Team for Wolves (A)

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
burnley007
Posts: 2579
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
Been Liked: 641 times
Has Liked: 674 times

Team for Wolves (A)

Post by burnley007 » Mon Dec 04, 2023 8:56 am

Beyer suspended, surely means Ekdal.


. . Traff

Vitinho Oshea Ekdal Taylor

JBL Berge Browny Luca

. . Amdouni

. . Jay

jedi_master
Posts: 7179
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3606 times
Has Liked: 1033 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by jedi_master » Mon Dec 04, 2023 8:57 am

Same team of course, but Ekdal for Beyer as you say.
This user liked this post: burnley007

burnley007
Posts: 2579
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
Been Liked: 641 times
Has Liked: 674 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by burnley007 » Mon Dec 04, 2023 8:59 am

JBG could come back in, but that would be harsh.

Maybe a change up front? Rest Jay, only a short gap from Saturday.

Clive 1960
Posts: 1328
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
Been Liked: 152 times
Has Liked: 198 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by Clive 1960 » Mon Dec 04, 2023 9:06 am

I would say same team as Saturday and maybe bring Roberts in at right back and Taylor to centre half and Vitinho to left back...

burnley007
Posts: 2579
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
Been Liked: 641 times
Has Liked: 674 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by burnley007 » Mon Dec 04, 2023 9:50 am

Clive 1960 wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2023 9:06 am
I would say same team as Saturday and maybe bring Roberts in at right back and Taylor to centre half and Vitinho to left back...
Never gonna happen.

Ekdal for Beyer will be the only change.

Luppy
Posts: 212
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2019 2:46 pm
Been Liked: 56 times
Has Liked: 11 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by Luppy » Mon Dec 04, 2023 9:50 am

Same team - Ekdal for Beyer - why lose any momentum we may have built by chopping and changing?

warksclaret
Posts: 6696
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1705 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by warksclaret » Mon Dec 04, 2023 10:04 am

Small chance Taylor moves to CH and Roberts and Vitinho as full backs, but Ekdal I think starts and the fact VK gave him a few mins on Saturday would support this

Tresor looked good when he came on Saturday. For me Larson must start and Tresor will soon start to show his quality. JBG is a safe pair of hands but lacks that final quality and speed, and finishing

Sleeping Cat
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:13 am
Been Liked: 164 times
Has Liked: 33 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by Sleeping Cat » Mon Dec 04, 2023 10:05 am

Same team, Ekdal in for suspended Beyer but this team is building momentum and the familiarity is helping cohesion.
This user liked this post: burnley007

burnley007
Posts: 2579
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
Been Liked: 641 times
Has Liked: 674 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by burnley007 » Mon Dec 04, 2023 10:21 am

Sleeping Cat wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2023 10:05 am
Same team, Ekdal in for suspended Beyer but this team is building momentum and the familiarity is helping cohesion.
Happy that we have found a good starting XI. Now just minor tweaks when required. We will start to move slowly up the table,

Need Lyle back soon though, will we see more of Oba?

Sleeping Cat
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:13 am
Been Liked: 164 times
Has Liked: 33 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by Sleeping Cat » Mon Dec 04, 2023 10:27 am

Agreed. In the first 9-10 games I think we all found many of the starting selections baffling at times, with too many changes from week to week and a good performance one week not being rewarded with a run in the team. Glad VK seems to have settled into a relatively consistent starting XI.

IWOODLOVETT
Posts: 1256
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:23 am
Been Liked: 495 times
Has Liked: 219 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by IWOODLOVETT » Mon Dec 04, 2023 11:06 am

Same team but the problem is who replaces Beyer as the left sided central defender.

Wolves counterattack with speed and are very dangerous at set pieces (Dawson). So, while Ekdal provides good cover in the air and a calming influence in possession, he is untried on the left and lacks real pace. Therefore I think that Delcroix might get the nod for this game.

Clive 1960
Posts: 1328
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:15 am
Been Liked: 152 times
Has Liked: 198 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by Clive 1960 » Mon Dec 04, 2023 11:30 am

IWOODLOVETT wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2023 11:06 am
Same team but the problem is who replaces Beyer as the left sided central defender.

Wolves counterattack with speed and are very dangerous at set pieces (Dawson). So, while Ekdal provides good cover in the air and a calming influence in possession, he is untried on the left and lacks real pace. Therefore I think that Delcroix might get the nod for this game.
That's why i went with Taylor as Ekdal is coming back from a injury.

NewClaret
Posts: 13511
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3114 times
Has Liked: 3833 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by NewClaret » Mon Dec 04, 2023 11:49 am

Sleeping Cat wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2023 10:27 am
Agreed. In the first 9-10 games I think we all found many of the starting selections baffling at times, with too many changes from week to week and a good performance one week not being rewarded with a run in the team. Glad VK seems to have settled into a relatively consistent starting XI.
I agree. Although I also think our squad is too big for maintaining a squad constantly.

In a three game week it wouldn’t shock me to see one or two changes.

I agree with the majority though that Ekdal in for Beyer will be the only swap. Let’s just hope that kick in to the stands doesn’t prove costly.

AlargeClaret
Posts: 4479
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 1160 times
Has Liked: 182 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by AlargeClaret » Mon Dec 04, 2023 1:05 pm

As per most , same team but with Ekdal. I’d imagine early subs to keep things fresh too . I try not to dwell on our defence but it looks gossamer thin .

alwaysaclaret
Posts: 1394
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 238 times
Has Liked: 443 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by alwaysaclaret » Mon Dec 04, 2023 2:43 pm

Just can't imagine ekdal being fit enough to start so quickly after he's return, although we're clearly short of options. Ekdal looked like he'd lost some bulk on Saturday which will clearly tell on him if he was to start the game, I'd have imagined he would have been eased in with sub appearances for at least 2 or 3 weeks with ongoing work in the gym before being deemed fit to start. The alternative being Al dakhill back in, or Roberts and vitinho filling the full back positions and Taylor moving inside, the latter being the safest although not ideal, Beyer a big loss after a confidence boosting win on Saturday.

RicardoMontalban
Posts: 622
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:51 am
Been Liked: 289 times
Has Liked: 312 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by RicardoMontalban » Mon Dec 04, 2023 2:49 pm

Clive 1960 wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2023 9:06 am
I would say same team as Saturday and maybe bring Roberts in at right back and Taylor to centre half and Vitinho to left back...
Why change one player when you can change three? Probably a bit too much disruption there. Ekdal for Beyer, the rest get the reward of a job well done with another start, other knocks and niggles notwithstanding.

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10171
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Mon Dec 04, 2023 2:52 pm

If Ekdal isn't deemed fit enough to start I would rather play Delcroix at centre half and leave Taylor at left back

Venkys4eva
Posts: 596
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:24 am
Been Liked: 139 times
Has Liked: 183 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by Venkys4eva » Mon Dec 04, 2023 3:09 pm

The match is live on prime if anyone didn't know :mrgreen: 👍

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18100
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3875 times
Has Liked: 2073 times

Re: Team for Wolves (A)

Post by Quickenthetempo » Mon Dec 04, 2023 3:09 pm

Ekdal must have been back training at least 6 weeks?

He played for the 21s.
Two weeks away on international duty.
One week unused sub
Off the bench on Saturday.

Post Reply