I think more people in the world think Tresor is a better winger than JBG.Burnley1989 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 7:42 amI think you might be the only man on the planet that thinks he should start, I’d not even have him anywhere near the match day squad, never mind starting a game.
Mike Tresor
Re: Mike Tresor
-
- Posts: 6977
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1490 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: Mike Tresor
Jayrod and attack was the way to go.Benny on the right against a tiring full back .Leaving Doughty to put yet another dangerous ball in was insane.
Jack Cork should have been on earlier too.
Jack Cork should have been on earlier too.
This user liked this post: RighteousClaret
-
- Posts: 6977
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1490 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: Mike Tresor
Jayrod and attack was the way to go.Benny on the right against a tiring full back .Leaving Doughty to put yet another dangerous ball in was insane.
Jack Cork should have been on earlier too.
Jack Cork should have been on earlier too.
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 702 times
- Has Liked: 174 times
-
- Posts: 5372
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1654 times
- Has Liked: 404 times
Re: Mike Tresor
Really unfair to single out a player with a 100+ post thread who was only on 10 minutes or so and whose job it clearly wasn’t to defend, nor it is his skillset. He was put on to get the 2nd goal and keep them occupied. The mistake was VKs because we were dealing with them fairly comfortably and it needed nous on to do those spoiling little things to see out a nervy game.
It’s like putting Neymar on to see out a game and then blaming him for missing a couple of tackles. Quite simply, you wouldn’t put even Neymar on in that situation.
It’s like putting Neymar on to see out a game and then blaming him for missing a couple of tackles. Quite simply, you wouldn’t put even Neymar on in that situation.
This user liked this post: Anthonini
Re: Mike Tresor
Tresor
I just don't see what he contributes.
I just don't see what he contributes.
Re: Mike Tresor
Absolutely spot on. Especially after what happened to Foster you'd think people got some more sense.CrosspoolClarets wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 8:14 amReally unfair to single out a player with a 100+ post thread who was only on 10 minutes or so and whose job it clearly wasn’t to defend, nor it is his skillset. He was put on to get the 2nd goal and keep them occupied. The mistake was VKs because we were dealing with them fairly comfortably and it needed nous on to do those spoiling little things to see out a nervy game.
It’s like putting Neymar on to see out a game and then blaming him for missing a couple of tackles. Quite simply, you wouldn’t put even Neymar on in that situation.
Re: Mike Tresor
Our own player being described as a ‘waste of oxygen’ is surely a new low, even for this board.
This user liked this post: longsidepies
-
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 688 times
- Has Liked: 133 times
Re: Mike Tresor
That's the problem with this board, it goes too far. To say he didn't look up for the fight in his cameo is fine, to say its an odd substitution is fine. He hasn't lit any fires since arriving but some of the criticism and abuse on here is way overboard.
Re: Mike Tresor
You could have quoted me RV.
Sorry you didn’t like my comment, I’ll admit that phrasing was over the top last night in the heat of moment after seeing another gutless display from this man.
I absolutely stand by the rest of my comment and it is clear from this thread that patience for this man has finally run out. Deservedly so.
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Mike Tresor
I wouldn’t call anything I’ve said towards Tresor as abuse, I said I really can’t see where he goes from here because he hasn’t shown anything yet in any game for mewhat_no_pies wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 1:35 amYou/they can do what you like but if that's spew negativity and abuse towards them then you're not supporting them, which is what I said.
-
- Posts: 5794
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Mike Tresor
It’s quite simple in a relegation battle (maybe not anymore) you need players who are going to run and show some fight he does neither so should be nowhere near the squad. Same goes for a few others.
This user liked this post: JohnDearyMe
-
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2020 10:17 am
- Been Liked: 147 times
- Has Liked: 24 times
Re: Mike Tresor
There was some questionable business done in the summer. He has to be the worst though, given what we are seemingly committed to paying for him at the end of this loan spell, made all the more baffling that he was the last one through the door that Koleosho, Odobert, JBL and Redmond had already come through (with Benson and Zaroury also here already for those positions)
Agree with the majority of others, the lack of effort from him is unacceptable, few assists in the Belgian league and he has the air of attitude that he's doing us a favour by being here. Wasn't there reports at the time that he'd decided he didn't want to sign for us after having a change of heart but was eventually talked into it? Perhaps that was a bit of an eye opener in hindsight because he certainly gives the impression of a man who doesn't want to be here.
Can't think of another player in our squad I'd have wanted to come on less last night, when trying to get over the line in a crucial game than Tresor, strange decision from Kompany.
Takes a lot to turn me against a player, but I'm at the point now where I'd not be disappointed if we didn't see him play for us again and if there's a way of backing out of signing him this summer, or even off loading him for a loss, I'd be all for it
Agree with the majority of others, the lack of effort from him is unacceptable, few assists in the Belgian league and he has the air of attitude that he's doing us a favour by being here. Wasn't there reports at the time that he'd decided he didn't want to sign for us after having a change of heart but was eventually talked into it? Perhaps that was a bit of an eye opener in hindsight because he certainly gives the impression of a man who doesn't want to be here.
Can't think of another player in our squad I'd have wanted to come on less last night, when trying to get over the line in a crucial game than Tresor, strange decision from Kompany.
Takes a lot to turn me against a player, but I'm at the point now where I'd not be disappointed if we didn't see him play for us again and if there's a way of backing out of signing him this summer, or even off loading him for a loss, I'd be all for it
-
- Posts: 3172
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 1751 times
- Has Liked: 273 times
Re: Mike Tresor
I think he could come good yet, but like Benson he’s not a battler. He’s a player to play when you’re well on top or even chasing a game.
His was the only sub/tactical change I had an issue with last night.
His was the only sub/tactical change I had an issue with last night.
-
- Posts: 6977
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1490 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: Mike Tresor
It should have been Benny on against a tiring defence but the blame is with VK .What he has against Benny and Zaroury is a mystery.
Mike gets selected and so he plays.It was a very weak effort he showed though and understandably fans were pxxxed off for his lack of energy and his general disinterested play.
Mike gets selected and so he plays.It was a very weak effort he showed though and understandably fans were pxxxed off for his lack of energy and his general disinterested play.
This user liked this post: alwaysaclaret
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Mike Tresor
For Tresor to come good, the position we are in now we have to start him every game or is 15-18m lost and will end up another weghorst out on loan next season
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:59 am
- Been Liked: 30 times
- Has Liked: 20 times
Re: Mike Tresor
Most of you on here are a disgrace to the fan base, waiting behind your keyboards excitedly for players to slip up so that you can spoute nonsense and constantly criticise.
No doubt he wasn't great coming on last night, but he's an attacking winger who shouldn't have been put in that situation. Let's try to get behind players - from what I saw he ran about a lot but looked lost unsurprisingly.
No doubt he wasn't great coming on last night, but he's an attacking winger who shouldn't have been put in that situation. Let's try to get behind players - from what I saw he ran about a lot but looked lost unsurprisingly.
This user liked this post: Anonymous
Re: Mike Tresor
I didn't see any running about just strolling, turning his back on balls coming near him, ducking out of challenges, not making blocks, wandering around aimlessly not pressing or slowing any fight whatsoever to keep that win. That's what people have a problem with, after the rest of the team had bust a gut trying to hold out for the win, they are not wanting a guy to "slip up".
But agree with others that he shouldn't have even come on, he's not shown any energy or fight in any of his appearances, I guess he's just not that kind of player.
But agree with others that he shouldn't have even come on, he's not shown any energy or fight in any of his appearances, I guess he's just not that kind of player.
Re: Mike Tresor
Just watched the goal back this morning, the lack of effort from Larsen to stop the cross is an absolute joke. Still fuming with the pair of them.
This user liked this post: FCBurnley
-
- Posts: 7177
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3605 times
- Has Liked: 1032 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Mike Tresor
Struggle to believe anyone is defending Tresor after last night, but there is a few (although when one is the one man Belgian National team fan club that isn’t even a Burnley fan, it’s no surprise). The double standards on here are laughable. Vitinho is fair game every single match for not being good enough (and he’s not, granted) and gets routinely slated but one thing that lad cannot ever have moaned at is his effort. He gives every ounce of his body and mind to try and bridge that gap, that’s enough for me because it’s not his fault he’s playing. You know full well he’s 100% committed to Burnley and ‘wants it’.
Tresor isn’t good enough by a long shot but if you saw that same application then he would (rightly) get a pass from the fans. Last night was Paul Stewart-esque (and yes, we now know the problems Stewart had off the pitch but the application on the field was comparable). Not withstanding awful comments on this thread of a more personal nature, Tresor is fair game to be criticised as the one thing Burnley fans will never tolerate is a lack of effort.
Tresor isn’t good enough by a long shot but if you saw that same application then he would (rightly) get a pass from the fans. Last night was Paul Stewart-esque (and yes, we now know the problems Stewart had off the pitch but the application on the field was comparable). Not withstanding awful comments on this thread of a more personal nature, Tresor is fair game to be criticised as the one thing Burnley fans will never tolerate is a lack of effort.
These 3 users liked this post: CoolClaret Burnley1989 spt_claret
-
- Posts: 6693
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1704 times
- Has Liked: 791 times
Re: Mike Tresor
Jedi-we have a few other people that whilst you can query if they are up to PL standard , give it their all ie Cullen, Brownhill, O'Shea, Taylor, and probably no one gives more than Foster. When that happens then it amplifies Tresor's lack of any committment or fight, and every one of our remaining games will be a dog fight. Up to yesterday I felt there must be something in his locker after seeing his playing stats in Belgium. However having seen him last night, albeit for around 10-15 minutes I dont want him in the team again-he might be OK in the Championship. I believe some of the criticism is extreme but can see why people have turned on him. VK has a serious challenge on his handsjedi_master wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 10:04 amStruggle to believe anyone is defending Tresor after last night, but there is a few (although when one is the one man Belgian National team fan club that isn’t even a Burnley fan, it’s no surprise). The double standards on here are laughable. Vitinho is fair game every single match for not being good enough (and he’s not, granted) and gets routinely slated but one thing that lad cannot ever have moaned at is his effort. He gives every ounce of his body and mind to try and bridge that gap, that’s enough for me because it’s not his fault he’s playing. You know full well he’s 100% committed to Burnley and ‘wants it’.
Tresor isn’t good enough by a long shot but if you saw that same application then he would (rightly) get a pass from the fans. Last night was Paul Stewart-esque (and yes, we now know the problems Stewart had off the pitch but the application on the field was comparable). Not withstanding awful comments on this thread of a more personal nature, Tresor is fair game to be criticised as the one thing Burnley fans will never tolerate is a lack of effort.
Re: Mike Tresor
Agree. I thought of Paul Stewart last night with his lack of effort and disinterest. Unacceptable. Many fans have grafted hard all week and are probably struggling to pay bills and then watch that lack of effort from someone who is paid a fortune.jedi_master wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 10:04 amStruggle to believe anyone is defending Tresor after last night, but there is a few (although when one is the one man Belgian National team fan club that isn’t even a Burnley fan, it’s no surprise). The double standards on here are laughable. Vitinho is fair game every single match for not being good enough (and he’s not, granted) and gets routinely slated but one thing that lad cannot ever have moaned at is his effort. He gives every ounce of his body and mind to try and bridge that gap, that’s enough for me because it’s not his fault he’s playing. You know full well he’s 100% committed to Burnley and ‘wants it’.
Tresor isn’t good enough by a long shot but if you saw that same application then he would (rightly) get a pass from the fans. Last night was Paul Stewart-esque (and yes, we now know the problems Stewart had off the pitch but the application on the field was comparable). Not withstanding awful comments on this thread of a more personal nature, Tresor is fair game to be criticised as the one thing Burnley fans will never tolerate is a lack of effort.
Re: Mike Tresor
I really wish folk could learn the difference between"disinterested" and "uninterested."
-
- Posts: 4406
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1259 times
- Has Liked: 1368 times
Re: Mike Tresor
When Tresor and Larsen came on I didn't feel right but thought well there's only a short time to hold out so it shouldn't matter too much.
On reflection with their injury time equaliser and Tresor's woeful short cameo I now know why I had that uneasy feeling.
On reflection with their injury time equaliser and Tresor's woeful short cameo I now know why I had that uneasy feeling.
This user liked this post: nil_desperandum
-
- Posts: 875
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:32 pm
- Been Liked: 311 times
- Has Liked: 199 times
Re: Mike Tresor
When Tresor was on the bench and warming up at half time you could only see his eyes, every other part of his head and body was wrapped up. I have never seen a player before with only his eyes visible like that , combined with the way he then played when he came on shows he has a lot to do now to convince Burnley fans he has the heart to be a success as Burnley . A total disgrace, when he came on it was worse than 10
men because virtually all the other players gave 100% and couldn’t have given more , they must feel very let down by him.
men because virtually all the other players gave 100% and couldn’t have given more , they must feel very let down by him.
Re: Mike Tresor
Not sure this is a fair criticism. Im sure Belgium wasnt much warmer in winter and he seemed to do fine over therenortheastclaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 11:23 amWhen Tresor was on the bench and warming up at half time you could only see his eyes, every other part of his head and body was wrapped up. I have never seen a player before with only his eyes visible like that , combined with the way he then played when he came on shows he has a lot to do now to convince Burnley fans he has the heart to be a success as Burnley . A total disgrace, when he came on it was worse than 10
men because virtually all the other players gave 100% and couldn’t have given more , they must feel very let down by him.
Re: Mike Tresor
VK got the subs 100% wrong AGAIN. We were in control of of the game when he brought Tresor and Larsen on. Both Odobert and JGB were doing a great job in both defense and attack. Tired ? maybe but certainly doing their jobs. We gave Luton a lifeline and they took it with or without a foul on Trafford. Just watch the build up to the goal. It is shocking on our part. Even the cross is more of a lob. That goal effectively confirmed our deserved return to the Championship
Re: Mike Tresor
Tresor is the epitome of all of what is wrong with the club at the moment
-
- Posts: 875
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:32 pm
- Been Liked: 311 times
- Has Liked: 199 times
Re: Mike Tresor
Did fine over there. If he showed so little fight and work rate over there and left that to his team mates and was allowed to get away with it , he is the wrong player for us. If he played that cameo for Luton last night I doubt if he would ever play for them again, knowing how important they regard 100% effort. Saying that almost every one of our players last night showed the same commitment.
Imagine how you feel if you are Lyle Foster, dead on his feet at the end but still running and trying so hard he was falling over and then a player comes on and it looks like he can’t be @rsed.
-
- Posts: 2587
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
- Been Liked: 955 times
- Has Liked: 169 times
Re: Mike Tresor
As soon as I saw Tresor duck out of his ‘challenge’, I said to my wife they are going to score. 30 seconds later the ball is in the back of the net.Elizabeth wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 11:03 amWhen Tresor and Larsen came on I didn't feel right but thought well there's only a short time to hold out so it shouldn't matter too much.
On reflection with their injury time equaliser and Tresor's woeful short cameo I now know why I had that uneasy feeling.
Seems like everything is going against us r
This season do far
-
- Posts: 4073
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1507 times
- Has Liked: 581 times
-
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:56 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 442 times
Re: Mike Tresor
That 'no look' flick pass he produced in the final minutes as we were hanging on to a lead - straight to a Luton player just outside our box, summed up Tresor's season and indeed our season so far.
This user liked this post: cockneyclaret
-
- Posts: 18100
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3875 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Mike Tresor
How can you describe something as a gutless display after a 10 minute sub appearance?ksrclaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 8:36 amYou could have quoted me RV.
Sorry you didn’t like my comment, I’ll admit that phrasing was over the top last night in the heat of moment after seeing another gutless display from this man.
I absolutely stand by the rest of my comment and it is clear from this thread that patience for this man has finally run out. Deservedly so.
-
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:11 pm
- Been Liked: 118 times
- Has Liked: 307 times
Re: Mike Tresor
I can't remember calling out any of our players on this forum but Tresor is trying my patience for sure and as forza said - that flick pass did pretty much sum him up at the moment.
-
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
- Been Liked: 278 times
- Has Liked: 3308 times
Re: Mike Tresor
I said the same to myself.. lazy, effortless football just giving Luton that chance.Belgianclaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 1:09 pmAs soon as I saw Tresor duck out of his ‘challenge’, I said to my wife they are going to score. 30 seconds later the ball is in the back of the net.
Seems like everything is going against us r
This season do far
Re: Mike Tresor
It’s simply because in that cameo he ducked out of at least one challenge, didn’t show any effort in closing down, didn’t make any runs into the spaces when we had the ball, and appeared very nonchalant on the ball which resulted in him giving it away extremely cheaply. He didn’t show the guts I thought we needed to fight tooth and nail to ensure we got the win we desperately needed.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 2:47 pmHow can you describe something as a gutless display after a 10 minute sub appearance?
This user liked this post: cockneyclaret
-
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:59 am
- Been Liked: 131 times
- Has Liked: 94 times
Re: Mike Tresor
I was more excited by this signing than any other at the beginning of the season. He has been very disappointing. I keep trying to find reasons for why he has performed so poorly, such as moving to a new country, adapting to a different style of play or very limited game time etc. As others have said I don't like to call out players but it appears as either he doesn't want to be here or that he is suffering from an extreme lack of confidence. If anyone can think of anything else, please let me know because I really want him to succeed. If he doesn't want to be here then he should be nowhere near the squad never mind the team. If he is suffering from a severe lack of confidence then he should not be brought on to help defend a slender lead with minutes remaining. That is on the manager, not the player.
-
- Posts: 797
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:28 pm
- Been Liked: 420 times
- Has Liked: 69 times
Re: Mike Tresor
I don't know the rules on transfers, but assuming we have to sign him in the summer, can we sell him that same summer? Or do you have to wait a window, meaning we've got him for another year at least.
-
- Posts: 18100
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3875 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Mike Tresor
This site doesn't allow sub ratings on the players ratings thread, if less than 20 minutes.ksrclaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 2:57 pmIt’s simply because in that cameo he ducked out of at least one challenge, didn’t show any effort in closing down, didn’t make any runs into the spaces when we had the ball, and appeared very nonchalant on the ball which resulted in him giving it away extremely cheaply. He didn’t show the guts I thought we needed to fight tooth and nail to ensure we got the win we desperately needed.
Yet you call a 10 minute appearance as a display.
Did you really expect much from any sub coming on for a few minutes at the end on a freezing night?
-
- Posts: 5372
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1654 times
- Has Liked: 404 times
Re: Mike Tresor
Just checked the stats because I detect the usual Burnley “anti flair player bias” on here.
Vitinho, Brownhill and Amdouni (somebody else ridiculed wrongly for this) were the only players to attempt more tackles than Tresor last night. He won one, missed two, OK, he isn’t very good at tackling, but to be accused of a lack of effort isn’t just thick and wrong, it is also insulting to our own player. In contrast, Foster, who I thought was total effort throughout despite not looking fully fit, attempted just one tackle. By the way Barkley tried eight, the most of anyone.
Obviously the wrong sub at the wrong time, him and Larsen only had 4 touches each and if we are letting Luton have the ball and sitting deep, they are the wrong players, but that is a totally different issue, and it didn’t cost us the game. The referee did.
Vitinho, Brownhill and Amdouni (somebody else ridiculed wrongly for this) were the only players to attempt more tackles than Tresor last night. He won one, missed two, OK, he isn’t very good at tackling, but to be accused of a lack of effort isn’t just thick and wrong, it is also insulting to our own player. In contrast, Foster, who I thought was total effort throughout despite not looking fully fit, attempted just one tackle. By the way Barkley tried eight, the most of anyone.
Obviously the wrong sub at the wrong time, him and Larsen only had 4 touches each and if we are letting Luton have the ball and sitting deep, they are the wrong players, but that is a totally different issue, and it didn’t cost us the game. The referee did.
This user liked this post: longsidepies
-
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 238 times
- Has Liked: 443 times
Re: Mike Tresor
So on that basis maybe there should be a ratings thread for kompany, because yet again and more so last night than any other it was an awful choice of substitution. One of the reasons for my voicing the opinion that vk is just not learning, he simply doesn't get ways of how to see a game and winning position out as a manager, not the first time it's happened last night.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 3:20 pmThis site doesn't allow sub ratings on the players ratings thread, if less than 20 minutes.
Yet you call a 10 minute appearance as a display.
Did you really expect much from any sub coming on for a few minutes at the end on a freezing night?
-
- Posts: 10328
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3342 times
- Has Liked: 1964 times
Re: Mike Tresor
I expected more than he showed.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 3:20 pmThis site doesn't allow sub ratings on the players ratings thread, if less than 20 minutes.
Yet you call a 10 minute appearance as a display.
Did you really expect much from any sub coming on for a few minutes at the end on a freezing night?
Re: Mike Tresor
We need to be careful, 15m is a lot and this move hasn’t worked out for either party clearly.
The worry is we go down and he ends up out on loan in Europe a la Weghorst.
The worry is we go down and he ends up out on loan in Europe a la Weghorst.
This user liked this post: Wokingclaret
Re: Mike Tresor
I expected much, much better than what I’ve described. I don’t think I’m being unreasonable in expecting more, given the general agreement on his showing last night.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 3:20 pmThis site doesn't allow sub ratings on the players ratings thread, if less than 20 minutes.
Yet you call a 10 minute appearance as a display.
Did you really expect much from any sub coming on for a few minutes at the end on a freezing night?
-
- Posts: 797
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:28 pm
- Been Liked: 420 times
- Has Liked: 69 times
Re: Mike Tresor
The worry is we go down, can't get rid of him, and he's rubbish for 3 more years.
At least out on loan his wages will be covered.
Re: Mike Tresor
Dont talk rubbish. In the last 30 years some of the most popular players have been flair players. Blake, Little, Eagles, Valois. Tresor is getting deserved stick because not for the first time he came on fresh as a daisy and couldnt be bothered to put the work in to help us get a result, for the record signing in our history it really is a disgrace. Ive not seen anything like it in the 25 years ive been watching Burnley. Id love to see him in a changing room with Ternent or Dyche after that shitshow that he put in last nightCrosspoolClarets wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 3:22 pmJust checked the stats because I detect the usual Burnley “anti flair player bias” on here.
Vitinho, Brownhill and Amdouni (somebody else ridiculed wrongly for this) were the only players to attempt more tackles than Tresor last night. He won one, missed two, OK, he isn’t very good at tackling, but to be accused of a lack of effort isn’t just thick and wrong, it is also insulting to our own player. In contrast, Foster, who I thought was total effort throughout despite not looking fully fit, attempted just one tackle. By the way Barkley tried eight, the most of anyone.
Obviously the wrong sub at the wrong time, him and Larsen only had 4 touches each and if we are letting Luton have the ball and sitting deep, they are the wrong players, but that is a totally different issue, and it didn’t cost us the game. The referee did.
This user liked this post: Bordeauxclaret
-
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 298 times
- Has Liked: 781 times
Re: Mike Tresor
Never liked the subs not being rated for less than a certain time on this site, they still get their appearance and appearance money and as often statements are made like "he's done more in 10 minutes than the rest" etc.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 3:20 pmThis site doesn't allow sub ratings on the players ratings thread, if less than 20 minutes.
Yet you call a 10 minute appearance as a display.
Did you really expect much from any sub coming on for a few minutes at the end on a freezing night?
-
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 298 times
- Has Liked: 781 times
Re: Mike Tresor
In this case he was crap 3
Re: Mike Tresor
He is a good player it just doesn't work for him here