On principle yes, in practice in the modern Prem not sure. Sterling would have been calling for a field surgeon, and unfortunately those histrionics can make a difference. It was a dirty kick and if we'd done that they'd have had a better chance of the red through their reactions
Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
-
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 463 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
-
- Posts: 2625
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 509 times
- Has Liked: 886 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Stirling getting some space. JT did OK.
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Surely every bit of dissent is not a yellow.
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
We had some momentum after the goal but have gone back to defending.
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Everton 2 up.
-
- Posts: 5141
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1177 times
- Has Liked: 2923 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Oh no own goal. Concede again just before half time. FFS.
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Vitinho is getting constantly skinned.
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:18 pm
- Been Liked: 187 times
- Has Liked: 287 times
- Location: Amsterdam
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
BUMMER Lucky Chelsea
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
What a scabby goal
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Not getting much luck.
-
- Posts: 2625
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 509 times
- Has Liked: 886 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Foster putting a real shift in, defensively..
I was about to say it was coming down that flank. Giving them plenty of space.
I was about to say it was coming down that flank. Giving them plenty of space.
-
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 463 times
-
- Posts: 2140
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 351 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
***** sake
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1575 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Al Dakhil own goal.
Unfortunate but can’t help think I say that far too often about him
Unfortunate but can’t help think I say that far too often about him
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Sterling is a problem. Soft free kick prior to that though, ball had already gone!!
This user liked this post: Taffy on the wing
-
- Posts: 2140
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 351 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
It's more he was looking at him as if to say just you wait. Very refreshing from an 18 year oldspt_claret wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 3:37 pmOn principle yes, in practice in the modern Prem not sure. Sterling would have been calling for a field surgeon, and unfortunately those histrionics can make a difference. It was a dirty kick and if we'd done that they'd have had a better chance of the red through their reactions
This user liked this post: spt_claret
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Very fortunate goal, but what Berge was doing giving the free kick away in the build up beggars belief. The ball was well on its way out before he made any contact and we'd have had the throw.
Last edited by ClaretMat on Sat Oct 07, 2023 3:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Al-Dakhil’s body shape wrong there, but it’s still bloody lucky. Sterling been excellent in fairness.
-
- Posts: 2625
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 509 times
- Has Liked: 886 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Was desperate to get to the break ahead.
Unlucky but a little sloppy.
Unlucky but a little sloppy.
-
- Posts: 1951
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 688 times
- Has Liked: 133 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
You know you're back in the Premier league when you're conceding leads just before half time.
-
- Posts: 9919
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2352 times
- Has Liked: 3183 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Tuesday night BFC scored just before half time.burnleymik wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 3:42 pmOh no own goal. Concede again just before half time. FFS.
-
- Posts: 6147
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 6468 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
From liquid football for the goal to schoolboy defending.
We need to be better at the back
We need to be better at the back
-
- Posts: 2140
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 351 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Freak goal we have been mostly on top need to take chances tresor did the hard part
-
- Posts: 2625
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 509 times
- Has Liked: 886 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Sloppy passing again.
We'll be the masters of our own downfall, if we're not careful.
We'll be the masters of our own downfall, if we're not careful.
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Been a bit too careless in possession this half but the defensive shape in general been really good.
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Larsen on for tresor
-
- Posts: 1332
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
- Been Liked: 152 times
- Has Liked: 200 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
that's what happens if you keep chopping and changing you need s settled side . Only my view.
-
- Posts: 2140
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 351 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Not a stupid mistake but a mistake all the same
-
- Posts: 9919
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2352 times
- Has Liked: 3183 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
So strange having Chelsea provide the Clarets+ commentary. Anyone know why that is?
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
You concede freak goals if you change the side?Clive 1960 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 3:48 pmthat's what happens if you keep chopping and changing you need s settled side . Only my view.
-
- Posts: 1951
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 688 times
- Has Liked: 133 times
-
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1040 times
- Has Liked: 2041 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
A good half, very promising and we were really unlucky with the OG. Was it even a free kick beforehand that lead to it ?
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Definite freekick in the build up but completely and utterly needless.
This user liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Larsen on for Tresor is a must. Sterling just getting so much space
This user liked this post: jojomk1
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Commentator on the stream I'm watching going on about how Thiago Silva was unlucky to pick up a yellow for the foul on Vitinho really boils my p*ss. Silva knew he wasn't going to be able to keep up with Vitinho and purposely shoulder-tackled him to take him out. Guess I shouldn't be surprised about biased commentary after all our previous seasons though...
Credit to the ref though, he's not putting up with any nonsense from Chelsea. Reckon Cucurella would have been given a straight red for lashing out at Odobert if he'd made contact.
Credit to the ref though, he's not putting up with any nonsense from Chelsea. Reckon Cucurella would have been given a straight red for lashing out at Odobert if he'd made contact.
-
- Posts: 1332
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
- Been Liked: 152 times
- Has Liked: 200 times
-
- Posts: 814
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:25 pm
- Been Liked: 313 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Berge caused that goal. What a stupid free kick to give away at that point. We would have come in at the break one up if he hadn't done that. Why on Earth did he push him over then
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
I think you're watching the same footage as me. Silva came charging across, completely missed the ball and made no attempt to get out of the way. Its a yellow every day of the week.
The commentary team have barely mentioned us though, it's all about Chelsea.
The commentary team have barely mentioned us though, it's all about Chelsea.
-
- Posts: 1854
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2017 11:30 am
- Been Liked: 301 times
- Has Liked: 28 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
I like Vitinho going forward though. Do think both full backs look our weakest positions.
Odobert and Tresor look the ********
Odobert and Tresor look the ********
-
- Posts: 2140
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 351 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
I’d get Koleosho on cucurellas side for the second half , only a matter of time before he gets a second yellow. Odobert looks rightly ****** so I’d get him away from him also.
-
- Posts: 5141
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1177 times
- Has Liked: 2923 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
We were doing really until the goal, then we stopped the high press and sat deeper. Foster is just getting better and better.
-
- Posts: 6217
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1277 times
- Has Liked: 8528 times
- Location: Greystones Ireland
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
I thought that we sat back too much towards the end of that half anyway let’s hope we can win this.
UTC
UTC
-
- Posts: 12382
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5213 times
- Has Liked: 922 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Been out all day so missed first 20 mins but surprised at some of comments on the team. Koleosho was due a rest and Andoumi is a no.10 so with 3 midfielders (Berge, Brownhill, Cullen) he doesnt really fit in. I expected it to be Larsen and Tresor but swapping the wide men isnt shocking at all.
At the back it looks like DeCroix was forced and Vithino looked great first half of last season at RB but Roberts was brilliant post World Cup and Vitinho had to play in positions he wasn't strongest in.
Bayer is a big miss but I was very happy with us swapping the two wide men and thought it was definitely needed.
Shame about deflected goal as we looked pretty comfortable from what I had seen but reckon this could go either way second half
At the back it looks like DeCroix was forced and Vithino looked great first half of last season at RB but Roberts was brilliant post World Cup and Vitinho had to play in positions he wasn't strongest in.
Bayer is a big miss but I was very happy with us swapping the two wide men and thought it was definitely needed.
Shame about deflected goal as we looked pretty comfortable from what I had seen but reckon this could go either way second half
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
No doubt they will bring on Mudryk
-
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 8:21 pm
- Been Liked: 196 times
- Has Liked: 407 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
From the jaws of victory by our sloppy passing, petty fouls and poor defending we are well on the way to snatching a defeat here.
Great effort from the lads but.....well ..you know what I mean. Our defence is poor.
Great effort from the lads but.....well ..you know what I mean. Our defence is poor.
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
14 minutes added at Fulham, Chris Basham broken leg, feel for the lad hopefully a full recovery for him.
-
- Posts: 5368
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
Re: Clarets v Chelsea Match Thread
Vitihno is a poor defensive full back. What happened to our passing game, our midfield and wide men losing the ball too easily.