Yep course it wouldn’t, nobody would bat an eye lid if we were comfortable
Mud analytics
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
-
- Posts: 16899
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6965 times
- Has Liked: 1484 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Mud analytics
If you choose not to believe me then that’s up to you.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:12 pmYep course it wouldn’t, nobody would bat an eye lid if we were comfortable
Re: Mud analytics
How do you know this ?123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 7:55 pm‘Some are saying’ without anything to back it up.
It’s fair to mention league position because as I have just said there would be no talk about any of this if things were going well
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:09 pm
- Been Liked: 14 times
- Has Liked: 40 times
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Mud analytics
It’s fair to mention league position because as I have just said there would be no talk about any of this if things were going well
You are just making things up
-
- Posts: 3172
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 1751 times
- Has Liked: 273 times
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Mud analytics
People are making up that we are using kompanys company without any concrete knowledge and then making up that it’s only been used this season.
As Chester mentioned he brought it up at the beginning on the season and nobody cared then but suddenly now when people don’t have anything else to moan about it’s being brought up.
There wasn’t a thread about it day after Luton away when we won early on in the season, this forum is 90% people making sh*te up
Re: Mud analytics
I think VK should explain his part in MUD and what deal if any they have with our club ? I once had a manager I was interviewing ask me for a commission on player sales !!! Needless to say I said no and he didn’t get the job. I have also seen ex England internationals paid significant signing on fees ( 50k in cash 40 years ago ) so don’t think bad stuff doesn’t happen
Re: Mud analytics
You included123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:29 pmPeople are making up that we are using kompanys company without any concrete knowledge and then making up that it’s only been used this season.
As Chester mentioned he brought it up at the beginning on the season and nobody cared then but suddenly now when people don’t have anything else to moan about it’s being brought up.
There wasn’t a thread about it day after Luton away when we won early on in the season, this forum is 90% people making sh*te up
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
-
- Posts: 16899
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6965 times
- Has Liked: 1484 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Mud analytics
I’ve mentioned it on here before. I’ve also had spoken conversations about it.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:32 pmMy point has been proven that nobody hasn’t mentioned it until now, Lee Mooney was heavily involved last summer but nobody mentioned it then when we signed benson, zaroury and all the rest but now it’s a problem
This user liked this post: Casper2
Re: Mud analytics
So your point hasn’t been proven and you are making things up , regardless of what you think , questions need answering.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:32 pmMy point has been proven that nobody hasn’t mentioned it until now, Lee Mooney was heavily involved last summer but nobody mentioned it then when we signed benson, zaroury and all the rest but now it’s a problem
-
- Posts: 2133
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 350 times
- Has Liked: 335 times
Re: Mud analytics
I think Chester said very few cared- not nobody. It's been mentioned on here before and I showed some concern as did some others. Ultimately its not like loads of people are showing concern now either, I think it's fair to say that the kind of people who do care about this will care no matter how the club is performing which is as it should be.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:29 pmPeople are making up that we are using kompanys company without any concrete knowledge and then making up that it’s only been used this season.
As Chester mentioned he brought it up at the beginning on the season and nobody cared then but suddenly now when people don’t have anything else to moan about it’s being brought up.
There wasn’t a thread about it day after Luton away when we won early on in the season, this forum is 90% people making sh*te up
It doesn't invalidate anything just because it's been brought up while we are doing badly anyway does it? So why do you keep hiding behind that?
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
-
- Posts: 13511
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3114 times
- Has Liked: 3833 times
Re: Mud analytics
We’ve got it wrong, so far, yes.boyyanno wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 7:40 pmBut this is a perfect example of how we've got it wrong isn't it?
You're lauding our business over Luton and yet they're doing better than us and arguably recruited better too. Why not ask who would you rather watch this season, Barkley and Townsend or Tresor and Amdouni?
There's a really bad mindset in modern football that flashy players are the best. It's mental when you look at the season we are currently having and then compare it to the workmanlike stuff under Dyche. We used to be substance over style but it feels like a lot only care about style over substance now. Ironically we're failing at both.
My point is, if you don’t focus on the here and now, and you accept that this season has been ultimately unsuccessful for all three promoted teams, would you rather be:
- us, using data analytics to identify some really great young talent (even though some have been loans); or
- Sheffield/Luton, whose transfer strategy I don’t know a lot about but let’s say it’s more traditional and about signing ‘old pros’
???
Said a few times what a massive signing Barkley would’ve been for us and I’d definitely have preferred to watch him over Tresor/Amdouni. Berge is a closer call though who I think has been v good for us.
I am not arguing that we want a whole team of style over substance, not at all, we’ve obviously got that balance very wrong this year… but I’d massively prefer our recruitment strategy to that of the other two down with us so I don’t care at all whether we’re using MUD or not.
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:09 pm
- Been Liked: 14 times
- Has Liked: 40 times
Re: Mud analytics
The club previously used ISF which is a far superior system to Mud and is used by the majority of higher league clubs. It changed over to Mud Analytics in approximately August 2023.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:29 pmPeople are making up that we are using kompanys company without any concrete knowledge and then making up that it’s only been used this season.
As Chester mentioned he brought it up at the beginning on the season and nobody cared then but suddenly now when people don’t have anything else to moan about it’s being brought up.
There wasn’t a thread about it day after Luton away when we won early on in the season, this forum is 90% people making sh*te up
This user liked this post: blatherwickstattoos
-
- Posts: 13511
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3114 times
- Has Liked: 3833 times
Re: Mud analytics
According to CP, nothing to suggest they’re profiting in their recent accounts anyway. Let’s see what next year brings.
Bit of a pointless discussion when we neither know whether we use them at all or the terms if we do.
-
- Posts: 7457
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2256 times
- Has Liked: 2171 times
Re: Mud analytics
I didn't see the initial report by CP - saw it much later on... but to steelman 123EasyasBFC'S point (and I mentioned this earlier in the season) then yes - even if we were doing well it'd be concerning; because we have so much tied in to one man that may go elsewhere, then what?boyyanno wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:49 pmI think Chester said very few cared- not nobody. It's been mentioned on here before and I showed some concern as did some others. Ultimately its not like loads of people are showing concern now either, I think it's fair to say that the kind of people who do care about this will care no matter how the club is performing which is as it should be.
It doesn't invalidate anything just because it's been brought up while we are doing badly anyway does it? So why do you keep hiding behind that?
Seems very naive to me.
-
- Posts: 16899
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6965 times
- Has Liked: 1484 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Mud analytics
Yes, spoken conversation, like with my mouth, in the vicinity of another human’s ear. And yes, it bothered me as soon as I heard about it.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:50 pmSpoken conversations yeah, bothered you last season did it?
Re: Mud analytics
Oh ok then , I forgot you were in charge.
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Mud analytics
Who’s hiding behind anything, it’s all hearsay. The same guy Lee Mooney heavily involved last season and nobody cared about the way we recruited because the reason went right.boyyanno wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:49 pmI think Chester said very few cared- not nobody. It's been mentioned on here before and I showed some concern as did some others. Ultimately its not like loads of people are showing concern now either, I think it's fair to say that the kind of people who do care about this will care no matter how the club is performing which is as it should be.
It doesn't invalidate anything just because it's been brought up while we are doing badly anyway does it? So why do you keep hiding behind that?
What is it you exactly care about? The is nothing whatsoever to show that kompany or his business has any financial gain for any of the signings made, caring about nothing and like I said earlier I’m sure it was first thing on your mind when we beat Luton or when we beat Fulham in December
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Mud analytics
I mean no disrespect to Chester here but if I remember rightly it was first brought up as part of finance discussions or somthing similar and I think it was easily missed as part of a wider discussion as opposed to people not caring. I think it's had one or two mentions since then but it's normally quickly shot down pretty quickly.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:52 pmI didn't see the initial report by CP - saw it much later on... but to steelman 123EasyasBFC'S point (and I mentioned this earlier in the season) then yes - even if we were doing well it'd be concerning; because we have so much tied in to one man that may go elsewhere, then what?
Seems very naive to me.
-
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
- Been Liked: 111 times
- Has Liked: 103 times
Re: Mud analytics
Now it’s getting interesting, worrying really. Can we sack kompanys company and still retain him as manager??Blondeclaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:51 pmThe club previously used ISF which is a far superior system to Mud and is used by the majority of higher league clubs. It changed over to Mud Analytics in approximately August 2023.
-
- Posts: 7457
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2256 times
- Has Liked: 2171 times
Re: Mud analytics
Precisely,boyyanno wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:59 pmI mean no disrespect to Chester here but if I remember rightly it was first brought up as part of finance discussions or somthing similar and I think it was easily missed as part of a wider discussion as opposed to people not caring. I think it's had one or two mentions since then but it's normally quickly shot down pretty quickly.
I missed it on there, I forgot which thread it was brought up on - presumably one about the recruitment 10 games or so into the season.
-
- Posts: 7457
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2256 times
- Has Liked: 2171 times
Re: Mud analytics
Wouldn't go on at any other club imo.blatherwickstattoos wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:00 pmNow it’s getting interesting, worrying really. Can we sack kompanys company and still retain him as manager??
I really do believe VK has got significant control that isn't afforded to other managers and the cynic in me suggests he got more upon signing his new deal.
This user liked this post: blatherwickstattoos
-
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
- Been Liked: 111 times
- Has Liked: 103 times
Re: Mud analytics
The way the American contingent hung on every word he said in the mission to Burnley has me believe the same too.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:03 pmWouldn't go on at any other club imo.
I really do believe VK has got significant control that isn't afforded to other managers and the cynic in me suggests he got more upon signing his new deal.
Re: Mud analytics
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about but you are a very confused individual.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:55 pmWho’s hiding behind anything, it’s all hearsay. The same guy Lee Mooney heavily involved last season and nobody cared about the way we recruited because the reason went right.
What is it you exactly care about? The is nothing whatsoever to show that kompany or his business has any financial gain for any of the signings made, caring about nothing and like I said earlier I’m sure it was first thing on your mind when we beat Luton or when we beat Fulham in December
I can't see anywhere where any of the people your engaging with has suggested anything nefarious about the connection, about the transfers, about Kompany- Can you please point this out?
I don't understand what problem you've got with someone saying they aren't comfortable about there being a conflict of interest?
Serious question but you know what one is don't you? You know it's not a good thing I assume?
-
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
- Been Liked: 111 times
- Has Liked: 103 times
Re: Mud analytics
So this mud recruitment agency had no dealings in the signings we made last season ??? But of all the signings from August 2023 , is there any proof of this ? Just so we can put to bed “we weren’t bothered when we were doing well” etc etc.
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Mud analytics
Riley literally explained about a player signed using his analytics company playing more minutes to up their value by playing them into form which could have financial gain for kompany if sold.boyyanno wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:07 pmI honestly have no idea what you're talking about but you are a very confused individual.
I can't see anywhere where any of the people your engaging with has suggested anything nefarious about the connection, about the transfers, about Kompany- Can you please point this out?
I don't understand what problem you've got with someone saying they aren't comfortable about there being a conflict of interest?
Serious question but you know what one is don't you? You know it's not a good thing I assume?
People can say they aren’t comfortable, it’s just time timing of the concerns, it hasn’t been a running thread throughout the season about people’s concerns when they apparently heard it moved over in August, only bothers them now in march. No thread questioning it in January when the window was open.
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Mud analytics
All the signings from August 2023 hahaha, hardly think kompany needed to use his own business to sign players like Delcroix and Larsen that he has previously managedblatherwickstattoos wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:09 pmSo this mud recruitment agency had no dealings in the signings we made last season ??? But of all the signings from August 2023 , is there any proof of this ? Just so we can put to bed “we weren’t bothered when we were doing well” etc etc.
Re: Mud analytics
Yeah just had a look back and it was first on the signings thread, then the KV (Belgium takeover) and then the normal takeover one. And not that it surprises me but quite a few people showed concerns, but unsurprisingly they were shouted down by RV and his merry men (including 123 easybfc above) saying anyone who showed concerns was not a proper fan and no one had mentioned it before.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:01 pmPrecisely,
I missed it on there, I forgot which thread it was brought up on - presumably one about the recruitment 10 games or so into the season.
So so much for 123easybfcs act
This user liked this post: CoolClaret
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Mud analytics
Lee Mooney and kompany at the club last season whatever system they used it was still the same people making the signingsblatherwickstattoos wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:09 pmSo this mud recruitment agency had no dealings in the signings we made last season ??? But of all the signings from August 2023 , is there any proof of this ? Just so we can put to bed “we weren’t bothered when we were doing well” etc etc.
-
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
- Been Liked: 111 times
- Has Liked: 103 times
Re: Mud analytics
I think you’re missing the point in this debate. No idea why you’re being so defensive about it all but I hope you prove me right and there’s absolutely no conflict of interest.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:15 pmAll the signings from August 2023 hahaha, hardly think kompany needed to use his own business to sign players like Delcroix and Larsen that he has previously managed
Re: Mud analytics
Riley gave you an example of why this conflict of interest exists- he didn't give you an example of what he thinks Kompany has done/is doing123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:13 pmRiley literally explained about a player signed using his analytics company playing more minutes to up their value by playing them into form which could have financial gain for kompany if sold.
People can say they aren’t comfortable, it’s just time timing of the concerns, it hasn’t been a running thread throughout the season about people’s concerns when they apparently heard it moved over in August, only bothers them now in march. No thread questioning it in January when the window was open.
This user liked this post: Rileybobs
-
- Posts: 16899
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6965 times
- Has Liked: 1484 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Mud analytics
Except for this thread questioning it in January when the window was open.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:13 pmRiley literally explained about a player signed using his analytics company playing more minutes to up their value by playing them into form which could have financial gain for kompany if sold.
People can say they aren’t comfortable, it’s just time timing of the concerns, it hasn’t been a running thread throughout the season about people’s concerns when they apparently heard it moved over in August, only bothers them now in march. No thread questioning it in January when the window was open.
http://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboar ... &start=100
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Mud analytics
Can you show me where I shouted people down in the KV takeover thread, don’t throw shade on me without backing it up, I haven’t never ever commented on someone being a proper fan.boyyanno wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:15 pmYeah just had a look back and it was first on the signings thread, then the KV (Belgium takeover) and then the normal takeover one. And not that it surprises me but quite a few people showed concerns, but unsurprisingly they were shouted down by RV and his merry men (including 123 easybfc above) saying anyone who showed concerns was not a proper fan and no one had mentioned it before.
So so much for 123easybfcs act
-
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
- Been Liked: 111 times
- Has Liked: 103 times
Re: Mud analytics
As for no previous thread… I found out about it today. This morning. So that’s why I’ve not started a thread before this. Hope that clears up your confusion about a few things .
This user liked this post: CoolClaret
-
- Posts: 16899
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6965 times
- Has Liked: 1484 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Mud analytics
I didn’t say there was anything nefarious about the connection, I pointed out an obvious conflict of interest.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:13 pmRiley literally explained about a player signed using his analytics company playing more minutes to up their value by playing them into form which could have financial gain for kompany if sold.
People can say they aren’t comfortable, it’s just time timing of the concerns, it hasn’t been a running thread throughout the season about people’s concerns when they apparently heard it moved over in August, only bothers them now in march. No thread questioning it in January when the window was open.
This user liked this post: forzagranata
-
- Posts: 7457
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2256 times
- Has Liked: 2171 times
Re: Mud analytics
Exactly, it's hardly widespread.blatherwickstattoos wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:18 pmAs for no previous thread… I found out about it today. This morning. So that’s why I’ve not started a thread before this. Hope that clears up your confusion about a few things .
Infact, it's the sort of thing if you mentioned it to the average fan they'd think you were spouting some sort of conspiratorial nonsense, because it does (at face value) sound it.
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Mud analytics
That isn’t a thread about it? That’s a mini discussion on ‘tonight’s football thread’ you started on 30th Jan, didn’t concern you enough earlier on to mention it in a stand alone thread?Rileybobs wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:17 pmExcept for this thread questioning it in January when the window was open.
http://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboar ... &start=100
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
-
- Posts: 16899
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6965 times
- Has Liked: 1484 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Mud analytics
So there was a thread in January when the transfer window was open where this was questioned. Cheers.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:21 pmThat isn’t a thread about it? That’s a mini discussion on ‘tonight’s football thread’ you started on 30th Jan, didn’t concern you enough earlier on to mention it in a stand alone thread?
-
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 12:16 pm
- Been Liked: 111 times
- Has Liked: 103 times
Re: Mud analytics
Time will tell I guess lads and lasses . Just found it a bit weird when I found out about it all. UTC
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Mud analytics
Regardless of the kompany being used it’s the same two people this season as last season, kompany and Mooneyblatherwickstattoos wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 9:16 pmI think you’re missing the point in this debate. No idea why you’re being so defensive about it all but I hope you prove me right and there’s absolutely no conflict of interest.
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 621 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
-
- Posts: 5371
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1654 times
- Has Liked: 404 times
Re: Mud analytics
You’re right, implying that the players we are getting from our analytics exceed that of others. It did last year, it probably did this year too (vs Championship clubs and the two we came up with). Money helps of course.NewClaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 7:22 pmHere’s a thought…
We’re going down. So are Sheffield United and barring any points deductions saving them, so are Luton.
Let’s assume they don’t use any data analysis in their recruitment.
I’m left wondering, as a fan, which of those three clubs would I be more excited about watching next year?
Burnley with an analytics system that’s brought us Foster, Benson, Zaroury, Tella, Maatsen, Koleosho, Odobert, Assingnon, Esteve, Beyer, etc, etc… or Luton & Sheffield United?
Theres not even a question in it for me.
When I invest in companies I invest in people and study them carefully - the ones involved in Mud seem very good, Mooney etc. So I don’t see a problem. It is a partnership that is exciting and all top clubs have partnerships nowadays. I’d be far more concerned if it were an agency, that would be a clear conflict. This seems to be analytics which is fine.
Any errors this season aren’t the analytics - most are fine players, far better than Luton or Sheffield have I believe, and we will show it next season, though Luton have found some extra wins from somewhere. It was the judgement not to layer it alongside experience and not to prioritise other skillsets or other positions. That is on Kompany. Heck, when I think of the players we missed, most of them are wingers too - Bakayoko, Palmer, Lukebakio etc. No blame on Mud as far as I can see it. They’ll just say who the good players are and how they complement each other. As I’ve posted many times though, he deserves a 2nd chance after the huge joys of last season that we will remember for a lifetime.
As for him having 11 directorships (I think, looking on Companies House) I don’t see any evidence he isn’t putting the hours in at the Turf, quite the reverse, so nothing to see here either, and we are lucky to have him (whether having so much going on leads to mental fatigue and impaired judgement, well, that is a decision the club have to make - I don’t know how he does it, even with all the team of advisors he’ll have. The man must be a machine. I like him.)