RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
-
- Posts: 9321
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4843 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Leigh Doughty (Blackpool) v Watford
HOW TO SCORE
A. Decision Making (including use of advantage) - out of 25
B. Consistency - out of 25
C. Fitness and Positioning - of 25
D. Control and Authority - out of 25
Please only Rate the Ref if you attended the game and only do so, after the game has ended. Thank you
-
- Posts: 9321
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4843 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
A 12
B 7
C 7
D 7
B 7
C 7
D 7
-
- Posts: 3106
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:46 pm
- Been Liked: 1132 times
- Has Liked: 302 times
- Location: Melbourne, Australia.
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Just wow!!
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1102 times
- Has Liked: 856 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
4 (one where we had two v one in watfords favour and he gave us advantage)
25 - consistently in watfords favour
8
3
The worst ref we will see for a long long time.
25 - consistently in watfords favour
8
3
The worst ref we will see for a long long time.
This user liked this post: Exsus
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Shocking. Thought I’d seen it all after the Ipswich ref.
These 2 users liked this post: tarkys_ears Prefeot
-
- Posts: 2968
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
- Been Liked: 807 times
- Has Liked: 1526 times
- Location: France
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Referee very good this evening. Be interested for folk to identify all the decisions he got wrong.
A. 20
B. 20
C. 20
D. 20
A. 20
B. 20
C. 20
D. 20
These 4 users liked this post: Tall Paul DAVETHEVICAR Cooclaret bf2k
-
- Posts: 9321
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4843 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Based on the comment you have made for your school for section B, you should surely be scoring a very low mark for consistency. The score of 25 means perfect consistency to both sidesMilltown1882 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 10:09 pm4 (one where we had two v one in watfords favour and he gave us advantage)
25 - consistently in watfords favour
8
3
The worst ref we will see for a long long time.
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
I couldn't make the game tonight had to make do with the TV.
If I was on the match I would have been slating him.....what a different view you get on the TV rather than being there live.
He had a decent game.
If I was on the match I would have been slating him.....what a different view you get on the TV rather than being there live.
He had a decent game.
This user liked this post: Cooclaret
-
- Posts: 2533
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 879 times
- Has Liked: 271 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
A - 5
B - 5
C - 5
D - 5
Single handedly ruined the game in the first half an hour. Woefully inconsistent. Just as **** as last time.
B - 5
C - 5
D - 5
Single handedly ruined the game in the first half an hour. Woefully inconsistent. Just as **** as last time.
This user liked this post: Exsus
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1102 times
- Has Liked: 856 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
5
5
15
5
Weak.
5
15
5
Weak.
-
- Posts: 1435
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 336 times
- Has Liked: 1516 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
20
25
25
15
Too many claret tinted glasses
25
25
15
Too many claret tinted glasses
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
-
- Posts: 6977
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1490 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Ref total shite and missed Watfords playacting and the assault on Ekdal also the stonewall penalty for handball
How anyone who was there can praise this clown is beyond me.
How anyone who was there can praise this clown is beyond me.
This user liked this post: Prefeot
-
- Posts: 7313
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1827 times
- Has Liked: 3965 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
We could have won that game had he added the correct number of minutes on at the end. It could have been a repetition of Rotherham.
Other than that he wasn't as bad as some of the marks, but he was weak, and I knew he wouldn't add time on.
Other than that he wasn't as bad as some of the marks, but he was weak, and I knew he wouldn't add time on.
-
- Posts: 2968
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
- Been Liked: 807 times
- Has Liked: 1526 times
- Location: France
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Did you watch live? The replay on the telly clearly shows the ref got that one right. I was also shouting penalty on first viewing.
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2021 8:36 pm
- Been Liked: 299 times
- Has Liked: 176 times
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Got some right but for the most part he was abysmal
This user liked this post: Prefeot
-
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:38 am
- Been Liked: 74 times
- Has Liked: 142 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
A - 10
B - 5
C - 18
D - 6
Some really strange decisions. Not sure why the time added on was not in double figures. Their goalkeeper wasn't too bad but the corner sequence second half, the large number of subs, the play acting, the kicking the ball away and him not having control meaning that he pulled players to the side constantly must have equalled more than six minutes. Some real soft free kicks for Watford early on meant that the game was a mess to control - both sides looking to take advantage of him. Just thought his threshold for what he felt was a foul was all over the place. His style also meant for a bitty game so we struggled to get any flow going. Instead of having a conversation make a decision and move on or book them and move on. Don't stand there chatting and then not add it on.
He wasn't the reason we didn't play well though.
B - 5
C - 18
D - 6
Some really strange decisions. Not sure why the time added on was not in double figures. Their goalkeeper wasn't too bad but the corner sequence second half, the large number of subs, the play acting, the kicking the ball away and him not having control meaning that he pulled players to the side constantly must have equalled more than six minutes. Some real soft free kicks for Watford early on meant that the game was a mess to control - both sides looking to take advantage of him. Just thought his threshold for what he felt was a foul was all over the place. His style also meant for a bitty game so we struggled to get any flow going. Instead of having a conversation make a decision and move on or book them and move on. Don't stand there chatting and then not add it on.
He wasn't the reason we didn't play well though.
These 2 users liked this post: nil_desperandum burnleymik
-
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:17 pm
- Been Liked: 130 times
- Has Liked: 55 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
I will start with one. The Laws of the Game state the goalkeeper is allowed to hold the ball for six seconds. The sanction for holding it longer is an indirect free kick. At least twice tonight, when the keeper had held the ball for probably more than twice the permitted length of time, he waved at the keeper to get the ball back into play. When ignored he waved again a little more frantically, and eventually the keeper did release the ball. Is it only in the professional game that referees are allowed to ignore the written Laws and apply something completely different. If a local league ref did that he would get hammered by the assessor.
This user liked this post: Rick_Muller
-
- Posts: 2968
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
- Been Liked: 807 times
- Has Liked: 1526 times
- Location: France
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
It’s an interesting point but you can hardly pin the blame on this ref for a law that is universally ignored across the game by every single referee without exception.Claretincraven wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 11:34 pmI will start with one. The Laws of the Game state the goalkeeper is allowed to hold the ball for six seconds. The sanction for holding it longer is an indirect free kick. At least twice tonight, when the keeper had held the ball for probably more than twice the permitted length of time, he waved at the keeper to get the ball back into play. When ignored he waved again a little more frantically, and eventually the keeper did release the ball. Is it only in the professional game that referees are allowed to ignore the written Laws and apply something completely different. If a local league ref did that he would get hammered by the assessor.
Be great if they did actually apply this law. The other one that annoys me is the not retreating at free kicks. Standard practice by a defending team to prevent quick free kicks. I find it infuriating especially as it could be eliminated with the issuing of an obligatory yellow card.
-
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2603 times
- Has Liked: 763 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Their guy who suddenly started rolling about with no one near him off the pitch was a good one. He got straight up when he realised he wasn't getting a free kick which was impressive given he'd just been in the throes of death.
Quite why a referees just dont go straight up and book players for that, I have no idea. The players are taking the **** out of the ref. It just shows how weak they are when they do nothing about it.
Quite why a referees just dont go straight up and book players for that, I have no idea. The players are taking the **** out of the ref. It just shows how weak they are when they do nothing about it.
These 2 users liked this post: Exsus Rick_Muller
-
- Posts: 5794
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Was that the one when the ref stopped Tella taking a quick throwing?quoonbeatz wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 11:51 pmTheir guy who suddenly started rolling about with no one near him off the pitch was a good one. He got straight up when he realised he wasn't getting a free kick which was impressive given he'd just been in the throes of death.
Quite why a referees just dont go straight up and book players for that, I have no idea. The players are taking the **** out of the ref. It just shows how weak they are when they do nothing about it.
-
- Posts: 67898
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Totally different view of his performance. I took had to make do with the TV. In the first half hour, with the crowd getting at him, he was getting most things right but his game management was awful, too many stoppages, treating similar incidents in different ways. He made a right arse of the Hoedt/Barnes situation at set pieces. Quite how he carded Barnes and not Hoedt is beyond me and given what he'd seen initially, he should then have seen the penalty. By the end, I thought he'd lost a lot of control.
These 2 users liked this post: jdrobbo Rick_Muller
-
- Posts: 9321
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4843 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
I’d agree with this.
The worst bit for me was pulling Burnley back for an ever so slightly moving ball. Yet within the next two minutes, he allowed Watford to take two free kicks where the ball was moving in each instant. I’ve obviously not watched back yet, but I’d be amazed if the tv showed the two Watford moving balls.
The worst bit for me was pulling Burnley back for an ever so slightly moving ball. Yet within the next two minutes, he allowed Watford to take two free kicks where the ball was moving in each instant. I’ve obviously not watched back yet, but I’d be amazed if the tv showed the two Watford moving balls.
-
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2603 times
- Has Liked: 763 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Yeah, the blonde sub just started convulsing like a snake had bitten himSteve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 11:52 pmWas that the one when the ref stopped Tella taking a quick throwing?
-
- Posts: 2093
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
- Been Liked: 430 times
- Has Liked: 4571 times
- Location: COTTON TREE
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
5
5
10
3
Lost control of the game
5
10
3
Lost control of the game
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Spot onxxmunkyennuixx wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 11:32 pmA - 10
B - 5
C - 18
D - 6
Some really strange decisions. Not sure why the time added on was not in double figures. Their goalkeeper wasn't too bad but the corner sequence second half, the large number of subs, the play acting, the kicking the ball away and him not having control meaning that he pulled players to the side constantly must have equalled more than six minutes. Some real soft free kicks for Watford early on meant that the game was a mess to control - both sides looking to take advantage of him. Just thought his threshold for what he felt was a foul was all over the place. His style also meant for a bitty game so we struggled to get any flow going. Instead of having a conversation make a decision and move on or book them and move on. Don't stand there chatting and then not add it on.
He wasn't the reason we didn't play well though.
-
- Posts: 830
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:03 pm
- Been Liked: 299 times
- Has Liked: 441 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
A. Decision Making -10
B. Consistency - 10
C. Fitness and Positioning - 20
D. Control and Authority - 10
B. Consistency - 10
C. Fitness and Positioning - 20
D. Control and Authority - 10
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Ha, typical Brazilian who’s idol I’m sure will be Neymar. It’s no surprise.quoonbeatz wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 11:57 pmYeah, the blonde sub just started convulsing like a snake had bitten him
-
- Posts: 5727
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 2833 times
- Has Liked: 141 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Again, this has just dissolved into a claret-tinted ref-bashing exercise.
Ref was fine. Same weakness as virtually every ref these days - it's clearly a policy thing - in that he didn't clamp down on time wasting/ slowing the game down early enough. BUt we've only started caring about that as Burnley fans this season.
He might well have missed a slap or similar on Al-Dakhil from the set play, but there was a lot going on and unfortunately to expect a ref to have eyes on everything is asking the impossible.
You can always pick holes in the odd decision (when we're getting into a moving ball for one team but not the other we are getting pedantic, and in any event if its the one im thinking of i thought he pulled Burnley back for taking it from the wrong place - he certainly allowed a couple of moving balls by Burnley). But his general decision making was fine. He let a few meaty challenges that might have been bookings (one on Zaroury, one by Brownhill) go with just a foul, and booked players for fouls he considered more cynical because they stopped a player who was in a promising position (Roberts, the lad on Tella in front of the CFS). It's not his fault that both sets of players resorted to niggling and handbags in the second half. He didn't make the game bitty - the players did (Watford deliberately, and us by getting frustrated and falling into their trap).
Refereeing a game like that is a very tough job made harder by the players. There needs to be more respect, and it isn't hardwired into this feature currently.
Ref was fine. Same weakness as virtually every ref these days - it's clearly a policy thing - in that he didn't clamp down on time wasting/ slowing the game down early enough. BUt we've only started caring about that as Burnley fans this season.
He might well have missed a slap or similar on Al-Dakhil from the set play, but there was a lot going on and unfortunately to expect a ref to have eyes on everything is asking the impossible.
You can always pick holes in the odd decision (when we're getting into a moving ball for one team but not the other we are getting pedantic, and in any event if its the one im thinking of i thought he pulled Burnley back for taking it from the wrong place - he certainly allowed a couple of moving balls by Burnley). But his general decision making was fine. He let a few meaty challenges that might have been bookings (one on Zaroury, one by Brownhill) go with just a foul, and booked players for fouls he considered more cynical because they stopped a player who was in a promising position (Roberts, the lad on Tella in front of the CFS). It's not his fault that both sets of players resorted to niggling and handbags in the second half. He didn't make the game bitty - the players did (Watford deliberately, and us by getting frustrated and falling into their trap).
Refereeing a game like that is a very tough job made harder by the players. There needs to be more respect, and it isn't hardwired into this feature currently.
These 3 users liked this post: Tall Paul Hipper DAVETHEVICAR
-
- Posts: 6977
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1490 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
This Sunday league standatd ref has 2yrs Championship experience yet some fool at the EFL thinks he could manage a game with Watford Alehouse brawling con artists
Unbelievable
Unbelievable
-
- Posts: 18100
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3875 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
I was frustrated at him but time and time again his decision making was proven to be right.
We gave needless foul away after needless foul.
It was 50/50 on the corner wrestling, which like many he erred on the side of caution. You have to be sure to give a pen.
We gave needless foul away after needless foul.
It was 50/50 on the corner wrestling, which like many he erred on the side of caution. You have to be sure to give a pen.
-
- Posts: 16900
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6965 times
- Has Liked: 1484 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Agree with this. I haven't seen any 'incidents' back, but my brother seemed to be watching an entirely different game to me as I thought the ref called most of the decisions correctly. He seemed to lack a bit of control and discipline but as you rightly point out, the players on both sides were trying every trick in the book to con him.claretspice wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:49 amAgain, this has just dissolved into a claret-tinted ref-bashing exercise.
Ref was fine. Same weakness as virtually every ref these days - it's clearly a policy thing - in that he didn't clamp down on time wasting/ slowing the game down early enough. BUt we've only started caring about that as Burnley fans this season.
He might well have missed a slap or similar on Al-Dakhil from the set play, but there was a lot going on and unfortunately to expect a ref to have eyes on everything is asking the impossible.
You can always pick holes in the odd decision (when we're getting into a moving ball for one team but not the other we are getting pedantic, and in any event if its the one im thinking of i thought he pulled Burnley back for taking it from the wrong place - he certainly allowed a couple of moving balls by Burnley). But his general decision making was fine. He let a few meaty challenges that might have been bookings (one on Zaroury, one by Brownhill) go with just a foul, and booked players for fouls he considered more cynical because they stopped a player who was in a promising position (Roberts, the lad on Tella in front of the CFS). It's not his fault that both sets of players resorted to niggling and handbags in the second half. He didn't make the game bitty - the players did (Watford deliberately, and us by getting frustrated and falling into their trap).
Refereeing a game like that is a very tough job made harder by the players. There needs to be more respect, and it isn't hardwired into this feature currently.
On this note, I've got to say I was quite disappointed by the antics of some of our players last night. We were taking some momentum into the final 15 minutes yet some of our players were choosing to play-act which did nothing but to slow the game down. I'm specifically thinking of Tella's dive in the BL/JM corner, and Al-Dakhil's attempt at getting Hoedt sent off which resulted in him feigning injury, receiving 'treatment' and us being a man light when attacking the corner. Poor from Burnley, and leaves us very little room to criticise the referee.
This user liked this post: Hipper
-
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2473 times
- Has Liked: 2010 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
TV only.
He was excellent first half then let them take control of the match second half. Still nothing wrong with the majority of his decisions but he needed to understand their gamesmanship and clamp down on it.
He was excellent first half then let them take control of the match second half. Still nothing wrong with the majority of his decisions but he needed to understand their gamesmanship and clamp down on it.
-
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:25 am
- Been Liked: 22 times
- Has Liked: 35 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
15
12
20
10
12
20
10
-
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2603 times
- Has Liked: 763 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Safe to say if we're calling a performance as poor as that 'fine' it's a sad indictment of how low refereeing standards are these days.
Agreed the players were being bellends at times last night but there are very very easy ways to sort that out.
Agreed the players were being bellends at times last night but there are very very easy ways to sort that out.
-
- Posts: 4955
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 1087 times
- Has Liked: 996 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Totally agree!claretspice wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:49 amAgain, this has just dissolved into a claret-tinted ref-bashing exercise.
Ref was fine. Same weakness as virtually every ref these days - it's clearly a policy thing - in that he didn't clamp down on time wasting/ slowing the game down early enough. BUt we've only started caring about that as Burnley fans this season.
He might well have missed a slap or similar on Al-Dakhil from the set play, but there was a lot going on and unfortunately to expect a ref to have eyes on everything is asking the impossible.
You can always pick holes in the odd decision (when we're getting into a moving ball for one team but not the other we are getting pedantic, and in any event if its the one im thinking of i thought he pulled Burnley back for taking it from the wrong place - he certainly allowed a couple of moving balls by Burnley). But his general decision making was fine. He let a few meaty challenges that might have been bookings (one on Zaroury, one by Brownhill) go with just a foul, and booked players for fouls he considered more cynical because they stopped a player who was in a promising position (Roberts, the lad on Tella in front of the CFS). It's not his fault that both sets of players resorted to niggling and handbags in the second half. He didn't make the game bitty - the players did (Watford deliberately, and us by getting frustrated and falling into their trap).
Refereeing a game like that is a very tough job made harder by the players. There needs to be more respect, and it isn't hardwired into this feature currently.
-
- Posts: 7313
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1827 times
- Has Liked: 3965 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
I also generally agree with what Spice said, but at the end of the day game management and timekeeping are very important, and adding just 6 minutes on was a complete joke.
Until referees add time on for time wasting, unsporting behaviour, injuries, (feigned injuries), substitutions etc, then teams will continue to waste time.
We've paid to see 90 minutes football. That second half was so disrupted that 10 minutes added on would not have been unreasonable.
There was the best part of 3 minutes when Pedro went down near the away dug out and a few subs came on, then we had the 3 delays caused by the Barnes stuff in the box, the El Dakhil incident, the other substitutions etc. etc.
I think that there is a good chance that we would have won that game had we played another 5 minutes. Having said that our performance was probably worse than the referees (in general).
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
I have just watched it back numerous times. It happened in the 62nd minute. There was no play acting from Al-Dakhil, he received a back slap to the face. The replays clearly show this and was also picked up by the commentators. As for being a man down from the following corner, we should have scored. Tella missed from point blank range.Rileybobs wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:19 amAgree with this. I haven't seen any 'incidents' back,
On this note, I've got to say I was quite disappointed by the antics of some of our players last night. We were taking some momentum into the final 15 minutes yet some of our players were choosing to play-act which did nothing but to slow the game down. I'm specifically thinking of Tella's dive in the BL/JM corner, and Al-Dakhil's attempt at getting Hoedt sent off which resulted in him feigning injury, receiving 'treatment' and us being a man light when attacking the corner. Poor from Burnley, and leaves us very little room to criticise the referee.
This user liked this post: burnleymik
-
- Posts: 16900
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6965 times
- Has Liked: 1484 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
I will need to see it again, but whilst I have no doubt he was caught, it looked very soft and certainly not enough to require treatment. The overreaction suggested he was looking to get Hoedt sent off.Raconteur wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 1:21 pmI have just watched it back numerous times. It happened in the 62nd minute. There was no play acting from Al-Dakhil, he received a back slap to the face. The replays clearly show this and was also picked up by the commentators. As for being a man down from the following corner, we should have scored. Tella missed from point blank range.
-
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
- Been Liked: 229 times
- Has Liked: 194 times
- Location: London
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
With the benefit of TV replays, I was more frustrated by the players' antics rather than the refereeing.
Yes, he missed a few and got a few wrong - but with so much attempted cheating going on - it is easy to imagine that he mistook those incidents as yet more fakery.
Yes, he missed a few and got a few wrong - but with so much attempted cheating going on - it is easy to imagine that he mistook those incidents as yet more fakery.
-
- Posts: 666
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2017 2:05 am
- Been Liked: 227 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Tbh I was absolutely raging leaving the turf last night with the ref, thought he was the worst we’ve had this season which is saying something…. The drive home, walk the dog and then decided to watch the game back on Sky.
Watching it back he actually wasn’t as bad as I first thought, and on reflection probably got most of the decisions spot on.
The only downfall was around the 55-60th min with the corners and that whole episode with Barnes etc which thought he’d lost control.
Actually think 6 min extra time was a little on the low side as well should be nearer 8-9 with all the subs and carrying on in the 2nd half.
Watching it back he actually wasn’t as bad as I first thought, and on reflection probably got most of the decisions spot on.
The only downfall was around the 55-60th min with the corners and that whole episode with Barnes etc which thought he’d lost control.
Actually think 6 min extra time was a little on the low side as well should be nearer 8-9 with all the subs and carrying on in the 2nd half.
-
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 546 times
- Has Liked: 51 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
S
H
I
T
E
not sure if this is the correct scoring method but hey ho
H
I
T
E
not sure if this is the correct scoring method but hey ho
-
- Posts: 13268
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
A. 9
B. 6
C. 10
D. 5
We shot ourselves in the foot with that performance, but to continue the metaphor, it was the referee who took off the safety catch and loaded the gun behind our backs.
B. 6
C. 10
D. 5
We shot ourselves in the foot with that performance, but to continue the metaphor, it was the referee who took off the safety catch and loaded the gun behind our backs.
-
- Posts: 2597
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 674 times
- Has Liked: 244 times
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
Interesting that there are lots of comments on this thread - not just ratings. I put a comment on a recent rate the ref thread which got deleted for some reason and led me to believe comments probably aren't allowed. Probably depends who you are....
-
- Posts: 2093
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
- Been Liked: 430 times
- Has Liked: 4571 times
- Location: COTTON TREE
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
IMO: A referee who is unable to time a match correctly is incompetent.
Questions for those who may know the answers:
1. Should a referee allow 30 seconds for a substitution ?
2. Is this a written Law of the Game?
3. If two substitutes enter the field of the play at the same time, should the referee add on 30 seconds for each substitute ?
Questions for those who may know the answers:
1. Should a referee allow 30 seconds for a substitution ?
2. Is this a written Law of the Game?
3. If two substitutes enter the field of the play at the same time, should the referee add on 30 seconds for each substitute ?
-
- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
- Been Liked: 834 times
- Has Liked: 1637 times
- Location: Lincoln
Re: RATE THE REF - Leigh Doughty v Watford
In the Premier League match Liverpool v Everton which Liverpool won 2-0 , the referee added 4 minutes stoppage time. There were 8 second half substitutes with players strolling to the touch line
Liverpool scored a goal and there was the clash between Pickford and Robertson.
Referees are obviously told not to add time on for time wasting on that evidence.
It also happens in every match in the Premier League now and Nick Pope is as big a culprit as anyone
Liverpool scored a goal and there was the clash between Pickford and Robertson.
Referees are obviously told not to add time on for time wasting on that evidence.
It also happens in every match in the Premier League now and Nick Pope is as big a culprit as anyone