Manger blackmail case
-
- Posts: 3324
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 702 times
- Has Liked: 174 times
Manger blackmail case
It appears that one of the ex players allegedly blackmailing a football manager was a Burnley coach a couple of years ago.
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
-
- Posts: 2113
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1151 times
- Has Liked: 1625 times
- Location: Worsthorne
-
- Posts: 3324
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 702 times
- Has Liked: 174 times
Re: Manger blackmail case
Auto correct & edit function
-
- Posts: 9326
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4843 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Manger blackmail case
Gambling has so so much to answer for. Some people still refuse to admit the damage it does. I want it as far removed from my football club as possible.
These 2 users liked this post: PhiladelphiaChris longsidepies
Re: Manger blackmail case
I agree to an extent John, but I find it difficult to say that when Barry Kilby is a director of Total Gaming Solutions. Admittedly he isn't part of the club anymore, but he and the money he made is one of - if not THE reason - we are where we are today.
I do think it needs to go the way of tobacco in terms of an advertising ban though.
This user liked this post: longsidepies
-
- Posts: 9326
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4843 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Manger blackmail case
No denying this at all, it’s a very valid point.Fretters wrote: ↑Tue Sep 20, 2022 9:56 pmI agree to an extent John, but I find it difficult to say that when Barry Kilby is a director of Total Gaming Solutions. Admittedly he isn't part of the club anymore, but he and the money he made is one of - if not THE reason - we are where we are today.
I do think it needs to go the way of tobacco in terms of an advertising ban though.
But…Barry Kilby didn’t stop you every few minutes…sometimes multiple times in a commercial break to tempt you with a trap of free offers. Nor did he approach you with incentives to return to gambling even if you were ‘taking a break’ like several people I know have been.
Furthermore, I believe BK made his money at first by selling his scratch cards to millworkers, with a very minimal amount of advertising….no rolling ads, no videos, no mobile phone pop-ups etc.
Most importantly, my main thought here, as it has been in the past, everyone has always acknowledged that fags knacker your lungs and booze pickles your liver; the effect that gambling has on the human body for a good number of people is still not ‘accepted’.
It will be though, at some point….
Cheers mate
These 2 users liked this post: Fretters longsidepies
Re: Manger blackmail case
BK didn’t make his money from gambling. His Grandad Charlie sort of did when he was at Accrington Stanley but Barry 100% did not. Trust me I know
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Manger blackmail case
I thought those bingo cards were free when you bought a newspaper? I do not recall hearing or reading about anyone spending their mortgage/rent money on buying up thousands of copies of The Sun or Daily Mirror.
Re: Manger blackmail case
It's was still gambling, which FCBurnley denied BK made his money from. Some people may only have bought the paper because of the bingo cards, and continue to buy it every day to collect the numbers.Billy Balfour wrote: ↑Wed Sep 21, 2022 7:49 amI thought those bingo cards were free when you bought a newspaper? I do not recall hearing or reading about anyone spending their mortgage/rent money on buying up thousands of copies of The Sun or Daily Mirror.
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Manger blackmail case
Pedantic.
Re: Manger blackmail case
Why do think the papers had these games?
Out of the goodness of their hearts?
Or to get people to spend on the paper, gambling that they'd win on the bingo
-
- Posts: 12382
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5214 times
- Has Liked: 922 times
Re: Manger blackmail case
People don't get into massive debt and terrible situations through gambling on football matches however the issue is that football draws people into gambling and that escalates. Sun bingo cards may have been free but whats to stay they weren't a gateway for some people into other gambling just like gambling companies use football as a gateway into other gambling.
I've no issues with how BK made his money but if you are going to go out all guns blazing on the ills of gambling then I'm not sure making excuses for someone whose made their fortune from gambling because you know them a bit more personally and you like and have a lot of respect for them is really a good look.
I've no issues with how BK made his money but if you are going to go out all guns blazing on the ills of gambling then I'm not sure making excuses for someone whose made their fortune from gambling because you know them a bit more personally and you like and have a lot of respect for them is really a good look.
These 2 users liked this post: Bordeauxclaret Middle-agedClaret
-
- Posts: 10173
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Manger blackmail case
Are those who are massively against it ok with paying money to attend "Skybet" sponsored matches ?
Re: Manger blackmail case
My thoughts are, Barry Kirby only printed gambling cards for others to reap the profit from. I stand corrected, if I’m wrong.
Re: Manger blackmail case
It’s amazing how some people will comment on subjects they know nothing about.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Manger blackmail case
On here?
I think its in the T & Cs!
These 3 users liked this post: Middle-agedClaret longsidepies ŽižkovClaret
-
- Posts: 12382
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5214 times
- Has Liked: 922 times
-
- Posts: 16935
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6971 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Manger blackmail case
This website hosts games which classify as gambling such as the First Goal Sweep and Fantasy Premier League.
Re: Manger blackmail case
On this occasion I will bow to your superior knowledge of Sun Bingo games. Clearly it’s another area of your expertiseDevils_Advocate wrote: ↑Wed Sep 21, 2022 12:07 pmTrue but please don't let it stop you posting on here
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Manger blackmail case
Blimey, the stuff you learn on here. 1980s/90s tabloid newspaper bingo cards were a gateway drug, and decades later it led people into ruin.
This user liked this post: FCBurnley
Re: Manger blackmail case
This is incorrect. Particularly since data suggests those most interested in placing football bets are likely to come from deprived or low income households where the amount lost is relative to ‘massive debt’.Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Wed Sep 21, 2022 10:02 amPeople don't get into massive debt and terrible situations through gambling on football matches
Re: Manger blackmail case
Has anyone suggested that?Billy Balfour wrote: ↑Wed Sep 21, 2022 2:45 pmBlimey, the stuff you learn on here. 1980s/90s tabloid newspaper bingo cards were a gateway drug, and decades later it led people into ruin.
No
Is bingo a form of gambling?
Yes
Did Barry Kilby make money out of printing bingo cards?
Yes
Is Billy over reacting?
Yes...
-
- Posts: 12382
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5214 times
- Has Liked: 922 times
Re: Manger blackmail case
I agree that in some cases people might only bet on football and ramp up their betting beyond their means but more commonly I believe Its the accumulation of betting across multiple things that becomes the real problem. People get sucked into betting and often start betting on almost anything and even worse get pulled into the casino style betting sites which really destroy people fast.
The point I was making is that gambling can start out innocently in many forms be it the odd bet on the football or just doing a free bingo card but some people get sucked into it and it escalates from there. I would argue that gambling sponsorship on shirts has little to no impact in turning people into gambling addicts and that its more specifically the targeted adds that really cause the problem and get people hooked.
If someones position is anything remotely gambling related should be completely removed from anything to do with football because of the damage it can cause then I dont see the consistency in downplaying where our ex chairman made his fortune because that kind of gambling isn't as bad.
Personally I would be all for some real restrictions on the adverts and the way people are targeted to have a bet but it seems like the focus is more on sponsorship where people can feel like they are making an impact but really the real issues are not the ones being addressed (cos they're are the things that generate those companies the money).
Re: Manger blackmail case
Bingo in bingo halls paying to play to win money was not what his company was involved in. The cards that they
Produced ( printed by a third party in Burnley) were a totally different concept to Bingo Hall gambling.
The promotional cards he produced were mainly for Newspapers with the purpose increasing circulation. However the laws of that time were that the cards had to be free and furthermore‘no purchase of the newspaper was necessary to play’
Hardly gambling in my book.
Re: Manger blackmail case
Increasing circulation how?... Oh, I know, by including a card, that perhaps by shear luck could win you money, its called a gamble, if nobody gambled, Mr Kilby would not have made any money.FCBurnley wrote: ↑Wed Sep 21, 2022 4:38 pmBingo in bingo halls paying to play to win money was not what his company was involved in. The cards that they
Produced ( printed by a third party in Burnley) were a totally different concept to Bingo Hall gambling.
The promotional cards he produced were mainly for Newspapers with the purpose increasing circulation. However the laws of that time were that the cards had to be free and furthermore‘no purchase of the newspaper was necessary to play’
Hardly gambling in my book.
Re: Manger blackmail case
Cards were free and delivered to every household in the U.K. No purchase of the newspaper was required. Gambling is when money changes hands. A man with no money could play The Sun Bingo game.
-
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 12:45 pm
- Been Liked: 664 times
- Has Liked: 379 times
Re: Manger blackmail case
Bet he would.
-
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 3:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1857 times
- Has Liked: 652 times
Re: Manger blackmail case
Yep. Gambling: games of chance for money; bet.
Re: Manger blackmail case
Sorry can’t take you up on your bet. That would be gambling !!!
Re: Manger blackmail case
Gambling
An agreement between 2 or more individuals to play collectively at a game of chance for a stake or wager which will become the property of the winner and to which all involved make a contribution.
Re: Manger blackmail case
No. I mean why would a newspaper spend millions on a promotion and then make it impossible to get a card. I can assure you that if you had wanted a thousand cards you would have been given them.
Re: Manger blackmail case
Excellent, I've now got my 1000 cards
How to I get the numbers to play the game?
Hang on, I know... I need to buy that newspaper for a fortnight to play the game.
-
- Posts: 8566
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2476 times
- Has Liked: 2014 times
Re: Manger blackmail case
On a lighter note did you catch the story about Colin ****** over the last few days?
Took all his team 10 pin bowling, suggested they all put a tenner in the pot for winner takes it all. Once they’d all divied up he got out his own shoes and ball and took the pot.
It tickled me.
Took all his team 10 pin bowling, suggested they all put a tenner in the pot for winner takes it all. Once they’d all divied up he got out his own shoes and ball and took the pot.
It tickled me.
Re: Manger blackmail case
Good luck. Hope you win a million lol
This user liked this post: Billy Balfour
Re: Manger blackmail case
Yeah that’s fair enough mate and I agreed with what you’ve said there in its entirety, that’s perhaps the nuance to your point I was missing. Appreciate your clarification, whereas others may not have bothered.Devils_Advocate wrote: ↑Wed Sep 21, 2022 4:01 pmI agree that in some cases people might only bet on football and ramp up their betting beyond their means but more commonly I believe Its the accumulation of betting across multiple things that becomes the real problem. People get sucked into betting and often start betting on almost anything and even worse get pulled into the casino style betting sites which really destroy people fast.
The point I was making is that gambling can start out innocently in many forms be it the odd bet on the football or just doing a free bingo card but some people get sucked into it and it escalates from there. I would argue that gambling sponsorship on shirts has little to no impact in turning people into gambling addicts and that its more specifically the targeted adds that really cause the problem and get people hooked.
If someones position is anything remotely gambling related should be completely removed from anything to do with football because of the damage it can cause then I dont see the consistency in downplaying where our ex chairman made his fortune because that kind of gambling isn't as bad.
Personally I would be all for some real restrictions on the adverts and the way people are targeted to have a bet but it seems like the focus is more on sponsorship where people can feel like they are making an impact but really the real issues are not the ones being addressed (cos they're are the things that generate those companies the money).
This user liked this post: Devils_Advocate
-
- Posts: 4926
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
- Been Liked: 863 times
- Has Liked: 334 times
- Location: Halifax
Re: Manger blackmail case
Back on topic of the thread, if any legal people know the answer. In the article Rogers claims he is going to sue the manager for legal costs and will try and get the anonymity of the manager removed as it is not right his name has been made public but not the manager.
Why would the manager be allowed to remain anonymous but other members in the case have their names made public?
Why would the manager be allowed to remain anonymous but other members in the case have their names made public?
Re: Manger blackmail case
It was his business. A well won contract and reaped the benefits, a little of which, he passed on to BFC (not you!)
We were grateful at the time and for several years. Gambling is for individuals, as is drinking and smoking. All may have negative outcomes. Help those for whom addiction beckons.
Re: Manger blackmail case
Like I said much earlier on the thread, but some seem to struggle with the concept, Barry made his money from the gambling industry, good on him, Burnley benefitted from it, end of.IanMcL wrote: ↑Thu Sep 22, 2022 3:23 pmIt was his business. A well won contract and reaped the benefits, a little of which, he passed on to BFC (not you!)
We were grateful at the time and for several years. Gambling is for individuals, as is drinking and smoking. All may have negative outcomes. Help those for whom addiction beckons.
This user liked this post: IanMcL
Re: Manger blackmail case
You'll have a job getting this back on topic. I think only about four of the forty-seven posts so far refer to the OP.claretburns wrote: ↑Thu Sep 22, 2022 3:15 pmBack on topic of the thread, if any legal people know the answer. In the article Rogers claims he is going to sue the manager for legal costs and will try and get the anonymity of the manager removed as it is not right his name has been made public but not the manager.
Why would the manager be allowed to remain anonymous but other members in the case have their names made public?
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Manger blackmail case
Didn't the manager get some sort of injunction to stop his name being made public?claretburns wrote: ↑Thu Sep 22, 2022 3:15 pmBack on topic of the thread, if any legal people know the answer. In the article Rogers claims he is going to sue the manager for legal costs and will try and get the anonymity of the manager removed as it is not right his name has been made public but not the manager.
Why would the manager be allowed to remain anonymous but other members in the case have their names made public?
Bit like Gary Flitter tried to do when he'd been playing away behind his wife's back?