Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
-
- Posts: 730
- Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 6:59 pm
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 77 times
Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Is it time to give last years players more of a chance.
Cullen looked better in the cup games and Muric deserved to start the season anyway.
Cullen looked better in the cup games and Muric deserved to start the season anyway.
-
- Posts: 5900
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1772 times
- Has Liked: 359 times
- Location: The Banana Stand
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Unless there's injury or suspension to Trafford, we won't see Muric in a Burnley shirt again
-
- Posts: 18102
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3875 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Not sure it would we wise to play them against a great pressing team.
They would be under far too much pressure.
It's not the game to go back to the passing out from the back.
Fulham would have been the one.
They would be under far too much pressure.
It's not the game to go back to the passing out from the back.
Fulham would have been the one.
This user liked this post: FCBurnley
-
- Posts: 4075
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1508 times
- Has Liked: 581 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
I'd like both back in but he's not going to bring either back unless he's forced to through injury etc.
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Its all well and good for us to say we should change it all around but if we do that then we go back to square one in February, still experimenting.
I think he just has to go with that second half line up from now on as much as he can, with the odd change here and there ie Taylor back in at full back.
I think he just has to go with that second half line up from now on as much as he can, with the odd change here and there ie Taylor back in at full back.
-
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:33 pm
- Been Liked: 384 times
- Has Liked: 236 times
- Location: Skipton
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Cullen and Muric in? - no
Esteve, Fofana and Taylor in? - yes
Esteve, Fofana and Taylor in? - yes
These 7 users liked this post: Anthonini evensteadiereddie Goliath Foshiznik bobinho whiffa Holtyclaret
-
- Posts: 896
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 325 times
- Has Liked: 189 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
I think he’s too stubborn to bring Muric back in.
I’m not sure Cullen is up to it in the PL and would need to need two others close to him in the middle for it to work. Maybe in a 4141 or 451 with him holding.
I’m not sure Cullen is up to it in the PL and would need to need two others close to him in the middle for it to work. Maybe in a 4141 or 451 with him holding.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 6696
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1705 times
- Has Liked: 791 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Cullen definitely in a midfield 3. Muric just not going to happen. A lot worse goals conceded by better teams than us this weekend. Trafford is fine. The team more than ever picks itself for me, lets hope VK thinks the same
Trafford
Assignon O Shea Beyer Esteve
Brownhill Berge Cullen
Odobert Fofana Foster
If Beyer not fit then Ekdal. Amdouini on bench and Bege play that more advanced role (he is not a defender)
Trafford
Assignon O Shea Beyer Esteve
Brownhill Berge Cullen
Odobert Fofana Foster
If Beyer not fit then Ekdal. Amdouini on bench and Bege play that more advanced role (he is not a defender)
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
I wouldn’t be so sure on that. A sticky start next season and VK may well be out and the new manager might prefer Muric over Trafford.claptrappers_union wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 10:48 amUnless there's injury or suspension to Trafford, we won't see Muric in a Burnley shirt again
-
- Posts: 8539
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2473 times
- Has Liked: 2010 times
-
- Posts: 5139
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1176 times
- Has Liked: 2922 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
In reply to the OP.. it just won't happen. VK is dying on the Trafford hill and we won't know whether Muric was good enough to step up. Well as long as there are no injuries/suspensions and even then he would probably play Amdouni in the net to shoe-horn him into the team.
As for Cullen, he could play the deep role Berge is doing to help get Berge picking up the ball and making things happen further up the pitch.
The only spanner in the works is the new lads, otherwise I genuinely believe we would see pretty much the same line up until the end of the season.
As for Cullen, he could play the deep role Berge is doing to help get Berge picking up the ball and making things happen further up the pitch.
The only spanner in the works is the new lads, otherwise I genuinely believe we would see pretty much the same line up until the end of the season.
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
More chance of seeing Benson starthelmclaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 11:18 amI think he’s too stubborn to bring Muric back in.
I’m not sure Cullen is up to it in the PL and would need to need two others close to him in the middle for it to work. Maybe in a 4141 or 451 with him holding.
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
I don’t think we’ll see Muric again, but perhaps Trafford might fancy his chances in the PL again next season, with one of the promoted teams maybe?
I wouldn’t be averse to selling him if that were the case and we could make a decent profit.
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
If Trafford scored 3 own goals against Liverpool he’ll still be back in for the following match. It would take an in injury to see Muric. Probably likely to see Amdouni and Ramsey in sone capacity too although they offer diddly squat for me along with Tresor. We need fight but we have plenty of weakness.
-
- Posts: 3922
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 834 times
- Has Liked: 1331 times
- Location: burnley
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
There's one thing for certain. If we try and play Liverpool and Arsenal without 3 proper central midfielders we'll get thumped.
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
There is more chance of being struck by lightning than this happening.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2018 3:33 pm
- Been Liked: 33 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Doesn't matter how we play them, we'll get thumped anywaysummitclaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 12:19 pmThere's one thing for certain. If we try and play Liverpool and Arsenal without 3 proper central midfielders we'll get thumped.
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
VK is dying on more than a Trafford hill. The ineffectual Amdouni and Ramsay are firmly dug in on this hill.burnleymik wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 11:48 amIn reply to the OP.. it just won't happen. VK is dying on the Trafford hill and we won't know whether Muric was good enough to step up. Well as long as there are no injuries/suspensions and even then he would probably play Amdouni in the net to shoe-horn him into the team.
As for Cullen, he could play the deep role Berge is doing to help get Berge picking up the ball and making things happen further up the pitch.
The only spanner in the works is the new lads, otherwise I genuinely believe we would see pretty much the same line up until the end of the season.
-
- Posts: 3089
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1185 times
- Has Liked: 418 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
VK hasnt fancied Muric for the PL since June so not sure why he'd start now.
Fofana, Gudmunsson and Esteve should be in, for me at the expense of Amdouni, Ramsey and Ekdal respectively.
Fofana, Gudmunsson and Esteve should be in, for me at the expense of Amdouni, Ramsey and Ekdal respectively.
-
- Posts: 5797
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
We should definitely not look at changing too many of the regular starters this season who have brought us 3 wins by February.
These 3 users liked this post: burnleymik claretcarrot93 JohnDearyMe
-
- Posts: 5727
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 2833 times
- Has Liked: 141 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Doesn't this underprice the possibility that Trafford is one of the most saleable assets on relegation, should we need to realise revenue?
I think that overall this season Trafford has done OK, even if his weaknesses are ones that mean he probably wasn't the ideal signing for us last summer, and has certainly done enough to confirm his long term potential (just as Ramsdale did when Bournemouth went down and again when Sheffield United went down). That probably makes him one of the more convincing candidates for a resale at a profit this summer, particularly given we have Muric who has already demonstrated his capability in the league below.
-
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:13 am
- Been Liked: 164 times
- Has Liked: 33 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
I would go with bringing in the sub that made the difference vs Fulham rather than changing people other positions. Fofana, JBG & Esteve in for Amdouni, Ramsey & Ekdal respectively.
Argument to bring Cullen in for Brownhill maybe, but given we will not have much possession in this match, I think Brownhill's energy & engine gets him the nod over Cullen.
Argument to bring Cullen in for Brownhill maybe, but given we will not have much possession in this match, I think Brownhill's energy & engine gets him the nod over Cullen.
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
VK still doesn’t know his best team or his best formation and that for me is our major problem
This user liked this post: k90bfc
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
No team featuring Cullen in the PL has picked itself. Other than that, looks good.warksclaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 11:23 amCullen definitely in a midfield 3. Muric just not going to happen. A lot worse goals conceded by better teams than us this weekend. Trafford is fine. The team more than ever picks itself for me, lets hope VK thinks the same
Trafford
Assignon O Shea Beyer Esteve
Brownhill Berge Cullen
Odobert Fofana Foster
If Beyer not fit then Ekdal. Amdouini on bench and Bege play that more advanced role (he is not a defender)
-
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 587 times
- Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Assuming Muric wants to stay.claretspice wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 1:30 pmDoesn't this underprice the possibility that Trafford is one of the most saleable assets on relegation, should we need to realise revenue?
I think that overall this season Trafford has done OK, even if his weaknesses are ones that mean he probably wasn't the ideal signing for us last summer, and has certainly done enough to confirm his long term potential (just as Ramsdale did when Bournemouth went down and again when Sheffield United went down). That probably makes him one of the more convincing candidates for a resale at a profit this summer, particularly given we have Muric who has already demonstrated his capability in the league below.
I’m not sure I would in his position.
-
- Posts: 4075
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1508 times
- Has Liked: 581 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
I'm also not entirely convinced about Trafford's marketability for a resale at profit.
-
- Posts: 730
- Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 6:59 pm
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 77 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Agree, Muric must be fed up. He should have started the season and if he had made the mistakes Trafford had, he would be out the team.
That 17 million / resale value is hindering us big style.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Young English keeper, very composed on the ball, ranking around mid-table vs other PL keepers by advanced shot stopping data metrics like PsxG. Got all the makings for marketability in my opinion. Think he’ll stay anyhow.Swizzlestick wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:57 pmI'm also not entirely convinced about Trafford's marketability for a resale at profit.
Last edited by RVclaret on Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
13.7mclaretcarrot93 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:02 pmAgree, Muric must be fed up. He should have started the season and if he had made the mistakes Trafford had, he would be out the team.
That 17 million / resale value is hindering us big style.
-
- Posts: 730
- Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 6:59 pm
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 77 times
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
The one thing that Trafford has got going for him is confidence, I haven't seen his head drop once, despite several mistakes. Plenty of decent keepers fold once theyve made a mistake.
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 855 times
- Has Liked: 605 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Trafford, saleable asset? Just because we paid around £19 million for him, doesn't mean anyone else would be daft enough. We'd be lucky to get £5 million if he continues his current form until the end of the season.claretspice wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 1:30 pmDoesn't this underprice the possibility that Trafford is one of the most saleable assets on relegation, should we need to realise revenue?
I think that overall this season Trafford has done OK, even if his weaknesses are ones that mean he probably wasn't the ideal signing for us last summer, and has certainly done enough to confirm his long term potential (just as Ramsdale did when Bournemouth went down and again when Sheffield United went down). That probably makes him one of the more convincing candidates for a resale at a profit this summer, particularly given we have Muric who has already demonstrated his capability in the league below.
This user liked this post: StayingDown4Ever
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
People like you are hilarious. Not only you blatantly ignore the fact we have not paid £19m for him, as has literally just been pointed out, you then ignore claretspices exact point that Ramsdale got relegated twice and Arsenal still paid £24m rising to £30m for him. No guarantees here but saying we’d be lucky to get £5m is laughable and borderline clueless.Gordaleman wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:53 pmTrafford, saleable asset? Just because we paid around £19 million for him, doesn't mean anyone else would be daft enough. We'd be lucky to get £5 million if he continues his current form until the end of the season.
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Correct. It was completely unnecessary spend. There was no need to drop Muric who made us tick. It is proving go be a terrible piece of business and now VK is stubbornly pressing on with him even though it has disturbed our options and slickness we had on playing out. Not to mention Trafford being far from ready, he is a decent shot stopper but presence in the area is poor and now we have no tempo and variance as a unit when playing out.Gordaleman wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:53 pmTrafford, saleable asset? Just because we paid around £19 million for him, doesn't mean anyone else would be daft enough. We'd be lucky to get £5 million if he continues his current form until the end of the season.
This user liked this post: k90bfc
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
I think we paid circa 16 million for him if you look at the reputable Transfer market sites? Whilst I agree with you that £5m is laughable, I think we would struggle to get anywhere near our outlay on him if he was sold.RVclaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:57 pmPeople like you are hilarious. Not only you blatantly ignore the fact we have not paid £19m for him, as has literally just been pointed out, you then ignore claretspices exact point that Ramsdale got relegated twice and Arsenal still paid £24m rising to £30m for him. No guarantees here but saying we’d be lucky to get £5m is laughable and borderline clueless.
I respect Spices posts but again he mentions Trafford’s potential. We seem to be referring to potential a lot now when we debate most of Vincent’s signings.
Sadly, potential alone won’t keep us in the Premier League.
-
- Posts: 1131
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:35 pm
- Been Liked: 345 times
- Has Liked: 1571 times
- Location: Wantage
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Trafford will be with us for the next two or three years at least (like Ramsay), probably best to see what he’s worth then I’d guess rather than speculate now for something that’s not going to happen.
Cullen would have to be in a three for me and Trafford will be picked in goal as he has for every league game this year.
Hoping Taylor will be fit and hoping we go 5 at back for the next two games like we reverted to against city. Looked
Solid (and wouldn’t play Esteve at lb if Taylor still isn’t back).
Cullen would have to be in a three for me and Trafford will be picked in goal as he has for every league game this year.
Hoping Taylor will be fit and hoping we go 5 at back for the next two games like we reverted to against city. Looked
Solid (and wouldn’t play Esteve at lb if Taylor still isn’t back).
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:27 pm
- Been Liked: 246 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Not a prayer!!!claretcarrot93 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 10:41 amIs it time to give last years players more of a chance.
Cullen looked better in the cup games and Muric deserved to start the season anyway.
Some posters never give in do they.
Muric wouldn't get in if Trafford was on crutches
Get over it ffs
-
- Posts: 6731
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 1820 times
- Has Liked: 1800 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
What we haven't had at all is a settled team, and just changing personnel game in, game out patently hasn't worked.
Pick a team and stick to it.
Pick a team and stick to it.
-
- Posts: 1131
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:35 pm
- Been Liked: 345 times
- Has Liked: 1571 times
- Location: Wantage
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
He pretty much has done from game 8 -10 ish which has brought better performances and results generally (gd has slowed remarkably since poor start).dougcollins wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:38 pmWhat we haven't had at all is a settled team, and just changing personnel game in, game out patently hasn't worked.
Pick a team and stick to it.
Nothing he could do but change when there’s injuries/suspensions to cover or new (better?) players to fit in.
Shows that he’s damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t as he’s apparently stubborn to change yet over-tinkers at the same time.
-
- Posts: 5727
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 2833 times
- Has Liked: 141 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
Different point. Was Trafford the keeper we needed last summer? Not sure he was. Is he someone that, because of his obvious potential, we might be able to make money on this summer? The history of the likes of Ramsdale suggests the answer might be yes, not least because after a very shaky start, he's generally done pretty well in the last 3 months and has been one of our better performers (not a high bar).Jamesy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:17 pmI think we paid circa 16 million for him if you look at the reputable Transfer market sites? Whilst I agree with you that £5m is laughable, I think we would struggle to get anywhere near our outlay on him if he was sold.
I respect Spices posts but again he mentions Trafford’s potential. We seem to be referring to potential a lot now when we debate most of Vincent’s signings.
Sadly, potential alone won’t keep us in the Premier League.
I take Enola Gay's point that Muric might want out because this season hasn't panned out as he hoped. However, if he's kicked up a fuss and been agitating for a move, he's done it very quietly because we might have expected him to look for a move in January.
-
- Posts: 4075
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1508 times
- Has Liked: 581 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
While I wouldn't go as far as being on full display in Burtons shop window, I still think we'll struggle to resell at a profit, certainly based on current form. I get the Ramsdale comparison in that he's young and English, but he won their player of the year award at Sheffield United due to a number of stand out displays, despite their relegation. Could you say the same about Trafford? I'm not so sure. Ramsdale also had previous top flight experience at Bournemouth (where he also won player of the year).
-
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 587 times
- Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
He could have been perfectly happy to stay until the end of this season knowing that an injury or suspension will get him back in, especially with Vigouroux and Franchi both gone.claretspice wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 4:43 pmI take Enola Gay's point that Muric might want out because this season hasn't panned out as he hoped. However, if he's kicked up a fuss and been agitating for a move, he's done it very quietly because we might have expected him to look for a move in January.
Come the summer though the dynamic is completely different. If Trafford stays (or leaves and gets replaced by another shiny new toy) the prospect of a season on the bench in the Championship probably won't appeal as much. And even if Trafford goes and Kompany tells Muric he's the Number 1 again, will someone whose been screwed over once want to risk that happening again?
Honest opinion, barring the aforementioned injuries or suspensions I think he's played his last competitive game for Burnley.
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:35 pm
- Been Liked: 41 times
- Has Liked: 20 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
and the Trafford Hate Squad take over another thread
-
- Posts: 4075
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1508 times
- Has Liked: 581 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
It’s been a perfectly reasonable debate so far, try joining it.LincsWoldsClaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 6:22 pmand the Trafford Hate Squad take over another thread
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 855 times
- Has Liked: 605 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
RVclaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:57 pmPeople like you are hilarious. Not only you blatantly ignore the fact we have not paid £19m for him, as has literally just been pointed out, you then ignore claretspices exact point that Ramsdale got relegated twice and Arsenal still paid £24m rising to £30m for him. No guarantees here but saying we’d be lucky to get £5m is laughable and borderline clueless.
[/quote
Whatever we paid for him was far too much and the post after yours agreed with me. OK £5 million might be a bit harsh but I doubt we will get our money back if Trafford leaves at the end of this season.
As for Ramsdale, his was a totally different situation as he wasn't at fault for goals in every other game like Trafford is.
You might not realise, but this forum is for different people to post varying views. Just because mine is different to yours, doesn't make me wrong.
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 855 times
- Has Liked: 605 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
I don't think anyone, and certainly not me, hates Trafford. He's a young player probably trying his best. The trouble is he's just not good enough and possibly never will be.LincsWoldsClaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 6:22 pmand the Trafford Hate Squad take over another thread
-
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2023 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 150 times
- Has Liked: 375 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
More chance Lord Lucan in goals this weekend than seeing Muric not on the bench ..
-
- Posts: 2499
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1031 times
- Has Liked: 280 times
Re: Cullen and Muric back in for Saturday?
James Trafford really is a divisive topic on this board.
We seem to have a number of people on this board who want to go completely overboard with their criticism of him. Comments like at fault for goals in every other game or literally fabricating things to try and blame him for recent goals conceded and single him out rather than other members of the team (or the manager) have all been way over the top this season.
I don’t know of many posters who are saying he has had a brilliant season or that he was worth every penny of his big fee so I’m not really sure why it has become such a divisive topic on this board.
Even many of those who are defending Trafford also feel that Muric should have been given a chance.
A balanced view is that Trafford is improving this season, he’s kept us in a few games but that his inexperience and lack of command and strength in the area has meant that teams have targeted this and it’s cost us (though this has to be in the context of how weak, poor and small the rest of our team has been). I also think a lot of people can see that Muric distributes the ball quicker and more accurately than Trafford and that Trafford’s hesitation and weight of pass has cost us problems and goals.
I don’t see this kind of hatred for the likes of Amdouni and a few other players who have had shocking seasons and cost similar amounts of money.
We seem to have a number of people on this board who want to go completely overboard with their criticism of him. Comments like at fault for goals in every other game or literally fabricating things to try and blame him for recent goals conceded and single him out rather than other members of the team (or the manager) have all been way over the top this season.
I don’t know of many posters who are saying he has had a brilliant season or that he was worth every penny of his big fee so I’m not really sure why it has become such a divisive topic on this board.
Even many of those who are defending Trafford also feel that Muric should have been given a chance.
A balanced view is that Trafford is improving this season, he’s kept us in a few games but that his inexperience and lack of command and strength in the area has meant that teams have targeted this and it’s cost us (though this has to be in the context of how weak, poor and small the rest of our team has been). I also think a lot of people can see that Muric distributes the ball quicker and more accurately than Trafford and that Trafford’s hesitation and weight of pass has cost us problems and goals.
I don’t see this kind of hatred for the likes of Amdouni and a few other players who have had shocking seasons and cost similar amounts of money.
This user liked this post: fidelcastro