Muric

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Claretnick
Posts: 575
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:41 am
Been Liked: 217 times
Has Liked: 191 times

Re: Muric

Post by Claretnick » Wed Jul 05, 2023 9:44 am

It must be difficult for him watching the club push the boat out to get a new GK in who is going to make him number 2.
Especially a guy who was probably junior to him at City.

He worked hard last season to improve his game and win most of the fans over. Hope he stays and really pushes Trafford to claim the no 1 spot.

SouthLondonexile
Posts: 567
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 1:35 pm
Been Liked: 84 times
Has Liked: 249 times

Re: Muric

Post by SouthLondonexile » Wed Jul 05, 2023 9:53 am

He doesn’t suddenly become a bad keeper.
Something has happened here. Think he is a v good keeper.

aggi
Posts: 8859
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2124 times

Re: Muric

Post by aggi » Wed Jul 05, 2023 9:55 am

Swizzlestick wrote:
Tue Jul 04, 2023 11:28 pm
Mind numbing.

Who was it who wasn’t sufficiently smiling on a picture once? Andre Gray? We had pages of it. Tedious beyond belief.
The body language experts loved (well hated) Andre Gray. Scoring the winner counts for nothing if you don't go and give the fans a quick clap at the end.

And as for Dwight McNeil, screw what the stats say, it was obvious from his body language that he was lazy and hated Dyche.

martin_p
Posts: 10381
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3768 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Muric

Post by martin_p » Wed Jul 05, 2023 10:28 am

He looks perfectly happy on the trading video the club released yesterday, smiling away!

basil6345789
Posts: 2714
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
Been Liked: 482 times
Has Liked: 2292 times

Re: Muric

Post by basil6345789 » Wed Jul 05, 2023 11:22 am

TPClaret wrote:
Tue Jul 04, 2023 9:08 pm
I thought he was fantastic for us. He passing was outstanding. But he did a few strange things.
Best one is that vid of him playing in an international and sticking 't nut on that player who got fly with him - was worth his sending-off!

FCBurnley
Posts: 9882
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2005 times
Has Liked: 1151 times

Re: Muric

Post by FCBurnley » Wed Jul 05, 2023 2:29 pm

I thought Muric was awful early in the season but I have to admit he improved dramatically over the season. I would be happy if we went into the new season with him as our number 1
This user liked this post: Leisure

NewClaret
Posts: 13537
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3118 times
Has Liked: 3841 times

Re: Muric

Post by NewClaret » Tue Sep 26, 2023 11:29 pm

My word I’ve missed watching Muric play. Such an amazing talent.

Praying we see him back in the league soon.

Belgianclaret
Posts: 2601
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
Been Liked: 956 times
Has Liked: 170 times

Re: Muric

Post by Belgianclaret » Wed Sep 27, 2023 8:04 am

Muric is the best 🙂

Stalbansclaret
Posts: 2511
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:21 am
Been Liked: 1666 times
Has Liked: 2984 times

Re: Muric

Post by Stalbansclaret » Wed Sep 27, 2023 8:09 am

NewClaret wrote:
Tue Sep 26, 2023 11:29 pm
My word I’ve missed watching Muric play. Such an amazing talent.

Praying we see him back in the league soon.
Bit OTT perhaps given you or I could have played in goal last night but must admit it was nice to see him.

NewClaret
Posts: 13537
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3118 times
Has Liked: 3841 times

Re: Muric

Post by NewClaret » Wed Sep 27, 2023 8:14 am

Stalbansclaret wrote:
Wed Sep 27, 2023 8:09 am
Bit OTT perhaps given you or I could have played in goal last night but must admit it was nice to see him.
I can tell you one thing for certain - i couldn’t have passed it around last night like Muric!!!!

We completely different when he plays in my opinion, although obviously the opposition was a factor last night.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4546
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2603 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Muric

Post by quoonbeatz » Wed Sep 27, 2023 8:27 am

NewClaret wrote:
Tue Sep 26, 2023 11:29 pm
My word I’ve missed watching Muric play. Such an amazing talent.
Not sure what he did last night to provoke exclamations of amazing talent? He was fine but had very little to do apart from pass it around under zero pressure.

He did play one decent ball over the top for Odobert who had made that Tella run that nobody is making for us now, but it was slightly too long.

bumba
Posts: 3139
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 201 times

Re: Muric

Post by bumba » Wed Sep 27, 2023 8:31 am

Would love Muric back in Saturday but it's hard to judge anything from last night he had zero saves to make and misplaced a couple of passes.
He needs a premier League test

NewClaret
Posts: 13537
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3118 times
Has Liked: 3841 times

Re: Muric

Post by NewClaret » Wed Sep 27, 2023 8:52 am

quoonbeatz wrote:
Wed Sep 27, 2023 8:27 am
Not sure what he did last night to provoke exclamations of amazing talent? He was fine but had very little to do apart from pass it around under zero pressure.

He did play one decent ball over the top for Odobert who had made that Tella run that nobody is making for us now, but it was slightly too long.
In general, he was unusually safe with his passes, especially given the scoreline allowed for him to be a bit more daring. But then the midfield greats generally do just that - pass it simply and safely. He pinged a few around though, only the one you mention do I remember being missplaced (maybe another) and some pinpoint accurate ones through the middle between two Salford players that nobody else would try.

But it it’s also his movement I love, the angles he creates. He runs around a lot for a GK, even last night when he didn’t need to use his hands.

At one point he went in to a deep LB position to create an angle for Roberts. Goal completely unguarded. Robert’s messed it up but the angle was on had he passed quicker. Then there’s how high he plays. He gives zero fecks and backs himself completely to win a diving header near the half way line :lol: Fabulous stuff.

I dare say Trafford is a better shot stopper than Muric and against top teams may well be the better bet for that reason, guess we’ll never know unless we see more of Muric against that standard, but I think the very small things Muric does with his movement and positioning make a huge difference to us. And just generally our style is less complete without him.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4546
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2603 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Muric

Post by quoonbeatz » Wed Sep 27, 2023 8:59 am

The one I mentioned wasn't misplaced, it was a great ball. He did put 4 or 5 into touch though.

The header he didn't have to come far for cos he was way out of his goal anyway and he wasn't really challenged, but was a good pass though.

I don't think there's a lot between our keepers and I think muric should have started the season, along with a few others but it's bit of an OTT reaction to what was essentially a training game last night. He played better against Forest.

helmclaret
Posts: 897
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 325 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Muric

Post by helmclaret » Wed Sep 27, 2023 9:06 am

This debate will rumble on all season. My preference would be Muric, although VK has made his mind up on who is his number 1.

I thought Muric was great at Huddersfield last season so really don’t understand these comments about him not being good early season.

dougcollins
Posts: 6734
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 1820 times
Has Liked: 1802 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: Muric

Post by dougcollins » Wed Sep 27, 2023 9:15 am

I really do wonder about the Muric German bar thing the week of the Boro game. I think if there had been a more reliable no 2 he'd have been dropped back then.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Muric

Post by Nori1958 » Wed Sep 27, 2023 9:37 am

dougcollins wrote:
Wed Sep 27, 2023 9:15 am
I really do wonder about the Muric German bar thing the week of the Boro game. I think if there had been a more reliable no 2 he'd have been dropped back then.
You're 100% correct

Clive 1960
Posts: 1332
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
Been Liked: 152 times
Has Liked: 200 times

Re: Muric

Post by Clive 1960 » Wed Sep 27, 2023 9:59 am

I would have started season with Muric but i can understand Vincent playing young Trafford because of the fee we paid but i know we are only a few games in but i know what is weakness is and so do other teams he is rooted to is line and player's around him and we don't protect him as we don't have leaders in our two centre half's. It will be interesting on Saturday from set pieces from Tripper to see how we defend them against there big centre halfs .

helmclaret
Posts: 897
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 325 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Muric

Post by helmclaret » Wed Sep 27, 2023 2:33 pm

dougcollins wrote:
Wed Sep 27, 2023 9:15 am
I really do wonder about the Muric German bar thing the week of the Boro game. I think if there had been a more reliable no 2 he'd have been dropped back then.
So you would have dropped him on the basis of how much he spent in a bar?

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11123
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1575 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Muric

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Wed Sep 27, 2023 2:35 pm

dougcollins wrote:
Wed Sep 27, 2023 9:15 am
I really do wonder about the Muric German bar thing the week of the Boro game. I think if there had been a more reliable no 2 he'd have been dropped back then.
I think VK has wanted to replace Muric ever since he was subbed off at half time last season.

helmclaret
Posts: 897
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 325 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Muric

Post by helmclaret » Wed Sep 27, 2023 2:37 pm

The reality is we have no idea what goes on behind the scenes.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Muric

Post by RVclaret » Wed Sep 27, 2023 2:38 pm

helmclaret wrote:
Wed Sep 27, 2023 2:33 pm
So you would have dropped him on the basis of how much he spent in a bar?
Not sure that’s the point.

More so was it the right moment to be having those exploits in the week prior to a pivotal game? What if he returned and didn’t train very well? I recall at the Boro game he was looking ill and the commentator suggested he might be sick at one point.

There was also the Watford home game where he had an absolute first half stinker and subbed off at half time. Kompany later said he was ill and it would have been helpful if he’d known before the game.

I just get the impression there is something more to it. I was a big Muric fan last season and excited to see him in the Prem, but surely the bigger picture, wanting a 13m+ keeper urgently, putting Trafford straight in… suggests the manager wasn’t going to trust him, for one reason or another.

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2116
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1165 times
Has Liked: 94 times
Location: your mum

Re: Muric

Post by daveisaclaret » Wed Sep 27, 2023 2:50 pm

I don't think there should be a position where the star goalie from last season's off field antics were so bad that he must be replaced in the team but not bad enough that it's fine for him to be the number 2 and play in the cup. Feels like a 2+2=5 while VK just prefers Trafford.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15285
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3168 times
Has Liked: 6770 times

Re: Muric

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Sep 27, 2023 2:50 pm

Didn't he save a penalty in the Boro game? Didn't look ill to me.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Muric

Post by RVclaret » Wed Sep 27, 2023 2:51 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Wed Sep 27, 2023 2:50 pm
Didn't he save a penalty in the Boro game? Didn't look ill to me.
Wrong Boro game.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Muric

Post by RVclaret » Wed Sep 27, 2023 2:53 pm

daveisaclaret wrote:
Wed Sep 27, 2023 2:50 pm
I don't think there should be a position where the star goalie from last season's off field antics were so bad that he must be replaced in the team but not bad enough that it's fine for him to be the number 2 and play in the cup. Feels like a 2+2=5 while VK just prefers Trafford.
Both are possibilities. Though the argument is that Muric is a better ball playing keeper and was pretty decent at the rest of it by the end of last season, so on that basis deserved his chance. Hence the other questions.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15285
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3168 times
Has Liked: 6770 times

Re: Muric

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Sep 27, 2023 3:06 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Wed Sep 27, 2023 2:51 pm
Wrong Boro game.
OK.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15285
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3168 times
Has Liked: 6770 times

Re: Muric

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Sep 27, 2023 3:08 pm

This is just an impression I'm getting at present:
Trafford looks small in goal. Yes, I know he isn't, maybe it's his positioning or how he sets himself.
Currently Muric looks far more commanding to me.

kaptin1
Posts: 1601
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 460 times
Has Liked: 109 times

Re: Muric

Post by kaptin1 » Wed Sep 27, 2023 3:12 pm

Problem is that we’ve only seen Muric perform in the Championship and only seen Trafford perform in the Premier League. Plenty of players out there that look fantastic in the Championship but are bang average in the Premier League. Comparing Muric and Trafford is complicated because we haven’t seen them both playing at the same level.

Post Reply