Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Big Vinny K
Posts: 2499
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1031 times
Has Liked: 280 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Big Vinny K » Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:22 am

Shame what’s happened to JBG for him and for us as fans. He was a very good signing and I enjoyed watching him.

Unfortunately his injuries have been pretty horrendous in last few years and that’s what he’s become known for.
At the moment any one we sign with a pair of boots and who is fit will be an upgrade !

Clearly we need to sign a bit of quality who can start for us in a wide position. But hopefully JBG will be able to contribute in some way this season before his contract and stay with us comes to an end and we can see some glimpses of the player we saw in the first few years before his injuries.

warksclaret
Posts: 6693
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1704 times
Has Liked: 790 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by warksclaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:27 am

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 8:32 am
Interesting that I saw several Oxford fans say that Luke McNally is better than Rob Dickie was for them when they sold him to QPR, and that he has a higher ceiling - time will tell, of course.
My friend who is a season ticket holder for Oxford FC re-iterated to me the weekend that McNally had outgrown Division 1, and was a real talent.We may have a great investment here

jedi_master
Posts: 7177
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3605 times
Has Liked: 1032 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by jedi_master » Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:32 am

Hopefully we can get Benson in by Friday to provide something on the bench for us.

Assuming we have no intention of playing Cornet, and with Twine and Gudmundsson being weirdly absent from anything game wise, we have very limited attacking options outside our first eleven currently (once again…).

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:33 am

jedi_master wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:32 am
Hopefully we can get Benson in by Friday to provide something on the bench for us.

Assuming we have no intention of playing Cornet, and with Twine and Gudmundsson being weirdly absent from anything game wise, we have very limited attacking options outside our first eleven currently (once again…).
Didn’t you say you were very impressed with Tucker at Shrewsbury? Could he be an option?

jedi_master
Posts: 7177
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3605 times
Has Liked: 1032 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by jedi_master » Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:35 am

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:33 am
Didn’t you say you were very impressed with Tucker at Shrewsbury? Could he be an option?
I think he’d have to be with the way squad currently is. He did do well and clearly Kompany likes the look of him as he got more game time than the other kids (bar Thomas). Whether that’s through genuine belief he can contribute in the first team this season or simply due to the lack of any options at all in the attacking midfield/striker areas remains to be seen.

brexit
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:20 am
Been Liked: 237 times
Has Liked: 58 times
Location: on the gravy train in strasbourg

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by brexit » Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:37 am

We keep talking about needing a striker is Richardson fit? if so is he good enough to play?
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

kenyon6923
Posts: 367
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 34 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by kenyon6923 » Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:44 am

brexit wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:37 am
We keep talking about needing a striker is Richardson fit? if so is he good enough to play?
He deserves a chance for sure, IF the season becomes a mid table stability one then the younger players get more time to progress which is not a bad thing.

CoolClaret
Posts: 7457
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2256 times
Has Liked: 2171 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CoolClaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:55 am

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:18 am
He’s a CM
Apologies- for some reason I thought the tweet indicated he was a forward player

123EasyasBFC
Posts: 3120
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 621 times
Has Liked: 184 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by 123EasyasBFC » Tue Jul 26, 2022 10:29 am

Report genk have agreed 4mil euro with Troyes for ugbo so that might put to bed that rumour, only actually saw one reporter say we was in for him tbf

Belgianclaret
Posts: 2587
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
Been Liked: 955 times
Has Liked: 169 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Belgianclaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:37 am

jedi_master wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:32 am
Hopefully we can get Benson in by Friday to provide something on the bench for us.

Assuming we have no intention of playing Cornet, and with Twine and Gudmundsson being weirdly absent from anything game wise, we have very limited attacking options outside our first eleven currently (once again…).
To be honest I'm not so convinced by Benson. Has plenty of quality but a bit lightweight and I'm not sure he'll deliver in the championship.

NewClaret
Posts: 13511
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3114 times
Has Liked: 3833 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by NewClaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:23 pm

Belgianclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:37 am
To be honest I'm not so convinced by Benson. Has plenty of quality but a bit lightweight and I'm not sure he'll deliver in the championship.
Definitely a risk, I would say.

It does feel like we are targeting players with one year left on their contract at the moment so can only assume without further sales we can’t buy.

Just wish we’d go for Delap on loan and then we look in pretty good shape.

KRBFC
Posts: 18135
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3804 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:27 pm

Belgianclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:37 am
To be honest I'm not so convinced by Benson. Has plenty of quality but a bit lightweight and I'm not sure he'll deliver in the championship.
he's shite but cheap so he'll be signed

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:29 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:27 pm
he's shite but cheap so he'll be signed
What a bizarre take
This user liked this post: louieollie

123EasyasBFC
Posts: 3120
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 621 times
Has Liked: 184 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by 123EasyasBFC » Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:34 pm

Belgianclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:37 am
To be honest I'm not so convinced by Benson. Has plenty of quality but a bit lightweight and I'm not sure he'll deliver in the championship.
Don’t understand the lightweight part, McNeil is very Lightweight and pushed off the ball easily and JBG gets injured whenever someone comes within a yard of him, can’t say I know anything about benson but if he’s quick and beat a man it’s something different to what we already have

KRBFC
Posts: 18135
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3804 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:37 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:29 pm
What a bizarre take
Not as bizarre as your takes, you've never seen him play but you're delighted for him to be replacing Cornet.

lrac
Posts: 519
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:51 pm
Been Liked: 106 times
Has Liked: 283 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by lrac » Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:38 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:27 pm
he's shite but cheap so he'll be signed
How do you know ?.just asking

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:43 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:37 pm
Not as bizarre as your takes, you've never seen him play but you're delighted for him to be replacing Cornet.
Find where I’ve said I’m delighted for him to be replacing Cornet.

But given Cornet would likely be a striker for Kompany I don’t think a winger / attacking midfielder would be his replacement regardless.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10171
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:44 pm

Weird that someone who puts nothing into the club and his idea of supporting the club is stealing illegal streams of games for nothing is the one who demands we spend more and more
These 2 users liked this post: tiger76 Juan Tanamera

nyclaret
Posts: 1219
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:57 am
Been Liked: 336 times
Has Liked: 163 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by nyclaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:45 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:27 pm
he's shite but cheap so he'll be signed
Why don’t Burnley just hire you as a scout? You seem to have a wealth of scouting knowledge.

Hedontplayforyou
Posts: 2340
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
Been Liked: 546 times
Has Liked: 51 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Hedontplayforyou » Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:53 pm

Bring on Friday , then some will either have a major meltdown or go way over the top, can’t wait

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 372 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:54 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:29 pm
What a bizarre take
Would be if it was someone else saying it.

Big Vinny K
Posts: 2499
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1031 times
Has Liked: 280 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Big Vinny K » Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:54 pm

KRBFC Scout Summary Report for Mr Kompany

Benson - shite
Twine - bit shite
Muric - dog shite
Harwood Bellis - probably shite
Delap - his dad was shite
Brownhill - King of Dog Shite (see Leeds away game)
These 7 users liked this post: RVclaret louieollie yosserhughes Juan Tanamera mybloodisclaret longsidepies CharlieinNewMexico

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 372 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:55 pm

123EasyasBFC wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 10:29 am
Report genk have agreed 4mil euro with Troyes for ugbo so that might put to bed that rumour, only actually saw one reporter say we was in for him tbf
Seems a bargain really. Maybe he’s said he wants to stay in Europe.

KRBFC
Posts: 18135
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3804 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:01 pm

Big Vinny K wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:54 pm
KRBFC Scout Summary Report for Mr Kompany

Benson - shite
Twine - bit shite
Muric - dog shite
Harwood Bellis - probably shite
Delap - his dad was shite
Brownhill - King of Dog Shite (see Leeds away game)
Wrong, Twine's a great signing, I haven't seen Muric but happy with that one, Delap would be a beast, shame THB is only a loan. But you keep up the new fangirl approach, probably a new account of an old fan.
Last edited by KRBFC on Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Bowclaret
Posts: 199
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2022 12:59 pm
Been Liked: 138 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Bowclaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:02 pm

Strange thing to say from KRBFC.

I’m new to this forum but a long term reader.

Comments like his will make me go elsewhere again !

ClaretAL
Posts: 2573
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 1045 times
Has Liked: 819 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretAL » Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:04 pm

Some people are just angry we are not in the Premier League as we were when they first started supporting ( I say supporting very loosely) us, so now nothing will do until we are back in the Premiere League, and that exemplifies on to this message board.

KRBFC
Posts: 18135
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3804 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:05 pm

ClaretAL wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:04 pm
Some people are just angry we are not in the Premier League as we were when they first started supporting ( I say supporting very loosely) us, so now nothing will do until we are back in the Premiere League, and that exemplifies on to this message board.
At least get your patronising comments correct, we were newly promoted to the 2nd tier when I started supporting/attending.

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6976
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1490 times
Has Liked: 1848 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Woodleyclaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:22 pm

Are we doing the my supports bigger than your support again? This is getting tedious.

whiffa
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:58 pm
Been Liked: 515 times
Has Liked: 2607 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by whiffa » Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:27 pm

Just put KRBFC on your "Foe" list and move on, this thread descending into turmoil again. Stop rising too it, you know what's he's like.
Is there any actual transfer news this week? Tired of watching handbags swinging around.
These 3 users liked this post: Woodleyclaret louieollie tiger76

It Is What It Is
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 8:21 pm
Been Liked: 196 times
Has Liked: 407 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by It Is What It Is » Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:41 pm

Let's get one optimism back.
Final Table May 2023.
1. Burnley. P46. W46. D0. L0. F100. A2(pens). PTS 138
This user liked this post: whiffa

spt_claret
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
Been Liked: 745 times
Has Liked: 463 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by spt_claret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:44 pm

Colburn_Claret wrote:
Mon Jul 25, 2022 12:51 pm
His ideas on football will be based on how Pep sets up and plays, even if not identical. He has already told the squad that it will take time, and the reason it will take time is because it isn't easy.
You need to know your position on the pitch, relative to your teammates. With or without the ball.
If you leave your zone someone has to replace you, by the same token if a teammate enters your zone, you may have to leave.
You have to learn how to pass, the right angle to protect the ball, the right weight of pass to keep the ball, but also be able to maintain control of it.
You have to learn not only how to press, but when to press, as a team, and as an individual.
When we get it right we could look like the Harlem Globetrotters, but before we get there, there will be times when we look like a salmon flopping about in a puddle.

I don't believe, because of the difficulties ahead, that VK will let himself be hand-tied by player profiles. He will pick the players that learn the system quickest.
You're massively over-intellectualising the concept of a VK system just as many people do with Guardiola, whose system modifies and draws on ideas from Cruyff, the Magical Magyars of the 50s and old WM formations with the added application of modern data science and fitness coaching.

Zonal marking and fluid positioning is not a new concept. Total Football style complete fluidity is extremely difficult to achieve and is tactically demanding, certainly. But experienced players will have played under multiple managers and formations and teams. You could argue that experienced players might be more set in their ways, or that they may have been overcoached in Dyche's system- but this firstly ignores that Dyche did tweak his system over the years, second ignores the capacity for professional footballers to use their experience and adapt, thirdly ignores that young players with less experience are likely to have been trained in fewer systems so find it even harder to adapt or,even if they have been trained in the VK/Pep system in the City academy, to know how to respond if the system isn't working. If a system is so complex and demanding that seasoned premier league footballers can't figure it out then maybe you want a system that doesn't narrow your player options so much. Overcomplicating is as bad as oversimplifying.

Passing is a skill literally every footballer learns. Some are better than others but neither Guardiola not Kompany invented passing. Ditto pressing- and from 2014-2017 we pressed like hell. Neither of these are beyond our players.

Dyche's biggest problem was reluctance to adapt formations or setups as much as he could- things did change and adjust more than most critics recognise, but I'd agree less than needed and especially as budgets squeezed we became increasingly squeezed in approaches too. Kompany might well have a system he favours, but there is still a danger in wedding too tightly to that system, no matter how successful it might be with City, because ultimately no one system is perfect for all teams at all resource levels against all opponents. The best managers don't just adapt their team to their system, but their system to the best players they have. All this talk of the VK System and the need to focus everything on fresh faces who he can mould from the off runs the risk of mythologising his system before it starts and leading us right back to "sticking to the framework" and overcoaching in a new way, before that framework has even been built. Especially when, as discussed,that system is an exceptionally demanding one for even the best and most rounded players. And then if it doesn't get results the people who mythologised it will be the ones to turn on it. We need to be able to do more than one system as the last couple years should have taught us, but especially if that system is highly demanding and our budget means many of our players are with the greatest respect likely to either be limited, or slight jack of all trades, compared to the other clubs who employ similar systems like City.

2 Bee Holed
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:37 am
Been Liked: 548 times
Has Liked: 31 times
Location: South Manchester

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by 2 Bee Holed » Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:53 pm

Bowclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:02 pm
Strange thing to say from KRBFC.

I’m new to this forum but a long term reader.

Comments like his will make me go elsewhere again !
Crikey!

Toodle pip, old boy.

fatboy47
Posts: 4196
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
Been Liked: 2327 times
Has Liked: 2697 times
Location: Isles of Scilly

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fatboy47 » Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:55 pm

2 Bee Holed wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:53 pm
Crikey!

Toodle pip, old boy.
Yup.

Off ya pop!

PaintYorkClaretnBlue
Posts: 1798
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:42 pm
Been Liked: 662 times
Has Liked: 1220 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by PaintYorkClaretnBlue » Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:59 pm

It Is What It Is wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:41 pm
Let's get one optimism back.
Final Table May 2023.
1. Burnley. P46. W46. D0. L0. F100. A2(pens). PTS 138
They were never pens in a million years!!
These 2 users liked this post: It Is What It Is Juan Tanamera

joey13
Posts: 7506
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1767 times
Has Liked: 1231 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by joey13 » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:04 pm

Bowclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:02 pm
Strange thing to say from KRBFC.

I’m new to this forum but a long term reader.

Comments like his will make me go elsewhere again !
Ha ha , quality.

jedi_master
Posts: 7177
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3605 times
Has Liked: 1032 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by jedi_master » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:07 pm

People are allowed to voice opinions in the positive light, yet constantly dived upon when in the negative. I have had disagreements with KRBFC often historically, but he’s just saying what he thinks having seen the player in question. How many of us have done?

Belgiumclaret clearly has and says he wouldn’t suit the Championship, in his opinion - that’s more valid than people like me going ‘hopefully we sign him this week and get him on the bench’ as I’ve not seen the guy from Adam bar the obligatory YouTube clips. I will say, the only discussion I can find of him on Twitter is a group of Standard Liege fans disappointed they aren’t in for him themselves.

I’ve no doubt any dissenting voices as to the quality of the player in question will support him when he pulls the shirt on (should we sign him!).

wilks_bfc
Posts: 11532
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3191 times
Has Liked: 1872 times
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by wilks_bfc » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:07 pm

PaintYorkClaretnBlue wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:59 pm
They were never pens in a million years!!
If only we had VAR

KRBFC
Posts: 18135
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3804 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:11 pm

jedi_master wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:07 pm
People are allowed to voice opinions in the positive light, yet constantly dived upon when in the negative. I have had disagreements with KRBFC often historically, but he’s just saying what he thinks having seen the player in question. How many of us have done?

Belgiumclaret clearly has and says he wouldn’t suit the Championship, in his opinion - that’s more valid than people like me going ‘hopefully we sign him this week and get him on the bench’ as I’ve not seen the guy from Adam bar the obligatory YouTube clips. I will say, the only discussion I can find of him on Twitter is a group of Standard Liege fans disappointed they aren’t in for him themselves.

I’ve no doubt any dissenting voices as to the quality of the player in question will support him when he pulls the shirt on (should we sign him!).
I've praised our recruits so far, I said the other day we're 2 or 3 proven quality additions short, this isn't one imo. I'll support the guy regardless, like I will anyone who wears the shirt but I'd be very disappointed if he was replacing Cornet instead of someone like O'Hare. Would scream cheap option to me.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Lancasterclaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:12 pm

I've never seen him play, but VK is a complete novice to the championship, and if this is someone he rates, rather than who the scouting teams rate, then its a concern

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:14 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:12 pm
I've never seen him play, but VK is a complete novice to the championship, and if this is someone he rates, rather than who the scouting teams rate, then its a concern
Do you have inside knowledge that the scouting team doesn’t rate him?

jedi_master
Posts: 7177
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3605 times
Has Liked: 1032 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by jedi_master » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:14 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:11 pm
I've praised our recruits so far, I said the other day we're 2 or 3 proven quality additions short, this isn't one imo. I'll support the guy regardless, like I will anyone who wears the shirt but I'd be very disappointed if he was replacing Cornet instead of someone like O'Hare. Would scream cheap option to me.
Just desperately need a minimum of one striker for me, and arguably a more experienced centre back.

KRBFC
Posts: 18135
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3804 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:15 pm

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:44 pm
Weird that someone who puts nothing into the club and his idea of supporting the club is stealing illegal streams of games for nothing is the one who demands we spend more and more
What on earth are you talking about? You have absolutely no idea how much I've bought/haven't bought, or how many games I've attended/haven't attended. Your typical petty off topic contribution, you're a weird chap.

Middle aged men, chasing around a ''14 year old boy'' online as you put it. What does that make you? You're intent on arguing with a 14 year old kid online, insulting a 14 year old kid online. Is that not strange to you?

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11120
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:17 pm

jedi_master wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:14 pm
Just desperately need a minimum of one striker for me, and arguably a more experienced centre back.
I personally think we need at least 1 CB (with experience), 2 x wingers (advanced Midfielders if cornet and McNeil go), 2 strikers.

Strikers are critical at this point. Struggling to see where the goals are going to come from at the moment.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Lancasterclaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:17 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:14 pm
Do you have inside knowledge that the scouting team doesn’t rate him?
Not at all, but he's a 25 year player from the Belgian league with a pretty average goal scoring record

He might be amazing, he might be just what we need, but its a gamble at a couple of million, and its a huge gamble at more than that

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10171
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:18 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:15 pm
What on earth are you talking about? You have absolutely no idea how much I've bought/haven't bought, or how many games I've attended/haven't attended. Your typical petty off topic contribution, you're a weird chap.

Middle aged men, chasing around a ''14 year old boy'' online as you put it. What does that make you? You're intent on arguing with a 14 year old kid online, insulting a 14 year old kid online. Is that not strange to you?
:D

SkiptonClaret
Posts: 1375
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 294 times
Has Liked: 92 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by SkiptonClaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:20 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:17 pm
I personally think we need at least 1 CB (with experience), 2 x wingers (advanced Midfielders if cornet and McNeil go), 2 strikers.

Strikers are critical at this point. Struggling to see where the goals are going to come from at the moment.
Ash is going to bag 20 easily (apparently).

Paul Waine
Posts: 9907
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 2352 times
Has Liked: 3182 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Paul Waine » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:20 pm

Bowclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:02 pm
Strange thing to say from KRBFC.

I’m new to this forum but a long term reader.

Comments like his will make me go elsewhere again !
Welcome to UpTheClarets, Bowclaret. New posters are always welcome.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:22 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:17 pm
Not at all, but he's a 25 year player from the Belgian league with a pretty average goal scoring record

He might be amazing, he might be just what we need, but its a gamble at a couple of million, and its a huge gamble at more than that
He’s a winger, not a striker. Goal contribution (goal or assist) at under 1 in 2 last season. Reports linking him this summer with Schalke, Lyon and Marseille:

https://www.dhnet.be/sports/football/di ... 2GW4ZTY6M/

Admittedly, I’ve never seen him play but at least let’s present some balance rather than KRBFC’s ‘he’s shite and cheap’, or that it’s ‘only Kompany who wants him and therefore crap’ insinuation.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Lancasterclaret » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:22 pm

SkiptonClaret wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:20 pm
Ash is going to bag 20 easily (apparently).
He never managed that when he was good though

At least I don't think he did

Its a big ask

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10171
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:22 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:22 pm
You're such a loser, sit here desperate for responses from a 14 year old kid. How do you think that's funny? sort your behaviour out, you're an adult.
:D

Post Reply