Post
by Spiral » Sat Jul 01, 2023 6:03 pm
This point I make below can be applied broadly, not only to what's happening in France.
While the complicated racial politics of France is very relevant to this shooting and it being the boiling point for that to all spill over into physical violence, anyone making a point of the lad's ethnically Algerian/Moroccan descent to make a comment that begins and ends with grumbling about culture clashes must realise that for entirely pragmatic purposes you've got to tread very carefully how this point is made, and even what the point is that you're making, because what gets forgotten in any comment about culture clashes is that the lad was French born and raised, and this mindset of him being an outsider of sorts due to his heritage, when played out into the world at large contributes to the alienation of groups of people, which leads them at first to disengage with a wider civil society, then to push back when they feel pushed. If the majority of society tells you you are $cum, it's human nature to find a community, a tribe if you will, in which you feel safe and respected.
People need to resist their base impulses in order to more clearly see the psychology of this playing out, but people often take such news events as opportunities to affirm their prejudices because it makes them feel good about themselves. They are not interested in solutions to problems, but rather the rush of adversary and the sense of self-satisfaction of telling themselves: me good; them bad. You want solutions? Understand how people's minds work. You want to know how people's minds work? You must first recognise they are human beings and not lesser animals. This isn't some mushy kumbaya shite, it's the basis of practical solutions.
Even a generic statement about culture clashes is loaded with the assumption that one culture is superior to the other, and the misunderstanding (wilfully or ignorantly) that leads to conflict — the cloudy perception at the heart of this — is the way in which, for lack of a better term, people belonging to a so-called 'native culture' have a base, tribal propensity to define a so-called 'outsider culture' by its criminal elements. This is a person's primitive brain on the lookout for threats, but the illness afflicting this psychology is in how the higher part of the brain actively seeks out threats for the stimulation it produces. In a sentence, people love to hate. In the mind of a so-called 'native' (again, for lack of a better term, but I think people understand what I mean by that), the culture of the 'outsider' is associated with criminality, delinquency, immorality, while the majority of people belonging to that culture would naturally associate their culture with more positive things. As such, an individual from immigrant descent, even one born and raised in the country they reside, may have negative values projected onto them by dint of birth and will be treated harshly for it. This fosters alienation, which leads to disregard of, and disrespect for the people belonging to the 'tribe' treating them like $cum. Couple that with economic hardship and the notion of personal responsibility loses its stability as a concept, because a criminal, rightly or wrongly, sees their behaviour as them being responsible to themselves and their community against one they were born into which sees them as less worthy of respect and dignity, even life.