Team for Wolves (A)
-
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 641 times
- Has Liked: 674 times
Team for Wolves (A)
Beyer suspended, surely means Ekdal.
. . Traff
Vitinho Oshea Ekdal Taylor
JBL Berge Browny Luca
. . Amdouni
. . Jay
. . Traff
Vitinho Oshea Ekdal Taylor
JBL Berge Browny Luca
. . Amdouni
. . Jay
-
- Posts: 7179
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3606 times
- Has Liked: 1033 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
Same team of course, but Ekdal for Beyer as you say.
This user liked this post: burnley007
-
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 641 times
- Has Liked: 674 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
JBG could come back in, but that would be harsh.
Maybe a change up front? Rest Jay, only a short gap from Saturday.
Maybe a change up front? Rest Jay, only a short gap from Saturday.
-
- Posts: 1328
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
- Been Liked: 152 times
- Has Liked: 198 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
I would say same team as Saturday and maybe bring Roberts in at right back and Taylor to centre half and Vitinho to left back...
-
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 641 times
- Has Liked: 674 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
Never gonna happen.Clive 1960 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2023 9:06 amI would say same team as Saturday and maybe bring Roberts in at right back and Taylor to centre half and Vitinho to left back...
Ekdal for Beyer will be the only change.
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
Same team - Ekdal for Beyer - why lose any momentum we may have built by chopping and changing?
-
- Posts: 6696
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1705 times
- Has Liked: 791 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
Small chance Taylor moves to CH and Roberts and Vitinho as full backs, but Ekdal I think starts and the fact VK gave him a few mins on Saturday would support this
Tresor looked good when he came on Saturday. For me Larson must start and Tresor will soon start to show his quality. JBG is a safe pair of hands but lacks that final quality and speed, and finishing
Tresor looked good when he came on Saturday. For me Larson must start and Tresor will soon start to show his quality. JBG is a safe pair of hands but lacks that final quality and speed, and finishing
-
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:13 am
- Been Liked: 164 times
- Has Liked: 33 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
Same team, Ekdal in for suspended Beyer but this team is building momentum and the familiarity is helping cohesion.
This user liked this post: burnley007
-
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 641 times
- Has Liked: 674 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
Happy that we have found a good starting XI. Now just minor tweaks when required. We will start to move slowly up the table,Sleeping Cat wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2023 10:05 amSame team, Ekdal in for suspended Beyer but this team is building momentum and the familiarity is helping cohesion.
Need Lyle back soon though, will we see more of Oba?
-
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:13 am
- Been Liked: 164 times
- Has Liked: 33 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
Agreed. In the first 9-10 games I think we all found many of the starting selections baffling at times, with too many changes from week to week and a good performance one week not being rewarded with a run in the team. Glad VK seems to have settled into a relatively consistent starting XI.
-
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:23 am
- Been Liked: 495 times
- Has Liked: 219 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
Same team but the problem is who replaces Beyer as the left sided central defender.
Wolves counterattack with speed and are very dangerous at set pieces (Dawson). So, while Ekdal provides good cover in the air and a calming influence in possession, he is untried on the left and lacks real pace. Therefore I think that Delcroix might get the nod for this game.
Wolves counterattack with speed and are very dangerous at set pieces (Dawson). So, while Ekdal provides good cover in the air and a calming influence in possession, he is untried on the left and lacks real pace. Therefore I think that Delcroix might get the nod for this game.
-
- Posts: 1328
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
- Been Liked: 152 times
- Has Liked: 198 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
That's why i went with Taylor as Ekdal is coming back from a injury.IWOODLOVETT wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2023 11:06 amSame team but the problem is who replaces Beyer as the left sided central defender.
Wolves counterattack with speed and are very dangerous at set pieces (Dawson). So, while Ekdal provides good cover in the air and a calming influence in possession, he is untried on the left and lacks real pace. Therefore I think that Delcroix might get the nod for this game.
-
- Posts: 13511
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3114 times
- Has Liked: 3833 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
I agree. Although I also think our squad is too big for maintaining a squad constantly.Sleeping Cat wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2023 10:27 amAgreed. In the first 9-10 games I think we all found many of the starting selections baffling at times, with too many changes from week to week and a good performance one week not being rewarded with a run in the team. Glad VK seems to have settled into a relatively consistent starting XI.
In a three game week it wouldn’t shock me to see one or two changes.
I agree with the majority though that Ekdal in for Beyer will be the only swap. Let’s just hope that kick in to the stands doesn’t prove costly.
-
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 1160 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
As per most , same team but with Ekdal. I’d imagine early subs to keep things fresh too . I try not to dwell on our defence but it looks gossamer thin .
-
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 238 times
- Has Liked: 443 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
Just can't imagine ekdal being fit enough to start so quickly after he's return, although we're clearly short of options. Ekdal looked like he'd lost some bulk on Saturday which will clearly tell on him if he was to start the game, I'd have imagined he would have been eased in with sub appearances for at least 2 or 3 weeks with ongoing work in the gym before being deemed fit to start. The alternative being Al dakhill back in, or Roberts and vitinho filling the full back positions and Taylor moving inside, the latter being the safest although not ideal, Beyer a big loss after a confidence boosting win on Saturday.
-
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:51 am
- Been Liked: 289 times
- Has Liked: 312 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
Why change one player when you can change three? Probably a bit too much disruption there. Ekdal for Beyer, the rest get the reward of a job well done with another start, other knocks and niggles notwithstanding.Clive 1960 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2023 9:06 amI would say same team as Saturday and maybe bring Roberts in at right back and Taylor to centre half and Vitinho to left back...
-
- Posts: 10171
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
If Ekdal isn't deemed fit enough to start I would rather play Delcroix at centre half and leave Taylor at left back
-
- Posts: 596
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:24 am
- Been Liked: 139 times
- Has Liked: 183 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
The match is live on prime if anyone didn't know
-
- Posts: 18100
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3875 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Team for Wolves (A)
Ekdal must have been back training at least 6 weeks?
He played for the 21s.
Two weeks away on international duty.
One week unused sub
Off the bench on Saturday.
He played for the 21s.
Two weeks away on international duty.
One week unused sub
Off the bench on Saturday.