TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Casper2
Posts: 1329
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 223 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Casper2 » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:12 pm

evensteadiereddie wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:05 pm
I've just back from the game, there was plenty of harmony and graft in today's performance.
It was a game we should have won and much improved although it doesn't suit the whingers'agenda to acknowledge that.
We lost though ,a poor Bournemouth had better chances than us

CoolClaret
Posts: 7460
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2257 times
Has Liked: 2171 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by CoolClaret » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:13 pm

evensteadiereddie wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:05 pm
I've just back from the game, there was plenty of harmony and graft in today's performance.
It was a game we should have won and much improved although it doesn't suit the whingers'agenda to acknowledge that.
You make it sound like we're a team thats got more than 13 points. '

Should have won' - did we? That's the difference; teams with that extra bit in them WOULD win that game.

Dyche referred to it many a time - almost as though you can 'smell' it on them.

We are a shadow. I cannot for the life of me figure out how anyone cannot see that.
This user liked this post: k90bfc

spt_claret
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:52 pm
Been Liked: 745 times
Has Liked: 463 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by spt_claret » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:13 pm

Shaggy wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 3:02 pm
Why? He isn’t good enough and is making constant mistakes costing the team a lot of goals and points. He deserves all he gets.
I've been on the Muric side of the debate since pre season, been 100% convinced there's nothing to be lost by swapping keepers since late October. This is a disgraceful sentiment. No surprise coming from you given you were never satisified under Dyche, you and StayingDown4Ever seem to always need to have a boo boy to hurl abuse upon however things are going, for you it was Dyche, for him it used to be Foster.

Trafford is miles off the Prem. He's overexposed, he's on a hiding to nothing he's blatantly not good enough. But you never, ever, boo or jeer your own. Even if you think they're crap. Even if you think they're lazy- they're not likely to be motivated to try harder by booing, it's for the manager to give them a bollocking.

The reality is, us cheering or booing players will never influence Kompany's thinking. Hes not swayed, he doesn't care, he's working on his own logic that isn't even considering performances on the pitch so certainly won't consider what we think. The guy gets paid in a week more than some of us get in two years, he's never gonna give one toss what we think.

All we can do as fans is vent opinions & frustrations appropriately, and get behind the players as best we can. It's practically a weekly humilation for Trafford at this point as it is, he doesn't deserve his own fans compounding it, the guy isn't good enough but neither are a bunch of them- Jay is miles below the level needed and would never be booed. If Andy Payton dusted off his boots he'd be an embarrassment but he wouldn't warrant booing. It serves nothing, and it blatantly achieves nothing - Kompany is never, ever, going to be swayed. He's far beyond Dyche for stubbornness.

Call for Kompany Out if you want, call for Trafford to be dropped, but don't boo the lad.

jlup1980
Posts: 2178
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:01 pm
Been Liked: 858 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by jlup1980 » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:17 pm

Darthlaw wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 4:58 pm
Stop reading here
Do you think he's really getting that much abuse? I sit in the Jimmy Mac and I don't think he was getting pelters all day. There were moans and the odd boo when he messed up his distribution but not as much as some are suggesting.

Darthlaw
Posts: 3089
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
Been Liked: 1185 times
Has Liked: 418 times
Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Darthlaw » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:23 pm

jlup1980 wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:17 pm
Do you think he's really getting that much abuse? I sit in the Jimmy Mac and I don't think he was getting pelters all day. There were moans and the odd boo when he messed up his distribution but not as much as some are suggesting.
I don’t remember many players getting boo’d when their name was announced in the starting lineup.

The chanting for Muric (after one misplaced pass where no outfield player made space) was pretty unique.

Regardless. If you wish to justify the abuse of your own player, crack on.
This user liked this post: Leisure

Leisure
Posts: 18611
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 12497 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Leisure » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:25 pm

bumba wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:33 pm

Have you not realised there's probably only 3 people left defending his selections now?
Talking even more boll**ks than usual! And it's not a case of defending him, it's called supporting your player!

jlup1980
Posts: 2178
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:01 pm
Been Liked: 858 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by jlup1980 » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:28 pm

Darthlaw wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:23 pm
I don’t remember many players getting boo’d when their name was announced in the starting lineup.

The chanting for Muric (after one misplaced pass where no outfield player made space) was pretty unique.

Regardless. If you wish to justify the abuse of your own player, crack on.
I'm not justifying anything, just asking the question. I arrived very late today, just as the players were coming out. I didn't pay much attention to the line up. I heard a small amount of Muric chanting but it was clearly a minority. As I've said previously, it's all on VK anyway and I suspect the abuse is aimed more at him than Trafford. It's not good for the kid though.

Superjohnnyfrancis
Posts: 2133
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
Been Liked: 350 times
Has Liked: 335 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Superjohnnyfrancis » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:37 pm

You’d have to be a massive muppet to want to play a keeper that has conceded 60 goals in 27 games even if the whole team is shite as most of you say they are.

Only player not changed this season, come on, its absolutely stupid whichever way you cut it.

If fans are frustrated in seeing him every week you can’t blame them. Do you just want them to clap like mutes or something. Bizarre.

Darthlaw
Posts: 3089
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
Been Liked: 1185 times
Has Liked: 418 times
Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Darthlaw » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:44 pm

jlup1980 wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:28 pm
I'm not justifying anything, just asking the question. I arrived very late today, just as the players were coming out. I didn't pay much attention to the line up. I heard a small amount of Muric chanting but it was clearly a minority. As I've said previously, it's all on VK anyway and I suspect the abuse is aimed more at him than Trafford. It's not good for the kid though.
That’s fair, although abuse in game shortly after a misplaced pass from Trafford is never going to be constructive/motivational is it?

Interestingly, I’ve never used the ‘foe’ function previously, but adding 4-5 prominent members on this thread particularly has made this board so much more tolerable again.

Regardless, I don’t think you’ll find anyone sane who’ll suggest Trafford has had an amazing season. Similarly I don’t think you’ll find one with an IQ greater than their shoe size who will believe abuse of one of our own is useful.
Last edited by Darthlaw on Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.

mickleoverclaret
Posts: 974
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:27 pm
Been Liked: 398 times
Has Liked: 432 times
Location: Mickleover, Derby
Contact:

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by mickleoverclaret » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:44 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:10 pm
Correct, they prefer to make things up to back up their ridiculous agendas, than to admit we were good in the main today, one defensive error and not clinical enough up front.
Some of the build up play was as good as we've been all season
If people had an "agenda" to criticise the performance of the team or the manager this season, they would hardly have to make anything up to do so.

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Nori1958 » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:45 pm

Superjohnnyfrancis wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:37 pm
You’d have to be a massive muppet to want to play a keeper that has conceded 60 goals in 27 games even if the whole team is shite as most of you say they are.

Only player not changed this season, come on, its absolutely stupid whichever way you cut it.

If fans are frustrated in seeing him every week you can’t blame them. Do you just want them to clap like mutes or something. Bizarre.
Just keep quiet, don't clap but don't boo

Spindles
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2020 8:29 am
Been Liked: 18 times
Has Liked: 34 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Spindles » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:47 pm

Darthlaw wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:23 pm

The chanting for Muric (after one misplaced pass where no outfield player made space) was pretty unique.
Stop making things up, you call out others for it....He misplaced a simple pass straight to a Bournemouth - not condoning the booing but don't make out it wasn't a dreadful error that could have cost us.
This user liked this post: Superjohnnyfrancis

Superjohnnyfrancis
Posts: 2133
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
Been Liked: 350 times
Has Liked: 335 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Superjohnnyfrancis » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:47 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:45 pm
Just keep quiet, don't clap but don't boo
Yes main coronel ;)

Darthlaw
Posts: 3089
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
Been Liked: 1185 times
Has Liked: 418 times
Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Darthlaw » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:52 pm

Spindles wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:47 pm


Stop making things up, you call out others for it....He misplaced a simple pass straight to a Bournemouth - not condoning the booing but don't make out it wasn't a dreadful error that could have cost us.
Sure…

The one he knocked out of play was ‘straight to a Bournemouth’. Even then ‘that could have cost us’.

You keep justifying that abuse

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Nori1958 » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:55 pm

Superjohnnyfrancis wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:47 pm
Yes main coronel ;)
If only I knew what that meant :lol:

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5133
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1623 times
Has Liked: 892 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by BurnleyFC » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:56 pm

evensteadiereddie wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:05 pm
I've just back from the game, there was plenty of harmony and graft in today's performance.
It was a game we should have won and much improved although it doesn't suit the whingers'agenda to acknowledge that.
Hmmm.

I thought it should’ve been about 4-1 to Bournemouth - they missed some glorious chances.

We huffed and we puffed but we’d still be puffing now trying to blow their house down.

Superjohnnyfrancis
Posts: 2133
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
Been Liked: 350 times
Has Liked: 335 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Superjohnnyfrancis » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:57 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:55 pm
If only I knew what that meant :lol:
Say it in a 1945 german accent :lol:

Spindles
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2020 8:29 am
Been Liked: 18 times
Has Liked: 34 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Spindles » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:58 pm

Darthlaw wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:52 pm
Sure…

The one he knocked out of play was ‘straight to a Bournemouth’. Even then ‘that could have cost us’.

You keep justifying that abuse
Obviously not any of the kicks to touch, but you know that. I'm talking about the pass directly to one of the Bournemouth players in the first half that led to booing from the crowd.

And can you not read where I said " not condoning the booing"

People have a legitimate view of Trafford's shortcomings but you don't even accept that. Stop it, you're making yourself look silly.
Last edited by Spindles on Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Darthlaw
Posts: 3089
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
Been Liked: 1185 times
Has Liked: 418 times
Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Darthlaw » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:59 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:56 pm

We huffed and we puffed but we’d still be puffing now trying to blow their house down.
Verbatim this is what I said coming out of the ground 😂

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Nori1958 » Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:59 pm

mickleoverclaret wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:44 pm
If people had an "agenda" to criticise the performance of the team or the manager this season, they would hardly have to make anything up to do so.
And yet they do
I have no problem people criticising players or manager if its factually correct, but StayingDown4Ever rant at half time was just 100% false, made up, lies, call it what you want.

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by taio » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:01 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:56 pm
Hmmm.

I thought it should’ve been about 4-1 to Bournemouth - they missed some glorious chances.

We huffed and we puffed but we’d still be puffing now trying to blow their house down.
You're seeing what you want to see. I can't comprehend how someone could watch the game today and conclude Bournemouth should have won 4-1

Darthlaw
Posts: 3089
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
Been Liked: 1185 times
Has Liked: 418 times
Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Darthlaw » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:02 pm

Spindles wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:58 pm
Obviously not any of the kicks to touch, but you know that. I'm talking about the pass directly to one of the Bournemouth players in the first half that led to booking from the crowd.

And can you not read where I said " not condoning the booing"

People have a legitimate view of Trafford's shortcomings but you don't even accept that. Stop it, you're making yourself look silly.
Again, sure….

I haven’t defended Trafford in a long time but point out the abuse he receives.

I realise not persecuting the lad for every error the team makes is not a popular view but it’s a hill I’m prepared to die on. If that makes me look silly then fair enough.

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5133
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1623 times
Has Liked: 892 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by BurnleyFC » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:03 pm

taio wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:01 pm
You're seeing what you want to see. I can't comprehend how someone could watch the game today and conclude Bournemouth should have won 4-1
Well they scored two and missed at least one sitter and one glorious chance in the second half.

Vitinho should’ve scored for us.

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by taio » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:05 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:03 pm
Well they scored two and missed at least one sitter and one glorious chance in the second half.

Vitinho should’ve scored for us.
Only Vitinho should've scored - OK.

Row Z
Posts: 353
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:17 am
Been Liked: 80 times
Has Liked: 17 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Row Z » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:06 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:10 pm
Correct, they prefer to make things up to back up their ridiculous agendas, than to admit we were good in the main today, one defensive error and not clinical enough up front.
Some of the build up play was as good as we've been all season
Disagree with this. We were good first 10 and had a lot of the ball throughout the game, but other than the free kick don’t remember us creating any chances or working their keeper.

In contrast, Bournemouth created 3/4 great chances second half and it could have easily been more for them.

Agree that first half the one error was the difference between the sides at half time but we didn’t create anything of note in response.

Didn’t think Trafford was at fault for either goal, but even Bournemouth fans were enjoying him getting the ball.
These 2 users liked this post: BurnleyFC spt_claret

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5133
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1623 times
Has Liked: 892 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by BurnleyFC » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:06 pm

taio wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:05 pm
Only Vitinho should've scored - OK.
Who else then? Odobert first half perhaps. Bruun Larsen’s was a good free kick but they don’t go in all that often.

The disallowed goal was a foul, by the way.

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5133
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1623 times
Has Liked: 892 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by BurnleyFC » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:08 pm

Row Z wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:06 pm
Disagree with this. We were good first 10 and had a lot of the ball throughout the game, but other than the free kick don’t remember us creating any chances or working their keeper.

In contrast, Bournemouth created 3/4 great chances second half and it could have easily been more for them.

Agree that first half the one error was the difference between the sides at half time but we didn’t create anything of note in response.

Didn’t think Trafford was at fault for either goal, but even Bournemouth fans were enjoying him getting the ball.
This is exactly how I saw the game.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 5794
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1884 times
Has Liked: 841 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:20 pm

If opposing fans are enjoying him having the ball then that kind of gives a clue on how poor he is.

Sheedyclaret
Posts: 984
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:44 am
Been Liked: 170 times
Has Liked: 45 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Sheedyclaret » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:21 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:56 pm
Hmmm.

I thought it should’ve been about 4-1 to Bournemouth - they missed some glorious chances.

We huffed and we puffed but we’d still be puffing now trying to blow their house down.
Correct we were wide open yet again Bournemouth could of had 3,4 or 5

Leisure
Posts: 18611
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 12497 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Leisure » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:38 pm

Superjohnnyfrancis wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:37 pm
You’d have to be a massive muppet to want to play a keeper that has conceded 60 goals in 27 games even if the whole team is shite as most of you say they are.

Only player not changed this season, come on, its absolutely stupid whichever way you cut it.

If fans are frustrated in seeing him every week you can’t blame them. Do you just want them to clap like mutes or something. Bizarre.
No, I don't be expect them to clap him but just what they think that booing him will achieve I'd like to know????

Leisure
Posts: 18611
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 12497 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Leisure » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:41 pm

mickleoverclaret wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:59 pm
Are people booing Trafford, or the decision to keep playing him?
Would love to know what those booing Trafford hope to achieve??? Certainly isn't going to help him or the team!

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by taio » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:43 pm

Superjohnnyfrancis wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:37 pm
You’d have to be a massive muppet to want to play a keeper that has conceded 60 goals in 27 games even if the whole team is shite as most of you say they are.

Only player not changed this season, come on, its absolutely stupid whichever way you cut it.

If fans are frustrated in seeing him every week you can’t blame them. Do you just want them to clap like mutes or something. Bizarre.
You'd have to be a massive muppet to perpetually post strong and negative views on here and then confess you don't even watch our games.
This user liked this post: Nori1958

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Elizabeth » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:47 pm

The number of times he was out of his box with his foot on the ball thinking what to do with the ball was unreal.
Some will argue there was no movement in front of him but I feel it's more than that. My take on it is that he doesn't know what to do with the ball

Superjohnnyfrancis
Posts: 2133
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
Been Liked: 350 times
Has Liked: 335 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Superjohnnyfrancis » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:47 pm

taio wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:43 pm
You'd have to be a massive muppet to perpetually post strong and negative views on here and then confess you don't even watch our games.
Your a real tough guy behind your keyboard arent you i bet your really scary in person :lol:

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by taio » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:50 pm

Superjohnnyfrancis wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:47 pm
Your a real tough guy behind your keyboard arent you i bet your really scary in person :lol:
You're x 2

Hapag Lloyd
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:24 am
Been Liked: 286 times
Has Liked: 427 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Hapag Lloyd » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:51 pm

Superjohnnyfrancis wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:47 pm
Your a real tough guy behind your keyboard arent you i bet your really scary in person :lol:

Is that the best you’ve got?

Superjohnnyfrancis
Posts: 2133
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
Been Liked: 350 times
Has Liked: 335 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Superjohnnyfrancis » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:51 pm

taio wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:50 pm
You're x 2
I thought you were a tough guy? you still working at Burnley hospital? Ill come and have a chat if you want.

Superjohnnyfrancis
Posts: 2133
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
Been Liked: 350 times
Has Liked: 335 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Superjohnnyfrancis » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:52 pm

Hapag Lloyd wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:51 pm
Is that the best you’ve got?
:lol:

dougcollins
Posts: 6730
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 1820 times
Has Liked: 1800 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by dougcollins » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:53 pm

There were a lot of worse performances on that field than Trafford today.

Try looking at the defenders who gave him two unstoppable goals.

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by taio » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:54 pm

Superjohnnyfrancis wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:51 pm
I thought you were a tough guy? you still working at Burnley hospital? Ill come and have a chat if you want.
I have never worked at Burnley hospital.

mickleoverclaret
Posts: 974
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:27 pm
Been Liked: 398 times
Has Liked: 432 times
Location: Mickleover, Derby
Contact:

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by mickleoverclaret » Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:59 pm

Leisure wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:41 pm
Would love to know what those booing Trafford hope to achieve??? Certainly isn't going to help him or the team!
I don't boo Trafford so I can't speak for them, but I don't imagine they're trying to achieve anything other than venting their understandable frustration.

IanMcL
Posts: 30418
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6390 times
Has Liked: 8742 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by IanMcL » Sun Mar 03, 2024 8:01 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:02 pm
Trafford
I think (hope) you are wrong, there, Nori.

The lad dies his best and makes some saves. Not a booing offence.

I think it is the same as cheating and chatting for Manuel Benson. Trafford is already on the pitch, against crowd will, so booj g is to send a message to Kimpaby, to do the right thing and change him out.

bumba
Posts: 3133
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 200 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by bumba » Sun Mar 03, 2024 8:02 pm

Leisure wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:25 pm
Talking even more boll**ks than usual! And it's not a case of defending him, it's called supporting your player!
I'd rather he wasn't out player

bumba
Posts: 3133
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 200 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by bumba » Sun Mar 03, 2024 8:03 pm

StayingDown4Ever wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:49 pm
Don’t worry, we’re just getting to the stage of the evening where Nori throws his toys out the pram and comes out with his classic “I am staying away from this forum after defeats from now on and I won’t be posting anything further until tomorrow” (but then posts something else 20 minutes later) 😆 👶
I've already seen his famous 'agenda' thrown about

bumba
Posts: 3133
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 200 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by bumba » Sun Mar 03, 2024 8:04 pm

Nori1958 wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:40 pm
Making things up again.... I never said he was 10/10, I've admitted he made the bad pass you describe
Iam not defending his selection
What I am saying, and getting bored of it now, is that he didn't pass it directly to a Bournemouth player 3 times in the 1st half as claimed by your mate
If he kicks it straight out of play for no reason then in theory he is passing to a Bournemouth player because they regain possession which actually happened more than three times 😂

Leisure
Posts: 18611
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 12497 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Leisure » Sun Mar 03, 2024 8:05 pm

Steve-Harpers-perm wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:20 pm
If opposing fans are enjoying him having the ball then that kind of gives a clue on how poor he is.
You serious! :o

Leisure
Posts: 18611
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 12497 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Leisure » Sun Mar 03, 2024 8:05 pm

bumba wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 8:04 pm
If he kicks it straight out of play for no reason then in theory he is passing to a Bournemouth player because they regain possession which actually happened more than three times 😂
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Superjohnnyfrancis
Posts: 2133
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
Been Liked: 350 times
Has Liked: 335 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Superjohnnyfrancis » Sun Mar 03, 2024 8:16 pm

Leisure wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:38 pm
No, I don't be expect them to clap him but just what they think that booing him will achieve I'd like to know????
Yeah booing's not going to work but how else can they show their displeasure, Boo the manager chant Muric? They are pretty limited from the stands.

Leisure
Posts: 18611
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 3811 times
Has Liked: 12497 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Leisure » Sun Mar 03, 2024 8:27 pm

Superjohnnyfrancis wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 8:16 pm
Yeah booing's not going to work but how else can they show their displeasure, Boo the manager chant Muric? They are pretty limited from the stands.
Can't really, just support him and the team. Booing is only likely to be counter productive.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 5794
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1884 times
Has Liked: 841 times

Re: TRAFFORD (AGAIN)

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Sun Mar 03, 2024 8:35 pm

Leisure wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2024 8:05 pm
You serious! :o
Pretty much and they’ve at least only had to watch him twice this season. Was it Bournemouth away when we got chipped from near the half way line?

Post Reply