RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
IPAclaret
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2023 6:22 am
Been Liked: 81 times
Has Liked: 2 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by IPAclaret » Sun Mar 31, 2024 11:58 am

Apologies for going off thread but compare yesterday's penalty and sending off and the one that still irritates me, Tim Krul almost taking Vydras head off a few seasons ago and absolutely nothing given.

Roosterbooster
Posts: 2600
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
Been Liked: 699 times
Has Liked: 362 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Roosterbooster » Sun Mar 31, 2024 12:09 pm

I wasn't at the game, so can't score

But having watched the penalty decision numerous times, I can confidently say one thing

The only way you give that decision is if you are actively trying to provide an advantage to one team

I knew there was an incident to watch out for when I was watching, and I have to say, on first viewing, I was amazed that that was it. I'm angry about it. But not in the least bit surprised.

One thing is for certain. We are never getting that decision
This user liked this post: Superjohnnyfrancis

Superjohnnyfrancis
Posts: 2140
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:11 pm
Been Liked: 351 times
Has Liked: 335 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Superjohnnyfrancis » Sun Mar 31, 2024 1:31 pm

This guy was lucky to survive his Liverpool error earlier in the season. Should be nowhere near the refs position moving forward. Got to be the weakest penalty I have seen for many a year. Touching someone’s shoulder shouldn’t make them fall down like that. Why didn’t var intervene? ( because their operators are clueless too!)

When are they going to get a hold on the quality of these refs.

PGMOL are abysmal.

Luppy
Posts: 214
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2019 2:46 pm
Been Liked: 56 times
Has Liked: 11 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Luppy » Sun Mar 31, 2024 1:39 pm

The penalty is just ridiculous. Are we going to start giving fouls every time a defender Marshall’s a ball out of play for a goal kick whilst making no attempt to play the ball and obstructing the attacker? They’re more of a foul than that ridiculous decision yesterday

Mondsley
Posts: 439
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:11 am
Been Liked: 140 times
Has Liked: 31 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Mondsley » Sun Mar 31, 2024 1:57 pm

SouthLondonexile wrote:
Sun Mar 31, 2024 11:28 am
Has to be - and there have been a number - the worst ever referee ever to have officiated a Burnley game.
He was so unbelievably biased in his decision making seeming to offer for example disproportionate punishment to our defender for such a limp challenge in the penalty area.
I cannot give any meaningful score to England.
I'm not disagreeing, but that's a big call after Lee Mason at home v PNE and Rob Jones away at Leeds. Saw a challenge by Dan Burn yesterday against West Ham in the box that was far more "robust" than Assignon's. Not even given as a foul. And that was Jones reffing. Go figure.

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3468
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1040 times
Has Liked: 2041 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sun Mar 31, 2024 2:51 pm

John Brooks on VAR shouldn't get off scott free either, he had the chance to correct it and chose not to. Shame is I really rate Brooks and rate him as being the best of the bunch constantly atm
Last edited by THEWELLERNUT70 on Sun Mar 31, 2024 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ecc
Posts: 4303
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 1443 times
Has Liked: 1290 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by ecc » Sun Mar 31, 2024 2:53 pm

I can only access the sites of the BBC and The Guardian. Neither reporter mentions any of England's decisions.

When I watched their penalty first time it looked like...a penalty. However, the replay from a camera behind the goal gives a different insight.

He didn't use VAR, did he?

Bobzuruncle
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 45 times
Has Liked: 36 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Bobzuruncle » Sun Mar 31, 2024 2:56 pm

The Krul one still nags at me too but what I find so galling is when I compare it to the onfield decision of the ref in the Brentford game for our penalty that had to be given by VAR. Both trained/retrained recently to current standards and directives in the same league - when you consider the first one not given for a blatant barge and yesterday’s given for the merest touch it really is hard not to consider at least a subconscious bias.

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3468
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1040 times
Has Liked: 2041 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sun Mar 31, 2024 3:09 pm

Bobzuruncle wrote:
Sun Mar 31, 2024 2:56 pm
The Krul one still nags at me too but what I find so galling is when I compare it to the onfield decision of the ref in the Brentford game for our penalty that had to be given by VAR. Both trained/retrained recently to current standards and directives in the same league - when you consider the first one not given for a blatant barge and yesterday’s given for the merest touch it really is hard not to consider at least a subconscious bias.

Perhaps it's a design fault in ref's with the first name Darren 🤔🤣

Bobzuruncle
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 45 times
Has Liked: 36 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Bobzuruncle » Sun Mar 31, 2024 3:21 pm

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:
Sun Mar 31, 2024 3:09 pm
Perhaps it's a design fault in ref's with the first name Darren 🤔🤣
You may have something there. Earlier someone mentioned preferring AI to ref matches and I tend to agree !
This user liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70

PaintYorkClaretnBlue
Posts: 1798
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:42 pm
Been Liked: 662 times
Has Liked: 1220 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by PaintYorkClaretnBlue » Sun Mar 31, 2024 3:26 pm

The problem stems from the fact that the refs and pundits promote cheating by not punishing players and not calling them out on tv. There should have to be a clear effort to stay on your feet and continue playing, the problem again is that if a player does that he gets nothing, even if he is genuinely impeded.
This user liked this post: Rowls

Zom Zom
Posts: 1771
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 688 times
Has Liked: 917 times
Location: The Park

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Zom Zom » Sun Mar 31, 2024 3:43 pm

Wasn't Darren England working the VAR when Sander Berge was ruled to have deliberately hand-balled when setting Foster up for what would have been the winner?

northeastclaret
Posts: 875
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:32 pm
Been Liked: 311 times
Has Liked: 199 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by northeastclaret » Sun Mar 31, 2024 3:56 pm

I think he was and involved against Luton as well?

What a dream team of tw@ts him and Jones at Forest , we stood no chance

Roosterbooster
Posts: 2600
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
Been Liked: 699 times
Has Liked: 362 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Roosterbooster » Sun Mar 31, 2024 4:16 pm

IPAclaret wrote:
Sun Mar 31, 2024 11:58 am
Apologies for going off thread but compare yesterday's penalty and sending off and the one that still irritates me, Tim Krul almost taking Vydras head off a few seasons ago and absolutely nothing given.
It is slightly off thread, but it backs up the argument of most posts on here. The level of "foul" for the 2 are poles apart. But the blatant foul doesn't get given. And the softest brush you'll ever see results in a red card and a penalty. And I can only think of one reason why...

Cheating is a strong word. Bias is not

It's probably somewhere in the middle
This user liked this post: Rowls

DAVETHEVICAR
Posts: 3020
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
Been Liked: 834 times
Has Liked: 1641 times
Location: Lincoln

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by DAVETHEVICAR » Sun Mar 31, 2024 4:54 pm

To answer Petersa further up the thread Rebecca Welch is on duty at the Stoke v Huddersfield game tomorrow.
She has been officiating in other games outs the Premier League

Hibsclaret
Posts: 3964
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 1240 times
Has Liked: 491 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Hibsclaret » Sun Mar 31, 2024 5:01 pm

The City Arsenal game is 30 mins old and Arsenal should have at least 2 bookings. If that was us we would have. That’s exactly how they referee the top teams differently.
This user liked this post: bfcmartin

DAVETHEVICAR
Posts: 3020
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
Been Liked: 834 times
Has Liked: 1641 times
Location: Lincoln

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by DAVETHEVICAR » Sun Mar 31, 2024 5:34 pm

Agree a yellow in second half would see a player off.
Second Halves see Referees waving cards around

Cirrus_Minor
Posts: 4449
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 1165 times
Has Liked: 1303 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Cirrus_Minor » Sun Mar 31, 2024 5:42 pm

Listened to Radio Lancashire shortly after the match yesterday and the concensus between the commentator and Glen Little was that VAR officials don't like to overrule the referee. Incredible that a professional journalist and ex pro footballer might think this could even be true. And now watching City v Arsenal, Arsenal players bear hug City players throughout a corner being taken without any intervention from any official. Refereeing is now a complete shambles in the Premier league.

dsr
Posts: 15249
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4579 times
Has Liked: 2271 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by dsr » Sun Mar 31, 2024 11:34 pm

When the ref gives a penalty, VAR will not overturn it unless they can prove that the forward was not touched. If there was the merest touch, then it will be confirmed. That's the way the powers that be think it should be done, for the time being.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16934
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6971 times
Has Liked: 1487 times
Location: Leeds

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Mar 31, 2024 11:48 pm

dsr wrote:
Sun Mar 31, 2024 11:34 pm
When the ref gives a penalty, VAR will not overturn it unless they can prove that the forward was not touched. If there was the merest touch, then it will be confirmed. That's the way the powers that be think it should be done, for the time being.
Exactly. Even though I was apoplectic when it was given I knew without doubt that the VAR wouldn’t overturn as all they need to look for is contact between two players to ratify the referee’s decision. The whole thing stinks.

JohnDearyMe
Posts: 2746
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:31 pm
Been Liked: 668 times
Has Liked: 2056 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by JohnDearyMe » Sun Mar 31, 2024 11:57 pm

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:
Sat Mar 30, 2024 11:37 pm
Let's hope they don't put this cretin in charge of our last game at home to Forest because if there's anything riding on it and he does that sort of thing again he might get lynched
Is it possible that he could be prevented from officiating in any future Burnley games after his efforts vs Chelsea and on the VAR against Forest? I'm sure if we were one of the "big" clubs he wouldn't be able to show his face again

RammyClaret61
Posts: 3107
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 1132 times
Has Liked: 302 times
Location: Melbourne, Australia.

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by RammyClaret61 » Mon Apr 01, 2024 3:57 am

The problem is VAR. we will never know if England was hoping that VAR would help after the fact. But VAR was brought in to get things right. In that sense, it’s failed miserably, in fact it’s a disaster. Way to many grey areas, way to many get outs!
1) “Clear and obvious”
2) “we don’t want VAR re-reffing the game”

First off, number one is still subjective. Is it? Or isn’t it? It’s different from one game to anther. Really inconsistent, so it’s improved nothing, in fact it’s made the game worse.
Secondly, when VAR intervenes, it is RE-REFFING the game! Running a microscope over every minute detail for several minutes. Then still getting it wrong. What’s the point?

Without VAR, yesterday would still be a penalty. The ref gave it. I’m sure we lived with these decisions before tv started to analyse every detail, “there was contact, he had a right to go down” and demanding we get everything to the millimetre correct. Technology, except goaline, doesn’t work. Let’s get rid and enjoy the game on the pitch.

VAR you are charged with the murder of the beautiful game.
This user liked this post: Stproc

HuncoatClaret
Posts: 552
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:09 pm
Been Liked: 203 times
Has Liked: 110 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by HuncoatClaret » Mon Apr 01, 2024 8:35 am

If VAR is here to stay, ref's have to be taken off it. Give it to some of the hundreds of ex players who want to stay in the game.

Joe14
Posts: 1186
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:43 pm
Been Liked: 252 times
Has Liked: 49 times
Location: Burnley

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Joe14 » Mon Apr 01, 2024 10:03 am

Zero

Some crap refs in this league. Embarrassing.

CleggHall
Posts: 3282
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
Been Liked: 843 times
Has Liked: 1051 times
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by CleggHall » Mon Apr 01, 2024 10:17 am

England is panhandled by Garth Crooks BBC website, well worth a read

Poulton-le-Claret
Posts: 359
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:12 pm
Been Liked: 98 times
Has Liked: 203 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Poulton-le-Claret » Mon Apr 01, 2024 10:41 am

CleggHall wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2024 10:17 am
England is panhandled by Garth Crooks BBC website, well worth a read
Just seen, posting below:

Cole Palmer (Chelsea): I've seen some poor decisions in my time but the penalty awarded to Chelsea for the apparent foul on Mykhailo Mudryk by Burnley's Lorenz Assignon was about as farcical as it gets.

Darren England's assessment of the situation was appalling. He awarded a penalty to a player whose first touch was so poor he sent the ball in the direction of the defender - who then inevitably made shoulder contact with the striker. Not every bit of contact in the box has to be a penalty. The issue is whether it is a foul or not.

For England to seriously consider the contact on Mudryk a penalty was laughable. However, having sent Assignon off for a second yellow he should have at least sought confirmation from the touchline monitor which is now available to referees - but he did not. It is hardly surprising Burnley boss Vincent Kompany completely lost it on the side of the pitch.

The way Palmer dispatched his penalty showed he has supreme confidence in his own ability. But his dinked finish was bordering on 'taking the Michael' and players have a way of dealing with that. If he's not careful he may have his wings clipped.

Petersa
Posts: 709
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:33 am
Been Liked: 206 times
Has Liked: 134 times
Location: South Africa

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Petersa » Mon Apr 01, 2024 10:51 am

DAVETHEVICAR wrote:
Sun Mar 31, 2024 4:54 pm
To answer Petersa further up the thread Rebecca Welch is on duty at the Stoke v Huddersfield game tomorrow.
She has been officiating in other games outs the Premier League
Thankyou Dave , pleased to hear that. I find it a bit surprising though she hasn't had another PL game I thought she did well in her Burnley game unlike some others who seem to be walking disaster areas week in week out
This user liked this post: DAVETHEVICAR

dsr
Posts: 15249
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4579 times
Has Liked: 2271 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by dsr » Mon Apr 01, 2024 11:00 am

Poulton-le-Claret wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2024 10:41 am
Just seen, posting below:

Cole Palmer (Chelsea): I've seen some poor decisions in my time but the penalty awarded to Chelsea for the apparent foul on Mykhailo Mudryk by Burnley's Lorenz Assignon was about as farcical as it gets.

Darren England's assessment of the situation was appalling. He awarded a penalty to a player whose first touch was so poor he sent the ball in the direction of the defender - who then inevitably made shoulder contact with the striker. Not every bit of contact in the box has to be a penalty. The issue is whether it is a foul or not.

For England to seriously consider the contact on Mudryk a penalty was laughable. However, having sent Assignon off for a second yellow he should have at least sought confirmation from the touchline monitor which is now available to referees - but he did not. It is hardly surprising Burnley boss Vincent Kompany completely lost it on the side of the pitch.

The way Palmer dispatched his penalty showed he has supreme confidence in his own ability. But his dinked finish was bordering on 'taking the Michael' and players have a way of dealing with that. If he's not careful he may have his wings clipped.
I don't think VAR is set up to give the ref a second look. The official ref is only allowed one look, and if he isn't sure, he has to guess (which incidentally should never mean guessing at a penalty, that's another issue.)

The ref will only have a second look after the VAR man has made a decision that the referee is positively, incontrovertibly wrong, and the ref will only get a second look then at carefully selected angles provided by the VAR man who is determined to prove that he is right.

Obviously if there is any contact at all, VAR will say it was a foul. However blatant or obvious the dive.

The problem runs deep. VAR, clearly, is organised by idiots who are more concerned with how VAR works than how football works. The PGMOL is run by people who believe that with proper training all referees can be turned into automata will will always give the identical decision whoever that ref may be. They are all chasing theoretical perfection, which can't be attained, and in the chase for theoretical perfection they are throwing out many of the things that made it satisfactory for the purpose.

ralph8
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 11:48 am
Been Liked: 36 times
Has Liked: 4 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by ralph8 » Mon Apr 01, 2024 11:05 am

I think he will now be known forever as:
Darren worst referee in England

Clarets4me
Posts: 4980
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 pm
Been Liked: 2341 times
Has Liked: 1041 times
Location: Ightenhill,Burnley

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Clarets4me » Mon Apr 01, 2024 11:32 am

His next assignment should be on Hackney Marshes, and those teams will wonder what they've done to deserve him ...

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3468
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1040 times
Has Liked: 2041 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Mon Apr 01, 2024 11:44 am

Dermot Gallagher " I'm sorry but it's 100% not a penalty"

No appeal for the second Assignon yellow card either

Rileybobs
Posts: 16934
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6971 times
Has Liked: 1487 times
Location: Leeds

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Rileybobs » Mon Apr 01, 2024 11:59 am

Stephen Warnock described it as the worst decision this season.
This user liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3468
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1040 times
Has Liked: 2041 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Mon Apr 01, 2024 12:10 pm

Yet there's one or two on here that say differently, even after Mr tow the PGMOL line Dermot Gallagher has stated 100% not a penalty.

There's some on here that would argue that the sky is green and the grass is blue 🤣

CaptJohn
Posts: 1546
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:41 pm
Been Liked: 468 times
Has Liked: 333 times
Location: Malabo, EG/Chester
Contact:

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by CaptJohn » Mon Apr 01, 2024 12:10 pm

I find it very sad that the standard of refereeing in this country has fallen so low. That performance was inept, gutless and unfortunately it had a whiff of bias about it.
These 2 users liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70 Aclaret

morninbob
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2024 5:00 pm
Been Liked: 15 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by morninbob » Mon Apr 01, 2024 12:32 pm

One of the worst decisions of the season

https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/1 ... lsea-drama

northeastclaret
Posts: 875
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:32 pm
Been Liked: 311 times
Has Liked: 199 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by northeastclaret » Mon Apr 01, 2024 1:50 pm

Didn’t stop Pochittino saying the ref got the decision right , no wonder refs are biased when some managers don’t support follow managers when there is a clear injustice. The Brentford manager two weeks ago was far more honourable.

Poch even said they were victims of a VAR decision earlier with the disallowed goal, what an odious ****@er.

Ashingtonclaret46
Posts: 3786
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 1831 times
Has Liked: 2635 times
Location: Ashington, Northumberland

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Ashingtonclaret46 » Mon Apr 01, 2024 2:15 pm

Petersa wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2024 10:51 am
Thankyou Dave , pleased to hear that. I find it a bit surprising though she hasn't had another PL game I thought she did well in her Burnley game unlike some others who seem to be walking disaster areas week in week out
She did referee the Bournemouth v Nottingham Forest match on 4 February and she sent Billings off and cautioned 5 other players in a 1-1 draw.
She was also involved in the Womens Premier League when she refereed Chelsea v Arsenal on 15 March.

Casper2
Posts: 1336
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 224 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Casper2 » Mon Apr 01, 2024 2:27 pm

How does this clown get to carry on , already suspended this season after he disallowed the Liverpool “offside”goal at Spurs

ralph8
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 11:48 am
Been Liked: 36 times
Has Liked: 4 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by ralph8 » Mon Apr 01, 2024 2:43 pm

Just sums up some of the Premier League posh seat fans seeing the middle aged Chelsea fan clapping the decision to Red Card Vincent.

beeholeclaret
Posts: 873
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:03 pm
Been Liked: 306 times
Has Liked: 449 times
Location: Burnley

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by beeholeclaret » Mon Apr 01, 2024 2:54 pm

northeastclaret wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2024 1:50 pm
Didn’t stop Pochittino saying the ref got the decision right , no wonder refs are biased when some managers don’t support follow managers when there is a clear injustice. The Brentford manager two weeks ago was far more honourable.

Poch even said they were victims of a VAR decision earlier with the disallowed goal, what an odious ****@er.
Ive never forgotten (or forgiven for that matter) when Poch took a hissy fit when his Spurs team lost at Burnley to that Ben Mee header.

It is typical that he would support the referees decision mainly becuase he will have been coaching and encouraging his players to 'play the South American way' which usually involves a lot of sneaky fouling and rolling about on the ground pretending theyve been kicked or punched. More's the pity that they haven't.

The guys a plank who cant get a £1bn team much above half way up the league table. Great to see.
This user liked this post: northeastclaret

Casper2
Posts: 1336
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 224 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Casper2 » Mon Apr 01, 2024 3:02 pm

beeholeclaret wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2024 2:54 pm
Ive never forgotten (or forgiven for that matter) when Poch took a hissy fit when his Spurs team lost at Burnley to that Ben Mee header.

It is typical that he would support the referees decision mainly becuase he will have been coaching and encouraging his players to 'play the South American way' which usually involves a lot of sneaky fouling and rolling about on the ground pretending theyve been kicked or punched. More's the pity that they haven't.

The guys a plank who cant get a £1bn team much above half way up the league table. Great to see.
Conti was Spurs manager for that game

Bosscat
Posts: 25657
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8539 times
Has Liked: 18289 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Bosscat » Mon Apr 01, 2024 3:16 pm

Casper2 wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2024 3:02 pm
Conti was Spurs manager for that game
Tom or Nina 🤔

Petersa
Posts: 709
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:33 am
Been Liked: 206 times
Has Liked: 134 times
Location: South Africa

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Petersa » Mon Apr 01, 2024 3:32 pm

Ashingtonclaret46 wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2024 2:15 pm
She did referee the Bournemouth v Nottingham Forest match on 4 February and she sent Billings off and cautioned 5 other players in a 1-1 draw.
She was also involved in the Womens Premier League when she refereed Chelsea v Arsenal on 15 March.
Thanks AC46

ClaretAL
Posts: 2575
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 1045 times
Has Liked: 820 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by ClaretAL » Mon Apr 01, 2024 3:48 pm

Someone at the club should clip all the game chaining injustices that have cost us points this season, and send them to the Premier League and the PGMOL and ask them for their explanation as to how so many can happen to 1 club.
This user liked this post: Superjohnnyfrancis

Casper2
Posts: 1336
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 224 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Casper2 » Mon Apr 01, 2024 3:49 pm

Bosscat wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2024 3:16 pm
Tom or Nina 🤔
Kunta

Goody1975
Posts: 2926
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 998 times
Has Liked: 265 times
Location: Burnley

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Goody1975 » Mon Apr 01, 2024 5:13 pm

We keep hearing, that we don't want referees to be robots but the idea of introducing technology is to get consistent decisions, that is not what VAR is doing at the minute.

IF VAR looks at two identical incidents and gives two different decisions then it shows it's not fit for purpose, sticking with the onfield decision is commendable in supporting officials but pointless, if you are doing that then just bin VAR and go back to what we had previously.
This user liked this post: Dark Cloud

Dark Cloud
Posts: 6659
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2007 times
Has Liked: 3354 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Dark Cloud » Mon Apr 01, 2024 5:21 pm

beeholeclaret wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2024 2:54 pm
Ive never forgotten (or forgiven for that matter) when Poch took a hissy fit when his Spurs team lost at Burnley to that Ben Mee header.

It is typical that he would support the referees decision mainly becuase he will have been coaching and encouraging his players to 'play the South American way' which usually involves a lot of sneaky fouling and rolling about on the ground pretending theyve been kicked or punched. More's the pity that they haven't.

The guys a plank who cant get a £1bn team much above half way up the league table. Great to see.
I think the game you're referring to was the 2-1 win with Barnes scoring quite close to the end. It was a great performance from us and a thoroughly deserved victory and Mr Pochetino really couldn't stomach it and the lid definitely came off post match!!
This user liked this post: beeholeclaret

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5393
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1658 times
Has Liked: 404 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Mon Apr 01, 2024 5:34 pm

ClaretAL wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2024 3:48 pm
Someone at the club should clip all the game chaining injustices that have cost us points this season, and send them to the Premier League and the PGMOL and ask them for their explanation as to how so many can happen to 1 club.
You can only send a certain amount of megabytes on an email.

Pretty sure our compilation will exceed it.

Even just the Forest and Luton ones alone have deprived us being in 17th currently.

beeholeclaret
Posts: 873
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:03 pm
Been Liked: 306 times
Has Liked: 449 times
Location: Burnley

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by beeholeclaret » Mon Apr 01, 2024 6:01 pm

Casper2 wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2024 3:02 pm
Conti was Spurs manager for that game
Yes thinking back I think he had to be restrained as they walked off - was it a day time match? The Ben Mee header was a night game I think.

Dark Cloud
Posts: 6659
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 2007 times
Has Liked: 3354 times

Re: RATE THE REF - Darren England v Chelsea

Post by Dark Cloud » Mon Apr 01, 2024 6:51 pm

beeholeclaret wrote:
Mon Apr 01, 2024 6:01 pm
Yes thinking back I think he had to be restrained as they walked off - was it a day time match? The Ben Mee header was a night game I think.
Yes, the 2-1 was an afternoon match and we randomly rode on the train to Sowerby after for a few pints and were able to "chat" to the many Spurs fans on the train, which was nice! 🙂
The Ben Mee header was a night game, but another great performance and every bit as deserving of the win.

Post Reply