TRAFFORD
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 7:02 am
- Been Liked: 269 times
- Has Liked: 161 times
TRAFFORD
Weak mug.
Who is defending him now?
Who is defending him now?
Re: TRAFFORD
Get a life pal. That was stone wall
-
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2023 7:57 pm
- Been Liked: 207 times
- Has Liked: 113 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Wasn’t a foul he was weak as **** !
-
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 641 times
- Has Liked: 674 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Weak ref
Weak keeper.
Weak VAR
Weak keeper.
Weak VAR
-
- Posts: 2601
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
- Been Liked: 956 times
- Has Liked: 170 times
Re: TRAFFORD
In any game against a big team that’s a blatant foul
-
- Posts: 18036
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4075 times
- Has Liked: 1854 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Poor from the keeper.
-
- Posts: 18036
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4075 times
- Has Liked: 1854 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Poor from the keeper.
-
- Posts: 18036
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4075 times
- Has Liked: 1854 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Poor from the keeper.
-
- Posts: 18036
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4075 times
- Has Liked: 1854 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Poor from the keeper.
All over the place there.
All over the place there.
-
- Posts: 18036
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4075 times
- Has Liked: 1854 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Poor from the keeper.
All over the place there.
All over the place there.
-
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2023 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 150 times
- Has Liked: 377 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Trafford had an excellent game but I think if you come off your line like that you’ve got to make sure you don’t mess up .. I’m not sure that’s a foul .. Trafford looked like he ran into him
Re: TRAFFORD
Haven’t seen it again yet, but it looked weak as **** from where I sit.
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: TRAFFORD
As obvious a foul as you’ll ever see
No attempt to play the ball - no question it’s a foul
No attempt to play the ball - no question it’s a foul
This user liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin
Re: TRAFFORD
If he did then I agree it’s not a foul but he didn’t, Adebayo isn’t looking at the ball and clearly moves into Trafford, blatant foul.
-
- Posts: 2601
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
- Been Liked: 956 times
- Has Liked: 170 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Deliberately backs into him
-
- Posts: 15283
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3168 times
- Has Liked: 6770 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Looked like a rehearsed move by Luton. Big fella blocks the keeper giving Morris a free header.
This user liked this post: claretbonkers
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 9:13 pm
- Been Liked: 66 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Replays show the luton player stepped right into Trafford and rolled him with his hip, no intentionto play the ball and avtively moved to block him. Foul all day long. All the commentary team/pundits called it as a clear foul as well.
-
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
- Been Liked: 1165 times
- Has Liked: 94 times
- Location: your mum
Re: TRAFFORD
Had a great game and got fouled at the end.
These 3 users liked this post: Holtyclaret Rick_Muller Foshiznik
-
- Posts: 1203
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 577 times
- Has Liked: 173 times
Re: TRAFFORD
A foul all night long. Even the Luton players thought it would be disallowed. ******* robbed.
-
- Posts: 30728
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11061 times
- Has Liked: 5667 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: TRAFFORD
some of you need to see it again. 100% a foul, he takes a look to see where Trafford is and then blocks him. It's as clear a foul as you will ever see.
This user liked this post: burnleymik
Re: TRAFFORD
No attempt whatsoever to play the ball, just backs into him to impede his jump. Absolutely blatant foul.
Re: TRAFFORD
Stone wall foul, how that wasn't given is a disgrace. I really do feel for this board with you 'burnley' fans that love decisions like that more than a Burnley goal, are you really fans
Re: TRAFFORD
don’t respond to the TROLL
Re: TRAFFORD
Clear clear foul. Complete and utter joke of a decision.
-
- Posts: 1203
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 577 times
- Has Liked: 173 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Even the Luton know they got away with that one. Funny how some of our own so-called fans see it differently.
These 2 users liked this post: RVclaret Holtyclaret
Re: TRAFFORD
Foul for what?
Bad decision by a little boy in our goal that's cost us again.
Bad decision by a little boy in our goal that's cost us again.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 837 times
Re: TRAFFORD
A little boy playing men's football. What a waste of money he is.
Re: TRAFFORD
Of course it was a foul , imagine that being given at Anfield
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2020 2:04 pm
- Been Liked: 10 times
- Has Liked: 2 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Wasn’t a foul
-
- Posts: 3072
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1102 times
- Has Liked: 857 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Anyone blaming Trafford for that is a moron. Clear as day foul.
Re: TRAFFORD
The most blatant of fouls on Trafford
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Somebody walks backwards into a keeper and sticks his arse out to knock him over - and some people use it to have a pop at our player - no excuse for it
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 396
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2022 3:11 am
- Been Liked: 120 times
- Has Liked: 54 times
Re: TRAFFORD
People letting their agenda against Trafford cloud their judgment.As obvious a foul on the keeper as you will see.
Re: TRAFFORD
He was no where near the cross even if he was fouled which I don’t think he was
-
- Posts: 6907
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2759 times
- Has Liked: 4325 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Ekdal and El Dhakil dont exactly cover themselves in glory for the goal either...
-
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:24 pm
- Been Liked: 553 times
- Has Liked: 79 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: TRAFFORD
Perhaps it might have been a foul but the keeper should have smashed him out of the way once he made the decision to come for it.
Like the majority of our side he is physically weak.
He caught the ball once and flapped at all the rest.
Like the majority of our side he is physically weak.
He caught the ball once and flapped at all the rest.
-
- Posts: 1203
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 577 times
- Has Liked: 173 times
Re: TRAFFORD
It was a foul - can't believe some of our own fans can't see it. Not that it makes any difference, but come on, get real.
-
- Posts: 9493
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1187 times
- Has Liked: 780 times
Re: TRAFFORD
The message is clear.
-
- Posts: 4152
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:39 pm
- Been Liked: 698 times
- Has Liked: 608 times
- Location: Wexford, Ireland. via Nelson.
Re: TRAFFORD
I thought it was the only error all night played really well just weak coming out for that, but any top team in the league gets a free kick.
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
-
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2022 9:53 pm
- Been Liked: 216 times
- Has Liked: 113 times
Re: TRAFFORD
I have absolutely no agenda against Trafford, I think he's a good keeper, will definitely improve with experience, but he needs to quickly improve his physical presence in the box,he's too easily brushed off.
-
- Posts: 10333
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3342 times
- Has Liked: 1964 times
Re: TRAFFORD
It’s a foul all day long.
Re: TRAFFORD
Had a good game.
Re: TRAFFORD
Any team in the top half and it's a foul
-
- Posts: 7476
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2263 times
- Has Liked: 2175 times
Re: TRAFFORD
Take that incident at the end out of it even.
We absolutely play better as a team with Muric between the sticks.
There's not even a debate at this point for me it's so blindingly obvious
We absolutely play better as a team with Muric between the sticks.
There's not even a debate at this point for me it's so blindingly obvious
-
- Posts: 9493
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1187 times
- Has Liked: 780 times
Re: TRAFFORD
It can always happen when you don't put the game to bed you run the risk, on the balance of play Luton deserved a share of the spoils just a kick in the gnashers we couldn't see it out.
This user liked this post: fatboy47
Re: TRAFFORD
Completely agree with this - his vision and execution both short and long are massive in how we played last year.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:21 pmTake that incident at the end out of it even.
We absolutely play better as a team with Muric between the sticks.
There's not even a debate at this point for me it's so blindingly obvious
Trafford has made minimal mistakes this season but it’s what he doesn’t give us that is hurting us.
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1509 times
- Has Liked: 582 times
Re: TRAFFORD
This. We cannot play how we want to play with him in the nets. It’s that simple.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:21 pmTake that incident at the end out of it even.
We absolutely play better as a team with Muric between the sticks.
There's not even a debate at this point for me it's so blindingly obvious
Re: TRAFFORD
Thought tonight for 90 mins was one of his better games then buggered it up ,but if VK hadn’t have brought Tresor on he wouldn’t have needed to make that cockup.