The Bar

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Shaggy
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 8:30 am
Been Liked: 394 times
Has Liked: 149 times

Re: The Bar

Post by Shaggy » Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:25 pm

As a side note. Iv been critical of Roberts this season but today he was absolutely superb. He was close to MOM for me today

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7313
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1827 times
Has Liked: 3965 times

Re: The Bar

Post by nil_desperandum » Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:28 pm

JohnMac wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:20 pm
I was shocked at the penalty because all I saw was the ball hit the bar and fortunately end up in Muric's hands.
Same from our view.
We couldn't work out what the penalty was for or who it was that was penalised.
Seeing the red waved at Roberts we assumed it was for dissent.
This user liked this post: JohnMac

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5133
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1623 times
Has Liked: 892 times

Re: The Bar

Post by BurnleyFC » Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:41 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 6:29 pm
He’s made some good saves, can’t think of many I’d describe as outstanding. But of course he will make some saves, he’s a goalkeeper. But generally his shot stopping is very poor. His attempt to save their goal today was appalling, whatever excuse you make for it. Just look at the angle from the camera in the JMU, it’s an atrocious attempt at a save.

He’s let in a lot of extremely soft attempts at goal this season. What he offers us with the ball compensates for this in the Championship, his passing today for example was very good. But in the Premier League we won’t be dominating possession and we will be facing a lot more shots at our goal. As I said he will be exposed ruthlessly and I would be amazed if he’s not upgraded on in the summer.
I think he thought the shot was initially trickling wide until it was too late.

If he didn’t then it really was atrocious.

Somethingfishy
Posts: 2594
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 515 times
Location: Padiham

Re: The Bar

Post by Somethingfishy » Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:42 pm

Crazily poor decision. Sat where I am in Block2 of the JHU it was plainly obvious it had hit the bar. The referee (despite being utterly clueless) got this one right and was led astray by the linesman in front of me. Yes Roberts made it difficult but from his position in line with it he must have been able to see the daylight between the bar and his hand.
It's lucky it was so late in the game.

whiffa
Posts: 1399
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:58 pm
Been Liked: 515 times
Has Liked: 2609 times

Re: The Bar

Post by whiffa » Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:46 pm

box_of_frogs wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 5:11 pm
He’s clearly hand balled it. Time to take the claret tinted specs off.
Mad as a...
This user liked this post: box_of_frogs

Somethingfishy
Posts: 2594
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 515 times
Location: Padiham

Re: The Bar

Post by Somethingfishy » Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:53 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 6:29 pm
He’s made some good saves, can’t think of many I’d describe as outstanding. But of course he will make some saves, he’s a goalkeeper. But generally his shot stopping is very poor. His attempt to save their goal today was appalling, whatever excuse you make for it. Just look at the angle from the camera in the JMU, it’s an atrocious attempt at a save.

He’s let in a lot of extremely soft attempts at goal this season. What he offers us with the ball compensates for this in the Championship, his passing today for example was very good. But in the Premier League we won’t be dominating possession and we will be facing a lot more shots at our goal. As I said he will be exposed ruthlessly and I would be amazed if he’s not upgraded on in the summer.
I agree. It wasnt even a particularly powerful shot and he just seemed to make no attempt at all to stop it. It just seemed to trickle in. The Rotherham second goal was very similar. His ability to claim crosses was also questionable today. The incident where Roberts was sent off..he really should have claimed that. There was one a few minutes before where he lost out in the air too. Excellent as a sweeper keeper but ordinary and indeed questionable at his actual job.

Bosscat
Posts: 25652
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8538 times
Has Liked: 18286 times

Re: The Bar

Post by Bosscat » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:00 pm

Its one of those ... if it was the other end ... Handball ... scream for a pen ... at our end hmmmmm was it ... wasn't it ... It was given ... Penalty ... and saved because Muric went the right way ... Connor will miss a couple now but if Vitinho can come back from injury no worries ... end of thread 😁

conyoviejo
Posts: 5829
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
Been Liked: 2491 times
Has Liked: 1477 times
Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates

Re: The Bar

Post by conyoviejo » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:04 pm

Bosscat wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:00 pm
Its one of those ... if it was the other end ... Handball ... scream for a pen ... at our end hmmmmm was it ... wasn't it ... It was given ... Penalty ... and saved because Muric went the right way ... Connor will miss a couple now but if Vitinho can come back from injury no worries ... end of thread 😁
Why will he miss a couple Bosscat ?

2 Bee Holed
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:37 am
Been Liked: 548 times
Has Liked: 31 times
Location: South Manchester

Re: The Bar

Post by 2 Bee Holed » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:06 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 5:16 pm
It’s nowhere near his hand. Roberts was absolutely fuming, he knew he hadn’t touched it.
He didn't touch it. However, what a crazy decision to flap/swot at the ball. It creates an image in the mind if the ref.

taio
Posts: 11639
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: The Bar

Post by taio » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:06 pm

Bosscat wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:00 pm
Its one of those ... if it was the other end ... Handball ... scream for a pen ... at our end hmmmmm was it ... wasn't it ... It was given ... Penalty ... and saved because Muric went the right way ... Connor will miss a couple now but if Vitinho can come back from injury no worries ... end of thread 😁
It shouldn't have been a penalty and should be rescinded. That'd be the case at either end.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: The Bar

Post by RVclaret » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:07 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:53 pm
I agree. It wasnt even a particularly powerful shot and he just seemed to make no attempt at all to stop it. It just seemed to trickle in. The Rotherham second goal was very similar. His ability to claim crosses was also questionable today. The incident where Roberts was sent off..he really should have claimed that. There was one a few minutes before where he lost out in the air too. Excellent as a sweeper keeper but ordinary and indeed questionable at his actual job.
If you watch the replay of the goal today it was actual a very accurate finish into the near post. It’s a one on one, it’s meant to favour the attacker. No idea why you feel he should do better for Rotherham’s second. If you want to take a look at some crap keeping then take a look at Zak Steffen for Boro today, garbage.

Bosscat
Posts: 25652
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8538 times
Has Liked: 18286 times

Re: The Bar

Post by Bosscat » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:09 pm

taio wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:06 pm
It shouldn't have been a penalty and should be rescinded. That'd be the case at either end.
I agree but its not our decision ... 🙄 Depends on the people in power but I was commenting on the match not the red card ... It was given ... will it be rescinded who knows ... I hope it is ... but can only comment on what the Ref saw

claretspice
Posts: 5727
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: The Bar

Post by claretspice » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:09 pm

It's a wrong decision but in real time it's certainly not a shocking or terrible decision. Its a pretty reasonable call in real time.

The really bad decision is Roberts' decision to put his hand up there and respond as though he planned to handle it. That causes the confusion, and its unnecessary.

Thought the ref got a reasonable amount wrong but that decision wasn't amongst them.

taio
Posts: 11639
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: The Bar

Post by taio » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:10 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:07 pm
If you watch the replay of the goal today it was actual a very accurate finish into the near post. It’s a one on one, it’s meant to favour the attacker. No idea why you feel he should do better for Rotherham’s second. If you want to take a look at some crap keeping then take a look at Zak Steffen for Boro today, garbage.
Muric should've done better for their goal. His positioning wasn't good and for some reason he became wrong-footed.

Bosscat
Posts: 25652
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8538 times
Has Liked: 18286 times

Re: The Bar

Post by Bosscat » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:11 pm

conyoviejo wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:04 pm
Why will he miss a couple Bosscat ?
Red card given ... if its upheld ... won't he miss a couple 🤔

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: The Bar

Post by RVclaret » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:12 pm

taio wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:10 pm
Muric should've done better for their goal. His positioning wasn't good and for some reason he became wrong-footed.
Fair enough. I’ve watched the replay and think it’s a very good finish.
This user liked this post: MeeActon1

claretspice
Posts: 5727
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: The Bar

Post by claretspice » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:17 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:12 pm
Fair enough. I’ve watched the replay and think it’s a very good finish.
Should save it. His weight is taking too far to his left, it's a scuffed finish and if he's balanced, he saves it every time.

That said, whilst having come the onus is on Muric to get a punch on the ball, I think Harwood-Bellis is the real culprit. He's in front of Muric and the attacker and has to get a head on it. If he does the rest is moot.

taio
Posts: 11639
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: The Bar

Post by taio » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:19 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:12 pm
Fair enough. I’ve watched the replay and think it’s a very good finish.
It was an average effort that was made to look better by Muric who was weak.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16902
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6966 times
Has Liked: 1484 times
Location: Leeds

Re: The Bar

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:32 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:12 pm
Fair enough. I’ve watched the replay and think it’s a very good finish.
Bloody hell RV, you seem desperate to defend any error that Muric makes. It’s fine that you rate him, we all have different opinions, but I can’t believe anyone can watch that goal back and think a.) it was a good finish, and b.) Muric shouldn’t have saved it.

Targetman
Posts: 1673
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:43 pm
Been Liked: 506 times
Has Liked: 47 times

Re: The Bar

Post by Targetman » Sat Dec 17, 2022 9:16 pm

box_of_frogs wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 5:56 pm
Hahaha, love a Billy big ******** giving it large on a forum.

I’m happy to say I’m wrong having previously only seen it once and without replays.
You were also happy to tell other people they were wrong! :D :roll:

box_of_frogs
Posts: 4955
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
Been Liked: 1087 times
Has Liked: 996 times

Re: The Bar

Post by box_of_frogs » Sat Dec 17, 2022 9:47 pm

Targetman wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 9:16 pm
You were also happy to tell other people they were wrong! :D :roll:
Yes, I thought they were at the time. I’ve since said I was incorrect. But thanks for pointing that part out.
This user liked this post: conyoviejo

Bosscat
Posts: 25652
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8538 times
Has Liked: 18286 times

Re: The Bar

Post by Bosscat » Sat Dec 17, 2022 9:55 pm

Just watched ITV footy show ... Roberts Red should be rescinded "If" we contest it ...

Somethingfishy
Posts: 2594
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 515 times
Location: Padiham

Re: The Bar

Post by Somethingfishy » Sat Dec 17, 2022 9:56 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:07 pm
If you watch the replay of the goal today it was actual a very accurate finish into the near post. It’s a one on one, it’s meant to favour the attacker. No idea why you feel he should do better for Rotherham’s second. If you want to take a look at some crap keeping then take a look at Zak Steffen for Boro today, garbage.
Ok so now I've watched it again and I'm even more certain it was just a poor effort from Muric. For a reason only he knows he moves to his left and shows Watmore an open net to his right. To add insult to it he slips as he realises he's made a bad call and the dive is way too late.

If you watch really closely you can see him saying "There you go Dunc..pop it in there lad". He might as well have done.

Dark Cloud
Posts: 6655
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2006 times
Has Liked: 3349 times

Re: The Bar

Post by Dark Cloud » Sat Dec 17, 2022 10:00 pm

JohnMac wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:20 pm
I was shocked at the penalty because all I saw was the ball hit the bar and fortunately end up in Muric's hands.
This.

Cheshireclaret
Posts: 808
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 4:43 pm
Been Liked: 341 times
Has Liked: 20 times

Re: The Bar

Post by Cheshireclaret » Sat Dec 17, 2022 10:05 pm

As an aside, as Roberts was walking off it appeared the linesman who had made the decision decided to have a few words with Roberts. I saw no need for that at all from my (admittedly distant) vantage point in the JMU as it looked like Roberts was ignoring him and heading down the tunnel before he decided to shout something at him. Assuming he said something along the lines of 'you know you handled it, I am right' then I hope Roberts gets an apology because it looked out of order to me.

Then again, Roberts may well have been uttering under his breath about what a member he was as he walked past him....................

It Is What It Is
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 8:21 pm
Been Liked: 196 times
Has Liked: 407 times

Re: The Bar

Post by It Is What It Is » Sun Dec 18, 2022 12:04 am

Roberts red card will ne rescinded at 9.01am Monday morning.

conyoviejo
Posts: 5829
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
Been Liked: 2491 times
Has Liked: 1477 times
Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates

Re: The Bar

Post by conyoviejo » Sun Dec 18, 2022 12:06 am

Bosscat wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:11 pm
Red card given ... if its upheld ... won't he miss a couple 🤔
Fair enough,but I will be gobsmacked if it's not rescinded as he didn't handle it..🤞

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4546
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2603 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: The Bar

Post by quoonbeatz » Sun Dec 18, 2022 12:08 am

RVclaret wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 6:38 pm
It’s an interesting one because statistically he’s one of the best shot stoppers in the division (talking about xG models for keepers, not just standard save %). At Sheff Utd, for example, he had a weird game, was shocking at crosses but made 3 top drawer saves. He’s got a lot to learn if he wants to make it as a PL keeper, but I draw quite a few comparisons with how Meslier and Raya were for Leeds and Brentford (age similarities, good ball players that lacked in some key areas), and now they are solid PL keepers.
Neither of them are 'solid' PL keepers.

martin_p
Posts: 10380
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3767 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: The Bar

Post by martin_p » Sun Dec 18, 2022 12:09 am

Bosscat wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 9:55 pm
Just watched ITV footy show ... Roberts Red should be rescinded "If" we contest it ...
Why would we not contest it?

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12373
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5210 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: The Bar

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sun Dec 18, 2022 1:20 am

RVclaret wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:12 pm
Fair enough. I’ve watched the replay and think it’s a very good finish.
Im with you, the safer option would be to cover the near post and leave an easy target at the other side and if the striker hits it then its the defenders fault for leaving the keeper exposed.

IMO Muric tried to leave no obvious easy target and put the doubt in the strikers mind but the striker reacted quickly and precisely exposed the gap left.

Id rather our defensive players took risks that put their own neck on the line for the better good of the team and I think Muric did that today. His flapping for the couple of crosses that eventually led to the wrongly awarded penalty is where I would direct my criticism rather than the goal he conceded
This user liked this post: RVclaret

Jamesy
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:53 pm
Been Liked: 806 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Re: The Bar

Post by Jamesy » Sun Dec 18, 2022 1:42 am

To most of us who saw it once it did look like handball so even though the ref was poor he can’t be blamed for giving a penalty and a sending off with only one look at it. The lino obviously didn’t see it hit the bar either.
Interesting though when we appeal it. Because Roberts had the intent to handball it,will the red card be rescinded?

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: The Bar

Post by RVclaret » Sun Dec 18, 2022 6:18 am

quoonbeatz wrote:
Sun Dec 18, 2022 12:08 am
Neither of them are 'solid' PL keepers.
Well they’ve been their teams number 1 over the past 2/3 seasons in the PL, Raya has even been called up for Spain, what would call it?

Let’s go for ‘undisputed PL regular’?

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4546
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2603 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: The Bar

Post by quoonbeatz » Sun Dec 18, 2022 9:07 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Sun Dec 18, 2022 6:18 am
Well they’ve been their teams number 1 over the past 2/3 seasons in the PL, Raya has even been called up for Spain, what would call it?

Let’s go for ‘undisputed PL regular’?
Let's call it 'goalkeepers who play in the PL'. Raya is a lot better than Meslier, who is total junk, but he doesn't strike me as particularly solid.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4546
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2603 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: The Bar

Post by quoonbeatz » Sun Dec 18, 2022 9:08 pm

Jamesy wrote:
Sun Dec 18, 2022 1:42 am
To most of us who saw it once it did look like handball so even though the ref was poor he can’t be blamed for giving a penalty and a sending off with only one look at it. The lino obviously didn’t see it hit the bar either.
Interesting though when we appeal it. Because Roberts had the intent to handball it,will the red card be rescinded?
Yes because he didn't handball it.

claret59
Posts: 354
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2017 8:10 pm
Been Liked: 138 times

Re: The Bar

Post by claret59 » Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:00 pm

Leaving the decision to one side at the moment I seem to recall that once a penalty has been awarded then that can be enough of punishment without a red card as well. The difference could be where the penalty is awarded for serious or dangerous foul play . In this case there was no intent at foul play that could cause injury.
I recall several penalty awards that did not attract a red card as well. A red card results in a two match ban, plus time in the game when reduced to ten men, which can effect the whole team not just the perpetrator.

houseboy
Posts: 7066
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
Been Liked: 2240 times
Has Liked: 1618 times
Location: Baxenden

Re: The Bar

Post by houseboy » Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:31 pm

This all raises an interesting point. Watched it back on the football league show and it is clear that he didn’t handle it,absolutely, but if it hadn’t hit the bar and had been going in he most definitely would have so the intention to handle it was there, why was his hand up there at all otherwise. So oddly, although strictly speaking he Is innocent he is a victim of his own action. The mistake, by whatever official, is totally understandable under the speed of the game and decisions needing to be made so we can’t criticise them. His sending off, albeit wrongly, is pretty much entirely of his own doing.
This user liked this post: Gerry Hattrick

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4546
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2603 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: The Bar

Post by quoonbeatz » Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:35 pm

claret59 wrote:
Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:00 pm
Leaving the decision to one side at the moment I seem to recall that once a penalty has been awarded then that can be enough of punishment without a red card as well. The difference could be where the penalty is awarded for serious or dangerous foul play . In this case there was no intent at foul play that could cause injury.
I recall several penalty awards that did not attract a red card as well. A red card results in a two match ban, plus time in the game when reduced to ten men, which can effect the whole team not just the perpetrator.
It was denial of goalscoring opportunity which is a red card.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16902
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6966 times
Has Liked: 1484 times
Location: Leeds

Re: The Bar

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:35 pm

houseboy wrote:
Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:31 pm
This all raises an interesting point. Watched it back on the football league show and it is clear that he didn’t handle it,absolutely, but if it hadn’t hit the bar and had been going in he most definitely would have so the intention to handle it was there, why was his hand up there at all otherwise. So oddly, although strictly speaking he Is innocent he is a victim of his own action. The mistake, by whatever official, is totally understandable under the speed of the game and decisions needing to be made so we can’t criticise them. His sending off, albeit wrongly, is pretty much entirely of his own doing.
Agreed. Stupid by Roberts and he’s lucky that the ball clipped the bar.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4546
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2603 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: The Bar

Post by quoonbeatz » Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:38 pm

houseboy wrote:
Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:31 pm
This all raises an interesting point. Watched it back on the football league show and it is clear that he didn’t handle it,absolutely, but if it hadn’t hit the bar and had been going in he most definitely would have so the intention to handle it was there, why was his hand up there at all otherwise. So oddly, although strictly speaking he Is innocent he is a victim of his own action. The mistake, by whatever official, is totally understandable under the speed of the game and decisions needing to be made so we can’t criticise them. His sending off, albeit wrongly, is pretty much entirely of his own doing.
Not sure it's excusable at all. There's a fairly obvious sound when the ball hits the bar. No boro players appealed (one stuck his hand up more as a result of the crowd shouting for it). Taking so long to make the decision implies that neither referee or liner were sure so they shouldn't be giving it. And the ref shouldn't be relying on his liner when he's way closer. Absolute joke of a decision that should really see the end of those official's careers.

Stanbill05
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2020 5:48 pm
Been Liked: 140 times
Has Liked: 54 times

Re: The Bar

Post by Stanbill05 » Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:49 am

claret59 wrote:
Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:00 pm
Leaving the decision to one side at the moment I seem to recall that once a penalty has been awarded then that can be enough of punishment without a red card as well. The difference could be where the penalty is awarded for serious or dangerous foul play . In this case there was no intent at foul play that could cause injury.
I recall several penalty awards that did not attract a red card as well. A red card results in a two match ban, plus time in the game when reduced to ten men, which can effect the whole team not just the perpetrator.
Red card every time. You can't have players buying a second chance to save a goal for free, players would literally do it all the time. Only alternative is to automatically award a goal in those circumstances, which makes sense but takes away the fundamental part of football.

Quicknick
Posts: 5650
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1217 times
Has Liked: 7199 times
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Re: The Bar

Post by Quicknick » Mon Dec 19, 2022 2:55 am

I watched it several times. It was no penalty. Roberts's expression when given the red card supports this view. He looked shocked. He wasn't acting.

houseboy
Posts: 7066
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
Been Liked: 2240 times
Has Liked: 1618 times
Location: Baxenden

Re: The Bar

Post by houseboy » Mon Dec 19, 2022 10:18 am

quoonbeatz wrote:
Sun Dec 18, 2022 11:38 pm
Not sure it's excusable at all. There's a fairly obvious sound when the ball hits the bar. No boro players appealed (one stuck his hand up more as a result of the crowd shouting for it). Taking so long to make the decision implies that neither referee or liner were sure so they shouldn't be giving it. And the ref shouldn't be relying on his liner when he's way closer. Absolute joke of a decision that should really see the end of those official's careers.
Maybe a little harsh bud demanding an end to their careers. Far far worse mistakes have been made. And it is likely the card will be dropped. The point is why did Roberts have his hand anywhere near the ball in the first place. Nobody is saying a mistake wasn’t made but a player acting as Roberts did makes refereeing even harder than it already is. As I said he was the victim of his own action. He intended to stop the ball with his hand on the line but got lucky because it hit the bar. VK should be having a word with him in my view.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4546
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2603 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: The Bar

Post by quoonbeatz » Tue Dec 20, 2022 2:42 pm

I mean, I wasn't being entirely serious....

Just a 10 match ban for the pair of them would suffice.

Post Reply