Calvert Lewin
-
- Posts: 10171
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Calvert Lewin
Has had his red card against Palace overturned.
Serious questions need asking about some of these officials. 3 looked at this over and over and then decided it was a red.
Serious questions need asking about some of these officials. 3 looked at this over and over and then decided it was a red.
These 2 users liked this post: AfloatinClaret IanMcL
-
- Posts: 2537
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 879 times
- Has Liked: 271 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: Calvert Lewin
Good. A nonsense of a decision.
-
- Posts: 10171
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
- Been Liked: 834 times
- Has Liked: 1641 times
- Location: Lincoln
Re: Calvert Lewin
Hope this means that if a “clown “ on VAR sends the match referee to the screen he now in some cases sticks to his original decision
-
- Posts: 30726
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11061 times
- Has Liked: 5665 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Calvert Lewin
the fix is simple, if VAR thinks there is an issue there should be a noise sent to the refs watch or headset that indicates they need to go to the screen. There should be ZERO voice communication and there should be 3 replays all at normal speed. If the ref can't spot the clear and obvious mistake then his/her on field decision stands. The whole mess is caused by those doing VAR giving their opinion when they shouldn't.
These 3 users liked this post: basil6345789 boatshed bill chekhov
-
- Posts: 5903
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1773 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
- Location: The Banana Stand
Re: Calvert Lewin
They need to stop using slow motion - if you need to use slow motion, it's not a clear and obvious error. Also, they need to show more of the play beforehand to give context to the challenge.
Or go the other way and change the rules - if studs are up in ANY instance - it's a straight red card. Same with contact in the penalty area - just say they are the rules. ANY contact off the ball will be punished.
That seems to be what they want, so why make it so confusing
Or go the other way and change the rules - if studs are up in ANY instance - it's a straight red card. Same with contact in the penalty area - just say they are the rules. ANY contact off the ball will be punished.
That seems to be what they want, so why make it so confusing
Re: Calvert Lewin
Might finish up 7 a side if they give reds for every studs up,I reckon that if a player makes reasonable contact with the ball first no more than a yellow can be given ,and as you say no slow motion,might be an idea to fit the ref with a camera and allow VAR only the use the view that the ref sees unless there’s an off the ball incident that the ref can’t see.claptrappers_union wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 4:30 pmThey need to stop using slow motion - if you need to use slow motion, it's not a clear and obvious error. Also, they need to show more of the play beforehand to give context to the challenge.
Or go the other way and change the rules - if studs are up in ANY instance - it's a straight red card. Same with contact in the penalty area - just say they are the rules. ANY contact off the ball will be punished.
That seems to be what they want, so why make it so confusing
-
- Posts: 8547
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2475 times
- Has Liked: 2011 times
Re: Calvert Lewin
It was a studs up challenge. I know he barely caught his shin but he did. I wouldn’t be calling the match officials even though it is overturned.
I also think this could cause some controversy in future, they’ve set a precedent.
I also think this could cause some controversy in future, they’ve set a precedent.
These 4 users liked this post: Elizabeth Awayfromburnley Rick_Muller mybloodisclaret
-
- Posts: 4925
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
- Been Liked: 862 times
- Has Liked: 334 times
- Location: Halifax
Re: Calvert Lewin
Each team get two challenges per game.
When they want to make a challenge the ref goes to the monitor and watches 3 normal speed replays, if a decision cannot be made after that then stick with the onfield original decision.
Get rid of Stockley Park completely so you don't have 2 or 3 people in the ref's ear giving their opinion.
For offside, just have an extra official on the side of the pitch to see a replay, if a clear mistake cannot be seen then it goes with the onfield decision. Or for replays introduce the automated offside which they use in UEFA and FIFA competitions.
When they want to make a challenge the ref goes to the monitor and watches 3 normal speed replays, if a decision cannot be made after that then stick with the onfield original decision.
Get rid of Stockley Park completely so you don't have 2 or 3 people in the ref's ear giving their opinion.
For offside, just have an extra official on the side of the pitch to see a replay, if a clear mistake cannot be seen then it goes with the onfield decision. Or for replays introduce the automated offside which they use in UEFA and FIFA competitions.
-
- Posts: 7413
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2326 times
- Has Liked: 2174 times
Re: Calvert Lewin
It would be impossible to slide tackle with your studs facing down. They need to be careful because very soon slide tackles will almost be ruled out, you can see why so many are switching off from footballclaptrappers_union wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 4:30 pm
Or go the other way and change the rules - if studs are up in ANY instance - it's a straight red card. Same with contact in the penalty area - just say they are the rules. ANY contact off the ball will be punished.
That seems to be what they want, so why make it so confusing
-
- Posts: 5903
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1773 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
- Location: The Banana Stand
Re: Calvert Lewin
That is point I’m making. I’m not sure what Football authorities want.
-
- Posts: 19434
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3166 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Calvert Lewin
The VAR official in question will be the 4th official at the Turf on Friday - the less opportunity he has to interfere in our matches the better, giving him such authority on the sideline would likely prove a huge errorclaretburns wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 6:19 pmEach team get two challenges per game.
When they want to make a challenge the ref goes to the monitor and watches 3 normal speed replays, if a decision cannot be made after that then stick with the onfield original decision.
Get rid of Stockley Park completely so you don't have 2 or 3 people in the ref's ear giving their opinion.
For offside, just have an extra official on the side of the pitch to see a replay, if a clear mistake cannot be seen then it goes with the onfield decision. Or for replays introduce the automated offside which they use in UEFA and FIFA competitions.
Re: Calvert Lewin
Is VAR operated by the Post Office ?
-
- Posts: 2243
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 8:04 pm
- Been Liked: 699 times
- Has Liked: 4036 times
Re: Calvert Lewin
Get rid of it.
It hasn't worked has been implemented terribly.
It hasn't worked has been implemented terribly.