Has Liked: 544 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:00 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:45 am
Interesting, very very few links to a striker so far
u G b O

BigChaCha
Posts: 886
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 12:45 pm
Been Liked: 253 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by BigChaCha » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:01 am

Rarely read so much utter rubbish.
Your memory of history seems somewhat clouded by your political views - so much so that you can’t even remember when the Euro final took place !
It doesn't matter what you think... I am merely pointing out the facts to add balance to some more typical nonsense on this board...

The fact is... that we have only been in the finals of major competitions outside the cartel... We have only won a major competition outside the cartel... All reports show that we have seen a massive increase in young English players included in teams since we left the cartel...

The cartel was an absolute disaster for English football!
This user liked this post: Quicknick

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11123
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1576 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:02 am

CharlieinNewMexico wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:00 am
u G b O
One unreliable link.

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3162
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 838 times
Has Liked: 544 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:06 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:02 am
One unreliable link.
If you say so.

Mrpotatohead
Posts: 391
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:32 pm
Been Liked: 169 times
Has Liked: 9 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Mrpotatohead » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:08 am

SkiptonClaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:00 am
Hopefully not. Vydra belongs to an era now past. In any case he's not a goalscorer.
Top Championship goalscorer 17/18 suggests he is a good goalscorer at this level when fit.
This user liked this post: KateR

Rileybobs
Posts: 16935
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6971 times
Has Liked: 1487 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:10 am

BigChaCha wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:06 am
Leaving the cartel has played a massive part in why we are now mainly targeting young English players and also giving young English players a chance that has come through our system as we did in our recent pre-season friendly...
Erm, just 2 of our 5 permanent signings are English.

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretandy » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:16 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:02 am
One unreliable link.
The athletic article mentions him.

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 372 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:17 am

Mrpotatohead wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:08 am
Top Championship goalscorer 17/18 suggests he is a good goalscorer at this level when fit.
He's not going to be fit until at least January, then another month to get match sharp.

I wouldn't even have offered him a deal, and I would have certainly rescinded the offer by now if I had done.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11123
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1576 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:21 am

claretandy wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:16 am
The athletic article mentions him.
Pretty sure it’s just a rehash of that original link.

It may turn into something but right now there’s nothing concrete linking him.

Big Vinny K
Posts: 2500
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1032 times
Has Liked: 280 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Big Vinny K » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:23 am

BigChaCha wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:01 am
It doesn't matter what you think... I am merely pointing out the facts to add balance to some more typical nonsense on this board...

The fact is... that we have only been in the finals of major competitions outside the cartel... We have only won a major competition outside the cartel... All reports show that we have seen a massive increase in young English players included in teams since we left the cartel...

The cartel was an absolute disaster for English football!
Pointing out facts about the 2 finals yes.
Spouting utter ******** about why they reached the finals is a very different matter.

Did the team that reached the euro finals not contain a number of players who broke through the various England ranks when England were in this cartel you talk about ? Was that during the period when the under 17s, under 19s, under 20s were winning trophies at world level ? Or was that all after the cartel ?
This user liked this post: Greenmile

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Top Claret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:26 am

I wouldn't even consider Vydra for this season.

It would be like holding our for a Mike Garlick transfer arrival, it might never happen

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3162
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 838 times
Has Liked: 544 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:32 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:21 am
Pretty sure it’s just a rehash of that original link.

It may turn into something but right now there’s nothing concrete linking him.
Hmmm.

Evening Standard reporter that covers Chelsea (ugbo’s former club) with 350k followers

Against Newcastleclaret93

Not sure who to believe tbh.
This user liked this post: BertiesBeehole

ksrclaret
Posts: 6931
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 2576 times
Has Liked: 771 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ksrclaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:32 am

My suspicion is that Kompany will use players like Twine and O'Hare (should he sign) as the furthest forward players in his 4222. Similarly to how we set up at Shrewsbury the other night, two defensive midfielders (Cork and Cullen), two box to box midfielders in front (2 of Brownhill, Bastien, McNeil), and then two forward players (two of Twine, O'Hare, Rodriguez).

I might be reading it incorrectly, but there appears to be a strong desire to bring O'Hare in and very few links to strikers.
This user liked this post: AGENT_CLARET

claptrappers_union
Posts: 5918
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1774 times
Has Liked: 361 times
Location: The Banana Stand

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claptrappers_union » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:35 am

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 5:47 am
These rumours are all from fake / fraud twitter accounts. Best we ignore them isn’t it.
I’m not fooled, it’s just when this site goes down, I find myself dropping into the world of Twitter… it’s an awful place.

jedi_master
Posts: 7182
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3607 times
Has Liked: 1033 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by jedi_master » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:41 am

Not a rumour (remember, NOT a rumour), just a thought as we clearly need a striker. This might be an insane suggestion, possibly, but here it is...

Michy Batshuayi on loan.

Belgian, will know Kompany presumably well, just been out on loan at Beskitas for the season (scored 14) and has basically lived his life out on loan since signing for Chelsea, or it feels that way. He clearly will get farmed out again, and yes, it might be batshit (HA) to suggest him as a loan in this league but - just a thought. I am not seeing many decent names available so I thought I'd throw it out there....

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 372 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:44 am

jedi_master wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:41 am
Not a rumour (remember, NOT a rumour), just a thought as we clearly need a striker. This might be an insane suggestion, possibly, but here it is...

Michy Batshuayi on loan.

Belgian, will know Kompany presumably well, just been out on loan at Beskitas for the season (scored 14) and has basically lived his life out on loan since signing for Chelsea, or it feels that way. He clearly will get farmed out again, and yes, it might be batshit (HA) to suggest him as a loan in this league but - just a thought. I am not seeing many decent names available so I thought I'd throw it out there....
Would be a pass from me. Hasn't hit decent numbers since he was at Marseille, and the wrong kind of attitude for us.

SkiptonClaret
Posts: 1375
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 294 times
Has Liked: 92 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by SkiptonClaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:44 am

Mrpotatohead wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:08 am
Top Championship goalscorer 17/18 suggests he is a good goalscorer at this level when fit.
Five years ago "when fit". It really is time to move on.

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretandy » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:46 am

ksrclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:32 am
My suspicion is that Kompany will use players like Twine and O'Hare (should he sign) as the furthest forward players in his 4222. Similarly to how we set up at Shrewsbury the other night, two defensive midfielders (Cork and Cullen), two box to box midfielders in front (2 of Brownhill, Bastien, McNeil), and then two forward players (two of Twine, O'Hare, Rodriguez).

I might be reading it incorrectly, but there appears to be a strong desire to bring O'Hare in and very few links to strikers.
More likely to play where brownhill and Bastien played.

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3162
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 838 times
Has Liked: 544 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:48 am

jedi_master wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:41 am
Not a rumour (remember, NOT a rumour), just a thought as we clearly need a striker. This might be an insane suggestion, possibly, but here it is...

Michy Batshuayi on loan.

Belgian, will know Kompany presumably well, just been out on loan at Beskitas for the season (scored 14) and has basically lived his life out on loan since signing for Chelsea, or it feels that way. He clearly will get farmed out again, and yes, it might be batshit (HA) to suggest him as a loan in this league but - just a thought. I am not seeing many decent names available so I thought I'd throw it out there....
And Jedi ill throw it back to you!
Does anyone believe he’s any good?

Never been impressed personally. Seems super lightweight and my god the wages 🤷🤷

Maybe Champ is his level though?

agreenwood
Posts: 3179
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1773 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by agreenwood » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:48 am

ŽižkovClaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:53 am
I wonder if we may have received encouragement from Vydra
Not a chance Kompany will want Vydra.

Wrong age and won’t be available for 6 months.

He’s gone.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11123
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1576 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:49 am

CharlieinNewMexico wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:32 am
Hmmm.

Evening Standard reporter that covers Chelsea (ugbo’s former club) with 350k followers

Against Newcastleclaret93

Not sure who to believe tbh.
Again I’m not saying it won’t happen.
I am saying we have had one unreliable link to a striker this window.

Is that not a bit concerning given it’s our least well stocked position.

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 372 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:50 am

ksrclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:32 am
My suspicion is that Kompany will use players like Twine and O'Hare (should he sign) as the furthest forward players in his 4222. Similarly to how we set up at Shrewsbury the other night, two defensive midfielders (Cork and Cullen), two box to box midfielders in front (2 of Brownhill, Bastien, McNeil), and then two forward players (two of Twine, O'Hare, Rodriguez).

I might be reading it incorrectly, but there appears to be a strong desire to bring O'Hare in and very few links to strikers.
Hopefully not, O'Hare's shooting stats are the worst part of his game. He's at the top end for chances created and passes completed in the final third.

Would much rather that they will play behind two actual strikers.

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3162
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 838 times
Has Liked: 544 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:56 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:49 am
Again I’m not saying it won’t happen.
I am saying we have had one unreliable link to a striker this window.

Is that not a bit concerning given it’s our least well stocked position.
Personally I just think you’re sitting on fences right now. Any fence you can sit on to appear “in the know” or later recant on what you said. Kind of like Nixon.



Ps. In other news Brownhill 3 assists on Friday

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:56 am

CharlieinNewMexico wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:56 am
Personally I just think you’re sitting on fences right now. Any fence you can sit on to appear “in the know” or later recant on what you said. Kind of like Nixon.

You should probably just shut up.

Ps. In other news Brownhill 3 assists on Friday ( yes I know it was a friendly and yes I know it was league 1 opposition before you spout that rubbish out)

He’s crap you know.
Can we please not start the Brownhill stuff.

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3162
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 838 times
Has Liked: 544 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:58 am

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:56 am
Can we please not start the Brownhill stuff.
Sorry.
But it makes me so mad!

Sorry (again)

☹️

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11123
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1576 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:58 am

CharlieinNewMexico wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:56 am
Personally I just think you’re sitting on fences right now. Any fence you can sit on to appear “in the know” or later recant on what you said. Kind of like Nixon.

You should probably just shut up.

Ps. In other news Brownhill 3 assists on Friday ( yes I know it was a friendly and yes I know it was league 1 opposition before you spout that rubbish out)

He’s crap you know.
Please try stick to remotely transfer stuff. Instead of trying to start fights.

You will just end up locking another threading

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3162
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 838 times
Has Liked: 544 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:00 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:58 am
Please try stick to remotely transfer stuff. Instead of trying to start fights.

You will just end up locking another threading
I was talking about the transfer stuff. That you lay claim to have so much knowledge about.

🤷

buzzclarets79
Posts: 666
Joined: Tue May 16, 2017 2:05 am
Been Liked: 227 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by buzzclarets79 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:06 am

It would be nice to get a 20 goal a season striker in but I guess that costs considerable money, if we have 3/4 guys able to score 10-15 goals a season from midfield / forward positions we’ll be fine. We have struggled for years to get goals from the midfield but all the new signings have given me hope that won’t continue this season.
These 2 users liked this post: tiger76 Suntan

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3162
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 838 times
Has Liked: 544 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:08 am

buzzclarets79 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:06 am
It would be nice to get a 20 goal a season striker in but I guess that costs considerable money, if we have 3/4 guys able to score 10-15 goals a season from midfield / forward positions we’ll be fine. We have struggled for years to get goals from the midfield but all the new signings have given me hope that won’t continue this season.
^^^^ this

warksclaret
Posts: 6699
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1706 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by warksclaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:08 am

Will VK being in Portugal, slow down any further signings for a while. He seems to be the "salesman" in getting players to join

NewClaret
Posts: 13548
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3118 times
Has Liked: 3841 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by NewClaret » Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:20 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:00 am
Got to be the number 1 priority for me right now. Can’t see any of our existing strikers getting close to 20
Agreed that should be priority. I’d have previously said a wide player too. I liked the look of that Gustav Isaksen there were some tenuous links to, but we didn’t seem to play with any width vs Shrewsbury so it might be a waste.

Disagree neither Barnes or JRod would get 20 at championship level. More JRod than Barnes though. There’s 46 games and we’ll be creating a lot more chances than we have historically. Brereton nearly scored 20 pens :lol: :lol:

AGENT_CLARET
Posts: 3150
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
Been Liked: 1162 times
Has Liked: 1079 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by AGENT_CLARET » Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:22 am

warksclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:08 am
Will VK being in Portugal, slow down any further signings for a while. He seems to be the "salesman" in getting players to join
Screenshot_20220718-101928_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20220718-101928_Chrome.jpg (38.72 KiB) Viewed 2362 times
This user liked this post: RVclaret

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11123
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1576 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:23 am

CharlieinNewMexico wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:00 am
I was talking about the transfer stuff. That you lay claim to have so much knowledge about.

🤷
I didn’t bring Brownhill up? That was you. That is directly trying to start an argument. Even this post I have highlighted is you directly trying to start an argument. Please stop as it will result in another locked thread

I will stick to transfers after this
Last edited by Newcastleclaret93 on Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11123
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1576 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:24 am

NewClaret wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:20 am
Agreed that should be priority. I’d have previously said a wide player too. I liked the look of that Gustav Isaksen there were some tenuous links to, but we didn’t seem to play with any width vs Shrewsbury so it might be a waste.

Disagree neither Barnes or JRod would get 20 at championship level. More JRod than Barnes though. There’s 46 games and we’ll be creating a lot more chances than we have historically. Brereton nearly scored 20 pens :lol: :lol:
I could see our front 4 (with 2 sitting deeper) lining up something like

McNeil, OHare
Twine, Jay

That might get enough goals but still feel we need a top finisher. Because the three others will create plenty of chances

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by tiger76 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:34 am

buzzclarets79 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:06 am
It would be nice to get a 20 goal a season striker in but I guess that costs considerable money, if we have 3/4 guys able to score 10-15 goals a season from midfield / forward positions we’ll be fine. We have struggled for years to get goals from the midfield but all the new signings have given me hope that won’t continue this season.
Good point O'Hare and Twins should certainly bag a few at this level, plus Dwight if he stays will surely provide a goal threat.

However I'd still prefer us to get a genuine striker if possible, be it on loan or perm, Jay might nab 10-12 over the course of the season fitness permitting, but Barnes I harbour doubts over, and Vydra isn't available right now, even if he does sign a new deal, which is by no means guaranteed.

Suntan
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2022 8:37 pm
Been Liked: 19 times
Has Liked: 20 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Suntan » Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:48 am

tiger76 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:34 am
Good point O'Hare and Twins should certainly bag a few at this level, plus Dwight if he stays will surely provide a goal threat.

However I'd still prefer us to get a genuine striker if possible, be it on loan or perm, Jay might nab 10-12 over the course of the season fitness permitting, but Barnes I harbour doubts over, and Vydra isn't available right now, even if he does sign a new deal, which is by no means guaranteed.
I think we're playing down the quality of Barnes & JRod - yes they're getting on in age but both are still quality strikers and will likely be a cut above most strikers in this division. Look at the top scorers from last season and apart from 3 or 4 the rest were very, very average.

They could both bag 20+ easily with the type of football we're supposedly going to play.
These 3 users liked this post: burnley007 NewClaret Quicknick

burnley007
Posts: 2582
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
Been Liked: 641 times
Has Liked: 675 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by burnley007 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:53 am

Suntan wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:48 am
I think we're playing down the quality of Barnes & JRod - yes they're getting on in age but both are still quality strikers and will likely be a cut above most strikers in this division. Look at the top scorers from last season and apart from 3 or 4 the rest were very, very average.

They could both bag 20+ easily with the type of football we're supposedly going to play.
I agree, especially with the kind of service they will hopefully receive this season 🙏

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by tiger76 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:56 am

Suntan wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:48 am
I think we're playing down the quality of Barnes & JRod - yes they're getting on in age but both are still quality strikers and will likely be a cut above most strikers in this division. Look at the top scorers from last season and apart from 3 or 4 the rest were very, very average.

They could both bag 20+ easily with the type of football we're supposedly going to play.
My biggest fears over Barnes and Jay is how many games will they play over the season, they appear to be picking up niggles on a regular basis now, and given the quick turnaround in the Champ with a lot of midweek fixtures they might feel the rapid pace more than the younger members of our squad, plus neither has any pace to offer us a different dimension if we're struggling to break down massed defences.

I'd love both to bag 20+, but I'll be pleasantly surprised if they do.

KRBFC
Posts: 18150
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1072 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:59 am

UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:44 am
Would be a pass from me. Hasn't hit decent numbers since he was at Marseille, and the wrong kind of attitude for us.
He was absolutely knocking them in with Dortmund during a loan spell

Cap
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 10:50 pm
Been Liked: 17 times
Has Liked: 26 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Cap » Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:01 am

O'hare at Coventry training this morning
https://twitter.com/Coventry_City/statu ... 0gmKQ&s=19

KRBFC
Posts: 18150
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1072 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:02 am

Mrpotatohead wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:08 am
Top Championship goalscorer 17/18 suggests he is a good goalscorer at this level when fit.
5 years ago, jesus christ, you'll be telling us to sign Gabriel Batistuta next and pointing at his figures and stats. He finished top scorer with an abnormally low amount of goals, 21 was it? I think Mitrovic just doubled that.

KRBFC
Posts: 18150
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1072 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:07 am

CharlieinNewMexico wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:56 am
Personally I just think you’re sitting on fences right now. Any fence you can sit on to appear “in the know” or later recant on what you said. Kind of like Nixon.



Ps. In other news Brownhill 3 assists on Friday
3 assists is pre-season against Shrewsbury and he's suddenly Ronaldinho!!!! Is that the same amount of assists in 1 game than he got all last season? :lol: Also wake up, open your eyes, nobody said Brownhill wouldn't be decent at Championship level, he was a crap PL midfielder.

Andreshotboots
Posts: 1680
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:05 pm
Been Liked: 648 times
Has Liked: 102 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Andreshotboots » Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:09 am

Mrpotatohead wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:08 am
Top Championship goalscorer 17/18 suggests he is a good goalscorer at this level when fit.
4/5 years is a very long time ago in terms of professional football.

I'm certainly hoping we're targeting another forward to replace him.

We have on the books the experience of J Rod and Barnes, we don't need another ageing, injury prone forward.

I'd be very suprised if Kompany sees a future at BFC for Vydra.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10173
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:11 am

KRBFC wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:07 am
3 assists is pre-season against Shrewsbury and he's suddenly Ronaldinho!!!! Is that the same amount of assists in 1 game than he got all last season? :lol: Also wake up, open your eyes, nobody said Brownhill wouldn't be decent at Championship level, he was a crap PL midfielder.

No he wasn't

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5395
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1658 times
Has Liked: 404 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:11 am

Jay’s only got one full season at this level in the last decade and got over 20 goals for a side worse than we should be (not bad, but worse). That was the slower Jay after his bad injuries.

KRBFC
Posts: 18150
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 1072 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:13 am

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 11:11 am
No he wasn't
In your opinion, i'm allowed mine too. We were a worse side with Brownhill playing.

Post Reply