Rovers after hart
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Rovers after hart
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football ... 1557005625" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; according to nixon Blackburn rovers after joe hart
-
- Posts: 17935
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4068 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
-
- Posts: 4402
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1465 times
- Has Liked: 995 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Rovers after hart
First Coyle now Hart, we really do keep throwing our **** over the fence into our neighbour's garden
These 2 users liked this post: Bosscat Hibsclaret
-
- Posts: 10970
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5185 times
- Has Liked: 804 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: Rovers after hart
I don't know about Hart, but they've needed a Heart for quite a while now.
-
- Posts: 5363
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1978 times
Re: Rovers after hart
Hard to know whether to believe that paper when IMO they don’t send reporters to games and makes up player ratings. BfC paying him wages to play for Blackburn ? I don’t think so.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Rovers after hart
I've heard from a reliable source he's off to Scotland..
-
- Posts: 3658
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1402 times
- Has Liked: 2692 times
- Location: varied
Re: Rovers after hart
Too Hearts ?tim_noone wrote:I've heard from a reliable source he's off to Scotland..
These 4 users liked this post: Jel dermotdermot IanMcL Foulthrow
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Rovers after hart
No......Ayr utdHunterST_BFC wrote:Too Hearts ?
-
- Posts: 3484
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
- Been Liked: 660 times
- Has Liked: 205 times
Re: Rovers after hart
A natural downhill progression.
-
- Posts: 30629
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11035 times
- Has Liked: 5648 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Rovers after hart
"So to get a deal done, Rovers would have to opt for a loan and hope Burnley give them favourable terms which would see them contributing some of his salary."
er nope
er nope
Re: Rovers after hart
Just as long as no one boos him if we play them.
-
- Posts: 2653
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:26 pm
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Re: Rovers after hart
Hel go abroad
Re: Rovers after hart
From BBC: "Blackburn are keen to sign former England goalkeeper Joe Hart, 32, from Lancashire rivals Burnley"
The effin cheek!!!!!
From Oxford Dictionary: "A person or thing competing with another for the same objective or for superiority in the same field of activity.
A person or thing that equals another in quality."
UTC!
The effin cheek!!!!!
From Oxford Dictionary: "A person or thing competing with another for the same objective or for superiority in the same field of activity.
A person or thing that equals another in quality."
UTC!
-
- Posts: 17249
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6488 times
- Has Liked: 2911 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Rovers after hart
Five million and none of this us paying half his wages bullshite and he's yours...take him away boys and good luck I think you might need it.
Re: Rovers after hart
I wouldn't sell them a virus.
I'd sell them Joe Hart though.
I'd sell them Joe Hart though.
These 2 users liked this post: No Ney Never No Ney Never
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: Rovers after hart
If this is true, then the Venkys need their heads read. How much more money are they prepared to sink into this lame duck?
-
- Posts: 2551
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:29 pm
- Been Liked: 605 times
- Has Liked: 346 times
- Location: Hertfordshire
Re: Rovers after hart
What are the odds in being drawn against them in a cup tie ?Moorite wrote:Just as long as no one boos him if we play them.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Rovers after hart
No chance. He is way too good for the championship. Never mind Rovers.
Re: Rovers after hart
The weird dislike of Joe Hart continues even though he never had a bad game for Burnley, won us vital points at Cardiff with an outstanding display and hasn't even played for months. The dislike probably started years ago for some reason.
These 6 users liked this post: basil6345789 turfytopper simonclaret randomclaret2 cricketfieldclarets The Hung Juror
Re: Rovers after hart
Hart would be a good fit for B'stards .... but as for a loan with us paying part of his wages Nooooooo Wayyyyyy.
If they want him they can pay for him and pay his wages too
If they want him they can pay for him and pay his wages too
-
- Posts: 3484
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
- Been Liked: 660 times
- Has Liked: 205 times
Re: Rovers after hart
He conceded forty one goals.NL Claret wrote:The weird dislike of Joe Hart continues even though he never had a bad game for Burnley, won us vital points at Cardiff with an outstanding display and hasn't even played for months. The dislike probably started years ago for some reason.
This user liked this post: Swizzlestick
-
- Posts: 4064
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1507 times
- Has Liked: 580 times
Re: Rovers after hart
If you didn’t think he played badly against Everton on Boxing Day, I’d suggest it’s you with the blinkers on.NL Claret wrote:The weird dislike of Joe Hart continues even though he never had a bad game for Burnley, won us vital points at Cardiff with an outstanding display and hasn't even played for months. The dislike probably started years ago for some reason.
He was that good for us that Dyche, who as we all know is hardly Mr Tinkerman, dropped him and we subsequently looked a far better defensive unit.
Re: Rovers after hart
He did his best. He made some saves.
It just so happened that we had two heroes, in that position. He has paid the price.
It just so happened that we had two heroes, in that position. He has paid the price.
-
- Posts: 2242
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 8:04 pm
- Been Liked: 699 times
- Has Liked: 4026 times
Re: Rovers after hart
Really can't see this for Hart. I think he is more likely to go to club just promoted to the prem. Also us give then "favourable terms" makes my blood boil just to think we would pay someone to play for them.
-
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:29 am
- Been Liked: 157 times
- Has Liked: 42 times
Re: Rovers after hart
"Love thy neighbour"? Okay maybe not...mybloodisclaret wrote:Really can't see this for Hart. I think he is more likely to go to club just promoted to the prem. Also us give then "favourable terms" makes my blood boil just to think we would pay someone to play for them.
This user liked this post: mybloodisclaret
Re: Rovers after hart
I couldn't name a single player who came out of the Everton game without rightful criticism. I can't name a single outfield player who came out of the first half of the season with any credit but let's put it all on Hart because the team (collective) with a non existent midfield and an out of form back 4 conceded 41 goals. Some disliked him before he came for whatever reason and due to narrow mindedness won't change their views. It took some a long time to warm to Dean Marney as he was a Laws signing. Some didn't like Lenny Johnrose because of a former club of his. Some didn't like Scott Arfield as they read on Hudddersfield message board he wasn't any good. Basic.
This user liked this post: Top Claret
-
- Posts: 4064
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1507 times
- Has Liked: 580 times
Re: Rovers after hart
Well Dyche ‘put it all on Hart’ because he dropped him. And maybe it was the two previous seasons of dreadful performances with West Ham and Torino that did it?
-
- Posts: 5641
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1217 times
- Has Liked: 7179 times
- Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Re: Rovers after hart
I hope it isn't. He is a really good goalkeeper, Why would you want someone as good as him to sign for our enemy?Vino blanco wrote:I sincerely hope this is true.
-
- Posts: 16728
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 3766 times
- Has Liked: 7557 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: Rovers after hart
NL Claret wrote:The weird dislike of Joe Hart continues even though he never had a bad game for Burnley, won us vital points at Cardiff with an outstanding display and hasn't even played for months. The dislike probably started years ago for some reason.
I find it strange too.
Hart is a Claret at the moment. He's not let us down?
Some on here letting him down.
-
- Posts: 6954
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1487 times
- Has Liked: 1847 times
Re: Rovers after hart
Joe Hart was a massive mistake signing Tom was nearing full fitness at the time of signing Joe and we had 2 keepers who all could have stepped up short term
The sooner we move him on the better
The sooner we move him on the better
-
- Posts: 984
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:44 am
- Been Liked: 170 times
- Has Liked: 45 times
Re: Rovers after hart
Joe hart was a absolute liability for us just glad the manager finally saw sense before it was to late..just hope we can offload him off the wage bill now..
Re: Rovers after hart
Definitely needs to go. Wasnt good enough for us. An unnecessary signing. Get him off the wage bill.
-
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:27 am
- Been Liked: 333 times
- Has Liked: 788 times
Re: Rovers after hart
According to the BBC football gossip column, Mowbray is distancing himself from reports linking the club he manages with Hart...although it quotes the source as the Lancashire Telegraph.
-
- Posts: 67811
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32417 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Rovers after hart
Mowbray has said he has no idea where it has come from
-
- Posts: 67811
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32417 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Rovers after hart
Yet he was winning man of the match after man of the matchSheedyclaret wrote:Joe hart was a absolute liability for us
-
- Posts: 10314
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3338 times
- Has Liked: 1954 times
Re: Rovers after hart
He wasn’t a liability but it was clear to me he was someway behind Heaton and Pope in terms of ability.
-
- Posts: 67811
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32417 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Rovers after hart
Remember coming away from West Ham after a 4-2 defeat and he'd made a major contribution to keeping the score down. One of my friends said he would leave him out because we'd tried everything else and it still wasn't working. It showed, when he eventually was left out, that it was the case.Bordeauxclaret wrote:He wasn’t a liability but it was clear to me he was someway behind Heaton and Pope in terms of ability.
Re: Rovers after hart
1st half of the season Lowton, Mee, Tarky, Taylor and Cork were more a liability than Hart but some UTC posters had made their mind made up before he was signed and their memories seem to have gone just to fit their agenda.
Lowton was dropped too after the Everton game, no one calling him out.
Had to laugh during the United home game, plenty round me abusing Hart all game and then he saved a penalty. Silence, some couldn't even muster a good save lad!
Lowton was dropped too after the Everton game, no one calling him out.
Had to laugh during the United home game, plenty round me abusing Hart all game and then he saved a penalty. Silence, some couldn't even muster a good save lad!