Shearer ...

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
ElectroClaret
Posts: 18014
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4074 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Shearer ...

Post by ElectroClaret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:08 pm

...on MOTD
"From a defensive point of view, Burnley are miles off."

Can't really disagree.

123EasyasBFC
Posts: 3120
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 621 times
Has Liked: 184 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by 123EasyasBFC » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:10 pm

But the fail to mention that Ramsey was fouled but tried to be honest and stay on his feet, there’s no wonder players dive

beddie
Posts: 5231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1408 times
Has Liked: 521 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by beddie » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:11 pm

Yes he was spot in with all his analysis of us. That’s been the story of our season so far.

DAVETHEVICAR
Posts: 3019
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
Been Liked: 834 times
Has Liked: 1637 times
Location: Lincoln

Re: Shearer ...

Post by DAVETHEVICAR » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:12 pm

Shearer is spot on
Ramsey was not fouled
All 3 Liverpool goals were legitimate
This user liked this post: Kilson810

Goliath
Posts: 1273
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:08 pm
Been Liked: 238 times
Has Liked: 106 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Goliath » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:13 pm

That was crap analysis though. Pundits fail to acknowledge that we've completely changed our style of play since last season.
And they hardly even touched on the obvious foul for the second goal.

Belial
Posts: 1682
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
Been Liked: 381 times
Has Liked: 321 times
Location: On a crazy train

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Belial » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:14 pm

He's said it several time this season as well (about us playing ourselves into trouble). Its just so obvious. Along with how awful we are at defending set pieces, which goes back to last season too

DAVETHEVICAR
Posts: 3019
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
Been Liked: 834 times
Has Liked: 1637 times
Location: Lincoln

Re: Shearer ...

Post by DAVETHEVICAR » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:15 pm

Was not an obvious foul

Goliath
Posts: 1273
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:08 pm
Been Liked: 238 times
Has Liked: 106 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Goliath » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:19 pm

DAVETHEVICAR wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:15 pm
Was not an obvious foul
He's volleyed his shin and not got the ball. If he goes down its a foul which is a complete nonsense.
Var should have eradicated the need to go down for fouls but of course it hasn't
These 2 users liked this post: oswyclaret MT03ALG

Mark the Claret
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2023 12:58 pm
Been Liked: 31 times
Has Liked: 12 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Mark the Claret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:21 pm

No foul.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 18014
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4074 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by ElectroClaret » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:23 pm

Christ, Sheffield U like Real Madrid.

Nearly.

123EasyasBFC
Posts: 3120
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 621 times
Has Liked: 184 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by 123EasyasBFC » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:23 pm

DAVETHEVICAR wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:12 pm
Shearer is spot on
Ramsey was not fouled
All 3 Liverpool goals were legitimate
So booting your opponents shin after they intercept the ball from you isn’t a foul? The only reason it’s not a foul is because Ramsey tries to continue for the one two from Amdouni.

The Liverpool player dives to the floor trying to win a foul after he kicks ramseys shin, should be a foul and booking for simulation to
This user liked this post: MT03ALG

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5133
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1623 times
Has Liked: 892 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by BurnleyFC » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:30 pm

DAVETHEVICAR wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:15 pm
Was not an obvious foul
You’re right. It was blindingly obvious.

Kilson810
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 836 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Kilson810 » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:43 pm

We can say it's a foul all we want, Ramsey was too honest, stayed on his feet and barely flinched.

No point being the only honest team in a league of 19 other clubs who aren't honest. There's no moral victory award.

Goliath
Posts: 1273
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:08 pm
Been Liked: 238 times
Has Liked: 106 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Goliath » Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:47 pm

He didnt flinch because hes volleyed his shin pad. Maybe they should stop wearing them so they can be sure it hurts when they are fouled in future. Should help them go down quicker and get the free kicks.

Kilson810
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 836 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Kilson810 » Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:13 am

Well I'd rather see a player go down and win a totally legitimate free kick than concede a goal.

Goliath
Posts: 1273
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:08 pm
Been Liked: 238 times
Has Liked: 106 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Goliath » Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:15 am

Kilson810 wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:13 am
Well I'd rather see a player go down and win a totally legitimate free kick than concede a goal.
Tbf he probably would have done if he'd known what Amdouni was about to do. But thats another discussion entirely.

Kilson810
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 836 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Kilson810 » Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:17 am

Goliath wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:15 am
Tbf he probably would have done if he'd known what Amdouni was about to do. But thats another discussion entirely.
Very true :D but who can predict what goes on inside Amdouni's head at the minute!

RammyClaret61
Posts: 3106
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 1132 times
Has Liked: 302 times
Location: Melbourne, Australia.

Re: Shearer ...

Post by RammyClaret61 » Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:47 am

DAVETHEVICAR wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:12 pm
Shearer is spot on
Ramsey was not fouled
All 3 Liverpool goals were legitimate
:lol: :lol: :lol:

I’m beginning to think you have shares in VAR.
This user liked this post: MeeActon1

Percy
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2024 2:56 pm
Been Liked: 6 times
Has Liked: 14 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Percy » Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:50 am

You know your doing bad if Shearer calls you out, must be like a black spot on the moon!

South West Claret.
Posts: 5642
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
Been Liked: 766 times
Has Liked: 499 times
Location: Devon

Re: Shearer ...

Post by South West Claret. » Sun Feb 11, 2024 7:46 am

ElectroClaret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:08 pm
...on MOTD
"From a defensive point of view, Burnley are miles off."

Can't really disagree.
50/50 I would say.

oswyclaret
Posts: 270
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 6:51 pm
Been Liked: 70 times
Has Liked: 386 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by oswyclaret » Sun Feb 11, 2024 8:23 am

Definite foul on Ramsey,but only if he went to ground holding his leg!

Var would have been used, but it would have gone Liverpools way anyway.

Wasn't that Ramey's only contribution yesterday?

dougcollins
Posts: 6730
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 1820 times
Has Liked: 1800 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: Shearer ...

Post by dougcollins » Sun Feb 11, 2024 8:52 am

Goliath wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:15 am
Tbf he probably would have done if he'd known what Amdouni was about to do. But thats another discussion entirely.
Amdouni has probably contributed to as many conceded goals as Trafford.

JohnMac
Posts: 7219
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
Been Liked: 2379 times
Has Liked: 3807 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Shearer ...

Post by JohnMac » Sun Feb 11, 2024 9:05 am

Playing out from the back especially from teams with lesser talented players has increased the number of goals scored in the Premier League. Unfortunately these goals are mainly scored by the opposing side but the TV mob love it!

Ilkley claret
Posts: 388
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 107 times
Has Liked: 33 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Ilkley claret » Sun Feb 11, 2024 9:07 am

Liverpool are a footballing team, so to lose against them with 3 headed goals speaks volumes about our inability to defend our six yard box

Culmclaret
Posts: 1548
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:12 pm
Been Liked: 473 times
Has Liked: 52 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Culmclaret » Sun Feb 11, 2024 10:12 am

Let’s face it. We re total bobbins. Teams don’t have to play well or try particularly hard to beat us. Against teams other than the two who came up with us plus Fulham we’ve managed a princely two points. Just think about that. Awful recruitment and clueless management. We will be the first 100 points plus Championship winning team to be relegated. To fail to build on such a strong platform was an act of staggering ineptitude…and then to pretend we are ahead of schedule and there is some cunning project plan is just insulting.
These 7 users liked this post: CaptJohn Quicknick Rumpelstiltskin CoolClaret Westleigh claretfern bfcjg

warksclaret
Posts: 6693
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1704 times
Has Liked: 790 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by warksclaret » Sun Feb 11, 2024 10:20 am

Good pundits with lots of proper experience of playing and critiquing are like top consultants who companies bring in to tell them where they are going wrong. I personally include Shearer as one of the better ones, and what he said last night he has been saying since about the fifth game this season. Some of us need to smell the coffeee
These 2 users liked this post: DAVETHEVICAR beddie

MrTopTier
Posts: 2994
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:20 am
Been Liked: 1047 times
Has Liked: 994 times
Location: The Moon, Outer Space.

Re: Shearer ...

Post by MrTopTier » Sun Feb 11, 2024 10:40 am

First goal weak by Trafford all on him nobody else.

The second goal was a real team effort, started near the halfway line. Berge actually puts his hands down to Indicate to Assignon to slow things down. The throw is taken quickly Berge goes back to O’Shea under pressure, who puts pressure Trafford under pressure, poor choice from Trafford, could have cleared his lines.
Instead plays a ball to Delcroix that puts him under pressure, another poor decision by Delcroix who chooses to play up the line instead of playing the ball out and getting back into shape. They get the ball back poor touch by Ramsey and the a poor ball to Amdouni who in turn loses the ball which leads to the cross and goal.

Third goal comes from a second phase of a set piece.

Only Forest conceded more from corners.

It is evident throughout the season that it is a weakness and yet here we are 2/3 of the way into the season, still not addressing it.

warksclaret
Posts: 6693
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1704 times
Has Liked: 790 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by warksclaret » Sun Feb 11, 2024 10:50 am

dougcollins wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 8:52 am
Amdouni has probably contributed to as many conceded goals as Trafford.
Probably the most talented insight right, No 10, or whatever you like to call him, since Robbie Blake. He consistently produces 10-15 minutes of brilliance then fades. For me he is an impact sub at best right now, particularly with Fofana joining us. Sadly he has scored 4 in 23 games, but as you say, has led to conceding more than this through poor control

ClaretLoup
Posts: 1856
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:35 pm
Been Liked: 540 times
Has Liked: 188 times
Location: Retirement Home in Suffolk

Re: Shearer ...

Post by ClaretLoup » Sun Feb 11, 2024 11:10 am

dougcollins wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 8:52 am
Amdouni has probably contributed to as many conceded goals as Trafford.
Amdouni flinches for the cross in for number three and turns his body away from the ball. The idea when you are defending is to get in the way of the ball not avoid it. At corners they might as well put him on the half way line as he has no interest in heading a ball.

However he is not the only one, O'Shea for City's third was criminal, stand up and he blocks it.

Add in Ekdal and Al Dakhil cowering as Morris rises above them to head Luton's goal, Berge flinching for Fulham's first, turns his head away and the ball hits him, face the ball and he has the opportunity to nut it out.

Another reason this team are going down, too soft and not enough guts.

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by claretspice » Sun Feb 11, 2024 11:11 am

I thought it was a bit OT from Shearer. He nails the first goal - straightforward Trafford error- and is mostly right about the second except he ignored the arguable goul on Ramsey and to my mind unfairly singled out Amdouni. Having watched a replay of the game last night, however, the implication of the analysis that those incidents were representative of the game seems to me wrong. I've seen Dyche teams go to Anfield and cough up far more clear chances than we did yesterday.
This user liked this post: agreenwood

Neil
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2022 9:49 pm
Been Liked: 211 times
Has Liked: 16 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Neil » Sun Feb 11, 2024 11:23 am

oswyclaret wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 8:23 am
Definite foul on Ramsey,but only if he went to ground holding his leg!

Var would have been used, but it would have gone Liverpools way anyway.

Wasn't that Ramey's only contribution yesterday?
No, he also miscontrolled the ball when in on goal right before half time.
Most annoying thing about yesterday was Liverpool weren't at the races. The place was flat, they were missing players through injury and illness and were there for the taking.
Unfortunately we have this habit of conceding incredibly soft goals. All the opposition have to do is stay in the game and they will inevitably score out of nothing.

Rumpelstiltskin
Posts: 314
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:18 pm
Been Liked: 83 times
Has Liked: 2764 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Rumpelstiltskin » Sun Feb 11, 2024 11:35 am

Culmclaret wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 10:12 am
Let’s face it. We re total bobbins. Teams don’t have to play well or try particularly hard to beat us. Against teams other than the two who came up with us plus Fulham we’ve managed a princely two points. Just think about that. Awful recruitment and clueless management. We will be the first 100 points plus Championship winning team to be relegated. To fail to build on such a strong platform was an act of staggering ineptitude…and then to pretend we are ahead of schedule and there is some cunning project plan is just insulting.
Agree 100 per cent…The Emperor’s New Clothes springs to mind !

ClaretLoup
Posts: 1856
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:35 pm
Been Liked: 540 times
Has Liked: 188 times
Location: Retirement Home in Suffolk

Re: Shearer ...

Post by ClaretLoup » Sun Feb 11, 2024 11:42 am

claretspice wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 11:11 am
I thought it was a bit OT from Shearer. He nails the first goal - straightforward Trafford error-
OK maybe, but what about the queue of three unmarked players on the back post waiting to head it in, who is marking them? Answer = Nobody. Assignon, Brownhill and Amdouni all marking space. Shearer is right, absolute bobbins defending and a complete shambles all over the box. Doesn't matter if you play really well except for when the three goals go in, the fact is three goals went in due to poor marking, decision making, & loose control etc at the key moments. It doesn't help if you have Brian Jensen Mark 2 in the nets.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18100
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3875 times
Has Liked: 2073 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sun Feb 11, 2024 11:44 am

claretspice wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 11:11 am
I've seen Dyche teams go to Anfield and cough up far more clear chances than we did yesterday.
Yesterday's Liverpool side aren't anywhere near the level of when Mane and Salah were ripping us apart.

Tricky Trevor
Posts: 8529
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 2473 times
Has Liked: 2010 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Tricky Trevor » Sun Feb 11, 2024 11:45 am

The initial foul by Nunez on Trafford has hardly been mentioned. The shove in the back totally interfered with his clearance and we never got it away after that.
They were both fouls for me.

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by claretspice » Sun Feb 11, 2024 11:48 am

Quickenthetempo wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 11:44 am
Yesterday's Liverpool side aren't anywhere near the level of when Mane and Salah were ripping us apart.
They're not far behind though.

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5371
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1654 times
Has Liked: 404 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Sun Feb 11, 2024 11:59 am

The person culpable is the set piece coach. They often spend so long on this the managers don’t hang around to watch it (not sure VK’s approach). How easy to say before the game “look James, TAA is world class on his delivery, they are so hard to read, if he floats in a back post corner, stay on your line”. Obvious no such conversation took place. I have similar concerns about the zonal marking and all our tall players getting caught near post.

But in open play our defending was outstanding and so was the goalkeeping.
These 2 users liked this post: nil_desperandum LincsWoldsClaret

Fretters
Posts: 2582
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:56 am
Been Liked: 1051 times
Has Liked: 554 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Fretters » Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:02 pm

Shearer's spot on. It's a shame we're no longer managed by a centre half.

Oh, wait...

CoolClaret
Posts: 7457
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2256 times
Has Liked: 2171 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by CoolClaret » Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:02 pm

Culmclaret wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 10:12 am
Let’s face it. We re total bobbins. Teams don’t have to play well or try particularly hard to beat us. Against teams other than the two who came up with us plus Fulham we’ve managed a princely two points. Just think about that. Awful recruitment and clueless management. We will be the first 100 points plus Championship winning team to be relegated. To fail to build on such a strong platform was an act of staggering ineptitude…and then to pretend we are ahead of schedule and there is some cunning project plan is just insulting.
This.

All I want is some realism and something that isn't platitudes and ******** from the manager/club.

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by claretspice » Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:25 pm

ClaretLoup wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 11:42 am
OK maybe, but what about the queue of three unmarked players on the back post waiting to head it in, who is marking them? Answer = Nobody. Assignon, Brownhill and Amdouni all marking space. Shearer is right, absolute bobbins defending and a complete shambles all over the box. Doesn't matter if you play really well except for when the three goals go in, the fact is three goals went in due to poor marking, decision making, & loose control etc at the key moments. It doesn't help if you have Brian Jensen Mark 2 in the nets.
Indeed. Shearer pointed out the general lack of authority beyond Trafford, and in particular the lack of decent blocking (this rather than marking because we dont mark man for man, because it would be a succession of mismatches). That has been a recurring theme on corner goals this season (Everton and Fulham last week a prime example) and is one reason that Trafford has been unfairly criticised recently. There's a lack of aggression generally in our set piece defending.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

JohnDearyMe
Posts: 2744
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:31 pm
Been Liked: 667 times
Has Liked: 2054 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by JohnDearyMe » Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:36 pm

claretspice wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:25 pm
Indeed. Shearer pointed out the general lack of authority beyond Trafford, and in particular the lack of decent blocking (this rather than marking because we dont mark man for man, because it would be a succession of mismatches). That has been a recurring theme on corner goals this season (Everton and Fulham last week a prime example) and is one reason that Trafford has been unfairly criticised recently. There's a lack of aggression generally in our set piece defending.
Fully agree. Which makes the signing of our rookie keeper all the more baffling. Given his lack of authority he needs a far more solid back line in front of him

ClaretLoup
Posts: 1856
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:35 pm
Been Liked: 540 times
Has Liked: 188 times
Location: Retirement Home in Suffolk

Re: Shearer ...

Post by ClaretLoup » Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:56 pm

claretspice wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:25 pm
. That has been a recurring theme on corner goals this season (Everton and Fulham last week a prime example) and is one reason that Trafford has been unfairly criticised recently.
One of Trafford's problems that he has been rightly criticised for is decision making. He has developed a nasty habit of vacating his net and making it easy for the forward to score. As on Saturday, the goals aren't entirely his fault, but he ends up in no man's land too many times, three times recently, Luton goal (Ok he was fouled but he was never going to get there after hesitating, tiptoeing out then trying to jump from a standing position,) the second Fulham goal and the obvious one vs Liverpool. Further back there are others like the goal at Bournemouth. Shay Given did an excellent appraisal on the paucity of some his technique earlier in the season, problems any decent goal-keeping coach or player himself ought to be able to rectify.

At the very highest level there are question marks not only with regard to the manager but also the calibre of his backroom staff as well.

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by claretspice » Sun Feb 11, 2024 1:24 pm

ClaretLoup wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:56 pm
One of Trafford's problems that he has been rightly criticised for is decision making. He has developed a nasty habit of vacating his net and making it easy for the forward to score. As on Saturday, the goals aren't entirely his fault, but he ends up in no man's land too many times, three times recently, Luton goal (Ok he was fouled but he was never going to get there after hesitating, tiptoeing out then trying to jump from a standing position,) the second Fulham goal and the obvious one vs Liverpool. Further back there are others like the goal at Bournemouth. Shay Given did an excellent appraisal on the paucity of some his technique earlier in the season, problems any decent goal-keeping coach or player himself ought to be able to rectify.

At the very highest level there are question marks not only with regard to the manager but also the calibre of his backroom staff as well.
Don't agree with you regarding the Luton goal. That was a straightforward case of a keeper being fouled just as he was bracing to jump. Sure, he was caught in no man's land for Fulham's second but in his mitigation I suspect he was as surprised as the rest of us that a speculative punt caught our defence out so comprehensively and allowed a 1v1 chance.

Trafford has made mistakes this season. No question. He was probably the wrong keeper for what we needed this season. But he's also become a lightening rod for broader failings which are leaving him exposed too often.

Blondeclaret
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:09 pm
Been Liked: 14 times
Has Liked: 40 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by Blondeclaret » Sun Feb 11, 2024 2:07 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:08 pm
...on MOTD
"From a defensive point of view, Burnley are miles off."

Can't really disagree.
Well I think he was spot on! Burnley’s problems have always been defending in the box, and the amount of goals scored against them from headers confirms this. But now it seems they also have issues in both boxes.

agreenwood
Posts: 3172
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1751 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by agreenwood » Sun Feb 11, 2024 2:48 pm

Shearer’s right, but it’s hardly news.

I actually think defending in the PL generally this season is poor. It’s probably an art that’s being lost a little bit.

I’m sat watching the West Ham vs Arsenal game and some of the early defending from the former has been **** poor. How does tiny Trossard drift on between West Ham’s giant centre halves for a free header for example? Then 4 really **** goals to concede on a par with anything we did yesterday. This is an expensively assembled dour David Moyes defence averaging the best part of conceding 2 goals a game this season.

It’s evidenced through the rise in goals scored in the PL over the last half a decade. All of the highest goal scoring years in the PL are from recent history. Is the attacking better or the defending getting worse?

I actually think our bigger problem is at the other end. We don’t score enough, so too much focus is on our defence. Yesterday was a prime example. We miss 3-4 gilt edged chances and all the analysis from Shearer is on our defensive frailties.

Not many sides come up and have solid defences. The sides who stay up are the ones who score goals. For all the plaudits Luton have had for being fiercely competitive this season, their defensive record isn’t much better than ours. They score more goals and important times. We miss too many chances at important times.
This user liked this post: longsidepies

ClaretLoup
Posts: 1856
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:35 pm
Been Liked: 540 times
Has Liked: 188 times
Location: Retirement Home in Suffolk

Re: Shearer ...

Post by ClaretLoup » Sun Feb 11, 2024 3:09 pm

agreenwood wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 2:48 pm
Shearer’s right, but it’s hardly news.

I actually think our bigger problem is at the other end. We don’t score enough, so too much focus is on our defence. Yesterday was a prime example. We miss 3-4 gilt edged chances and all the analysis from Shearer is on our defensive frailties.
Not sure I agree with this. The first season Burnley went down under Dyche we conceded 53 goals and the season they stayed up 55 whilst scoring 25 and then 39 respectively. So scoring more goals kept them up, but so did having a much tighter defence than they have at the moment which is performing at Owen Coyle/Brian Laws levels. At the moment Burnley are on course to hit that 39 goal mark, which in the past was enough to keep them up, but won't be this season if they keep conceding at the same rate so Shearer is right to focus on defensive frailties. Burnley have scored seven goals in the last five games and got two points to show for it.

agreenwood
Posts: 3172
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1751 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by agreenwood » Sun Feb 11, 2024 3:24 pm

ClaretLoup wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 3:09 pm
Not sure I agree with this. The first season Burnley went down under Dyche we conceded 53 goals and the season they stayed up 55 whilst scoring 25 and then 39 respectively. So scoring more goals kept them up, but so did having a much tighter defence than they have at the moment which is performing at Owen Coyle/Brian Laws levels. At the moment Burnley are on course to hit that 39 goal mark, which in the past was enough to keep them up, but won't be this season if they keep conceding at the same rate so Shearer is right to focus on defensive frailties. Burnley have scored seven goals in the last five games and got two points to show for it.
Dyche was (and still is) an outlier I think. Outside of the top 6, Everton are the only side barely conceding over a goal a game. Even the Liverpool defence looked ropey when tested yesterday.

Luton are billed as the new equivalent to those promoted Dyche teams in the way they play, but it’s not born out through the stats. Their defensive record is far worse than even the relegated Dyche team of 14/15. What Luton seem to have a knack of doing is scoring goals that count.

I just think our inability is to score puts all the focus on our defence, which has been poor, but isn’t necessarily significantly worse than some of our rivals. They are more equipped to pick up points because they score goals.

basil6345789
Posts: 2713
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
Been Liked: 482 times
Has Liked: 2292 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by basil6345789 » Sun Feb 11, 2024 3:33 pm

The Captain should always be the Centre Half, who should make sure that his lads always "mark their man".

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by claretspice » Sun Feb 11, 2024 3:34 pm

agreenwood wrote:
Sun Feb 11, 2024 3:24 pm
Dyche was (and still is) an outlier I think. Outside of the top 6, Everton are the only side barely conceding over a goal a game. Even the Liverpool defence looked ropey when tested yesterday.

Luton are billed as the new equivalent to those promoted Dyche teams in the way they play, but it’s not born out through the stats. Their defensive record is far worse than even the relegated Dyche team of 14/15. What Luton seem to have a knack of doing is scoring goals that count.

I just think our inability is to score puts all the focus on our defence, which has been poor, but isn’t necessarily significantly worse than some of our rivals. They are more equipped to pick up points because they score goals.
Certainly conceding 9 goals across games at Arsenal, City and Liverpool doesn't feel a particularly outlier compared to performances and outcomes under Dyche.

agreenwood
Posts: 3172
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1751 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Shearer ...

Post by agreenwood » Sun Feb 11, 2024 5:00 pm

In the first 9 games (up to Brentford away) we conceded 23 goals at a rate of 2.6 goals per game. We've conceded 27 in the following 15 games at a rate of 1.8 goals per game. Whilst 1.8 goals per game is obviously nothing to crow about and we still make plenty of mistakes, there's been an improvement in the last 2/3rds of the fixtures we've played so far. I haven't looked, but I suspect if you look at the rate of goals conceded by most of our relegation rivals over the last 15-16 games, our defence won't statistically be any worse. Even taking the season as a whole, 7 other clubs have conceded 40 goals or over this season. Statistically we're not miles out on our own.

We just don't score enough to give ourselves a chance and it compounds the fact that, like a lot of teams in the bottom half, we have defensive frailties.

Post Reply