Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Belgianclaret
Posts: 2601
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
Been Liked: 956 times
Has Liked: 170 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Belgianclaret » Mon Aug 01, 2022 4:02 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Aug 01, 2022 3:59 pm
Agree.
Maybe, although I think Bastien is better further up the pitch

Belgianclaret
Posts: 2601
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
Been Liked: 956 times
Has Liked: 170 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Belgianclaret » Mon Aug 01, 2022 4:05 pm

FC Bruges are apparently selling defender N'Soki to Hoffenheim.
May affect sale of Hendry, depends to be seen

GrahamBranchsPerm
Posts: 157
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:17 pm
Been Liked: 74 times
Has Liked: 81 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by GrahamBranchsPerm » Mon Aug 01, 2022 4:09 pm

Yeah, I do feel covered now in Mid, will defo have to max and match a bit over the season, but that's normal, and keep the squad interested.

Rumours - would really like Sepp. Very rated.

UTC

willsclarets
Posts: 1951
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 688 times
Has Liked: 133 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by willsclarets » Mon Aug 01, 2022 4:45 pm

Cabral would be tremendous!

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 8566
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 2476 times
Has Liked: 2014 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Tricky Trevor » Mon Aug 01, 2022 4:55 pm

The flexibilty on Friday showed there is nothing to fear from losing one of the Cork, Cullen, Brownhill, Bastien quartet. Losing two could be problematic. When Westy is fit we have real competition for places in there.
Goal scoring Striker is key to a great season. CB seems to be high up on the wish list but with the cover provided on Friday not essential.

NewClaret
Posts: 13537
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3118 times
Has Liked: 3841 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by NewClaret » Mon Aug 01, 2022 4:55 pm

Heard this morning that a couple “out of the blue” are expected.

No idea if that includes Benson or Cabral, mind.
These 2 users liked this post: randomclaret2 RVclaret

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30730
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11061 times
Has Liked: 5667 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Vegas Claret » Mon Aug 01, 2022 5:03 pm

Tricky Trevor wrote:
Mon Aug 01, 2022 4:55 pm
The flexibilty on Friday showed there is nothing to fear from losing one of the Cork, Cullen, Brownhill, Bastien quartet. Losing two could be problematic. When Westy is fit we have real competition for places in there.
Goal scoring Striker is key to a great season. CB seems to be high up on the wish list but with the cover provided on Friday not essential.
I would not want to lose Cullen at all !!

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3553
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 656 times
Has Liked: 2899 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Burnley Ace » Mon Aug 01, 2022 5:17 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Aug 01, 2022 4:00 pm
Thought we’d be going for more experience at the back rather than another 20 year old but by all accounts PNE fans rated him highly.
He’s already proved himself at Championship level with 60 games at Preston, Liverpool might want a bigger challenge for him.

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Top Claret » Mon Aug 01, 2022 5:19 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Mon Aug 01, 2022 5:03 pm
I would not want to lose Cullen at all !!

West Ham or in for him

Rileybobs
Posts: 16934
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6971 times
Has Liked: 1487 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Mon Aug 01, 2022 5:35 pm

GrahamBranchsPerm wrote:
Mon Aug 01, 2022 3:18 pm
Thanks Cohiba.

Feedback from Benfica supporting mate on Cabral.

"I like him a lot. Think of a bulky, faster, stronger Nani with less technique, plays on both wings".

UTC
:lol: So basically someone with completely different attributes to Nani?

GrahamBranchsPerm
Posts: 157
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:17 pm
Been Liked: 74 times
Has Liked: 81 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by GrahamBranchsPerm » Mon Aug 01, 2022 5:42 pm

:lol: :mrgreen: Yup sounds it.

UTC

fatboy47
Posts: 4199
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
Been Liked: 2327 times
Has Liked: 2701 times
Location: Isles of Scilly

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fatboy47 » Mon Aug 01, 2022 5:48 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Mon Aug 01, 2022 4:55 pm
Heard this morning that a couple “out of the blue” are expected.

That's great news.... Can't beat something expected coming out of the blue.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

Belgianclaret
Posts: 2601
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
Been Liked: 956 times
Has Liked: 170 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Belgianclaret » Mon Aug 01, 2022 5:58 pm

fatboy47 wrote:
Mon Aug 01, 2022 5:48 pm
That's great news.... Can't beat something expected coming out of the blue.
Except for... Ablueclaret ? ;)
These 2 users liked this post: fatboy47 scrambledclaret

LaLigaClaret
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 9:30 pm
Been Liked: 191 times
Has Liked: 34 times
Location: Norfolk

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by LaLigaClaret » Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:36 pm

Benson looking very close to getting done with the fee at £3.5m

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretandy » Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:45 pm


warksclaret
Posts: 6699
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1705 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by warksclaret » Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:46 pm

Do we know what our total spend has been since signing our first signing McNally including £3.3m for Benson assuming it goes ahead . Not our net spend factoring outgoing sales but just our incoming purchases (an estimate would do).

Steddyman
Posts: 2406
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:45 pm
Been Liked: 625 times
Has Liked: 492 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Steddyman » Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:51 pm

claretandy wrote:
Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:45 pm
Benson on his way ...

https://twitter.com/sachatavolieri/stat ... rXKiKy_l9A
That says there is an IMPORTANT issue with the fee structure still to be resolved. Doesn't sound done yet.

IanMcL
Posts: 30443
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6395 times
Has Liked: 8754 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by IanMcL » Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:54 pm

Minus a good few million.

randomclaret2
Posts: 6907
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 2759 times
Has Liked: 4325 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by randomclaret2 » Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:55 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:46 pm
Do we know what our total spend has been since signing our first signing McNally including £3.3m for Benson assuming it goes ahead . Not our net spend factoring outgoing sales but just our incoming purchases (an estimate would do).
I think around £16.5m

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 8566
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 2476 times
Has Liked: 2014 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Tricky Trevor » Mon Aug 01, 2022 9:31 pm

Medical in next 48hrs.
C4E4C15A-62F8-440E-8090-97BBE65BAD3D.jpeg
C4E4C15A-62F8-440E-8090-97BBE65BAD3D.jpeg (254.3 KiB) Viewed 5209 times

Boxy
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:57 pm
Been Liked: 37 times
Has Liked: 7 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Boxy » Mon Aug 01, 2022 9:39 pm

Hopefully Tuesday so he can get some decent training in before Saturday
This user liked this post: gawthorpe_view

warksclaret
Posts: 6699
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1705 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by warksclaret » Mon Aug 01, 2022 10:43 pm

randomclaret2 wrote:
Mon Aug 01, 2022 8:55 pm
I think around £16.5m
Cheers Randomclaret-that feels about right
This user liked this post: randomclaret2

IanMcL
Posts: 30443
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6395 times
Has Liked: 8754 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by IanMcL » Tue Aug 02, 2022 3:20 am

Couple of other wingers being touted too. We will certainly have some strength in depth. I foresee lots of subs being used.

agreenwood
Posts: 3179
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1773 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by agreenwood » Tue Aug 02, 2022 5:45 am

Some good news to start the day. 😉

Portuguese press reporting Cabral has rejected us.

Belgian press reporting our offer for Benson is insufficient for now.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Aug 02, 2022 5:53 am

agreenwood wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 5:45 am
Some good news to start the day. 😉

Portuguese press reporting Cabral has rejected us.

Belgian press reporting our offer for Benson is insufficient for now.
Was never convinced with Cabral coming.

Benson - from reports it sounds like we are penny pinching a bit, just get it over the line.

Darnhill Claret
Posts: 2313
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 513 times
Has Liked: 1070 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Darnhill Claret » Tue Aug 02, 2022 5:58 am

We need to penny pinch. We can’t afford not to.
This user liked this post: ClaretTony

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Aug 02, 2022 6:00 am

Darnhill Claret wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 5:58 am
We need to penny pinch. We can’t afford not to.
To be fair we’ve done well to this point in being relatively ‘aggressive’ in getting deals done. As the Belgian press report though, this one appears to be ‘dragging on’.

Darnhill Claret
Posts: 2313
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 513 times
Has Liked: 1070 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Darnhill Claret » Tue Aug 02, 2022 6:01 am

We need to meet somewhere in the middle, not have our pants pulled down.

Darnhill Claret
Posts: 2313
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 513 times
Has Liked: 1070 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Darnhill Claret » Tue Aug 02, 2022 6:05 am

At the end of this window we could do with knocking a bit off the debt if at all possible just leaving a little bit to play with in January.
This user liked this post: Colburn_Claret

Darnhill Claret
Posts: 2313
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 513 times
Has Liked: 1070 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Darnhill Claret » Tue Aug 02, 2022 6:06 am

Sorry, back to the subject in hand.

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3159
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 838 times
Has Liked: 544 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Tue Aug 02, 2022 7:33 am

Cabral off to Besiktas who will presumably pay him 50k a week.

As far as any Belgian club, we are seemingly (now) a busted flush who walks away from the table. We offer a mill, they ask for 6, we seem to meet around 3, but we won’t go higher (as per Bart). They know we have money so the market gets inflated.

Becomes expensive to work in.
This user liked this post: Top Claret

Goody1975
Posts: 2926
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 998 times
Has Liked: 265 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Goody1975 » Tue Aug 02, 2022 7:42 am

I said yesterday that there were a few posts saying Cabral was still going to Turkey, they've been in for him for a few weeks but thought the fee was too high.

It appears that our interest has just forced their hand.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Aug 02, 2022 7:43 am

Goody1975 wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 7:42 am
I said yesterday that there were a few posts saying Cabral was still going to Turkey, they've been in for him for a few weeks but thought the fee was too high.

It appears that our interest has just forced their hand.
Or we don’t have any interest and its just an agent thing, looks like they used us with the Muleka thing too

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretandy » Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:13 am

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 7:43 am
Or we don’t have any interest and its just an agent thing, looks like they used us with the Muleka thing too
Muleka was coming here until he couldn't get a work permit.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:17 am

claretandy wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:13 am
Muleka was coming here until he couldn't get a work permit.
Not convinced with that story.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14571
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3437 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:25 am

CharlieinNewMexico wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 7:33 am
Cabral off to Besiktas who will presumably pay him 50k a week.

As far as any Belgian club, we are seemingly (now) a busted flush who walks away from the table. We offer a mill, they ask for 6, we seem to meet around 3, but we won’t go higher (as per Bart). They know we have money so the market gets inflated.

Becomes expensive to work in.
Busted flush or a club which doesn't want to pay what they'd consider to be over the odds?
This user liked this post: fatboy47

Goody1975
Posts: 2926
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 998 times
Has Liked: 265 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Goody1975 » Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:30 am

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 7:43 am
Or we don’t have any interest and its just an agent thing, looks like they used us with the Muleka thing too
Maybe, I suppose we'll never know, I'm sure because of how active we are in the market that we will be used several times by agents during this window.

In regards Benson, we have to be prudent with the cash we have, being aggressive to push deals through early is one thing but overpaying because we are impatient is another.

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5393
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1658 times
Has Liked: 404 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:33 am

The level of ambition we are showing is so high for the level we are now at that we have to get used to disappointment, but some will get over the line.

It is obvious that the club is really going for it and will need to sell to finance that change, so selling all those players was probably vital, including Max.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Lancasterclaret » Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:36 am

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:25 am
Busted flush or a club which doesn't want to pay what they'd consider to be over the odds?
I know we are not allowed to talk about money on this thread, but it does seem that the fact we have a limited amount and still large holes in the squad isn't really getting through to some people
This user liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:41 am

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:36 am
I know we are not allowed to talk about money on this thread, but it does seem that the fact we have a limited amount and still large holes in the squad isn't really getting through to some people
I personally don’t see the large holes you mention. Probably two players shy (attacking midfield / winger) and striker (or two) short of having a very competitive squad.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Lancasterclaret » Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:43 am

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:41 am
I personally don’t see the large holes you mention. Probably two players shy (attacking midfield / winger) and striker (or two) short of having a very competitive squad.
If we don't get in those players then we have large holes in the squad

I'm old enough to remember the bench from last friday for starters

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10173
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:44 am

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:36 am
I know we are not allowed to talk about money on this thread, but it does seem that the fact we have a limited amount and still large holes in the squad isn't really getting through to some people
How many clubs in football don't have a limited amount ?

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Lancasterclaret » Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:45 am

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:44 am
How many clubs in football don't have a limited amount ?
WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT *THAT*

agreenwood
Posts: 3179
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1773 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by agreenwood » Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:51 am

We’ve successfully negotiated 9 deals so far this window. On the VERY early evidence, we appear to have brought some good players in.

There are 29 days of the window left. Don’t fret.

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 372 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:54 am

Royal Antwerp appear to be dicking us around with the fee, keep adding more whenever we match it.

Time to move on. Unfortunate for the lad but we can't be held ransom. Wouldn't pay more than 3/4 mill for him.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:54 am

UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:54 am
Royal Antwerp appear to be dicking us around with the fee, keep adding more whenever we match it.

Time to move on. Unfortunate for the lad but we can't be held ransom. Wouldn't pay more than 3/4 mill for him.
How have you reached this conclusion?
This user liked this post: IanMcL

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 372 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:59 am

RVclaret wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:54 am
How have you reached this conclusion?
The fact that it's been reported as agreed several times, and then reported as being too low the day after.

Latest figure stands at 4 million euros, originally it was believed they just wanted to recoup their investment of 3 million euros.

Safe to say they are probably messing us around because they know we've made some big sales.

Obviously nobody knows for certain but it certainly appears that way.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Lancasterclaret » Tue Aug 02, 2022 9:01 am

agreenwood wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:51 am
We’ve successfully negotiated 9 deals so far this window. On the VERY early evidence, we appear to have brought some good players in.

There are 29 days of the window left. Don’t fret.
I think what we have done is amazing, but we still have quite a few holes in the squad to be genuinely competitive (ie to compete with a few injuries)

All I was really commenting on was the post about how we were not paying what other clubs demanded for their players, when we have to use our limited funds wisely to fill the gaps we have

I think we've done really well so far considering
This user liked this post: agreenwood

Paddy1882
Posts: 333
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:46 pm
Been Liked: 135 times
Has Liked: 18 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Paddy1882 » Tue Aug 02, 2022 9:02 am

Not a rumour but if Antwerp are messing us around and we’ve reached the top figure we are prepared to go, I’d be switching my attention to Bowler at Blackpool, championship experience, young, exciting and an asking price of 3-4million, ticks all the boxes for me.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10173
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Aug 02, 2022 9:06 am

UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:59 am
The fact that it's been reported as agreed several times, and then reported as being too low the day after.

Latest figure stands at 4 million euros, originally it was believed they just wanted to recoup their investment of 3 million euros.

Safe to say they are probably messing us around because they know we've made some big sales.

Obviously nobody knows for certain but it certainly appears that way.

Went from "safe to say they are probably messing us around" to "obviously nobody knows for certain" in 1 sentence.

The fact that it has been reported as agreed and not enough being offered suggests more like the person doing the reporting got something wrong.
This user liked this post: RVclaret

Post Reply