Arijanet Muric
-
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 8:21 pm
- Been Liked: 196 times
- Has Liked: 407 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
Can someone do one of them “Vote” posts you see….you know either vote for Trafford or Vote for Muric.
Be interesting to see final result after a week.
Be interesting to see final result after a week.
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 625 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
Anything slightly positive about our performances and it’s always turned to well the other team played rubbish, they rested players, what team outside of the top 6 players a team in the top 6 and doesn’t rely on them potentially having an off day.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 12:44 pmDecent strawman. What was our side then? Kulusevski, Richarlison, Porro, Udogie, Vicario all been first team regulars and are good players in there own right - not to mention it was away.
Could have easily won that and Spurs want silverware, they're going for a Cup.
Dyche used to say it regularly, to beat the big boys, you have to be at it and they need to be off it
This user liked this post: CoolClaret
-
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2023 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 150 times
- Has Liked: 377 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
A lot of the saves Trafford makes are a result of being constantly under pressure which I think is the outcome of how the defence and team play while he is in nets .. we won the championship with Muric and strolled that division so he must have had some consistency .: and before anyone chips in that we aren’t in the championship now /. we aren’t in division 1 either where Trafford is used to playing
-
- Posts: 7476
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2264 times
- Has Liked: 2175 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
Here's the real question
Would we be on more than 11 points IF the combined fees that went on Traff, Trésor and Ramsey(who are good players in their own right) around the 50 mill mark were instead allocated to you know what (most) thought were the obvious needs in fullback(s), DM, Striker...
It's a resounding YES for me.
Collective > Individuals. Think of the team first (not who will bring the most money after development) and the rest will fall into place.
Would we be on more than 11 points IF the combined fees that went on Traff, Trésor and Ramsey(who are good players in their own right) around the 50 mill mark were instead allocated to you know what (most) thought were the obvious needs in fullback(s), DM, Striker...
It's a resounding YES for me.
Collective > Individuals. Think of the team first (not who will bring the most money after development) and the rest will fall into place.
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
5? Short of being our normal XI? A few in positions that have been changeable for most of the season.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 12:44 pmDecent strawman. What was our side then? Kulusevski, Richarlison, Porro, Udogie, Vicario all been first team regulars and are good players in there own right - not to mention it was away.
Could have easily won that and Spurs want silverware, they're going for a Cup.
We could have won that, Spurs were poor and there for the taking but unfortunately Zeki can’t hit a barn door so we didn’t take our best chance.
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
People need to stop comparing to when we were in the Championship. Cullen was player of the season in that league and I’d like to think no one is deluded enough to still think he’s PL quality.Carlos the Great wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 12:49 pmA lot of the saves Trafford makes are a result of being constantly under pressure which I think is the outcome of how the defence and team play while he is in nets .. we won the championship with Muric and strolled that division so he must have had some consistency .: and before anyone chips in that we aren’t in the championship now /. we aren’t in division 1 either where Trafford is used to playing
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
Now we’re on the same page!CoolClaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 12:51 pmHere's the real question
Would we be on more than 11 points IF the combined fees that went on Traff, Trésor and Ramsey(who are good players in their own right) around the 50 mill mark were instead allocated to you know what (most) thought were the obvious needs in fullback(s), DM, Striker...
It's a resounding YES for me.
Collective > Individuals. Think of the team first (not who will bring the most money after development) and the rest will fall into place.
I think Trafford is the better keeper but I also think it’s a signing you make last after we bought 2 new full backs, a central midfielder and a striker as a minimum. Arguably a CB too, I’d have liked to see THB back with Beyer.
This user liked this post: Anthonini
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 625 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
People need to stop comparing what we did in the championship, you just tried to compare things muric did last season?deanothedino wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 12:53 pmPeople need to stop comparing to when we were in the Championship. Cullen was player of the season in that league and I’d like to think no one is deluded enough to still think he’s PL quality.
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
I think comparing mistakes people made a lower level is a bit different to saying the positives at that level should have carried over to harder competition.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 1:00 pmPeople need to stop comparing what we did in the championship, you just tried to compare things muric did last season?
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 625 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
Why? Foster wasn’t great in the championship but has arguably been our most important player this season, muric could have also made the step and and improved further given the chance, he also could of done a Cullen who right now doesn’t look up to the level (although he had a good game last night) the point is muric is the only player bare benson who hasn’t been given a chancedeanothedino wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 1:01 pmI think comparing mistakes people made a lower level is a bit different to saying the positives at that level should have carried over to harder competition.
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
I don’t disagree he wasn’t given a chance, and that comes back to what I’ve said in reply to CoolClarets last post. I think Trafford is a better keeper but I wouldn’t have rushed to do that business when we clearly needed two new fullbacks and a defensive midfielder as a minimum (even if you were giving Cullen a chance it’s clear VK thinks Cork can’t do the job anymore)123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 1:03 pmWhy? Foster wasn’t great in the championship but has arguably been our most important player this season, muric could have also made the step and and improved further given the chance, he also could of done a Cullen who right now doesn’t look up to the level (although he had a good game last night) the point is muric is the only player bare benson who hasn’t been given a chance
Re: Arijanet Muric
Unfortunately if you prefer Trafford you looking for every little mistake that Muric makes and if the prefer Muric then your doing the same to Trafford ,and as we tend to be the underdog in most games it becomes nearly impossible for either of them to have a faultless game.It Is What It Is wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 12:45 pmCan someone do one of them “Vote” posts you see….you know either vote for Trafford or Vote for Muric.
Be interesting to see final result after a week.
-
- Posts: 16934
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6971 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Arijanet Muric
But he did lose the shirt. Players train every day to earn their place in the team.Swizzlestick wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 12:43 pmMuric should not have been dropped. It was his shirt to lose and Trafford should have been doing the challenging for it. Some think it doesn’t matter either way - I think it very much has mattered and we’ve sat through a lot of staid, lifeless football because of it. A big error - not the only one, by any stretch, but a big one.
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
And we weren’t at it, despite them being off it. Hard truth.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 12:48 pmAnything slightly positive about our performances and it’s always turned to well the other team played rubbish, they rested players, what team outside of the top 6 players a team in the top 6 and doesn’t rely on them potentially having an off day.
Dyche used to say it regularly, to beat the big boys, you have to be at it and they need to be off it
Re: Arijanet Muric
He certainly has a presence.
He's so used to wanting to get his team moving that he gets frustrated and is liable to choose a bad option. Last season was easy for him from that point of view. I honestly think he'd fit in with a better PL team than us where his players had more time on the ball.
He's so used to wanting to get his team moving that he gets frustrated and is liable to choose a bad option. Last season was easy for him from that point of view. I honestly think he'd fit in with a better PL team than us where his players had more time on the ball.
These 2 users liked this post: deanothedino Foshiznik
-
- Posts: 16934
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6971 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Arijanet Muric
Muric generally was good last night. He zipped the ball around well and made some decent saves. He also collected everything in the air comfortably, although this flatters to deceive a little as they were all regulation catches under no pressure.
His throw out leading to the goal was a poor decision although Amdouni should have done better. However, and I’m absolutely expecting pelters for this, I think he should have saved the strike. To not even make an effort to go for it considering his proximity to it and the time he had to react was very poor. Considering how well Trafford seems to cover the width of his goal I would be very confident that he’d have saved it. And I think that goal pretty much summed up in a nutshell why one keeper is favoured over the other by VK.
His throw out leading to the goal was a poor decision although Amdouni should have done better. However, and I’m absolutely expecting pelters for this, I think he should have saved the strike. To not even make an effort to go for it considering his proximity to it and the time he had to react was very poor. Considering how well Trafford seems to cover the width of his goal I would be very confident that he’d have saved it. And I think that goal pretty much summed up in a nutshell why one keeper is favoured over the other by VK.
Re: Arijanet Muric
No way Trafford would've saved it.Rileybobs wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 1:50 pmMuric generally was good last night. He zipped the ball around well and made some decent saves. He also collected everything in the air comfortably, although this flatters to deceive a little as they were all regulation catches under no pressure.
His throw out leading to the goal was a poor decision although Amdouni should have done better. However, and I’m absolutely expecting pelters for this, I think he should have saved the strike. To not even make an effort to go for it considering his proximity to it and the time he had to react was very poor. Considering how well Trafford seems to cover the width of his goal I would be very confident that he’d have saved it. And I think that goal pretty much summed up in a nutshell why one keeper is favoured over the other by VK.
-
- Posts: 8160
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3087 times
- Has Liked: 5071 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Arijanet Muric
Muric for me.
Trafford has improved a lot lately, and kept us in games, but it's Murics influence in attack that gets him the nod, and his command of the box.
Trafford has improved a lot lately, and kept us in games, but it's Murics influence in attack that gets him the nod, and his command of the box.
This user liked this post: Carlos the Great
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
The only way we score more goals with Muric in the side is if we put him upfront as I suspect he can finish better than some of our attacking playersColburn_Claret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 1:56 pmMuric for me.
Trafford has improved a lot lately, and kept us in games, but it's Murics influence in attack that gets him the nod, and his command of the box.
-
- Posts: 16934
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6971 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Arijanet Muric
We’ll have to agree to disagree. But I don’t think a keeper should be conceding from that range and angle to his right hand side from a right footed shot when positioned where he is. His reactions to the shot were very poor, he didn’t even flinch. Not often you see a keeper at the top level completely rooted to the spot.
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret
Re: Arijanet Muric
What that photo obviously doesn't show is the pace of the shot so doesnt really help and, in any case, I remember the goal, circumstances and positions very well. I agree Muric should've made an attempt, but even if he had he wouldn't have saved it, nor would Trafford in my view.Rileybobs wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 2:06 pmIMG_3450.jpeg
We’ll have to agree to disagree. But I don’t think a keeper should be conceding from that range and angle to his right hand side from a right footed shot when positioned where he is. His reactions to the shot were very poor, he didn’t even flinch. Not often you see a keeper at the top level completely rooted to the spot.
Re: Arijanet Muric
Interesting point this. He also didn’t move for Tarkowski’s goal at Everton earlier this season which, at the time, I found odd.Rileybobs wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 2:06 pmIMG_3450.jpeg
We’ll have to agree to disagree. But I don’t think a keeper should be conceding from that range and angle to his right hand side from a right footed shot when positioned where he is. His reactions to the shot were very poor, he didn’t even flinch. Not often you see a keeper at the top level completely rooted to the spot.
-
- Posts: 2601
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
- Been Liked: 956 times
- Has Liked: 170 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
No doubt we have two capable keepers, and Muric is certainly one if you ask me.
The agility of Trafford might be slightly better, but the presence of Muric in his own box has improved a lot and for me he is the better goalie in that area.
Muric also made a very good save early on, and I'm sure neither could do anything to prevent that goal.
The agility of Trafford might be slightly better, but the presence of Muric in his own box has improved a lot and for me he is the better goalie in that area.
Muric also made a very good save early on, and I'm sure neither could do anything to prevent that goal.
Re: Arijanet Muric
That ball was moving wicked. Really not sure many keepers could have touched it let alone save it.
-
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1165 times
- Has Liked: 94 times
- Location: your mum
Re: Arijanet Muric
I posted earlier in the season that it was stupid to say any Burnley fan wanted Trafford to fail. Looking at some of the reactions to Muric's performance I have to say I was wrong and plenty of people on here are very capable of wanting a goalie to fail.
-
- Posts: 16934
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6971 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Arijanet Muric
Well I think it does help to show Muric’s relative proximity to where the ball ends up and the distance that the ball is struck from. It was hit incredibly well and accurately but Muric had time to react and make a short dive to his right to stop it. It would have required a good save but it certainly wasn’t an unstoppable shot considering how close the keeper is to it and the height at which the ball hits the net.taio wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 2:09 pmWhat that photo obviously doesn't show is the pace of the shot so doesnt really help and, in any case, I remember the goal, circumstances and positions very well. I agree Muric should've made an attempt, but even if he had he wouldn't have saved it, nor would Trafford in my view.
Re: Arijanet Muric
Not make that throw would have prevented it. We should be calm and relaxed when it's 0-0 vs Tottenham. Let them rush things and make daft mistakes.Belgianclaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 2:10 pmNo doubt we have two capable keepers, and Muric is certainly one if you ask me.
The agility of Trafford might be slightly better, but the presence of Muric in his own box has improved a lot and for me he is the better goalie in that area.
Muric also made a very good save early on, and I'm sure neither could do anything to prevent that goal.
-
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2020 10:17 am
- Been Liked: 147 times
- Has Liked: 24 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
Always like to see a keeper at least put a dive in. Real bug bearer of mine seeing a goalkeeper watch the ball go into the net without moving.Rileybobs wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 2:06 pmIMG_3450.jpeg
We’ll have to agree to disagree. But I don’t think a keeper should be conceding from that range and angle to his right hand side from a right footed shot when positioned where he is. His reactions to the shot were very poor, he didn’t even flinch. Not often you see a keeper at the top level completely rooted to the spot.
I'm not sure he sees this one until late though, think the picture you have used shows Cullen obscuring the ball from his vision. Very good strike, but again I'd still like to have seen him make more of an effort to keep it out
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 625 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
Surely nobody actually thinks muric should save that goal last night
-
- Posts: 16934
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6971 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Arijanet Muric
Fair point re his vision potentially being blocked. Could explain the lack of reaction.matttheclaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 2:20 pmAlways like to see a keeper at least put a dive in. Real bug bearer of mine seeing a goalkeeper watch the ball go into the net without moving.
I'm not sure he sees this one until late though, think the picture you have used shows Cullen obscuring the ball from his vision. Very good strike, but again I'd still like to have seen him make more of an effort to keep it out
Re: Arijanet Muric
What the photo doesnt show is the dip, thats why he didnt dive. It reminded me of that famous Essien strike agsinst Arsenal, absolutely unstoppable
Re: Arijanet Muric
It’s the out to in trajectory of the strike that made it an impossible one to save for any goalkeeper.
Come on now.
Come on now.
-
- Posts: 2601
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
- Been Liked: 956 times
- Has Liked: 170 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
Yeah, but such viewpoint is subject to so many what-ifs.
What if Amdouny - who attempted to play the ball between the legs - actually controls the ball better or even manages to pass him?
Re: Arijanet Muric
Muric, who I have always rated as a sweeper, has been much improved as a goalkeeper, from rail end of last season and his occasional appearances this season.
We are far more dynamic and less fragile, with Muric.
We are far more dynamic and less fragile, with Muric.
Re: Arijanet Muric
I'm not sure it helps that much, really. As well as the speed and accuracy on the ball, there was plenty of dip and movement on the ball too. I'm not saying it was unstoppable, I just think very few keepers would've stopped it, including Trafford. Fair enough if you are very confident Trafford would have.Rileybobs wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 2:15 pmWell I think it does help to show Muric’s relative proximity to where the ball ends up and the distance that the ball is struck from. It was hit incredibly well and accurately but Muric had time to react and make a short dive to his right to stop it. It would have required a good save but it certainly wasn’t an unstoppable shot considering how close the keeper is to it and the height at which the ball hits the net.
This user liked this post: Rileybobs
-
- Posts: 6699
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1705 times
- Has Liked: 791 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
Dont think anyone is blaming Muric for not stopping that super strike, but have to disagree with the comment that NO goalkeeper would have stopped. We are blessed with some of the world's finest keepers inn the PL, and almost every week see comparable stops from the likes of Allison, Ederson, De Gea when he was in his prime, Martinez, Nick Pope . Ramsdale, Raya and a few more. What I am pretty certain about though is that just about all of these keepers, in my opinion would have moved and attempted to save it. Muric just appeared static-maybe a little shell shocked that his throw to Amdouini was quickly and clinically recycled by Spurs followed by a very hard hit shot-but it was at some distance and he was in a good position
-
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1040 times
- Has Liked: 2041 times
-
- Posts: 7476
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2264 times
- Has Liked: 2175 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
Nice still - doesn't show the swerve of the ball or the pace like.. No comment on some of the other diving saves he made last night though?Rileybobs wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 2:06 pmIMG_3450.jpeg
We’ll have to agree to disagree. But I don’t think a keeper should be conceding from that range and angle to his right hand side from a right footed shot when positioned where he is. His reactions to the shot were very poor, he didn’t even flinch. Not often you see a keeper at the top level completely rooted to the spot.
Crikey, could make regulation saves look a bit more dramatic I suppose, might garner a bit more praise then.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1575 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
I was surprised he didn’t attempt to at least save it.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 2:22 pmSurely nobody actually thinks muric should save that goal last night
I just assumed he didn’t have site of the ball
Re: Arijanet Muric
Strange that it's the same ones criticising Muric that never took to him last season and big Trafford up to be way better than he is. Muric should save everything yet every goal Trafford concedes is a worldie and every save he makes is a worldie despite 99% of them being bog standard saves.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 5:30 pmNice still - doesn't show the swerve of the ball or the pace like.. No comment on some of the other diving saves he made last night though?
Crikey, could make regulation saves look a bit more dramatic I suppose, might garner a bit more praise then.
Muric is currently better than Trafford as an all round goalkeeper it's very easy to see
-
- Posts: 5799
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
Even if he’d dived he wasn’t stopping it. Maybe he should have done to make himself look better.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 5:33 pmI was surprised he didn’t attempt to at least save it.
I just assumed he didn’t have site of the ball
-
- Posts: 16934
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6971 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Arijanet Muric
I commented on his other saves.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 5:30 pmNice still - doesn't show the swerve of the ball or the pace like.. No comment on some of the other diving saves he made last night though?
Crikey, could make regulation saves look a bit more dramatic I suppose, might garner a bit more praise then.
Of course a still doesn’t show the swerve or dip of the ball. I can’t post a video of the goal so a photo was the best way to illustrate my point. And of course the swerve and dip of the ball is completely irrelevant if the goalkeeper is stood still and makes no attempt to make a save.
As I posted above, Muric on the whole was good last night, but in my opinion he was poor in the build up to the goal and he was poor at stopping or at least attempting to stop the goal. And ultimately games are decided on these moments and not the other 95% of play.
-
- Posts: 7476
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2264 times
- Has Liked: 2175 times
Re: Arijanet Muric
Sorry lads just have to clear this up - I mean at least be objective.
Have criticisms about maybe not playing to the scenario properly - fair enough but suggesting that a keeper saves this (yep I'll post a still as well) is just ludcirous
Have criticisms about maybe not playing to the scenario properly - fair enough but suggesting that a keeper saves this (yep I'll post a still as well) is just ludcirous
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot 2024-01-06 at 17.38.11.png (828.49 KiB) Viewed 4558 times
-
- Screenshot 2024-01-06 at 17.38.04.png (791.02 KiB) Viewed 4558 times
This user liked this post: burnleymik
-
- Posts: 16934
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6971 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Arijanet Muric
As CoolClaret was responding to me I can only assume your comments also relate to me. In which case you’re wrong. I didn’t ’never take to Muric’ last season, I just didn’t, and don’t think he has the raw goalkeeping attributes to be a successful Premier League goalkeeper. I don’t think Muric should save everything and I don’t claim that every save Trafford makes is a worldie.bumba wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 5:37 pmStrange that it's the same ones criticising Muric that never took to him last season and big Trafford up to be way better than he is. Muric should save everything yet every goal Trafford concedes is a worldie and every save he makes is a worldie despite 99% of them being bog standard saves.
Muric is currently better than Trafford as an all round goalkeeper it's very easy to see
I’ve made what I would consider to be well reasoned points about Trafford who also has significant weaknesses to his game. I’ve argued that both of our keepers are not at the level required, although we have seen improvement from Trafford since then with a string of good performances.
Feel free to make things up, but it doesn’t really strengthen your case.
Re: Arijanet Muric
Didn't even read what you'd wrote so no it wasn't aimed at you, was a general comment relating to a few posters on the board.Rileybobs wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 5:48 pmAs CoolClaret was responding to me I can only assume your comments also relate to me. In which case you’re wrong. I didn’t ’never take to Muric’ last season, I just didn’t, and don’t think he has the raw goalkeeping attributes to be a successful Premier League goalkeeper. I don’t think Muric should save everything and I don’t claim that every save Trafford makes is a worldie.
I’ve made what I would consider to be well reasoned points about Trafford who also has significant weaknesses to his game. I’ve argued that both of our keepers are not at the level required, although we have seen improvement from Trafford since then with a string of good performances.
Feel free to make things up, but it doesn’t really strengthen your case.
So no I'm not wrong and I'm not making anything up, you've just made something up.