Blackburn......

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Vegas Claret
Posts: 30712
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11057 times
Has Liked: 5663 times
Location: clue is in the title

Blackburn......

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Feb 03, 2024 9:50 pm

made a similar mistake last window
Attachments
Screenshot 2024-02-03 1.49.56 PM.png
Screenshot 2024-02-03 1.49.56 PM.png (689.64 KiB) Viewed 8914 times

Buxtonclaret
Posts: 16761
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 3777 times
Has Liked: 7572 times
Location: Derbyshire

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Buxtonclaret » Sat Feb 03, 2024 9:54 pm

Did he fall or, was he pushed. :D

Bosscat
Posts: 25642
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8537 times
Has Liked: 18277 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Bosscat » Sat Feb 03, 2024 9:57 pm

Blackburn Rovers the gift that just keeps on giving 😁

Spike
Posts: 2705
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:07 pm
Been Liked: 598 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Spike » Sun Feb 04, 2024 11:54 am

Gnomeless

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9601
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3150 times
Has Liked: 10257 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: Blackburn......

Post by evensteadiereddie » Sun Feb 04, 2024 12:14 pm

The horse has bolted...
This user liked this post: basil6345789

FCBurnley
Posts: 9853
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2002 times
Has Liked: 1148 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by FCBurnley » Sun Feb 04, 2024 12:22 pm

Bet McGuire is relieved

Clarets4me
Posts: 4980
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 pm
Been Liked: 2341 times
Has Liked: 1041 times
Location: Ightenhill,Burnley

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Clarets4me » Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:28 pm

The player was 2 weeks into pre-season with Orlando City, and last year earned a reported $77,360 ... less than £1200 a week ! Last season, the average wage at Blackburn was around £329,000, or £6,320 ...

No wonder he jumped at the chance of putting himself in the shop window of English football ...

fatboy47
Posts: 4196
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
Been Liked: 2327 times
Has Liked: 2697 times
Location: Isles of Scilly

Re: Blackburn......

Post by fatboy47 » Sun Feb 04, 2024 7:46 pm

Is he the one who smokes 40 a day and can jump over minis?

randomclaret2
Posts: 6905
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 2758 times
Has Liked: 4325 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by randomclaret2 » Sun Feb 04, 2024 7:47 pm

fatboy47 wrote:
Sun Feb 04, 2024 7:46 pm
Is he the one who smokes 40 a day and can jump over minis?
One for the youngsters...😉
This user liked this post: fatboy47

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 8529
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 2473 times
Has Liked: 2010 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Tricky Trevor » Sun Feb 04, 2024 8:28 pm

fatboy47 wrote:
Sun Feb 04, 2024 7:46 pm
Is he the one who smokes 40 a day and can jump over minis?
And the same fella threw a golf ball from the shed at Bellend Rd into the stand at the other end, the name of which I refuse to write.
This user liked this post: fatboy47

HuncoatClaret
Posts: 552
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:09 pm
Been Liked: 203 times
Has Liked: 110 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by HuncoatClaret » Sun Feb 04, 2024 8:37 pm

It wasn't too long ago when Rovers stopped 5,500 paying Burnley fans from going to Deadwood for the big game. That would have given this broken club approximately £160,000 in their overdrawn bank account.
These 2 users liked this post: turfytopper whalleyclaret

fatboy47
Posts: 4196
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
Been Liked: 2327 times
Has Liked: 2697 times
Location: Isles of Scilly

Re: Blackburn......

Post by fatboy47 » Sun Feb 04, 2024 9:30 pm

A lifelong reliable friend and diehard Rover who attended yesterday's match tells me that he'd be amazed if the true attendance (given as nearly 13k) was actually in 5 figures.

He's not given to exaggeration.
These 2 users liked this post: Quicknick Bosscat

turfytopper
Posts: 1275
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:19 am
Been Liked: 409 times
Has Liked: 3431 times
Location: Crawley West Sussex

Re: Blackburn......

Post by turfytopper » Sun Feb 04, 2024 10:10 pm

HuncoatClaret wrote:
Sun Feb 04, 2024 8:37 pm
It wasn't too long ago when Rovers stopped 5,500 paying Burnley fans from going to Deadwood for the big game. That would have given this broken club approximately £160,000 in their overdrawn bank account.
Plus pie and celebratory beer sales.

Incredible decision and insulting to honest fans.

Westleigh
Posts: 1387
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2023 5:09 pm
Been Liked: 241 times
Has Liked: 230 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Westleigh » Mon Feb 05, 2024 8:54 pm

Rovers on about Crowdfunding to send up a drone ,and also tapping into the match day screen when they play Newcastle in the cup .😁😂😂😂

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30712
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11057 times
Has Liked: 5663 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Vegas Claret » Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:49 am

look at their run in
Attachments
Screenshot 2024-02-05 8.48.36 PM.png
Screenshot 2024-02-05 8.48.36 PM.png (117.88 KiB) Viewed 5692 times

SalouClaret
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 2:54 pm
Been Liked: 340 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by SalouClaret » Tue Feb 06, 2024 6:57 am

Vegas Claret wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:49 am
look at their run in
Very very difficult for them. I had a tenner on them going down at 28/1 a few weeks back. Currently 9/1 and still good value.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 18014
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4074 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by ElectroClaret » Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:49 am

Wow. :shock:
Apart from the Sheffield Wednesday game, those are all toughies.

Might not be playing them after all.

Rick_Muller
Posts: 6142
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
Been Liked: 2635 times
Has Liked: 6464 times
Location: -90.000000, 0.000000

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Rick_Muller » Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:57 am

Vegas Claret wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:49 am
look at their run in
Looks terrible, they have Blackburn to watch in every game
These 7 users liked this post: Rowls Exsus bfcjg Bosscat Vegas Claret simonclaret Goodclaret

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10171
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:58 am

There is a screenshot doing the rounds regarding one of their ideas for a protest.

They want the whole ground to make chicken noises on agreed minutes during the match :D

They really are the most gutless lot in football.

Won't go on the pitch as they might get in trouble, won't boycott the game as they are playing a Premier League side but will make clucking noises on tv. They really are spineless.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

Westleigh
Posts: 1387
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2023 5:09 pm
Been Liked: 241 times
Has Liked: 230 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Westleigh » Tue Feb 06, 2024 8:16 am

Apparently the Rovers hierarchy put a block on any players coming in that involved a fee,oh dear what a pity never mind.

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 8529
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 2473 times
Has Liked: 2010 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Tricky Trevor » Tue Feb 06, 2024 8:36 am

We went through this scenario in the ‘80s. Inevitable decline. If they get away with it this season JDT will leave and they’ll go down next.

Anonymous Claret
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:59 am
Been Liked: 131 times
Has Liked: 94 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Anonymous Claret » Tue Feb 06, 2024 9:01 am

Whenever I am feeling a little down in the dumps due to our poor season, I can always look at the circus down the M65 and console myself it could be a lot worse.
These 3 users liked this post: Bosscat AfloatinClaret Juan Tanamera

Quicknick
Posts: 5650
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1217 times
Has Liked: 7199 times
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Quicknick » Tue Feb 06, 2024 12:42 pm

I won't be gloating if they go down. If we do, we'll need to get back up double-quick or we could go the same way.

dsr
Posts: 15240
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4578 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by dsr » Tue Feb 06, 2024 12:49 pm

Quicknick wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 12:42 pm
I won't be gloating if they go down. If we do, we'll need to get back up double-quick or we could go the same way.
True enough. Remember they have an owner willing to put £20m per year into the club. We don't.
This user liked this post: Quicknick

Juan Tanamera
Posts: 2165
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 771 times
Has Liked: 10082 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Juan Tanamera » Tue Feb 06, 2024 12:57 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 12:49 pm
True enough. Remember they have an owner willing to put £20m per year into the club. We don't.
The latest £20m could be the last if the Indian government/taxman has a say.

Quicknick
Posts: 5650
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1217 times
Has Liked: 7199 times
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Quicknick » Tue Feb 06, 2024 1:13 pm

Juan Tanamera wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 12:57 pm
The latest £20m could be the last if the Indian government/taxman has a say.
Let's hope so.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10171
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Feb 06, 2024 1:22 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 12:49 pm
True enough. Remember they have an owner willing to put £20m per year into the club. We don't.
Would you rather we had the Venkys running us or them ?

FCBurnley
Posts: 9853
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2002 times
Has Liked: 1148 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by FCBurnley » Tue Feb 06, 2024 1:37 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:49 am
look at their run in
They have Stoke at home this weekend

ElectroClaret
Posts: 18014
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4074 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by ElectroClaret » Tue Feb 06, 2024 1:45 pm

FCBurnley wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 1:37 pm
They have Stoke at home this weekend
Yeah.
And lose that and it'll be meltdown time up Shaddy. :mrgreen:

dsr
Posts: 15240
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4578 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by dsr » Tue Feb 06, 2024 1:53 pm

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 1:22 pm
Would you rather we had the Venkys running us or them ?
No question that Alan Pace is a better football man than the various people Venky's have put in. But on the other hand, there are certain advantages to having an owner who puts £300m into the club rather than an owner who takes £100m out.

FCBurnley
Posts: 9853
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2002 times
Has Liked: 1148 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by FCBurnley » Tue Feb 06, 2024 1:59 pm

Stoke only a point behind Rovers but Rovers have a game in hand Getting very tight especially after QPR win at Deadwood

ElectroClaret
Posts: 18014
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4074 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by ElectroClaret » Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:07 pm

Definitely a horrible run-in and their last game (a daunting trip to Leicester) could be vital.

But hopefully, they'll be screwed before then.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 10171
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 4188 times
Has Liked: 57 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by claretonthecoast1882 » Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:49 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 1:53 pm
No question that Alan Pace is a better football man than the various people Venky's have put in. But on the other hand, there are certain advantages to having an owner who puts £300m into the club rather than an owner who takes £100m out.
What advantage have Rovers had from putting in the money the Venkys have, they have got them out the championship once and that was to the 3rd tier.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

dsr
Posts: 15240
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4578 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by dsr » Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:00 pm

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:49 pm
What advantage have Rovers had from putting in the money the Venkys have, they have got them out the championship once and that was to the 3rd tier.
There's no way of knowing where they would be if thay had had £400m less money to spend over the last few years. But the chances are it would be lower than they are now.

Bosscat
Posts: 25642
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8537 times
Has Liked: 18277 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Bosscat » Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:00 pm

claretonthecoast1882 wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:49 pm
What advantage have Rovers had from putting in the money the Venkys have, they have got them out the championship once and that was to the 3rd tier.
Could be twice looking at that fixture list 🤣
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14571
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3437 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:03 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 1:53 pm
No question that Alan Pace is a better football man than the various people Venky's have put in. But on the other hand, there are certain advantages to having an owner who puts £300m into the club rather than an owner who takes £100m out.
Eh?

Rovers operate at a huge loss
Any potential buyer would face huge issues because the club is running at a loss, mainly due to players wages

See Bolton, after Eddie sold them, to see what happens

The Venkys are obliged to keep pumping money into the place because the alternative is administration/embargoes/points deductions and the like

dsr
Posts: 15240
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4578 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by dsr » Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:43 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:03 pm
Eh?

Rovers operate at a huge loss
Any potential buyer would face huge issues because the club is running at a loss, mainly due to players wages

See Bolton, after Eddie sold them, to see what happens

The Venkys are obliged to keep pumping money into the place because the alternative is administration/embargoes/points deductions and the like
The Venky's have several other choices. One, they could have cut wages sufficiently that the club wasn't running at a loss any more. Two, they could decide to cut their losses and let the club go into administration. Three, they can deliberately follow the policy they have been following of subsidising the club by £20m per year.

Clarets4me
Posts: 4980
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 pm
Been Liked: 2341 times
Has Liked: 1041 times
Location: Ightenhill,Burnley

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Clarets4me » Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:13 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:03 pm
Eh?

Rovers operate at a huge loss .... Any potential buyer would face huge issues because the club is running at a loss, mainly due to players wages

See Bolton, after Eddie sold them, to see what happens.The Venkys are obliged to keep pumping money into the place because the alternative is administration/embargoes/points deductions and the like
They've operated at a weekly trading loss of around £400k a week for the last 3 years, subsidised by issuing further shares to the Venkys. The training ground was sold to an entity, owned by some connections of their family, based in Bolton. Their latest Court case in India has been adjourned until April.

Last summer, they had to apply to Court for permission to remit a multi-million pound sum to BRFS, to settle a " tax bill ". Their briefs major argument was that the Venkys but also India would suffer " reputational loss " if the bill went unpaid.

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3891
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1282 times
Has Liked: 682 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Royboyclaret » Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:16 pm

dsr wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:43 pm
The Venky's have several other choices. One, they could have cut wages sufficiently that the club wasn't running at a loss any more. Two, they could decide to cut their losses and let the club go into administration. Three, they can deliberately follow the policy they have been following of subsidising the club by £20m per year.
My understanding is that "three" is no longer an option.

Where does that leave Blackburn ?

Clarets4me
Posts: 4980
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 pm
Been Liked: 2341 times
Has Liked: 1041 times
Location: Ightenhill,Burnley

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Clarets4me » Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:17 pm

425733651_791165456370826_5344730248365522261_n.jpg
425733651_791165456370826_5344730248365522261_n.jpg (783.03 KiB) Viewed 3756 times

ElectroClaret
Posts: 18014
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4074 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by ElectroClaret » Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:53 pm

Royboyclaret wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:16 pm
My understanding is that "three" is no longer an option.

Where does that leave Blackburn ?
If that's the case, then presumably they'll be using the money they got from flogging Wharton to Palace to keep them going ....for now.

Clarets4me
Posts: 4980
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 pm
Been Liked: 2341 times
Has Liked: 1041 times
Location: Ightenhill,Burnley

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Clarets4me » Tue Feb 06, 2024 6:39 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:53 pm
If that's the case, then presumably they'll be using the money they got from flogging Wharton to Palace to keep them going ....for now.
Yes, that's the thinking .... 50% up front so £9m due straight away, and the £500k fee from the sale of Ennis to Stoke was to cover the loan fee to Orlando City. By the Summer, I suspect they're hoping the Court case will be settled ..

I hadn't seen the run in before, Jesus ! They need to get to 50 points sharpish .. 8-)

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3891
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1282 times
Has Liked: 682 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Royboyclaret » Tue Feb 06, 2024 6:48 pm

Clarets4me wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 6:39 pm
Yes, that's the thinking .... 50% up front so £9m due straight away, and the £500k fee from the sale of Ennis to Stoke was to cover the loan fee to Orlando City. By the Summer, I suspect they're hoping the Court case will be settled ..

I hadn't seen the run in before, Jesus ! They need to get to 50 points sharpish .. 8-)
No more than a temporary arrangement......Venky's are now fully aware of the ultimate situation.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 18014
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4074 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by ElectroClaret » Tue Feb 06, 2024 6:53 pm

Royboyclaret wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 6:48 pm
No more than a temporary arrangement......Venky's are now fully aware of the ultimate situation.
Yes, of course that situation can only be temporary.
Perhaps Rovers are just hoping, like Mr. Micawber, that
"something will turn up".

(Was it Micawber?)
This user liked this post: Silkyskills1

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3891
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1282 times
Has Liked: 682 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Royboyclaret » Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:01 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 6:53 pm
Yes, of course that situation can only be temporary.
Perhaps Rovers are just hoping, like Mr. Micawber, that
"something will turn up".

(Was it Micawber?)
Past the point of no return........at least that's the verdict in India.......no more £20m pocket money.

Clarets4me
Posts: 4980
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 pm
Been Liked: 2341 times
Has Liked: 1041 times
Location: Ightenhill,Burnley

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Clarets4me » Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:11 pm

Royboyclaret wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:01 pm
Past the point of no return........at least that's the verdict in India.......no more £20m pocket money.
Is that from the Venky's by choice, or due to legal constraints ?

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3891
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1282 times
Has Liked: 682 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Royboyclaret » Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:15 pm

Clarets4me wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:11 pm
Is that from the Venky's by choice, or due to legal constraints ?
Purely legal.......Venky's have been more than accommodating to Blackburn over many years.

Now circumstances appear to have changed.
This user liked this post: mybloodisclaret

Westleigh
Posts: 1387
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2023 5:09 pm
Been Liked: 241 times
Has Liked: 230 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Westleigh » Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:20 pm

Royboyclaret wrote:
Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:15 pm
Purely legal.......Venky's have been more than accommodating to Blackburn over many years.

Now circumstances appear to have changed.
😂😂😂😂😂

Clarets4me
Posts: 4980
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 pm
Been Liked: 2341 times
Has Liked: 1041 times
Location: Ightenhill,Burnley

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Clarets4me » Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:23 pm

Article from the " Athletic " by Oliver Kay & Tom Bogert ...


HOW BLACKBURN ROVER'S DUNCAN MCGUIRE DEAL FELL APART .... TWICE !

Duncan McGuire rushed through JFK airport to make his connecting flight, even as the reason he was taking it seemed to be falling apart.

The Orlando City striker, a recent USMNT debutant, had been the subject of transfer interest all winter long from the EFL Championship – England’s second tier, just below the Premier League. Blackburn Rovers and Sheffield Wednesday were among the interested clubs, but Blackburn had finally come to terms with Orlando around 48 hours before the Feb. 1 transfer deadline. The deal was advanced enough that McGuire was permitted to say his goodbyes to his teammates and depart Orlando’s preseason training camp in Mexico, heading to Manchester with a stop in New York City.

But as McGuire sat on that first flight, Blackburn Rovers’ management team was told by the club’s owners in India that they would have to pull out of the deal. The finances, they said, simply weren’t there.

It would be the first of two times McGuire’s attempted winter move to Blackburn would be called off. The second came on Tuesday, when the club announced that the striker’s move had been rejected by the English Football League (EFL) due to late transmission of transfer documents.

Tuesday’s announcement extends one of the most bizarre sagas of the transfer window, and one that could have a direct impact on the USMNT’s chances at the 2024 Olympics.

“All of the necessary paperwork had been completed prior to 10 p.m. on Thursday February 1st,” Blackburn said in a statement, “however due to an administrative error, the the forms were not processed in the prescribed times.”

The club added that it is appealing the decision, with the EFL board set to consider the case and bring it to a conclusion on Thursday, Feb. 8. If that appeal fails, Blackburn said McGuire will stay in the UK until the process concludes, and would be allowed to return to Orlando City for the start of the MLS season if the appeal is denied. The club says if that happens, it will extend a pre-contract agreement to McGuire to join the club in the summer.

“Detailed discussions with legal representatives and the relevant football authorities have taken place over the last few days to try and reach an urgent resolution on the matter,” the Blackburn statement reads.

In fact, discussions among relevant football figures have been ongoing for many days before today’s announcement – a drawn-out deadline-day tale with a young player’s career hanging in the balance.

Days before the deadline, with the player yet to land at JFK and Blackburn in the middle of this deal’s first collapse, McGuire was up in the air in more ways than one as Blackburn executives apologized to Orlando City sporting director Luiz Muzzi, technical director Ricardo Moreira and McGuire’s agent Chris Megaloudis.

As that unfolded, Megaloudis had a little time and a little hunger to kill before his own connecting flight on his way to meet McGuire in England. He stopped in to P.F. Chang’s, a popular Asian cuisine chain, which accompanies its meals with the traditional fortune cookie.

Hoping for some bit of good news from somewhere, Megaloudis opened it. It didn’t say “Duncan McGuire Will Move To Blackburn” as he hoped, but it did say “a small act will bring happiness to the family”. There was happiness, but not for long.

This account of the saga is according to multiple sources on both sides of the Atlantic who were either briefed on or directly involved with negotiations. The sources were granted anonymity to protect their relationships within the game.

McGuire experienced quite the whirlwind 72 hours before the Feb. 1 transfer deadline – especially considering the player’s whirlwind rise, from collegiate soccer for Creighton University in Nebraska to the U.S. national team in the space of a year. A first-round draft pick by Orlando City, McGuire came in with modest expectations but greatly exceeded them, beating out Austrian international Ercan Kara to be his team’s starting striker and scoring 15 goals in all competitions in his first professional season. He made his USMNT debut in a January friendly against Slovenia, and should be in contention to play with the U.S. at the Olympics this summer.

Orlando City did not want to lose McGuire this winter. After all, he was on perhaps the most team-friendly contract in MLS: A paltry $77,360 guaranteed, according to the most recent figures released by the MLS Players’ Association. To put that salary in context: McGuire scored 13 league goals in 2023. The next six players behind him on the league scoring charts each make at least $2 million in guaranteed compensation, according to those same MLSPA figures.

Naturally, McGuire’s representation wanted a new contract, but McGuire and Orlando were not especially close to a deal as the club opened negotiations.

Blackburn had tracked McGuire during his breakout season in MLS, and saw him as a long-term target rather than a panic buy. Early in the January window, Blackburn made its first forays for McGuire – two loan offers that Orlando rejected. The English side didn’t have the money upfront for a loan or permanent transfer (first payment of a transfer fee or loan fee), which was integral for Orlando so they could have increased freedom to bring in a replacement for McGuire.

Sheffield Wednesday had a few offers declined, too, as they looked at McGuire to save their season from relegation. Upon learning of these rejected offers, McGuire visited Muzzi, telling the Orlando sporting director he wanted to go, and he wanted to go now. There was no guarantee another offer would arrive in the summer. He wanted to bet on himself.

For Blackburn, circumstances were changing. The club had initially offered a loan deal due to a lack of cash, but Crystal Palace’s interest in Blackburn midfielder Adam Wharton grew serious and a deal was getting closer. Blackburn wanted to use that money to get McGuire. In the days before the close of the transfer window, Wharton’s deal to Crystal Palace for £22 million ($27.8 million) was nearly done. Blackburn returned to Orlando with an offer for a permanent transfer.

Negotiations between Blackburn and Orlando intensified to the point where a deal had finally been verbally agreed late Tuesday night U.S. time (early Wednesday U.K. time), with just enough hours left before the deadline for McGuire to travel to England. The sides agreed on an initial fee of just under $4 million (around £3 million) plus add-ons that could see the deal rise north of $6 million (around £5 million). Orlando would retain a sell-on clause, another crucial negotiating point.

Wednesday morning, Orlando authorized McGuire to depart the team’s preseason camp in Cancun. He did. Blackburn had booked and paid for his flight. McGuire stepped on board, took off, and things changed yet again: Venky’s, the Indian firm that owns Blackburn, called chief executive Steve Waggott, director of football Gregg Broughton and coach John Dahl Tomasson, telling the group that there was no money to do the deal.

Disappointed and apologetic, Broughton called Muzzi and Megaloudis just as McGuire was nearing New York City. The deal, McGuire’s future, Blackburn’s relegation fight and Orlando’s offseason plans all laid in the balance. There were 30 hours until the transfer window closed.

As McGuire rushed to catch his flight to Manchester, Muzzi told Megaloudis that the club would welcome the forward back. Orlando tried to contact McGuire directly to tell him to come back as well, but he proved to be unreachable. If McGuire returned to preseason camp, there was no way he could travel to England in time to complete any move. If he didn’t get on that flight to Manchester, it was over.

McGuire landed in England on Wednesday evening, with about 24 hours until the window closing. By that point, Sheffield Wednesday had re-opened talks with Orlando. Several other Championship clubs, including Plymouth Argyle and Ipswich Town, also expressed interest in making a deal happen, sources say. Ultimately, though, Sheffield Wednesday and Blackburn were the only serious bidders.

Megaloudis assumed that Sheffield Wednesday was the most likely destination, so he eventually settled with McGuire at the Mercure Sheffield Kenwood Hall & Spa hotel in Sheffield on Wednesday evening. McGuire was spotted by a reporter in the lobby on Thursday morning, a mere 13 hours before the window closed. A deal still had not been finalized. He sat in a chair in the lobby – a purple one, like the primary color of Orlando City. At this sleek, relaxing hotel and spa, it was difficult to take even momentary breaks from reality.

In addition to being a trying time for McGuire, the episode has intensified the focus on Blackburn’s ownership: Venky’s, an Indian poultry and pharmaceutical conglomerate, which had assets seized as part of an Indian government clampdown on investment overseas.

Since the turbulence that followed Venky’s’ acquisition of the club in 2010, when they were in the Premier League, Blackburn had found a measure of stability, with investment having helped the club through the difficult years since their relegation from the top flight.

However, there are now serious doubts about whether Venky’s, under growing pressure from the Indian government over the past 12 months, can keep funding Blackburn.

Last week Blackburn issued a statement insisting that legal proceedings in India “will not impact the day-to-day funding of the club in any way”, adding, “The owners have given assurance to the board and executive of BRFC that they will continue to fully support the club, as they have done since they acquired the club in 2010.”

This year, though, Blackburn was struggling to complete deals, even as the sporting staff scrambled to continue pursuing McGuire and other deadline-day targets. One of them, Slovenian international center back David Brekalo, just so happened to be on the verge of a move to Orlando when Blackburn swooped in, creating another messy situation between the two clubs. Orlando City, for its part, certainly wasn’t thrilled to learn Blackburn was trying to hijack the deal, which would have worked in Wednesday’s favor. The Athletic reported on Thursday that Orlando was finalizing a deal to sign Brekalo. Blackburn ultimately signed center back Billy Koumetio on loan from Liverpool on deadline day.

Thankfully for Blackburn, funds were coming in – Palace’s deal to sign Wharton was about to get done. Once again, the club’s circumstances had changed.

Meanwhile, that picture of McGuire at the hotel in Sheffield made rounds on X, previously known as Twitter. Wednesday fans recognized McGuire, showed up and started asking for autographs. McGuire signed a few, though his future was far from decided.

With time ticking and nothing quite set with Wednesday, Megaloudis called Broughton, and asked if Blackburn could come back to the table now that the deal for Wharton was done. It was the first communication between all parties since the previous deal was scrapped.

Broughton said they were still interested in a loan. It was a question of whether they could make an offer that would tempt Orlando back to the table.

Orlando remained open-minded, if surprised. Blackburn said it could only do a loan, and Orlando said it would only sanction the deal if it included a sizable loan fee and a purchase option higher than the previously agreed deal.

After a bit of haggling, Blackburn agreed to pay a $700,000 loan fee (£550,000) with a purchase option near $7 million (around £5.5 million). The purchase option included another $2.5 million add-ons (£2 million), and Orlando would still retain a sell-on percentage. The on-again/off-again hassle had, in effect, netted Orlando a few million more in transfer and loan fees.

Yet still, the deal wasn’t done, and Wednesday remained in the picture. Eventually, both Blackburn and Wednesday sent cars to McGuire and Megaloudis’ hotel, hoping theirs would be the one to take the forward to his medical. A decision would come soon and time running out, plans needed to be set.

Broughton sent data points to Megaloudis about why Blackburn was a better home for McGuire than Wednesday. They showed that the club created more scoring chances than Wednesday, more clear shots per 90, and far more open play expected goals. And most important of all: Blackburn was eight points clear of relegation, with Wednesday five points below the relegation line.

Muzzi ultimately accepted Blackburn’s offer. They called a taxi, spurning both club-sent cars, and began the two-hour drive to Ewood Park. As they traveled across the Peak District, the final agreements were hammered out and contracts drawn up. They arrived around five hours before the window closed for the medical and final steps.

Blackburn reimbursed Megaloudis for the cab, offered the contract, and with 100 minutes to go before the deadline, all parties had signed. McGuire was Blackburn’s newest player. The clubs announced at 11 p.m. UK / 6 p.m. ET — The exact time the transfer window shut (or so they thought).

But the following day it emerged that something was amiss. Suspicions were first raised when Tomasson was blocked from speaking at Blackburn’s pre-match press conference on Friday lunchtime. Local media were encouraged to speak to new signings Kyle McFadzean and Billy Koumetio, who had arrived from Coventry City and on loan from Liverpool respectively, but Tomasson and McGuire were not made available for interview.

McGuire and Megaloudis were in the stands at Ewood Park the next day as Blackburn fell to a 2-1 home defeat to Queens Park Rangers, their eighth Championship match without a win. In his post-match press conference, Tomasson responded to questions about McGuire by saying he was “not allowed to speak about” it. “I think you should ask Steve (Waggott), Suhail (Shaikh, the club’s operations and management consultant and the ownership about the Duncan McGuire case,” the coach added.

Blackburn officials remained silent on the subject of the McGuire deal. But The Athletic revealed on Saturday evening that the player was in limbo once more due to an administrative error.

Although numerous documents relating to the McGuire transfer were signed and uploaded onto the EFL’s online player registration system well before the transfer deadline on Thursday evening, some of the paperwork had not been submitted in time. It was there on the system, but not submitted.

It was particularly embarrassing for Blackburn given the collapse of a deal to sign midfielder Lewis O’Brien on loan from Nottingham Forest 12 months earlier. On that occasion, Blackburn officials felt the deal had been thrown into confusion by a late administrative request from the EFL. With the McGuire deal, it was entirely down to human error at the Blackburn end.

Blackburn requested special dispensation on the basis that they had signed and attempted to submit all the documents in good faith ahead of the deadline. They cited FIFA’s willingness to approve the transfers of Said Benrahma and Pablo Fornais, who have joined Lyon (on loan) and Real Betis respectively despite difficulties processing the paperwork in time, but the EFL rejected Blackburn’s request.

The morning after the deal seemed to have gone through, one Premier League owner told Megalounis the fact that McGuire got on that plane changed his life. So, too, could Thursday’s EFL board meeting.

Royboyclaret
Posts: 3891
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
Been Liked: 1282 times
Has Liked: 682 times

Re: Blackburn......

Post by Royboyclaret » Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:36 pm

Simply a ridiculous situation that was allowed to play out with the player.

After 14 years of propping up the club Venky's knew full well at that date that finance was unavailable to complete the transfer and, for that matter, any future transactions in the immediate future.
This user liked this post: bfcjg

Post Reply