Manger blackmail case

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Nonayforever
Posts: 3324
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
Been Liked: 702 times
Has Liked: 174 times

Manger blackmail case

Post by Nonayforever » Tue Sep 20, 2022 8:10 pm

It appears that one of the ex players allegedly blackmailing a football manager was a Burnley coach a couple of years ago.

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14571
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3437 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Tue Sep 20, 2022 8:24 pm

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... e-masthead
Screenshot_20220920-202433.png
Screenshot_20220920-202433.png (428.37 KiB) Viewed 5422 times

Claret Till I Die
Posts: 2113
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 8:31 am
Been Liked: 1151 times
Has Liked: 1625 times
Location: Worsthorne

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Claret Till I Die » Tue Sep 20, 2022 8:53 pm

Away.

Corky
Posts: 1433
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:37 pm
Been Liked: 535 times
Has Liked: 414 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Corky » Tue Sep 20, 2022 8:58 pm

Who, the little baby jesus
This user liked this post: jen1066

Nonayforever
Posts: 3324
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
Been Liked: 702 times
Has Liked: 174 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Nonayforever » Tue Sep 20, 2022 9:21 pm

Auto correct & edit function 🙄

jdrobbo
Posts: 9326
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
Been Liked: 4843 times
Has Liked: 947 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by jdrobbo » Tue Sep 20, 2022 9:36 pm

Gambling has so so much to answer for. Some people still refuse to admit the damage it does. I want it as far removed from my football club as possible.
These 2 users liked this post: PhiladelphiaChris longsidepies

Fretters
Posts: 2588
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:56 am
Been Liked: 1052 times
Has Liked: 556 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Fretters » Tue Sep 20, 2022 9:56 pm

jdrobbo wrote:
Tue Sep 20, 2022 9:36 pm
Gambling has so so much to answer for. Some people still refuse to admit the damage it does. I want it as far removed from my football club as possible.
I agree to an extent John, but I find it difficult to say that when Barry Kilby is a director of Total Gaming Solutions. Admittedly he isn't part of the club anymore, but he and the money he made is one of - if not THE reason - we are where we are today.

I do think it needs to go the way of tobacco in terms of an advertising ban though.
This user liked this post: longsidepies

jdrobbo
Posts: 9326
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
Been Liked: 4843 times
Has Liked: 947 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by jdrobbo » Tue Sep 20, 2022 10:13 pm

Fretters wrote:
Tue Sep 20, 2022 9:56 pm
I agree to an extent John, but I find it difficult to say that when Barry Kilby is a director of Total Gaming Solutions. Admittedly he isn't part of the club anymore, but he and the money he made is one of - if not THE reason - we are where we are today.

I do think it needs to go the way of tobacco in terms of an advertising ban though.
No denying this at all, it’s a very valid point.

But…Barry Kilby didn’t stop you every few minutes…sometimes multiple times in a commercial break to tempt you with a trap of free offers. Nor did he approach you with incentives to return to gambling even if you were ‘taking a break’ like several people I know have been.

Furthermore, I believe BK made his money at first by selling his scratch cards to millworkers, with a very minimal amount of advertising….no rolling ads, no videos, no mobile phone pop-ups etc.

Most importantly, my main thought here, as it has been in the past, everyone has always acknowledged that fags knacker your lungs and booze pickles your liver; the effect that gambling has on the human body for a good number of people is still not ‘accepted’.

It will be though, at some point….

Cheers mate 👍🏻
These 2 users liked this post: Fretters longsidepies

FCBurnley
Posts: 9883
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2005 times
Has Liked: 1151 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by FCBurnley » Tue Sep 20, 2022 11:17 pm

BK didn’t make his money from gambling. His Grandad Charlie sort of did when he was at Accrington Stanley but Barry 100% did not. Trust me I know

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Sep 21, 2022 7:13 am

FCBurnley wrote:
Tue Sep 20, 2022 11:17 pm
BK didn’t make his money from gambling. His Grandad Charlie sort of did when he was at Accrington Stanley but Barry 100% did not. Trust me I know
Sun bingo cards
This user liked this post: IanMcL

Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Billy Balfour » Wed Sep 21, 2022 7:49 am

I thought those bingo cards were free when you bought a newspaper? I do not recall hearing or reading about anyone spending their mortgage/rent money on buying up thousands of copies of The Sun or Daily Mirror.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Sep 21, 2022 8:23 am

Billy Balfour wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 7:49 am
I thought those bingo cards were free when you bought a newspaper? I do not recall hearing or reading about anyone spending their mortgage/rent money on buying up thousands of copies of The Sun or Daily Mirror.
It's was still gambling, which FCBurnley denied BK made his money from. Some people may only have bought the paper because of the bingo cards, and continue to buy it every day to collect the numbers.

Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Billy Balfour » Wed Sep 21, 2022 9:25 am

Pedantic.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Sep 21, 2022 9:44 am

Billy Balfour wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 9:25 am
Pedantic.

Why do think the papers had these games?
Out of the goodness of their hearts?
Or to get people to spend on the paper, gambling that they'd win on the bingo

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12382
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5214 times
Has Liked: 922 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Devils_Advocate » Wed Sep 21, 2022 10:02 am

People don't get into massive debt and terrible situations through gambling on football matches however the issue is that football draws people into gambling and that escalates. Sun bingo cards may have been free but whats to stay they weren't a gateway for some people into other gambling just like gambling companies use football as a gateway into other gambling.

I've no issues with how BK made his money but if you are going to go out all guns blazing on the ills of gambling then I'm not sure making excuses for someone whose made their fortune from gambling because you know them a bit more personally and you like and have a lot of respect for them is really a good look.
These 2 users liked this post: Bordeauxclaret Middle-agedClaret

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10173
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Wed Sep 21, 2022 10:05 am

Are those who are massively against it ok with paying money to attend "Skybet" sponsored matches ?

Bfc
Posts: 1050
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:28 am
Been Liked: 443 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Bfc » Wed Sep 21, 2022 10:37 am

My thoughts are, Barry Kirby only printed gambling cards for others to reap the profit from. I stand corrected, if I’m wrong.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Sep 21, 2022 11:45 am

Bfc wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 10:37 am
My thoughts are, Barry Kirby only printed gambling cards for others to reap the profit from. I stand corrected, if I’m wrong.
I've nothing against betting or how he made his money

But to say the betting industry didn't help him make money is farsical

FCBurnley
Posts: 9883
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2005 times
Has Liked: 1151 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by FCBurnley » Wed Sep 21, 2022 11:53 am

It’s amazing how some people will comment on subjects they know nothing about.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Lancasterclaret » Wed Sep 21, 2022 11:58 am

FCBurnley wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 11:53 am
It’s amazing how some people will comment on subjects they know nothing about.
On here?

I think its in the T & Cs!
These 3 users liked this post: Middle-agedClaret longsidepies ŽižkovClaret

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12382
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5214 times
Has Liked: 922 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Devils_Advocate » Wed Sep 21, 2022 12:07 pm

FCBurnley wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 11:53 am
It’s amazing how some people will comment on subjects they know nothing about.
True but please don't let it stop you posting on here

Rileybobs
Posts: 16935
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6971 times
Has Liked: 1487 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Rileybobs » Wed Sep 21, 2022 12:53 pm

This website hosts games which classify as gambling such as the First Goal Sweep and Fantasy Premier League.

Hipper
Posts: 5723
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:33 pm
Been Liked: 1179 times
Has Liked: 922 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Hipper » Wed Sep 21, 2022 1:07 pm


FCBurnley
Posts: 9883
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2005 times
Has Liked: 1151 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by FCBurnley » Wed Sep 21, 2022 2:27 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 12:07 pm
True but please don't let it stop you posting on here
On this occasion I will bow to your superior knowledge of Sun Bingo games. Clearly it’s another area of your expertise

Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Billy Balfour » Wed Sep 21, 2022 2:45 pm

Blimey, the stuff you learn on here. 1980s/90s tabloid newspaper bingo cards were a gateway drug, and decades later it led people into ruin.
This user liked this post: FCBurnley

BigGaz
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2022 6:24 pm
Been Liked: 113 times
Has Liked: 40 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by BigGaz » Wed Sep 21, 2022 3:21 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 10:02 am
People don't get into massive debt and terrible situations through gambling on football matches
This is incorrect. Particularly since data suggests those most interested in placing football bets are likely to come from deprived or low income households where the amount lost is relative to ‘massive debt’.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Sep 21, 2022 3:35 pm

FCBurnley wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 11:53 am
It’s amazing how some people will comment on subjects they know nothing about.
So, Barry's company on East Park Rd Blackburn, what did they produce, if not bingo cards?

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Sep 21, 2022 3:42 pm

Billy Balfour wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 2:45 pm
Blimey, the stuff you learn on here. 1980s/90s tabloid newspaper bingo cards were a gateway drug, and decades later it led people into ruin.
Has anyone suggested that?
No
Is bingo a form of gambling?
Yes
Did Barry Kilby make money out of printing bingo cards?
Yes
Is Billy over reacting?
Yes...

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12382
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5214 times
Has Liked: 922 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Devils_Advocate » Wed Sep 21, 2022 4:01 pm

BigGaz wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 3:21 pm
This is incorrect. Particularly since data suggests those most interested in placing football bets are likely to come from deprived or low income households where the amount lost is relative to ‘massive debt’.
I agree that in some cases people might only bet on football and ramp up their betting beyond their means but more commonly I believe Its the accumulation of betting across multiple things that becomes the real problem. People get sucked into betting and often start betting on almost anything and even worse get pulled into the casino style betting sites which really destroy people fast.

The point I was making is that gambling can start out innocently in many forms be it the odd bet on the football or just doing a free bingo card but some people get sucked into it and it escalates from there. I would argue that gambling sponsorship on shirts has little to no impact in turning people into gambling addicts and that its more specifically the targeted adds that really cause the problem and get people hooked.

If someones position is anything remotely gambling related should be completely removed from anything to do with football because of the damage it can cause then I dont see the consistency in downplaying where our ex chairman made his fortune because that kind of gambling isn't as bad.

Personally I would be all for some real restrictions on the adverts and the way people are targeted to have a bet but it seems like the focus is more on sponsorship where people can feel like they are making an impact but really the real issues are not the ones being addressed (cos they're are the things that generate those companies the money).

FCBurnley
Posts: 9883
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2005 times
Has Liked: 1151 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by FCBurnley » Wed Sep 21, 2022 4:38 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 3:35 pm
So, Barry's company on East Park Rd Blackburn, what did they produce, if not bingo cards?
Bingo in bingo halls paying to play to win money was not what his company was involved in. The cards that they
Produced ( printed by a third party in Burnley) were a totally different concept to Bingo Hall gambling.

The promotional cards he produced were mainly for Newspapers with the purpose increasing circulation. However the laws of that time were that the cards had to be free and furthermore‘no purchase of the newspaper was necessary to play’

Hardly gambling in my book.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Sep 21, 2022 4:50 pm

FCBurnley wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 4:38 pm
Bingo in bingo halls paying to play to win money was not what his company was involved in. The cards that they
Produced ( printed by a third party in Burnley) were a totally different concept to Bingo Hall gambling.

The promotional cards he produced were mainly for Newspapers with the purpose increasing circulation. However the laws of that time were that the cards had to be free and furthermore‘no purchase of the newspaper was necessary to play’

Hardly gambling in my book.
Increasing circulation how?... Oh, I know, by including a card, that perhaps by shear luck could win you money, its called a gamble, if nobody gambled, Mr Kilby would not have made any money.

FCBurnley
Posts: 9883
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2005 times
Has Liked: 1151 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by FCBurnley » Wed Sep 21, 2022 4:57 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 4:50 pm
Increasing circulation how?... Oh, I know, by including a card, that perhaps by shear luck could win you money, its called a gamble, if nobody gambled, Mr Kilby would not have made any money.
Cards were free and delivered to every household in the U.K. No purchase of the newspaper was required. Gambling is when money changes hands. A man with no money could play The Sun Bingo game.

Volvoclaret
Posts: 1450
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 12:45 pm
Been Liked: 664 times
Has Liked: 379 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Volvoclaret » Wed Sep 21, 2022 4:59 pm

Bet he would.

Billy Balfour
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
Been Liked: 1857 times
Has Liked: 652 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Billy Balfour » Wed Sep 21, 2022 5:01 pm

Yep. Gambling: games of chance for money; bet.

FCBurnley
Posts: 9883
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2005 times
Has Liked: 1151 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by FCBurnley » Wed Sep 21, 2022 5:03 pm

Volvoclaret wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 4:59 pm
Bet he would.
Sorry can’t take you up on your bet. That would be gambling !!!

FCBurnley
Posts: 9883
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2005 times
Has Liked: 1151 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by FCBurnley » Wed Sep 21, 2022 5:13 pm

Billy Balfour wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 5:01 pm
Yep. Gambling: games of chance for money; bet.
Gambling

An agreement between 2 or more individuals to play collectively at a game of chance for a stake or wager which will become the property of the winner and to which all involved make a contribution.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Sep 21, 2022 5:37 pm

FCBurnley wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 5:13 pm
Gambling

An agreement between 2 or more individuals to play collectively at a game of chance for a stake or wager which will become the property of the winner and to which all involved make a contribution.
Ever try to get a card without buying a paper?

FCBurnley
Posts: 9883
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2005 times
Has Liked: 1151 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by FCBurnley » Wed Sep 21, 2022 6:15 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 5:37 pm
Ever try to get a card without buying a paper?
Now I know you do not understand sales and marketing

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Sep 21, 2022 6:22 pm

FCBurnley wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 6:15 pm
Now I know you do not understand sales and marketing
You mean offer something different and people will buy your product instead of another one?

FCBurnley
Posts: 9883
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2005 times
Has Liked: 1151 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by FCBurnley » Wed Sep 21, 2022 6:25 pm

No. I mean why would a newspaper spend millions on a promotion and then make it impossible to get a card. I can assure you that if you had wanted a thousand cards you would have been given them.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Nori1958 » Thu Sep 22, 2022 6:47 am

FCBurnley wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 6:25 pm
No. I mean why would a newspaper spend millions on a promotion and then make it impossible to get a card. I can assure you that if you had wanted a thousand cards you would have been given them.
Excellent, I've now got my 1000 cards

How to I get the numbers to play the game?

Hang on, I know... I need to buy that newspaper for a fortnight to play the game.

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 8566
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 2476 times
Has Liked: 2014 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Tricky Trevor » Thu Sep 22, 2022 8:00 am

On a lighter note did you catch the story about Colin ****** over the last few days?
Took all his team 10 pin bowling, suggested they all put a tenner in the pot for winner takes it all. Once they’d all divied up he got out his own shoes and ball and took the pot.
It tickled me.

FCBurnley
Posts: 9883
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2005 times
Has Liked: 1151 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by FCBurnley » Thu Sep 22, 2022 11:15 am

Nori1958 wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 6:47 am
Excellent, I've now got my 1000 cards

How to I get the numbers to play the game?

Hang on, I know... I need to buy that newspaper for a fortnight to play the game.
Good luck. Hope you win a million lol
This user liked this post: Billy Balfour

BigGaz
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2022 6:24 pm
Been Liked: 113 times
Has Liked: 40 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by BigGaz » Thu Sep 22, 2022 1:18 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 4:01 pm
I agree that in some cases people might only bet on football and ramp up their betting beyond their means but more commonly I believe Its the accumulation of betting across multiple things that becomes the real problem. People get sucked into betting and often start betting on almost anything and even worse get pulled into the casino style betting sites which really destroy people fast.

The point I was making is that gambling can start out innocently in many forms be it the odd bet on the football or just doing a free bingo card but some people get sucked into it and it escalates from there. I would argue that gambling sponsorship on shirts has little to no impact in turning people into gambling addicts and that its more specifically the targeted adds that really cause the problem and get people hooked.

If someones position is anything remotely gambling related should be completely removed from anything to do with football because of the damage it can cause then I dont see the consistency in downplaying where our ex chairman made his fortune because that kind of gambling isn't as bad.

Personally I would be all for some real restrictions on the adverts and the way people are targeted to have a bet but it seems like the focus is more on sponsorship where people can feel like they are making an impact but really the real issues are not the ones being addressed (cos they're are the things that generate those companies the money).
Yeah that’s fair enough mate and I agreed with what you’ve said there in its entirety, that’s perhaps the nuance to your point I was missing. Appreciate your clarification, whereas others may not have bothered.
This user liked this post: Devils_Advocate

claretburns
Posts: 4926
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
Been Liked: 863 times
Has Liked: 334 times
Location: Halifax

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by claretburns » Thu Sep 22, 2022 3:15 pm

Back on topic of the thread, if any legal people know the answer. In the article Rogers claims he is going to sue the manager for legal costs and will try and get the anonymity of the manager removed as it is not right his name has been made public but not the manager.

Why would the manager be allowed to remain anonymous but other members in the case have their names made public?

IanMcL
Posts: 30443
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6395 times
Has Liked: 8754 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by IanMcL » Thu Sep 22, 2022 3:23 pm

Bfc wrote:
Wed Sep 21, 2022 10:37 am
My thoughts are, Barry Kirby only printed gambling cards for others to reap the profit from. I stand corrected, if I’m wrong.
It was his business. A well won contract and reaped the benefits, a little of which, he passed on to BFC (not you!😁)

We were grateful at the time and for several years. Gambling is for individuals, as is drinking and smoking. All may have negative outcomes. Help those for whom addiction beckons.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Nori1958 » Thu Sep 22, 2022 3:28 pm

IanMcL wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 3:23 pm
It was his business. A well won contract and reaped the benefits, a little of which, he passed on to BFC (not you!😁)

We were grateful at the time and for several years. Gambling is for individuals, as is drinking and smoking. All may have negative outcomes. Help those for whom addiction beckons.
Like I said much earlier on the thread, but some seem to struggle with the concept, Barry made his money from the gambling industry, good on him, Burnley benefitted from it, end of.
This user liked this post: IanMcL

Hipper
Posts: 5723
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:33 pm
Been Liked: 1179 times
Has Liked: 922 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Hipper » Thu Sep 22, 2022 3:37 pm

claretburns wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 3:15 pm
Back on topic of the thread, if any legal people know the answer. In the article Rogers claims he is going to sue the manager for legal costs and will try and get the anonymity of the manager removed as it is not right his name has been made public but not the manager.

Why would the manager be allowed to remain anonymous but other members in the case have their names made public?
You'll have a job getting this back on topic. I think only about four of the forty-seven posts so far refer to the OP.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by Nori1958 » Thu Sep 22, 2022 4:01 pm

Hipper wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 3:37 pm
You'll have a job getting this back on topic. I think only about four of the forty-seven posts so far refer to the OP.
I know, it's weird isn't it, a conversion going in different directions, almost like real life

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14571
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3437 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Manger blackmail case

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Thu Sep 22, 2022 4:10 pm

claretburns wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2022 3:15 pm
Back on topic of the thread, if any legal people know the answer. In the article Rogers claims he is going to sue the manager for legal costs and will try and get the anonymity of the manager removed as it is not right his name has been made public but not the manager.

Why would the manager be allowed to remain anonymous but other members in the case have their names made public?
Didn't the manager get some sort of injunction to stop his name being made public?

Bit like Gary Flitter tried to do when he'd been playing away behind his wife's back?

Post Reply