Too good yet not good enough?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Guitargeorge
Posts: 810
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 337 times
Has Liked: 93 times
Location: Burnley

Too good yet not good enough?

Post by Guitargeorge » Mon Jan 23, 2023 8:35 am

Statistics show that we are way above most of the other teams in the division, yet how will we fair in the Prem? Will we be good enough to show a bit more (European season apart) than we did under Dyche? Will we be just surviving, or can we see top half finishes with this team? What do you all think?

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11120
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jan 23, 2023 8:41 am

Totally depends who we bring in.

Midfield and striker need improving on where stand now to stay up.

4midable
Posts: 2494
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2022 9:26 am
Been Liked: 390 times
Has Liked: 182 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by 4midable » Mon Jan 23, 2023 8:49 am

Players will come.in for kompany this time

mdd2
Posts: 6027
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1666 times
Has Liked: 701 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by mdd2 » Mon Jan 23, 2023 8:55 am

Players will come in to play and for £££££££-end of
These 3 users liked this post: gtclaret Stayingup Middle-agedClaret

clive40golf
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:51 am
Been Liked: 153 times
Has Liked: 180 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by clive40golf » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:00 am

I don’t think we’re the finished article just yet. We’re only just past half way in a season of a brand new team. I think they’ll be a lot more comings and goings in the next couple of windows ( this one included). Some of the old guard and 90% of the loans will probably not be here at the start of the new season. As it stands right now, imo I think we’d struggle with this squad. Plus the standard of managers are next level as well ( VK still in top 15% of those though).

Shaggy
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 8:30 am
Been Liked: 394 times
Has Liked: 149 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by Shaggy » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:07 am

One things for sure. This team/squad eclipses any of the previous Burnley championship team/squads

Socrates
Posts: 848
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 1:45 pm
Been Liked: 912 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by Socrates » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:10 am

Don’t worry about it.

Enjoy now. Tomorrow will take care of itself.
These 4 users liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland MT03ALG SouthLondonexile Falcon

welsbyswife
Posts: 1058
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:50 pm
Been Liked: 494 times
Has Liked: 280 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by welsbyswife » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:17 am

clive40golf wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:00 am
Plus the standard of managers are next level as well ( VK still in top 15% of those though).
How do you calculate such a precise figure of manager 'levels'? Complex algorithm?

morpheus2
Posts: 1583
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
Been Liked: 762 times
Has Liked: 1855 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by morpheus2 » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:44 am

welsbyswife wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:17 am
How do you calculate such a precise figure of manager 'levels'? Complex algorithm?

Image
These 7 users liked this post: Dawlishclaret welsbyswife Guitargeorge cricketfield73 MT03ALG bf2k lesxdp

jedi_master
Posts: 7177
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3605 times
Has Liked: 1032 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by jedi_master » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:51 am

I think we'll step up really well.

Need a really quality addition in central midfield though, for me.

Hipper
Posts: 5723
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:33 pm
Been Liked: 1179 times
Has Liked: 922 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by Hipper » Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:14 am

morpheus2 wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:44 am
Image
Help. I must be doing something wrong. I can't get it to equal 15%.

Cleveleys_claret
Posts: 3048
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
Been Liked: 956 times
Has Liked: 583 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by Cleveleys_claret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:15 am

clive40golf wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:00 am
I don’t think we’re the finished article just yet. We’re only just past half way in a season of a brand new team. I think they’ll be a lot more comings and goings in the next couple of windows ( this one included). Some of the old guard and 90% of the loans will probably not be here at the start of the new season. As it stands right now, imo I think we’d struggle with this squad. Plus the standard of managers are next level as well ( VK still in top 15% of those though).
So we have 5 players on loan (100%)

Each player therefore is 20% of our loan total

90% suggests 4 and a half of our players won't be here next season. Which half of a player you think we will keep?

Now managers. 20 managers (100%) each being 5%.

So by top 15% you are saying VK will be in the top 3 of the managers in the top flight?

dibraidio
Posts: 1526
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 3:34 pm
Been Liked: 505 times
Has Liked: 143 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by dibraidio » Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:48 am

Earlier in the season I would have agreed. Now I get the feeling that we've stepped up a level.
Fulham scored 106 goals last season but only gathered 90 points losing 10 times GD +63.
I'd like to think that we're going to lose fewer games than that and get more points but we'll be some way off the number of goals scored.
We'll certainly have an excellent starting point for the summer. What remains to be seen is whether the players we're recruiting now are good enough for the Premier League because that's surely the objective.

It's an odd one because the year before Norwich won the league with 98 points losing 7 games and scoring 75 goals GD +33 and yet they were nowhere near in the Premier League. With the likes of Hanley and Gibson they had a solid defensive base for the Championship but they were too slow for the Premier League and I think that makes a big difference. I don't think we'll have the same sort of problems.

If we carry on with the same form as the full season we'll finish on 101 and score 90 goals with a goal difference of +43.
If we don't do better than that I'd be disappointed because we're a far better team than the one that played the first 10 games.
I expect to have more points and a better goal difference than when we won this division last time and I don't see why we can't go on to have an equally successful first season in the Premier League.

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 8529
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 2473 times
Has Liked: 2010 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by Tricky Trevor » Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:54 am

Impossible to know. Fulham went up the other year, playing super football, spent big and went straight back down. It’s a minefield. What promoted clubs really need is for a couple of the top tier clubs to have a nightmare season.

welsbyswife
Posts: 1058
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:50 pm
Been Liked: 494 times
Has Liked: 280 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by welsbyswife » Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:55 am

Cleveleys_claret wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:15 am
So we have 5 players on loan (100%)

Each player therefore is 20% of our loan total

90% suggests 4 and a half of our players won't be here next season. Which half of a player you think we will keep?

Now managers. 20 managers (100%) each being 5%.

So by top 15% you are saying VK will be in the top 3 of the managers in the top flight?
The problem you've got there Cleveleys is that you are over simplifying it. You clearly don't understand the algorithm. Best leave it to the professionals ;)
This user liked this post: Cleveleys_claret

Jel
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 3:54 pm
Been Liked: 266 times
Has Liked: 1178 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by Jel » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:14 am

Hipper wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:14 am
Help. I must be doing something wrong. I can't get it to equal 15%.
I'm not surprised. That's how to calculate the effects of pressure on sound!

equinox
Posts: 912
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2022 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 224 times
Has Liked: 42 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by equinox » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:25 am

One thing is for sure, we can't take 15 - 20 minutes at the start of the game to get going in the Premier League, even if we got away with only conceding one we wouldn't find it as easy to turn it around.

FeedTheArf
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 349 times
Has Liked: 151 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by FeedTheArf » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:42 am

Nobody knows til we get there, and that in itself brings a bit of excitement to getting back in that league.

As much as Dyche achieved here, if he'd still been here and we'd have got promoted you'd know we'd be in for a tough slog, sh*thousing our way for 17th place.

It might all come crashing down with VK, but the unknown to everything (performances, signings, different league) this season has brought a real freshness to going to watch us every week. I don't mind admitting, with the exception of THB, I hadn't heard of a single one of our signings prior to us signing them. Next season will be my 30th of watching Burnley and I have to confess under Dyche I was bored the last few seasons. Chris Wood got slated at the time for his 'comfort zone' comments - from me included I think! - but in hindsight he was spot on, even down to us as fans. Yes we performed above expectations and scrapped away, but this is a whole new model and IMO we were crying out for a fresh approach.

Bring it on!!

kentonclaret
Posts: 6530
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 982 times
Has Liked: 205 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by kentonclaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:44 am

Tricky Trevor wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:54 am
Impossible to know. Fulham went up the other year, playing super football, spent big and went straight back down. It’s a minefield. What promoted clubs really need is for a couple of the top tier clubs to have a nightmare season.

The big difference is in scoring goals. That season Fulham only scored 27 goals in 38 matches. What a complete different story this time around - 32 goals scored in 20 matches thus far and sitting in 7th place. The season they went straight back down Mitrović couldn’t score for love nor money but this season has led the line superbly bagging 11 goals. That is despite missing several games out injured.

clarethomer
Posts: 3121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:24 am
Been Liked: 946 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by clarethomer » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:54 am

Tricky Trevor wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:54 am
Impossible to know. Fulham went up the other year, playing super football, spent big and went straight back down. It’s a minefield. What promoted clubs really need is for a couple of the top tier clubs to have a nightmare season.
I think that is why VK looking now with next season is important. Team more settled, understand the system etc. I don't expect us to change what we do so its key he has time to prepare them and have the players in the house asap.

The unknown to us is

- whether the players will get good enough in our system to be able to do it against better players
- if we can't retain the possession like we have done - how well we cope out of possession. Think Sheff Utd and West Brom away are the only teams that have really pressured us to a point
- how players will react when they are not winning as regularly etc.

That is the unknown. I have confidence that VK and the team know how tough it is, I think that will count for a lot.

dsr
Posts: 15240
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4578 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by dsr » Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:57 am

Did OK at Bournemouth, and not so bad at Man U for that matter.
This user liked this post: MT03ALG

kentonclaret
Posts: 6530
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 982 times
Has Liked: 205 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by kentonclaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:00 pm

Tricky Trevor wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:54 am
Impossible to know. Fulham went up the other year, playing super football, spent big and went straight back down. It’s a minefield. What promoted clubs really need is for a couple of the top tier clubs to have a nightmare season.

Perhaps the big problem was having Scott Parker in charge :?

clive40golf
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:51 am
Been Liked: 153 times
Has Liked: 180 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by clive40golf » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:10 pm

welsbyswife wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:17 am
How do you calculate such a precise figure of manager 'levels'? Complex algorithm?

Simple!:-
Number of managers in premiership- those who are not as good as Vinny / number of managers who are better x the age of your youngest child + a factor of 2 (for the children you don’t know about) =X%
Or you could just make an estimate of what percentage you want!
Like I said simple
😊

clive40golf
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:51 am
Been Liked: 153 times
Has Liked: 180 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by clive40golf » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:26 pm

Cleveleys_claret wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 10:15 am
So we have 5 players on loan (100%)

Each player therefore is 20% of our loan total

90% suggests 4 and a half of our players won't be here next season. Which half of a player you think we will keep?

Now managers. 20 managers (100%) each being 5%.

So by top 15% you are saying VK will be in the top 3 of the managers in the top flight?

You’ve too much time on your hands buddy😊
Yes you’re right, the math doesn’t add up, I’ll be more precise in my next post, if I have more time,

Let’s do a reset then:-
I think the only loan we keep will be Beyer, I don’t think we’ll be able to get ThB, and the others, imo aren’t good enough for the premiership yet. I also think Barnes,Jay,Taylor, gudmundsson, and maybe Cork will leave as well
Vinny will probably be in the top 6 managers in the premiership, taking into account technical knowledge,tactics,man management,training, nutrition ect.
This user liked this post: Cleveleys_claret

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by tiger76 » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:31 pm

dsr wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:57 am
Did OK at Bournemouth, and not so bad at Man U for that matter.
Yes those results, and more importantly performances suggest we could hold our own in the PL, certainly I'd hope we could beat a lot of the lower half sides anyway.

Stan Tastic
Posts: 1075
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 445 times
Has Liked: 59 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by Stan Tastic » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:40 pm

clive40golf wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:26 pm
You’ve too much time on your hands buddy😊
Yes you’re right, the math doesn’t add up, I’ll be more precise in my next post, if I have more time,

Let’s do a reset then:-
I think the only loan we keep will be Beyer, I don’t think we’ll be able to get ThB, and the others, imo aren’t good enough for the premiership yet. I also think Barnes,Jay,Taylor, gudmundsson, and maybe Cork will leave as well
Vinny will probably be in the top 6 managers in the premiership, taking into account technical knowledge,tactics,man management,training, nutrition ect.
How is it possible that you can still get the name of the league wrong after 15 years of it being called The Premier League?

NRC
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
Been Liked: 908 times
Has Liked: 107 times
Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by NRC » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:54 pm

Who knows. Certainly bagging record points or record goals counts for nothing. For me, IF we go up, and IF we stay up, the mystery is what we look like in season 2 up there. The newness of season 1 will be done and then we can truly start to compare the two styles of football and how they fare respectively in the PL

warksclaret
Posts: 6693
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1704 times
Has Liked: 790 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by warksclaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:58 pm

Depends if VK stays as he has masterminded our revival-I do however take heart in what Brentford are achieving. They have a very bright manager and they buy wisely. I saw them play yesterday and they defended magnificently. They also know how to score and can play direct when they need to.I also take heart from our showing v Man Utd and I think its fair to say if we go up we will have a stronger side, particularly up front, and then of course we beat Bournemouth comfortably. I think a good FA cup run will be fantastic for us enabling inevitably to pit our wits v other PL sides, and that will greatly benefit VK's future planning of our squad for the PL

fatboy47
Posts: 4197
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
Been Liked: 2327 times
Has Liked: 2698 times
Location: Isles of Scilly

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by fatboy47 » Mon Jan 23, 2023 1:01 pm

NRC wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:54 pm
Who knows. Certainly bagging record points or record goals counts for nothing. For me, IF we go up, and IF we stay up, the mystery is what we look like in season 2 up there. The newness of season 1 will be done and then we can truly start to compare the two styles of football and how they fare respectively in the PL
Avoid Beachy Head on this year's hols fella. 😂

Vino blanco
Posts: 5367
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
Been Liked: 1904 times
Has Liked: 1980 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by Vino blanco » Mon Jan 23, 2023 1:04 pm

If this new striker we are hopefully signing turns out to be as good as our other VK signings, I think we would need a 'Patrick Viera type' midfielder, plus anothet footballing, pacy striker to be ok for the PL.
Regarding THB, many are saying we won't keep him next season: if we get promotion we might just be surprised.

clive40golf
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:51 am
Been Liked: 153 times
Has Liked: 180 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by clive40golf » Mon Jan 23, 2023 1:20 pm

Vino blanco wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 1:04 pm

Regarding THB, many are saying we won't keep him next season: if we get promotion we might just be surprised.

Really hope we do. I just think Man City will want to keep him.

clive40golf
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:51 am
Been Liked: 153 times
Has Liked: 180 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by clive40golf » Mon Jan 23, 2023 1:26 pm

Stan Tastic wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:40 pm
How is it possible that you can still get the name of the league wrong after 15 years of it being called The Premier League?

Did you get what I meant? Of course you did! It’s just that you wanted to point out something that made someone feel inferior or make yourself look superior.

How Sad!

It’s posts like yours that make people stop from contributing. Sad people picking up on every mistake. It’ll end up just a few posters and their sycophant followers.

AfloatinClaret
Posts: 1847
Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 7:16 pm
Been Liked: 562 times
Has Liked: 1412 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by AfloatinClaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 1:39 pm

Socrates wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:10 am
Don’t worry about it.

Enjoy now. Tomorrow will take care of itself.
:shock: That sounds more like Heraclitus than a Socratean Philosophy

ElectroClaret
Posts: 18014
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4074 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by ElectroClaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 1:48 pm

There's at least 3 or 4 teams in the PL we'd beat with this team right now, I'd say. We've already beaten Bournemouth.

But of course, 3 of those wont be there next season.

clive40golf
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:51 am
Been Liked: 153 times
Has Liked: 180 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by clive40golf » Mon Jan 23, 2023 2:38 pm

Stan Tastic wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 1:33 pm
You're calling me sad for being correct. Would you rather continue to get the name of the league wrong and have people not take you seriously?

Did you understand what I meant when I said Premiership?
Of course you did, you just wanted to belittle someone.
I don’t care wether you or anyone like you who pick faults in peoples posts, take me seriously !
You have no idea wether someone has a disability that doesn’t allow them to spell, not do math correctly or doesn’t get something right, just as long as you look superior. What did it matter if it was wrong, it’s a minor thing on the whole.
I’ve met people like you throughout my career ( I’m retired now) small minded people who live in a little world who just come out to snipe. But in reality are just nobodies
Jog on buddy, I’m sure someone else has got something wrong on the board, to make you feel superior

NewClaret
Posts: 13511
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3114 times
Has Liked: 3833 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by NewClaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 3:12 pm

My gut feel is that with current squad we’d survive if promoted today, but it’d be tough going. At the end of the season, with another 30-odd games experience of playing this system under our belts and the new players integrated I might feel more optimistic than a scrappy survival.

But generally I think we’d need signings to make it more comfortable than that and I think we’d get them given ALK’s track record and Kompany’s ability to attract players.

But as Socrates says, best just to enjoy the process rather than worry about the future!

Greenmile
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1081 times
Has Liked: 4263 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by Greenmile » Mon Jan 23, 2023 3:48 pm

clive40golf wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 2:38 pm
Did you understand what I meant when I said Premiership?
Of course you did, you just wanted to belittle someone.
I don’t care wether you or anyone like you who pick faults in peoples posts, take me seriously !
You have no idea wether someone has a disability that doesn’t allow them to spell, not do math correctly or doesn’t get something right, just as long as you look superior. What did it matter if it was wrong, it’s a minor thing on the whole.
I’ve met people like you throughout my career ( I’m retired now) small minded people who live in a little world who just come out to snipe. But in reality are just nobodies
Jog on buddy, I’m sure someone else has got something wrong on the board, to make you feel superior
*whether

*people’s

*maths

;)

clive40golf
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:51 am
Been Liked: 153 times
Has Liked: 180 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by clive40golf » Mon Jan 23, 2023 4:15 pm

Greenmile wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 3:48 pm
*whether

*people’s

*maths

;)
Not you as well 😂

510E02B9-86BC-4F66-A134-B2A29109EF5A.jpeg
510E02B9-86BC-4F66-A134-B2A29109EF5A.jpeg (285.87 KiB) Viewed 1641 times
I think Both Math or Maths are both correct, Math being the correct abbreviation for mathematics.
I’ll give you wether, 😊

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30712
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11058 times
Has Liked: 5663 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by Vegas Claret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 4:27 pm

Kompany will make us good enough, the guy is a relentless serial winner - he (and Bellamy to a degree) knows exactly what the requirements are in the PL. I'm not remotely concerned
This user liked this post: RVclaret

Stan Tastic
Posts: 1075
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 445 times
Has Liked: 59 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by Stan Tastic » Mon Jan 23, 2023 4:39 pm

clive40golf wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 2:38 pm
Did you understand what I meant when I said Premiership?
Of course you did, you just wanted to belittle someone.
I don’t care wether you or anyone like you who pick faults in peoples posts, take me seriously !
You have no idea wether someone has a disability that doesn’t allow them to spell, not do math correctly or doesn’t get something right, just as long as you look superior. What did it matter if it was wrong, it’s a minor thing on the whole.
I’ve met people like you throughout my career ( I’m retired now) small minded people who live in a little world who just come out to snipe. But in reality are just nobodies
Jog on buddy, I’m sure someone else has got something wrong on the board, to make you feel superior
Image

welsbyswife
Posts: 1058
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:50 pm
Been Liked: 494 times
Has Liked: 280 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by welsbyswife » Mon Jan 23, 2023 4:42 pm

clive40golf wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 4:15 pm
Not you as well 😂


510E02B9-86BC-4F66-A134-B2A29109EF5A.jpeg

I think Both Math or Maths are both correct, Math being the correct abbreviation for mathematics.
I’ll give you wether, 😊
I think you're about 15% right Clive 😂
This user liked this post: clive40golf

clive40golf
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:51 am
Been Liked: 153 times
Has Liked: 180 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by clive40golf » Mon Jan 23, 2023 4:50 pm

Stan Tastic wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 4:39 pm
Image
Fair description of what I would have done to you, only closed it a little bit harder 😂 bellend!😊

Greenmile
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1081 times
Has Liked: 4263 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by Greenmile » Mon Jan 23, 2023 6:47 pm

clive40golf wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 4:15 pm
Not you as well 😂


510E02B9-86BC-4F66-A134-B2A29109EF5A.jpeg

I think Both Math or Maths are both correct, Math being the correct abbreviation for mathematics.
I’ll give you wether, 😊
I was just joshing with you, but my innate pedantry won’t let this lie, so...

Math is correct if you’re American. In the UK we abbreviate mathematics to “maths”.

I didn’t add an “s” to your “peoples” - I added a (possessive) apostrophe.

I’ll leave you alone now ;)

clive40golf
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:51 am
Been Liked: 153 times
Has Liked: 180 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by clive40golf » Mon Jan 23, 2023 7:16 pm

Greenmile wrote:
Mon Jan 23, 2023 6:47 pm
I was just joshing with you, but my innate pedantry won’t let this lie, so...

Math is correct if you’re American. In the UK we abbreviate mathematics to “maths”.

I didn’t add an “s” to your “peoples” - I added a (possessive) apostrophe.

I’ll leave you alone now ;)

Bet you’re great fun on a night out

Yes please leave me alone 😂
This user liked this post: Greenmile

BabylonClaret
Posts: 3095
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
Been Liked: 710 times
Has Liked: 619 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by BabylonClaret » Mon Jan 23, 2023 7:49 pm

Arguably we need to be better than one existing Premier league team. We are already better than the two others who go up with us ;)

Spike
Posts: 2705
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:07 pm
Been Liked: 598 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by Spike » Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:15 pm

Too early to tell depends who we buy this window and what happens to the loans.
I think Breyer is the most accessible with the best upside

JohnMac
Posts: 7219
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
Been Liked: 2379 times
Has Liked: 3807 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by JohnMac » Tue Jan 24, 2023 10:39 am

Too many people are becoming obsessed with next Season. Enjoy this one first, it is very special and different to anything most fans will have experienced, ever!

UTC
This user liked this post: Bosscat

JTClaret
Posts: 668
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:51 am
Been Liked: 181 times
Has Liked: 119 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by JTClaret » Tue Jan 24, 2023 11:13 am

63% of all facts are made up

KRBFC
Posts: 18135
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3804 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Too good yet not good enough?

Post by KRBFC » Tue Jan 24, 2023 11:26 am

The problem is how much will we need to spend on Tella, THB, Beyer and Maatsen to even be the same side promoted without improvements on top. I guess we're hoping Ekdal is good enough to start next season ahead of 1 of those.

The good news is with the current team, I don't think we need a lot of players to be able to compete in the division above, likely just 1 CM to replace Cork and a starting striker.

Muric
Roberts Ekdal Beyer/THB Taylor/Maatsen
NEW Cullen Brownhill
Benson NEW Zaroury

Looks a pretty good base to build around.

Post Reply