Appearances for promotion winners
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Appearances for promotion winners
I've just been asked the following question: How many starts were made by promotion winning players in the next season in the Premier League?
I've just looked at it
2009/10 - 261, more than 30 from Jensen (38), Elliott (34), Alexander (33)
2014/15 - 302, more than 30 from Heaton (38), Shackell (38), Trippier (38), Arfield (36), Jones (36), Ings (35), Mee (32)
2016/17 - 330, more than 30 from Ward (37), Lowton (36), Heaton (35), Keane (35), Mee (34), Boyd (33)
Currently, after 26 games
2023/24 - 139, more than 20 from Brownhill (22)
That ends today's daft stat.
I've just looked at it
2009/10 - 261, more than 30 from Jensen (38), Elliott (34), Alexander (33)
2014/15 - 302, more than 30 from Heaton (38), Shackell (38), Trippier (38), Arfield (36), Jones (36), Ings (35), Mee (32)
2016/17 - 330, more than 30 from Ward (37), Lowton (36), Heaton (35), Keane (35), Mee (34), Boyd (33)
Currently, after 26 games
2023/24 - 139, more than 20 from Brownhill (22)
That ends today's daft stat.
This user liked this post: bfcjg
-
- Posts: 5900
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1772 times
- Has Liked: 359 times
- Location: The Banana Stand
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
Questionable man-management skills. Our promotion winners did nothing wrong.
I honestly believe there are contractual stipulations as to why some players are playing.
I honestly believe there are contractual stipulations as to why some players are playing.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
Interesting to see the number of appearances from the promotion winning goalkeeper and back four in the first season we stayed up
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
I wonder how much those figures would have changed had dyche or coyle had a decent budget to work with?ClaretTony wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:29 amI've just been asked the following question: How many starts were made by promotion winning players in the next season in the Premier League?
I've just looked at it
2009/10 - 261, more than 30 from Jensen (38), Elliott (34), Alexander (33)
2014/15 - 302, more than 30 from Heaton (38), Shackell (38), Trippier (38), Arfield (36), Jones (36), Boyd (35), Ings (35), Mee (32)
2016/17 - 330, more than 30 from Ward (37), Lowton (36), Heaton (35), Keane (35), Mee (34), Boyd (33)
Currently, after 26 games
2023/24 - 139, more than 20 from Brownhill (22)
That ends today's daft stat.
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
Need to be careful when comparing the 2. We had a highly coveted young centre back in Keane and a player who had premier league experience at centre back.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 12:00 pmInteresting to see the number of appearances from the promotion winning goalkeeper and back four in the first season we stayed up
We also had PL experience at right back, left back and in goal and couldn't afford any improvements on them.
This season we had basically 0 PL experience in any of those positions bar Taylor and a few appearances for Roberts. If anything it points out to me we probably had a much bigger task than we realised in the Summer.
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
I bet Dyche wouldn't have spent big on a new goalkeeper to replace Heaton.
Could also argue how much the stats would change if Kompany gave some credit to how good the squad he already had was
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
We didn't replace any of those positions with experience either though that's the strange thingGoliath wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 12:09 pmNeed to be careful when comparing the 2. We had a highly coveted young centre back in Keane and a player who had premier league experience at centre back.
We also had PL experience at right back, left back and in goal and couldn't afford any improvements on them.
This season we had basically 0 PL experience in any of those positions bar Taylor and a few appearances for Roberts. If anything it points out to me we probably had a much bigger task than we realised in the Summer.
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
Quite interesting stats and possibly/probably why we are really struggling.
-
- Posts: 6655
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2006 times
- Has Liked: 3349 times
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
The "promotion winners" not getting game time isn't necessarily a problem in itself IF the personnel recruited are a clear and obvious upgrade capable of giving the extra needed for the higher league. They're not! And in several cases they are a fairly obvious downgrade. (The obvious exception imo is Koleosho who definitely looks to have something "extra" which makes his injury all the more frustrating. Not that one player is going to make that much difference though.)
This user liked this post: bfcjg
-
- Posts: 3563
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
- Been Liked: 2604 times
- Has Liked: 301 times
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
Consistency builds a team ethos....
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
They have to be good enough first.
-
- Posts: 3563
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
- Been Liked: 2604 times
- Has Liked: 301 times
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
Plenty of players on the list above, as individuals were deemed not good enough. Arfield, Lowton, Jones, Boyd, Ward - all faced into teams that had them regularly needing being replaced with NEW in the desired XI's around transfer windows.
The team needs to be good enough.... being better than the sum of it's parts, allowing the exceptional individuals to deliver their skills.
These 4 users liked this post: CoolClaret ClaretTony Buxtonclaret evensteadiereddie
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
Man management doesn’t exist it seems, we just freeze players out at the slightest issue.
If it did our £12m striker wouldn’t be on loan in Germany when we can’t hit a barn door.
If it did our £12m striker wouldn’t be on loan in Germany when we can’t hit a barn door.
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
All of those players were signed at Championship level and we basically couldnt afford to replace a full squad so had to go with them. Id argue Boyd, Jones and to a lesser extent Arfield proved that they werent good enough for the Premier League but they were experienced and hardworking.dandeclaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:24 pmPlenty of players on the list above, as individuals were deemed not good enough. Arfield, Lowton, Jones, Boyd, Ward - all faced into teams that had them regularly needing being replaced with NEW in the desired XI's around transfer windows.
The team needs to be good enough.... being better than the sum of it's parts, allowing the exceptional individuals to deliver their skills.
There's just too many that arent good enough, however much we play them that will continue to be the case. From what ive seen the selection and tactics have been pretty consistent since around the Arsenal away game. Its not made a jot of difference
Interesting example though as thinking about it all 4 left on a free transfer, thats not really sustainable and was part of the problem. We werent really generating enough income from transfers to refresh the team. The new approach is trying to avoid that and sign players that we can move on for a profit.
-
- Posts: 7466
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2258 times
- Has Liked: 2174 times
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
I find it hard to fathom that Burnley fans after watching Dyche for 9.5 seasons and see him squeeze every last drop out of players will now suggest that large swathes of a 101 point Champ winning team isn't good enough having wholesale changes is a sound strategy, then use any excuse other than the simple one that the manager hasn't gotten enough out of the resources he has and could be argued that he's made poor use of the resources made available to him - which is even worse.dandeclaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:24 pmPlenty of players on the list above, as individuals were deemed not good enough. Arfield, Lowton, Jones, Boyd, Ward - all faced into teams that had them regularly needing being replaced with NEW in the desired XI's around transfer windows.
The team needs to be good enough.... being better than the sum of it's parts, allowing the exceptional individuals to deliver their skills.
-
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 298 times
- Has Liked: 781 times
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
We missed that promotion bounce with the players that brought us up
This user liked this post: bfcjg
-
- Posts: 3563
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
- Been Liked: 2604 times
- Has Liked: 301 times
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
What does sustainable mean? In 10 years the club was run profitably. In 10 years, there 8 years in the premier league, and a championship winning season? In 10 years, there was enough money generated to pay for a new state of the art training ground.Goliath wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:39 pmAll of those players were signed at Championship level and we basically couldnt afford to replace a full squad so had to go with them. Id argue Boyd, Jones and to a lesser extent Arfield proved that they werent good enough for the Premier League but they were experienced and hardworking.
There's just too many that arent good enough, however much we play them that will continue to be the case. From what ive seen the selection and tactics have been pretty consistent since around the Arsenal away game. Its not made a jot of difference
Interesting example though as thinking about it all 4 left on a free transfer, thats not really sustainable and was part of the problem. We werent really generating enough income from transfers to refresh the team. The new approach is trying to avoid that and sign players that we can move on for a profit.
I must have a different view of what sustainable means though.
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
Dyches first promotion team were also immediately relegated quite comfortably. Obviosuly not quite as spectacularly but if i remember rightly we went about 10 or 11 games before we won our first game. So the strategy of keeping that same team didnt work. That was the other extreme, Kompany deserves time to find that balance.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:41 pmI find it hard to fathom that Burnley fans after watching Dyche for 9.5 seasons and see him squeeze every last drop out of players will now suggest that large swathes of a 101 point Champ winning team isn't good enough having wholesale changes is a sound strategy, then use any excuse other than the simple one that the manager hasn't gotten enough out of the resources he has and could be argued that he's made poor use of the resources made available to him - which is even worse.
-
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 298 times
- Has Liked: 781 times
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
Wasn't for the lack of trying though, but yes a learning curveGoliath wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:53 pmDyches first promotion team were also immediately relegated quite comfortably. Obviosuly not quite as spectacularly but if i remember rightly we went about 10 or 11 games before we won our first game. So the strategy of keeping that same team didnt work. That was the other extreme, Kompany deserves time to find that balance.
-
- Posts: 7466
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2258 times
- Has Liked: 2174 times
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
That Matty Taylor penalty miss and Leicester going up the other end and bagging is what did us - huge 6 point swing. Very different to what we've seen this season, the situations aren't remotely similar.Goliath wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:53 pmDyches first promotion team were also immediately relegated quite comfortably. Obviosuly not quite as spectacularly but if i remember rightly we went about 10 or 11 games before we won our first game. So the strategy of keeping that same team didnt work. That was the other extreme, Kompany deserves time to find that balance.
It was very close to working - close enough to give you confidence that with another crack at the whip and a few more players we could maybe do it.
-
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:59 am
- Been Liked: 131 times
- Has Liked: 94 times
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
Regarding 2014-15 I thought that we signed Boyd in the Summer of 2014 and he wasn't part of the 2013-14 promotion season.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:29 amI've just been asked the following question: How many starts were made by promotion winning players in the next season in the Premier League?
I've just looked at it
2009/10 - 261, more than 30 from Jensen (38), Elliott (34), Alexander (33)
2014/15 - 302, more than 30 from Heaton (38), Shackell (38), Trippier (38), Arfield (36), Jones (36), Boyd (35), Ings (35), Mee (32)
2016/17 - 330, more than 30 from Ward (37), Lowton (36), Heaton (35), Keane (35), Mee (34), Boyd (33)
Currently, after 26 games
2023/24 - 139, more than 20 from Brownhill (22)
That ends today's daft stat.
-
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 2625 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
When we went up with Dyche, our best players hadn't been on loan either, which is a factor. There's more gone wrong than that, but after Forest went up with a load of loan stars, they spent £150m and just about made it. Tella, Maatsen and Harwood Bellis were all big players for us.
I probably agree though, the way some others have been sidelined this season is a bit mystifying.
I probably agree though, the way some others have been sidelined this season is a bit mystifying.
-
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:40 am
- Been Liked: 97 times
- Has Liked: 87 times
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
It’s all just bizarre.
-
- Posts: 7466
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2258 times
- Has Liked: 2174 times
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
They were and the manager opted for two different players than two of them listed.NottsClaret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 2:11 pmWhen we went up with Dyche, our best players hadn't been on loan either, which is a factor. There's more gone wrong than that, but after Forest went up with a load of loan stars, they spent £150m and just about made it. Tella, Maatsen and Harwood Bellis were all big players for us.
I probably agree though, the way some others have been sidelined this season is a bit mystifying.
Forest also scraped up through the playoffs and hadn't been in the PL for 20+ years, we had just spent 6 years in there and had better existing players in the squad.
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 7:02 am
- Been Liked: 269 times
- Has Liked: 161 times
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
I assume you are of the opinion Muric should have started the season too? Or at the very least should have come in to replace Trafford months ago?ClaretTony wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 12:00 pmInteresting to see the number of appearances from the promotion winning goalkeeper and back four in the first season we stayed up
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
We did, and on the last day of the window. I've removed him from that list but I hadn't included him in the total.Anonymous Claret wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 2:09 pmRegarding 2014-15 I thought that we signed Boyd in the Summer of 2014 and he wasn't part of the 2013-14 promotion season.
This user liked this post: Anonymous Claret
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
Neither. I wasn't offering any opinions but just posting a stat that I'd been asked for.StayingDown4Ever wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 2:21 pmI assume you are of the opinion Muric should have started the season too? Or at the very least should have come in to replace Trafford months ago?
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 18 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
- Location: burnley
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
Game against Cardiff at the end of last season included - Twine, Maatsen, Barnes, Harwood Bellis, Peacock Farrell, Zaroury, Roberts all of whom are no longer at the club. Vincent has made mistakes however he cant play players who aren't here.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
He chose to dispense with five of the seven you mentionjohnalexander wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 3:55 pmGame against Cardiff at the end of last season included - Twine, Maatsen, Barnes, Harwood Bellis, Peacock Farrell, Zaroury, Roberts all of whom are no longer at the club. Vincent has made mistakes however he cant play players who aren't here.
Re: Appearances for promotion winners
And only Maatsen if Premier League level who we tried to sign. I thought Zaroury could be but looking at his performances for hull and for us since Xmas, Kompany might have been right on that one.johnalexander wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 3:55 pmGame against Cardiff at the end of last season included - Twine, Maatsen, Barnes, Harwood Bellis, Peacock Farrell, Zaroury, Roberts all of whom are no longer at the club. Vincent has made mistakes however he cant play players who aren't here.