People away from this board don't watch him week in week out, making the same mistakes.SalisburyClaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 11:42 amAn obvious example is the current manager of Argentina saw fit to play Meslier.
Trafford is on a different level and away from this board most observers see him as one of our best players and the reason why we are still in contention- just about
Age is irrelevant- as certain darts players have shown
TRAFFORD
-
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 238 times
- Has Liked: 443 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Re: TRAFFORD
For those who are unsure what a foul on the keeper looks like this was given in another match last night.
https://twitter.com/hullcitystats/statu ... HaZHTCZYJA
https://twitter.com/hullcitystats/statu ... HaZHTCZYJA
-
- Posts: 7466
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2258 times
- Has Liked: 2173 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Jack Butland got similar hype at a similar age and I think he was better - didn't quite reach the levels expected.JimmyRobbo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 11:18 amWhy world class? Well, he was the U21 England keeper that won the Euros.
Who have you seen at his age who is better?
This user liked this post: IanMcL
-
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 238 times
- Has Liked: 443 times
Re: TRAFFORD
I've acknowledged he's improvement, but I've also pointed out that a keeper can't be taking 21 games to learn a basic skill that obviously wasn't there in the first place in this league. And I've also said it's on vk.JimmyRobbo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 11:45 amEh?
Name me a keeper you have watched at his age who is better. I honestly can't name one.
I favoured Muric in pre-season. I'm now onboard with JT as our keeper. It is clear to see his improvement. His growrh will contnue. You have to be stubborn to the nth degree not to see it.
-
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
- Been Liked: 482 times
- Has Liked: 2292 times
Re: TRAFFORD
In summary
Trafford played well overall
Made a mistake coming for ball - it was one for his defenders
Was fouled
A draw was the right result but should've held on for win having got to where we were
Trafford played well overall
Made a mistake coming for ball - it was one for his defenders
Was fouled
A draw was the right result but should've held on for win having got to where we were
Re: TRAFFORD
Don’t bring Tresor on for Odobert and we wouldn’t be having this conversation. The 2 subs took away our attacking threat and handed the game to Luton. Massive mistake by VK and not for the first time. Having said that Trafford screws up again as he normally does. Every team we play go with a high press and pile crosses in to the big men.
The equalizer last night was the final straw for Trafford VK and Pace in this season horriblis
The equalizer last night was the final straw for Trafford VK and Pace in this season horriblis
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:27 pm
- Been Liked: 246 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Our support really should ease of Trafford,he was excellent last night and a foul on him leading to the equaliser has made him the scapegoat again,10 other players where out there on that field last night are they all totally blameless,really is shocking the amount of abuse that young lad takes on here.
These 4 users liked this post: bfcjg SalisburyClaret Holtyclaret Leisure
-
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 238 times
- Has Liked: 443 times
Re: TRAFFORD
I've said exactly the same, subs should have been zaroury and Benson, not larsen and tresor, I did think for 2 or 3 games larsen may have given us something, since then he's simply flattered to deceive, tresor is another in the ramsay camp, given nothing since he walked through the door. Zaroury and Benson double sub last night would have lifted the whole stadium and continued to keep Luton where they were which was in their own half, yet another poor performance from vk.FCBurnley wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 11:57 amDon’t bring Tresor on for Odobert and we wouldn’t be having this conversation. The 2 subs took away our attacking threat and handed the game to Luton. Massive mistake by VK and not for the first time. Having said that Trafford screws up again as he normally does. Every team we play go with a high press and pile crosses in to the big men.
The equalizer last night was the final straw for Trafford VK and Pace in this season horriblis
Re: TRAFFORD
He flatters to deceive. He didn’t really do much last night. Made a Hollywood save which was comfortable, claimed a few crosses ( equally missed a few aswell )Vincent'sCap wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:04 pmOur support really should ease of Trafford,he was excellent last night and a foul on him leading to the equaliser has made him the scapegoat again,10 other players where out there on that field last night are they all totally blameless,really is shocking the amount of abuse that young lad takes on here.
The main gripe people have with trafford is the rip off fee we paid for him, and the fact that he starts regardless.
He’s not ready for premier league football, he’s too weak and inconsistent. He’s an academy level player.
This user liked this post: alwaysaclaret
-
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 351 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: TRAFFORD
It’s strange last week it was Murics’ fault for conceding a world class strike when Amdouni clearly loses the ball.Shaggy wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:15 pmHe flatters to deceive. He didn’t really do much last night. Made a Hollywood save which was comfortable, claimed a few crosses ( equally missed a few aswell )
The main gripe people have with trafford is the rip off fee we paid for him, and the fact that he starts regardless.
He’s not ready for premier league football, he’s too weak and inconsistent. He’s an academy level player.
This week var is corrupt because Trafford ran into a forward no where near the ball ( crosses are his major weakness) and crumpled on the ground looking for a foul.
Its like their paid shills or something.
Very very odd.
Lost us two points in his naivety.
-
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 351 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: TRAFFORD
This is a manager that brings Tresor on to shore things up against Luton. School boy errors again and again.alwaysaclaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:08 pmI've said exactly the same, subs should have been zaroury and Benson, not larsen and tresor, I did think for 2 or 3 games larsen may have given us something, since then he's simply flattered to deceive, tresor is another in the ramsay camp, given nothing since he walked through the door. Zaroury and Benson double sub last night would have lifted the whole stadium and continued to keep Luton where they were which was in their own half, yet another poor performance from vk.
Re: TRAFFORD
Just turn the telly off if you're not enjoying the gameSuperjohnnyfrancis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:26 pmThis is a manager that brings Tresor on to shore things up against Luton. School boy errors again and again.
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: TRAFFORD
It’s the most watched league in the world - you’d think someone would spot these ‘same mistakes’ - whatever they arealwaysaclaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 11:46 amPeople away from this board don't watch him week in week out, making the same mistakes.
Re: TRAFFORD
When we signed Trafford I was pleased , He was over priced probably but with tremendous potential and will make a world class goalkeeper one day probably. However I expected us to send him out on loan to a championship team to continue learning I did not for a moment expect him to be No1 keeper in the premier league. The PM is not the place for Trafford to learn his trade it is so intense every week that we risk his development and may end up with a complete dud. I expected Muric to be first choice if VK did not rate him then we should have bought an experienced keeper and sold Muric when his stock was high ( Now we will get very little for him) instead we bought a div2 goalkeeper as back up who has barely made the bench this year and kept Muric as a bench warmer whilst playing a raw recruit in the most difficult league in the world. I don't criticise Trafford for any of his mistakes , he is not the one to blame: It just makes no sense.
This user liked this post: alwaysaclaret
-
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
- Been Liked: 956 times
- Has Liked: 169 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Look, I’m a fan of Muric and think he should have been given a chance earlier this season.Vincent'sCap wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:04 pmOur support really should ease of Trafford,he was excellent last night and a foul on him leading to the equaliser has made him the scapegoat again,10 other players where out there on that field last night are they all totally blameless,really is shocking the amount of abuse that young lad takes on here.
But yesterday we saw Trafford come off his line several times to claim the ball, so for me he played really well.
The goal conceded was maybe not the right decision to come off his line, but it was a clear foul on him so the goal should never have stood.
-
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 238 times
- Has Liked: 443 times
Re: TRAFFORD
It was aimed at the specific poster I was replying to.... Not in generalalwaysaclaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 1:00 pmBeen very hard to watch a lot of the time this season, but I watch live, and the main thing, I'm still there, cos have to take the bad times as well, although as I say been hard this season.
-
- Posts: 16902
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6966 times
- Has Liked: 1484 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: TRAFFORD
A couple of weeks ago some people disagreed when I said there were people on here willing Trafford to fail. Well the evidence is pretty clear again here, the same 5 or 6 posters who write and behave like small children.
A flawless performance from Trafford last night until the 92nd minute where he made a poor decision to come for the cross. He should have got away with it though as he was quite obviously fouled and how the goal was allowed to stand is beyond me.
A flawless performance from Trafford last night until the 92nd minute where he made a poor decision to come for the cross. He should have got away with it though as he was quite obviously fouled and how the goal was allowed to stand is beyond me.
These 3 users liked this post: RVclaret cblantfanclub Leisure
-
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 622 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: TRAFFORD
I agree with what you are saying but I would say almost flawless performance because of the poor decision to come for the cross, other than that didn’t put a foot wrongRileybobs wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 1:09 pmA couple of weeks ago some people disagreed when I said there were people on here willing Trafford to fail. Well the evidence is pretty clear again here, the same 5 or 6 posters who write and behave like small children.
A flawless performance from Trafford last night until the 92nd minute where he made a poor decision to come for the cross. He should have got away with it though as he was quite obviously fouled and how the goal was allowed to stand is beyond me.
-
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 1160 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
Re: TRAFFORD
The foul wasn’t given as Trafford was nowhere near the ball whatsoever , neither did the player jump , push, raise arms /elbows etc . If this was 2 outfield players going for the ball that wouldn’t have been a foul ( a minor push into the body of an oncoming player )
While this would usually be given , Trafford didn’t help himself by throwing himself to the ground at first contact .Apart from that JT was very clean and tidy and distributed well .
While this would usually be given , Trafford didn’t help himself by throwing himself to the ground at first contact .Apart from that JT was very clean and tidy and distributed well .
-
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 238 times
- Has Liked: 443 times
-
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1040 times
- Has Liked: 2041 times
Re: TRAFFORD
It's a 50/50 for me. If the ref gives the foul VAR wouldn't have overturned it but for me there wasn't enough in it to overturn the goal either. It's a shame really because Trafford had been excellent to that point, but for me it's a keeper error and he's simply not getting to the ball after he's come tearing out of his goal. I played centre half for 99% of my time as a player and I would have been asking the keeper what he thought he was doing if I'm being totally honest. If he keeps his head their he probably stays on his line and lets the defenders mop it up
This user liked this post: alwaysaclaret
Re: TRAFFORD
Trafford played well last night up to the goal. Unfortunately he is out muscled too easily. Having said that, if it had been Allison at Liverpool or Ederson at City the goal would probably have been chalked off by VAR.
I have seen Vincent’s comments regarding the goal and other VAR decisions that we have been on the wrong end of and it’s difficult to disagree with him.
Next week this could happen to another keeper and VAR will rule it as a foul. Here lays the problem. VAR is a lottery and is ruining the game because of the lack of consistency by the utter muppets who are paid to operate it.
I have seen Vincent’s comments regarding the goal and other VAR decisions that we have been on the wrong end of and it’s difficult to disagree with him.
Next week this could happen to another keeper and VAR will rule it as a foul. Here lays the problem. VAR is a lottery and is ruining the game because of the lack of consistency by the utter muppets who are paid to operate it.
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:12 pm
- Been Liked: 473 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: TRAFFORD
I want Trafford to succeed and he will at some point when he is stronger. It is the people responsible for overpaying for him and consistently selecting him when he is not ready for this level of football whom I blame
These 2 users liked this post: Swizzlestick alwaysaclaret
-
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:56 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 442 times
Re: TRAFFORD
We sold Nick Pope for 13 million and signed James Trafford for 20 million.
Re: TRAFFORD
Butland and one or two others were brilliant for the under 21’s but never improved and he was playing when the game was more physical ,I was a Trafford sceptic but he has improved a great deal in the last few games ,but if a striker had gone down like he did against us we’d give him some real stick ,the half hearted attempt to get the ball was pathetic,we’re sat at the Jimmy Mac end of the ground and you can see fans around us cringing as he misses ball after ball going into the box,but it’s ok because in 4 yrs he may be the best goalkeeper in Burnley.JimmyRobbo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 11:45 amEh?
Name me a keeper you have watched at his age who is better. I honestly can't name one.
I favoured Muric in pre-season. I'm now onboard with JT as our keeper. It is clear to see his improvement. His growrh will contnue. You have to be stubborn to the nth degree not to see it.
-
- Posts: 4075
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1508 times
- Has Liked: 581 times
Re: TRAFFORD
He should have been playing Championship football this season to improve his strength, presence and distribution but we’ve decided to throw him straight in and it just hasn’t worked, completely derailing the style we’d developed in the process. What’s done is done, and I guess he’ll be developing in the Championship next season anyway.
This user liked this post: alwaysaclaret
-
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 622 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Muric for 4 million before Trafford toforzagranata wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 2:05 pmWe sold Nick Pope for 13 million and signed James Trafford for 20 million.
Re: TRAFFORD
Huh? Why do people just make up figures?forzagranata wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 2:05 pmWe sold Nick Pope for 13 million and signed James Trafford for 20 million.
Pope was sold for 10-11m and Trafford bought for 13.5.
Re: TRAFFORD
Butland is/was and always has been far superior to Trafford.
-
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:56 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 442 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Trafford was reported by several outlets, including the BBC and The Athletic, to be 15 million up-front to City plus 4 million in add-ons. So 19 million total if the unspecified add-ons kick in.
You are right about Pope - we sold him for even cheaper than I recalled.
Re: TRAFFORD
A website called everybody soccer has a list of the top 24 goalkeepers in the world under 23, James Trafford doesn't even make the list! There's a 20 year old at City on the list but JT playing premier league football fails to make the list.JimmyRobbo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 11:45 amEh?
Name me a keeper you have watched at his age who is better. I honestly can't name one.
I favoured Muric in pre-season. I'm now onboard with JT as our keeper. It is clear to see his improvement. His growrh will contnue. You have to be stubborn to the nth degree not to see it.
-
- Posts: 2625
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 509 times
- Has Liked: 886 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Brilliant! That proves it.
Re: TRAFFORD
The deal was around 13.7m. Fab Romano reported it ‘around 14m’, I’m led to believe it was just under. The add ons will only kick in if Trafford is a success here, such as we stay up, he plays for England and we finish top 10. Saying we spent 20m is therefore factually inaccurate.forzagranata wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 2:35 pmTrafford was reported by several outlets, including the BBC and The Athletic, to be 15 million up-front to City plus 4 million in add-ons. So 19 million total if the unspecified add-ons kick in.
You are right about Pope - we sold him for even cheaper than I recalled.
This user liked this post: Steve1956
-
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 463 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Couldn't get to or watch the match last night as I had other commitments. I'll take people's word for it he had a good game beyond the goal, because all I can go on is Sky highlights.
The Luton player Adebayo turns his back and then plants his feet, standing his ground, he doesn't look at Trafford, don't know where people are getting this from I've watched the replay about 20 times now. Kompany might say otherwise but he turns his back but doesn't look from any angle I've seen, Trafford runs into him nowhere near the ball then bounces off like he's made of paper. He moves in as he turns his back, static by the time he's got his back to Trafford. Same with 'they didnt' celebrate' - Morris & Adebayo both did, the rest are wondering what the ref's gonna do because when the keeper goes sprawling you never know.
I think it's given as a foul against Allison, Ederson, etc. I'm not sure it should be given against them or any keeper, as it's weak keeping more than anything, I genuinely don't know if he gets there either way.
Always going to lean towards "its a foul" when it's on a Burnley player but if that's at the other end I'm saying the keeper's just too weak and gets his run wrong and I'm fuming if it's disallowed. I think that's why it's not changed by VAR honestly- if the ref blows his whistle as a foul, VAR won't overturn it and allow the goal, if the ref lets it stand so does VAR.
Shocking from Al Dakhil though he just lets Morris bypass and lose him, Ekdal's trying to mark Adebayo then I think sees Morris is free, or sees Adebayo and Trafford collide, tries to get back across to Morris but doesn't make it and can't get off his feet. We're just not strong enough in the air anywhere for that goal.
People away from this board largely don't watch players from smaller clubs and will just go on stats or 10-second Twitter clips, 2 minutes of SkKy coverage at most. On stats he's the most deployed keeper for passes which makes him sound like a dream playmaker even if he's not, and has made a few big saves that are good for Twitter clips. He's had 2 maybe 3 MOTM performances but he's not remotely 'on a different level'. He makes so many basic errors, is now less risky passer than Muric even if he wasn't at first, but FAR less productive, and is physically and aerially so weak especially for his height.SalisburyClaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 11:42 amAn obvious example is the current manager of Argentina saw fit to play Meslier.
Trafford is on a different level and away from this board most observers see him as one of our best players and the reason why we are still in contention- just about
Age is irrelevant- as certain darts players have shown
The Luton player Adebayo turns his back and then plants his feet, standing his ground, he doesn't look at Trafford, don't know where people are getting this from I've watched the replay about 20 times now. Kompany might say otherwise but he turns his back but doesn't look from any angle I've seen, Trafford runs into him nowhere near the ball then bounces off like he's made of paper. He moves in as he turns his back, static by the time he's got his back to Trafford. Same with 'they didnt' celebrate' - Morris & Adebayo both did, the rest are wondering what the ref's gonna do because when the keeper goes sprawling you never know.
I think it's given as a foul against Allison, Ederson, etc. I'm not sure it should be given against them or any keeper, as it's weak keeping more than anything, I genuinely don't know if he gets there either way.
Always going to lean towards "its a foul" when it's on a Burnley player but if that's at the other end I'm saying the keeper's just too weak and gets his run wrong and I'm fuming if it's disallowed. I think that's why it's not changed by VAR honestly- if the ref blows his whistle as a foul, VAR won't overturn it and allow the goal, if the ref lets it stand so does VAR.
Shocking from Al Dakhil though he just lets Morris bypass and lose him, Ekdal's trying to mark Adebayo then I think sees Morris is free, or sees Adebayo and Trafford collide, tries to get back across to Morris but doesn't make it and can't get off his feet. We're just not strong enough in the air anywhere for that goal.
I don't see how there's a laugh at all and nobody should want "Trafford fan boys eating humble pie", I favour Muric but Trafford is a Burnley keeper playing in a Burnley shirt and whatever we think about selection we ought to back him and want him to do well, it's FAR worse for the club if he plays badly, I for one was hoping his run of good shot stopping performances and reduced errors in passing/the air were a sign he'd turned the corner and was set to do as Muric did last year, really push on. Everyone should want that regardless of which keeper we'd pick.
-
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 298 times
- Has Liked: 781 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Adebayo knew what he was doing....
Re: TRAFFORD
How many times did we block a defender or keeper when Sean Dyche was here?
-
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 622 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Course he did and it’s clever, if there’s no var you can live with it and say he’s got away with one, but when var have checked it over and over again it’s crazy how they don’t give a foul
Re: TRAFFORD
Young goalkeepers are not yet the best. Only potentially the best. Older keepers - 30 plus - know what they are doing.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 11:48 amJack Butland got similar hype at a similar age and I think he was better - didn't quite reach the levels expected.
Trafford is agile. Lacking in most other departments.
Re: TRAFFORD
I know but it’s as though someone’s just invented the wheel,too many fans with poor little Burnley attitude ,the players apart from 3 or 4 should look at themselves and ask if they’re up for the fight ,and on last night’s showing the answer is no ,fans calling for no VAR ,ok no VAR the ref gave the goal.
Re: TRAFFORD
After seeing this in real time from about 10 yards away last night, I finally rewatched it.
It’s absolutely shite goalkeeping from Trafford. There’s no need to even think of coming for that ball at all and he goes down like a sack of spuds. Weak as ****.
I’d want that given if it was for us.
It’s absolutely shite goalkeeping from Trafford. There’s no need to even think of coming for that ball at all and he goes down like a sack of spuds. Weak as ****.
I’d want that given if it was for us.
This user liked this post: Superjohnnyfrancis
Re: TRAFFORD
How much did the call to talksport cost you?BurnleyFC wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 5:07 pmAfter seeing this in real time from about 10 yards away last night, I finally rewatched it.
It’s absolutely shite goalkeeping from Trafford. There’s no need to even think of coming for that ball at all and he goes down like a sack of spuds. Weak as ****.
I’d want that given if it was for us.
Re: TRAFFORD
There was a guy on, who was sat the same distance away as you, and said the same thing... coincidence?
-
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 351 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: TRAFFORD
It was a flawless performance according to one poster who also thought Muric should have saved that worldie last weekBurnleyFC wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 5:07 pmAfter seeing this in real time from about 10 yards away last night, I finally rewatched it.
It’s absolutely shite goalkeeping from Trafford. There’s no need to even think of coming for that ball at all and he goes down like a sack of spuds. Weak as ****.
I’d want that given if it was for us.
-
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 298 times
- Has Liked: 781 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Your underestimating the power of Adebayo's arse, it blew him awayBurnleyFC wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 5:07 pmAfter seeing this in real time from about 10 yards away last night, I finally rewatched it.
It’s absolutely shite goalkeeping from Trafford. There’s no need to even think of coming for that ball at all and he goes down like a sack of spuds. Weak as ****.
I’d want that given if it was for us.