The Royals.

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Peter Loo
Posts: 1343
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:16 pm
Been Liked: 135 times
Has Liked: 97 times

The Royals.

Post by Peter Loo » Tue Mar 19, 2024 12:02 pm

There all heart aren't they :D

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68601344

Targetman
Posts: 1673
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:43 pm
Been Liked: 506 times
Has Liked: 47 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by Targetman » Tue Mar 19, 2024 12:17 pm

Peter Loo wrote:
Tue Mar 19, 2024 12:02 pm
There all heart aren't they :D

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68601344

Damned if they do, damned if they dont!
These 5 users liked this post: Leisure bfcjg Poulton-le-Claret NewClaret AfloatinClaret

FCBurnley
Posts: 9853
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2002 times
Has Liked: 1148 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by FCBurnley » Tue Mar 19, 2024 1:08 pm

Alleged photo of her looked nothing remotely like her !!
This user liked this post: Anonymous Claret

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10915
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5560 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by TheFamilyCat » Tue Mar 19, 2024 2:27 pm

"There will have been a sense of relief from Prince William to get back to the grittier business of public duty

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
This user liked this post: fatboy47

Anonymous Claret
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:59 am
Been Liked: 131 times
Has Liked: 94 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by Anonymous Claret » Tue Mar 19, 2024 3:43 pm

TheFamilyCat wrote:
Tue Mar 19, 2024 2:27 pm
"There will have been a sense of relief from Prince William to get back to the grittier business of public duty

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I misread your post and I thought it was 'the grifter business of public duty.'
Then again, maybe it was a typo from the reporter🤔

claret2018
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm
Been Liked: 819 times
Has Liked: 26 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by claret2018 » Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:22 pm

Thanks goodness William can get back to public duties, I thought the country was going to grind to a halt anytime soon.

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6976
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1490 times
Has Liked: 1848 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by Woodleyclaret » Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:30 pm

I thought on this football site we may be spared Windsor family trivia.

South West Claret.
Posts: 5642
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
Been Liked: 766 times
Has Liked: 499 times
Location: Devon

Re: The Royals.

Post by South West Claret. » Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:32 pm

Don’t you just love’em 😂

jdrobbo
Posts: 9321
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
Been Liked: 4843 times
Has Liked: 947 times
Location: Leeds

Re: The Royals.

Post by jdrobbo » Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:40 pm

I hear that Trawden will be getting a Royal visit shortly.

South West Claret.
Posts: 5642
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
Been Liked: 766 times
Has Liked: 499 times
Location: Devon

Re: The Royals.

Post by South West Claret. » Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:49 pm

Which one is it to be?

yTib
Posts: 2758
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 711 times
Has Liked: 667 times
Location: Château d'If

Re: The Royals.

Post by yTib » Tue Mar 19, 2024 6:03 pm

headline news, apparently.

the bbc really should have something important to report. like me picking my arse.

bfcjg
Posts: 13354
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5087 times
Has Liked: 6901 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by bfcjg » Tue Mar 19, 2024 6:05 pm

I suppose we need a head of state and if so I'd sooner have what we have as opposed to a Putin, Trump,Biden Macron etc. It's all ceremonial they have no actual power and wouldn't have a hope of standing against parliament.
That said the antiquated House of Lords needs scrapping, a load of daft old fart lords, ladies, bishops and cronies playing ping pong with the sitting government of noth parties whilst drawing a fortune in expenses is tiresome.

yTib
Posts: 2758
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 711 times
Has Liked: 667 times
Location: Château d'If

Re: The Royals.

Post by yTib » Tue Mar 19, 2024 6:09 pm

i don't object to a monarchy. i couldn't care less.

what i object to is the celebrity crap that surrounds it.

kate middleton is just another lass. she is not news.

aclaretinstevenage
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:55 pm
Been Liked: 302 times
Has Liked: 733 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by aclaretinstevenage » Tue Mar 19, 2024 6:17 pm

bfcjg wrote:
Tue Mar 19, 2024 6:05 pm
I suppose we need a head of state and if so I'd sooner have what we have as opposed to a Putin, Trump,Biden Macron etc. It's all ceremonial they have no actual power and wouldn't have a hope of standing against parliament.
That said the antiquated House of Lords needs scrapping, a load of daft old fart lords, ladies, bishops and cronies playing ping pong with the sitting government of noth parties whilst drawing a fortune in expenses is tiresome.
Absolutely agree with this.

claret2018
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm
Been Liked: 819 times
Has Liked: 26 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by claret2018 » Tue Mar 19, 2024 6:44 pm

Retire them all with a nice pension and open the palaces up to tourists.
This user liked this post: jetblackcat

timshorts
Posts: 2546
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:52 pm
Been Liked: 413 times
Has Liked: 307 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by timshorts » Tue Mar 19, 2024 7:14 pm

yTib wrote:
Tue Mar 19, 2024 6:09 pm
i don't object to a monarchy. i couldn't care less.

what i object to is the celebrity crap that surrounds it.

kate middleton is just another lass. she is not news.
Well if that is her at the farm shop then she looks an awful lot better not dressed up.

Eldest child has dreadful hooray Henry haircut.

bumba
Posts: 3133
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:21 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 200 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by bumba » Tue Mar 19, 2024 7:33 pm

Only good thing from the royals is the occasional bank holiday

South West Claret.
Posts: 5642
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
Been Liked: 766 times
Has Liked: 499 times
Location: Devon

Re: The Royals.

Post by South West Claret. » Tue Mar 19, 2024 7:35 pm

Scoungers the lot of them.

gandhisflipflop
Posts: 5543
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
Been Liked: 2340 times
Has Liked: 1405 times
Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.

Re: The Royals.

Post by gandhisflipflop » Tue Mar 19, 2024 9:16 pm

:)
Attachments
BB453515-1DF1-43A7-81F8-CB01E35CA97C.jpeg
BB453515-1DF1-43A7-81F8-CB01E35CA97C.jpeg (70.13 KiB) Viewed 2193 times

Lip
Posts: 580
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 2:35 pm
Been Liked: 205 times
Has Liked: 147 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by Lip » Tue Mar 19, 2024 9:40 pm

jdrobbo wrote:
Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:40 pm
I hear that Trawden will be getting a Royal visit shortly.
Princess Anne ,she is visiting the local community centre,the community shop and the Trawden Arms. Plus other places. Well done to Trawden public and all involved for their hard work on the community spirit..

Hibsclaret
Posts: 3962
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 1240 times
Has Liked: 491 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by Hibsclaret » Tue Mar 19, 2024 11:35 pm

When are they getting more points deducted?

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5133
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1623 times
Has Liked: 892 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by BurnleyFC » Tue Mar 19, 2024 11:45 pm

I wouldn’t wish what Prince William had to go through as a child on my worst enemy.

He seems like a good egg.
These 2 users liked this post: mdd2 bfcjg

fatboy47
Posts: 4196
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
Been Liked: 2327 times
Has Liked: 2697 times
Location: Isles of Scilly

Re: The Royals.

Post by fatboy47 » Wed Mar 20, 2024 9:59 am

Gotta admire the serfs, cant afford the lecky and gas but clamouring to flagwag and cheer at the dudes riding by in gold carriages.
These 3 users liked this post: longsidepies ŽižkovClaret tarkys_ears

ŽižkovClaret
Posts: 7070
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
Been Liked: 2176 times
Has Liked: 3110 times
Location: Praha
Contact:

Re: The Royals.

Post by ŽižkovClaret » Wed Mar 20, 2024 1:01 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:
Tue Mar 19, 2024 11:45 pm
I wouldn’t wish what Prince William had to go through as a child on my worst enemy.

He seems like a good egg.
Don't have him pegged as a good egg, personally, but each to their own.
This user liked this post: Enola Gay

mdd2
Posts: 6027
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1666 times
Has Liked: 701 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by mdd2 » Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:23 pm

Recent attempts to measure the size of the impact of the royal family on UK tourism have estimated the capital value of UK monarchy as a business to be £67.5 billion (up from £44 billion in 2012) and the annual contribution to the UK economy to be £1.766 billion.
And then both the monarch and Duchy of Cornwall have paid capital gains tax and income tax voluntarily for past 32 years.
Be careful what you wish for when it comes to a Monarchy or Republic. Presidents Atlee, Churchill, Eden, MacMillan, Home, Wilson, Heath, Callaghan, Thatcher, Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron, May, Johnson, Truss, Sunak & Starmer. All in the time of George, Elizabeth and Charles PERISH THE THOUGHT of those 18 as heads of state

mdd2
Posts: 6027
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1666 times
Has Liked: 701 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by mdd2 » Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:29 pm

So lets sell it all off. House of Windsor worth £19 billion earning apparently £1.766billion per annum.
£19billion amongst 65million population £292.30 each.Enjoy and I am no Royalist but a pragmatist

houseboy
Posts: 7066
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
Been Liked: 2240 times
Has Liked: 1618 times
Location: Baxenden

Re: The Royals.

Post by houseboy » Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:41 pm

bfcjg wrote:
Tue Mar 19, 2024 6:05 pm
I suppose we need a head of state and if so I'd sooner have what we have as opposed to a Putin, Trump,Biden Macron etc. It's all ceremonial they have no actual power and wouldn't have a hope of standing against parliament.
That said the antiquated House of Lords needs scrapping, a load of daft old fart lords, ladies, bishops and cronies playing ping pong with the sitting government of noth parties whilst drawing a fortune in expenses is tiresome.
So you would keep an unelected bunch of people receiving large amounts of public money for doing very little but scrap the second house that is part of our governmental process (and stops or at least puts a break on extreme policies). The only thing that needs changing is making the House of Lords (or our second house) elected. The monarch doesn’t need to be there as head of state and their replacement doesn’t have to be anyone like Trump et al. It should be just the prime minister and as bad as some are or have been I don’t think this country has ever produced anything like Trump or ever will. We don’t have gun toting hoards of rednecks with the brain power of a gnat.

CoolClaret
Posts: 7457
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2256 times
Has Liked: 2171 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by CoolClaret » Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:53 pm

mdd2 wrote:
Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:29 pm
So lets sell it all off. House of Windsor worth £19 billion earning apparently £1.766billion per annum.
£19billion amongst 65million population £292.30 each.Enjoy and I am no Royalist but a pragmatist
Now imagine how much more money the Castles, Palaces & Estates would bring in if they were opened up for visitors for a fee?
This user liked this post: Greenmile

mdd2
Posts: 6027
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1666 times
Has Liked: 701 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by mdd2 » Wed Mar 20, 2024 3:04 pm

bumba wrote:
Tue Mar 19, 2024 7:33 pm
Only good thing from the royals is the occasional bank holiday
Paid for by employers who have no choice in the matter

mdd2
Posts: 6027
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1666 times
Has Liked: 701 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by mdd2 » Wed Mar 20, 2024 3:06 pm

CoolClaret wrote:
Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:53 pm
Now imagine how much more money the Castles, Palaces & Estates would bring in if they were opened up for visitors for a fee?
We would demand that they were sold off to build houses or fund the reckless and feckless in our country
This user liked this post: Tw@

Clovius Boofus
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:47 am
Been Liked: 577 times
Has Liked: 171 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by Clovius Boofus » Wed Mar 20, 2024 3:06 pm

mdd2 wrote:
Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:23 pm
Be careful what you wish for when it comes to a Monarchy or Republic. Presidents Atlee, Churchill, Eden, MacMillan, Home, Wilson, Heath, Callaghan, Thatcher, Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron, May, Johnson, Truss, Sunak & Starmer. All in the time of George, Elizabeth and Charles PERISH THE THOUGHT of those 18 as heads of state
Those 18 were prime ministers chosen by parties - I didn't vote for a single one of them, but their constituents did. If the UK was a republic, the people would elect a president, however, we would still have a prime minister.

Anyhow, our constitutional monarchy has served us well enough, and unless it messes up badly, I'll stick with it, though it does need slimming down.

As for the unelected House of Lords - it should be abolished. 792 members, eh? An 'upper house' should be chosen by we the people, not the privileged, not by political donations, backhanders or because you own a media group, and certainly not on some failed prime minister whim.
Last edited by Clovius Boofus on Wed Mar 20, 2024 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: bfcjg

mdd2
Posts: 6027
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1666 times
Has Liked: 701 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by mdd2 » Wed Mar 20, 2024 3:06 pm

Any way back to football.......

CoolClaret
Posts: 7457
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2256 times
Has Liked: 2171 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by CoolClaret » Wed Mar 20, 2024 3:09 pm

I'd go with the House of Lords being scrapped before the Monarchy.

It was well intentioned as a concept, sadly the sh1theads have ruined that as well - some of the members of that are an absolute joke these days. Literally have an oligarch in our HoL. Cheers Boris

mdd2
Posts: 6027
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1666 times
Has Liked: 701 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by mdd2 » Wed Mar 20, 2024 3:12 pm

But before we do the Sovereign also pays Band H council tax on Buck Palace Windsor Castle Sandringham and Balmoral.
Of course this will come from the Parliiamentary allowance only paid to Charles and I assume Camilla

mdd2
Posts: 6027
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1666 times
Has Liked: 701 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by mdd2 » Wed Mar 20, 2024 3:13 pm

Back to the game at Chelsea.......

Peter Loo
Posts: 1343
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:16 pm
Been Liked: 135 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by Peter Loo » Wed Mar 20, 2024 3:24 pm

On the whole as I say they are just a bunch of Royal scournges.

...and as for Prince Andrew yuk!

What an appalling excuse for a human being.

mdd2
Posts: 6027
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1666 times
Has Liked: 701 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by mdd2 » Wed Mar 20, 2024 4:53 pm

Anyhow, our constitutional monarchy has served us well enough, and unless it messes up badly, I'll stick with it, though it does need slimming down.
Pretty slim now CB by previous standards in what the State pays them if at all

Peter Loo
Posts: 1343
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:16 pm
Been Liked: 135 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by Peter Loo » Wed Mar 20, 2024 5:53 pm

mdd2 wrote:
Wed Mar 20, 2024 4:53 pm
Anyhow, our constitutional monarchy has served us well enough, and unless it messes up badly, I'll stick with it, though it does need slimming down.
Pretty slim now CB by previous standards in what the State pays them if at all
Really? what do you think of Prince Andrew's conduct then ?

mdd2
Posts: 6027
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1666 times
Has Liked: 701 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by mdd2 » Wed Mar 20, 2024 6:52 pm

Really? what do you think of Prince Andrew's conduct then ?
Appalling
As was Lloyd George and I expect many other politicians we tax payers fund none more than Boris when he was PM.
On the plus side, and I know the tax payer pays alot out, Duke of Edinburgh Award, Princes Trust and their name attached to many charities helps to swell their coffers.
Already stated i am not a "Royal" but I think many put in a shift far more than many in this country.
But Andrew and his behaviour-not good-but then "an erect penis has no conscience."
And we better not go there with our male politicians-from Lloyd George, Profumo, Ron Davies, Jeremy Thorpe, Cyril Smith and beyond.

aggi
Posts: 8848
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2123 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by aggi » Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:04 am

mdd2 wrote:
Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:23 pm
Recent attempts to measure the size of the impact of the royal family on UK tourism have estimated the capital value of UK monarchy as a business to be £67.5 billion (up from £44 billion in 2012) and the annual contribution to the UK economy to be £1.766 billion.
And then both the monarch and Duchy of Cornwall have paid capital gains tax and income tax voluntarily for past 32 years.
Be careful what you wish for when it comes to a Monarchy or Republic. Presidents Atlee, Churchill, Eden, MacMillan, Home, Wilson, Heath, Callaghan, Thatcher, Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron, May, Johnson, Truss, Sunak & Starmer. All in the time of George, Elizabeth and Charles PERISH THE THOUGHT of those 18 as heads of state
I love this line. They should be feted for paying taxes that everyone else would be sent to prison if they didn't pay.

Big Vinny K
Posts: 2499
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 2:57 pm
Been Liked: 1031 times
Has Liked: 280 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by Big Vinny K » Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:40 am

mdd2 wrote:
Wed Mar 20, 2024 6:52 pm
Really? what do you think of Prince Andrew's conduct then ?
Appalling
As was Lloyd George and I expect many other politicians we tax payers fund none more than Boris when he was PM.
On the plus side, and I know the tax payer pays alot out, Duke of Edinburgh Award, Princes Trust and their name attached to many charities helps to swell their coffers.
Already stated i am not a "Royal" but I think many put in a shift far more than many in this country.
But Andrew and his behaviour-not good-but then "an erect penis has no conscience."
And we better not go there with our male politicians-from Lloyd George, Profumo, Ron Davies, Jeremy Thorpe, Cyril Smith and beyond.
In what way do they “put a shift in” ?
They do their royal duties (to a varying degree amongst them) and in return they get a lifetime of privilege and wealth beyond their dreams for themselves and their families with zero risk of it ever stopping or ever reducing !!

Of course the Prince’s Trust has been a great thing - but let’s not pretend that a scheme like this does not exist in other countries that don’t have a royal family or it couldn’t exist in another name here. Look at countries like Canada - they have many successful similar schemes.

As for the point about it’s better for royal family to be “head of state” than some of the PMs we have had. Whilst in theory this may be ideologically correct - in practice the head of state is powerless in terms of any decisions that matter. The PM is effectively the head of state - their powers are little or no different to the president of a country without a royal family

Anonymous Claret
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:59 am
Been Liked: 131 times
Has Liked: 94 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by Anonymous Claret » Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:58 am

'An erect penis has no conscience'

So let's not worty about Andrew being a pedophile or visiting his pedo mate Epstein shortly after he was released from prison.

Was it £12,000,000 of the tax payers cash to push that 'jolly bit of fun' under the carpet?

fatboy47
Posts: 4196
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
Been Liked: 2327 times
Has Liked: 2697 times
Location: Isles of Scilly

Re: The Royals.

Post by fatboy47 » Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:01 am

Big Vinny K wrote:
Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:40 am

They do their royal duties
They do what they're told by the Tory party, (ie in their complicity over suspension of Parliament) in the full knowledge that theyd have been given the bum's rush decades ago without them.

It wont last forever thankfully. The sycophantic drivel on mainstream media will get drowned out and younger generations will eventually realise they're being had.

dougcollins
Posts: 6730
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 1820 times
Has Liked: 1800 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: The Royals.

Post by dougcollins » Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:08 am

jdrobbo wrote:
Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:40 pm
I hear that Trawden will be getting a Royal visit shortly.
Is it a deprived area?

RMutt
Posts: 1067
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 pm
Been Liked: 374 times
Has Liked: 88 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by RMutt » Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:22 am

https://www.royal.uk/media-centre/future-engagements

You can look here to see what they’re up to. Not much for anyone other than Anne to be honest. A lot of receptions and dinners mainly, even for her.
If they didn’t exist and someone came up with the idea to pick a family, give them land, houses, a huge income, enable that family to pass on their privileges to their future generations at tax payers expense. And in return expect them to do what you can find in the above link you’d tell them they were mad.

Corky
Posts: 1432
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:37 pm
Been Liked: 535 times
Has Liked: 414 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by Corky » Thu Mar 21, 2024 12:49 pm

For me a minimum requirement for a head of state would be an ability to use a fountain pen. I know that is setting the bar quite low but this current incumbent can’t even do that.
This user liked this post: ecc

dsr
Posts: 15240
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4578 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: The Royals.

Post by dsr » Fri Mar 22, 2024 11:29 pm

Big Vinny K wrote:
Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:40 am
As for the point about it’s better for royal family to be “head of state” than some of the PMs we have had. Whilst in theory this may be ideologically correct - in practice the head of state is powerless in terms of any decisions that matter. The PM is effectively the head of state - their powers are little or no different to the president of a country without a royal family
Not just in theory. If we get a Putin head of government, or any leader who decides to abolish free elections, then the Head of State has the power to chuck him out. The Army swear allegiance to the head of state, so do the police and the courts. The beauty of our system os that most of the power, especially the power to be a dictator, are in the hands of someone who can't use it - but while the King has the power that he can't use, no=one else can use it either.

How much better it would be if there was a Czar in Russia who could declare that Putin was not constitutionally elected, and dissolve his parliament to be replaced by a freely elected one. It would be wrong to assume that it couldn't happen here, because in living memory it has happened in Germany, Spain, Portugal, all of eastern Europe, Italy, Greece.
This user liked this post: jos

Post Reply