That sort of mirrors us. There are two of us and ours should have been £59, and we currently pay £28 / month.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 10:01 amYou must be using a hell of a lot of water. I’ve taken a look back and I was paying £58 pm until I had the water meter fitted and it then went down initially to £15 with the meter. I’m now paying £19 pm.
Water meter
-
- Posts: 7313
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1827 times
- Has Liked: 3965 times
Re: Water meter
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Water meter
I’m on my own which probably explains the current difference. Having a meter was something I’d never considered until a friend of mine told me how much they were saving having had one installed.nil_desperandum wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 10:54 amThat sort of mirrors us. There are two of us and ours should have been £59, and we currently pay £28 / month.
This user liked this post: nil_desperandum
-
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:03 pm
- Been Liked: 1161 times
- Has Liked: 791 times
Re: Water meter
I got the same results i.e. my charge would roughly double compared to what I'm paying now
The thing is I already do have a meter so I think that their estimating algorithm is a little unreliable
This user liked this post: dsr
Re: Water meter
Anyone wanting to buy your house would not be put off by a water meter!Leisure wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 4:42 pmMany thanks for all the responses. On the basis that there are only 2 of us in a 3/4 bedroom house, it seems reasonable to assume that we could save a few hundred pounds per year, which is good. However, against that, there seems to be probably 3 issues - 1) the high cost if I have leak (especially if I'm not aware of it!); 2) it may put off prospective large family future buyers, if we ever came to sell the house, and 3) whilst I'm conscious of the need to save/use less water, I don't want on a daily basis to be monitoring how many times we wash up, flush the toilet, water the garden etc etc. Decisions, decisions.
This user liked this post: Leisure
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Water meter
I’d just go for it Leisure. If you are not saving you can always switch back. I don’t do any monitoring and have already saved a considerable amount.Leisure wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 4:42 pmMany thanks for all the responses. On the basis that there are only 2 of us in a 3/4 bedroom house, it seems reasonable to assume that we could save a few hundred pounds per year, which is good. However, against that, there seems to be probably 3 issues - 1) the high cost if I have leak (especially if I'm not aware of it!); 2) it may put off prospective large family future buyers, if we ever came to sell the house, and 3) whilst I'm conscious of the need to save/use less water, I don't want on a daily basis to be monitoring how many times we wash up, flush the toilet, water the garden etc etc. Decisions, decisions.
-
- Posts: 2499
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1031 times
- Has Liked: 280 times
Re: Water meter
I know a lot of friends and family who moved to water meters and including myself all have had their bills roughly halved. When I did it we had 4 in the house and our bill halved with immediate effect and has remained roughly the same for the last 10 years despite the kids moving out and also moving house.
-
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
- Been Liked: 482 times
- Has Liked: 2292 times
Re: Water meter
Same herelakedistrictclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 12:00 pmMy water bill has halved since I had one installed.
Re: Water meter
I have a feeling that if you buy a house, no matter what age it is, you have to have a meter fitted.Leisure wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 4:42 pmMany thanks for all the responses. On the basis that there are only 2 of us in a 3/4 bedroom house, it seems reasonable to assume that we could save a few hundred pounds per year, which is good. However, against that, there seems to be probably 3 issues - 1) the high cost if I have leak (especially if I'm not aware of it!); 2) it may put off prospective large family future buyers, if we ever came to sell the house, and 3) whilst I'm conscious of the need to save/use less water, I don't want on a daily basis to be monitoring how many times we wash up, flush the toilet, water the garden etc etc. Decisions, decisions.