G Cahill officially linked

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
# 1
Papabendi
Posts: 398
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:29 pm
Been Liked: 87 times
Has Liked: 3 times

G Cahill officially linked

Postby Papabendi » Tue May 07, 2019 2:13 pm

Dyche a big fan. And Perhaps Tarkowski is on his way.

# 2
claretonthecoast1882
Posts: 1707
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
Been Liked: 872 times
Has Liked: 27 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby claretonthecoast1882 » Tue May 07, 2019 2:14 pm

Bit young, let him go to Stoke for a couple of years 1st, give the helmets something else to whinge about.

All out for Charlie Adam this summer

# 3
Chester Perry
Posts: 6463
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
Been Liked: 932 times
Has Liked: 320 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Chester Perry » Tue May 07, 2019 2:15 pm

well that took it's time coming - rather have Kevin Long these days

# 4
Spijed
Posts: 9282
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 1674 times
Has Liked: 733 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Spijed » Tue May 07, 2019 2:17 pm

What's the difference between being officially linked and unofficially linked?

# 5
Pearcey
Posts: 1280
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:59 pm
Been Liked: 485 times
Has Liked: 546 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Pearcey » Tue May 07, 2019 2:19 pm

I see Charlie Adam has become the new Dry Powder.

I’d be delighted with Cahill. Top player.

# 6
ElectroClaret
Posts: 9226
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 2473 times
Has Liked: 1320 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby ElectroClaret » Tue May 07, 2019 2:20 pm

Officially linked by whom?

# 7
Rowls
Posts: 6437
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 2349 times
Has Liked: 2369 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Rowls » Tue May 07, 2019 2:50 pm

Cahill's an international class defender and he's be a great player to bring in.

One can imagine wages would be a sticking point however.

# 8
Goobs
Posts: 2785
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
Been Liked: 951 times
Has Liked: 661 times
Location: Burnley

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Goobs » Tue May 07, 2019 3:01 pm

Cahill? Seriously? I would hope that IF this was to happen it would be as a back up player. Would be good to have him partner a young CB (Dunne maybe) in our cup games.

# 9
gtclaret
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
Been Liked: 158 times
Has Liked: 75 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby gtclaret » Tue May 07, 2019 3:04 pm

This would be against the stated policy of player trading, buying younger players with sell on value and using them to replace a future big sale. If this is to replace Tarky, then it is going in the opposite direction
This user liked this post: moaninclaret

# 10
Jakubs Tash
Posts: 815
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 177 times
Has Liked: 83 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Jakubs Tash » Tue May 07, 2019 4:28 pm

Good defender but wrong age for us.

Could see him signing for Sheff Utd. He supports them and they will probably require some experience.

# 11
moaninclaret
Posts: 696
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:19 pm
Been Liked: 161 times
Has Liked: 261 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby moaninclaret » Tue May 07, 2019 4:29 pm

A class player but a bit too old to make regular pl football as with crouch. They are great to have in the dressing room with their know how but i cant see any making the starting 11 every week,

# 12
Foulthrow
Posts: 1658
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:48 am
Been Liked: 482 times
Has Liked: 1100 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Foulthrow » Tue May 07, 2019 4:32 pm

I think it would be an excellent signing should we need to bolster the ranks at CH - however, I don't think we do at the moment. But, the bloke isn't happy on Chelsea's bench so why would he be happy on Burnley's?

# 13
AlargeClaret
Posts: 1214
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 394 times
Has Liked: 34 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby AlargeClaret » Tue May 07, 2019 4:58 pm

Can’t see him coming back here we’d never get near his wages ,but what a player bona fida international class player too, miles better than what we have tbh and he scores a few as well .

# 14
ClaretTony
Posts: 29045
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 13347 times
Has Liked: 2563 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby ClaretTony » Tue May 07, 2019 5:00 pm

Spijed wrote:What's the difference between being officially linked and unofficially linked?


Don’t think there’s such a thing as an official link

# 15
Steve1956
Posts: 6422
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 1978 times
Has Liked: 1014 times
Location: Fife

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Steve1956 » Tue May 07, 2019 5:01 pm

We need to move on from signing over 30s....not a criticism ....just an observation.

# 16
FactualFrank
Posts: 15399
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 4213 times
Has Liked: 7422 times
Location: Leeds

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby FactualFrank » Tue May 07, 2019 5:14 pm

An official link I guess is when the club actually come out and say they are interested in bringing him to the club.

# 17
Wile E Coyote
Posts: 5791
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
Been Liked: 1839 times
Has Liked: 1020 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Wile E Coyote » Tue May 07, 2019 5:27 pm

i dont think he's too old , and as long as the most of the team are younger, then with his experience it could be a very astute addition.
Its not as if we are aiming to pack the squad with over 30's players.

# 18
dougcollins
Posts: 1449
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 447 times
Has Liked: 447 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby dougcollins » Tue May 07, 2019 5:29 pm

Gibson?
This user liked this post: Quicknick

# 19
claretfern
Posts: 416
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:36 am
Been Liked: 93 times
Has Liked: 708 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby claretfern » Tue May 07, 2019 5:47 pm

Jakubs Tash wrote:
Could see him signing for Sheff Utd. He supports them and they will probably require some experience.


Thought exactly the same.

# 20
Murger
Posts: 1464
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 408 times
Has Liked: 468 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Murger » Tue May 07, 2019 5:58 pm

Would definitely take him if Tarks was to be sold.

# 21
Bosscat
Posts: 4265
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 1332 times
Has Liked: 3490 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Bosscat » Tue May 07, 2019 6:36 pm


# 22
ksrclaret
Posts: 1806
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:56 am
Been Liked: 619 times
Has Liked: 81 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby ksrclaret » Tue May 07, 2019 6:41 pm

If we offload a few of the older lads (Hart, Defour, Crouch, Bardsley), then there's room in the squad for one more experienced player. Cahill would be a good signing if Tarkowski goes.

The bulk of our business must be younger players, as Rigg has alluded to.

# 23
Devils_Advocate
Posts: 3759
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 213 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Devils_Advocate » Tue May 07, 2019 6:46 pm

Maybe we are planning on entering a team in the Tommy centre walking football league next season

# 24
Fretters
Posts: 1018
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:56 am
Been Liked: 520 times
Has Liked: 279 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Fretters » Tue May 07, 2019 6:51 pm

dougcollins wrote:Gibson?


No, Gary ;)
This user liked this post: Goobs

# 25
claretspice
Posts: 4178
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 1819 times
Has Liked: 84 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby claretspice » Tue May 07, 2019 6:53 pm

No per se objection to this if we need a stop gap replacement for Tarks and aren't convinced by the younger options. We'll need someone in sharpish for pre-season if Tarks does leave so they can build a partnership. Cahill's as good a man for that as any.

It would though place a greater emphasis on youth in other areas of the team.

# 26
CoolClaret
Posts: 956
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 337 times
Has Liked: 429 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby CoolClaret » Tue May 07, 2019 6:55 pm

Cahill would be quality playing in a protected back four & means another leader on the pitch.

# 27
boatshed bill
Posts: 4699
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 981 times
Has Liked: 2222 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby boatshed bill » Tue May 07, 2019 7:11 pm

claretspice wrote:No per se objection to this if we need a stop gap replacement for Tarks and aren't convinced by the younger options. We'll need someone in sharpish for pre-season if Tarks does leave so they can build a partnership. Cahill's as good a man for that as any.

It would though place a greater emphasis on youth in other areas of the team.


TBH I'm not sure about this. He's 33 and we haven't had real value for money out of several of our older signings.
Would he be a replacement for Tarks?
Would he be an upgrade on Kevin Long?
We are an established PL club, should we be looking at signing "stop-gaps"?

# 28
Dark Cloud
Posts: 2893
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 749 times
Has Liked: 813 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Dark Cloud » Tue May 07, 2019 7:43 pm

One for the future.....

# 29
Suratclaret
Posts: 612
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:27 am
Been Liked: 128 times
Has Liked: 275 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Suratclaret » Wed May 08, 2019 8:10 am

Not convinced. OK, Cahill is still a good player but by next season, Gibson will have served his twelve months apprenticeship and Dyche has never been afraid to play Kevin Long if necessary...unless there are transfers out from the central defender ranks.

# 30
tiger76
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 500 times
Has Liked: 1592 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby tiger76 » Wed May 08, 2019 10:27 am

He'd be a decent enough short-term replacement if either Mee or Tarks left this summer,wages could be a problem,and we definitely don't want another Joe Hart scenario.

I'm more worried about the suggestion Crouch's contract might be renewed.

# 31
Hipper
Posts: 2343
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:33 pm
Been Liked: 470 times
Has Liked: 341 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Hipper » Wed May 08, 2019 10:31 am

boatshed bill wrote:TBH I'm not sure about this. He's 33 and we haven't had real value for money out of several of our older signings.
Would he be a replacement for Tarks?
Would he be an upgrade on Kevin Long?
We are an established PL club, should we be looking at signing "stop-gaps"?


Most of our players are 'stop-gaps' if you think about it.

Any player that stays at Burnley is either too young to have yet shown their full potential, too old to have a Premier League future elsewhere, or simply isn't good enough to do better.

Gary Cahill, I would guess, has been unable to get in the current Chelsea side because he is basically an old school defender with limited playmaking abilities. If he has no injury worries I would think he would be good for us for three years, not only as a solid centre back but as a goalscorer too. He scored some spectacular goals at Villa:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c30oz81cup4

# 32
Quickenthetempo
Posts: 8110
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 1805 times
Has Liked: 1036 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Quickenthetempo » Wed May 08, 2019 10:36 am

People saying he's not good enough for us when we have shipped 65 league goals. The highest of any side not relegated.

To say we're a defensive side first it's a little bit worrying.

# 33
nyclaret
Posts: 223
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:57 am
Been Liked: 72 times
Has Liked: 55 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby nyclaret » Wed May 08, 2019 10:38 am

Jakubs Tash wrote:Good defender but wrong age for us.

Could see him signing for Sheff Utd. He supports them and they will probably require some experience.

He supports Wednesday?

# 34
Spijed
Posts: 9282
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 1674 times
Has Liked: 733 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Spijed » Wed May 08, 2019 10:42 am

Quickenthetempo wrote:People saying he's not good enough for us when we have shipped 65 league goals. The highest of any side not relegated.

To say we're a defensive side first it's a little bit worrying.


Let's have some balance here as that's only because of the first half of the season.

Once we got everything sorted after Boxing day we are now pretty much back to our best defensively.

# 35
Dark Cloud
Posts: 2893
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 749 times
Has Liked: 813 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Dark Cloud » Wed May 08, 2019 10:47 am

It's not a position we really need to recruit tbh unless as speculated somebody (maybe more) are leaving. Most here seem to think the most likely to leave is Tarks, but realistically where would he go? He's good, but he's not top 5/ Champions League good so that leaves Everton and possibly Leicester who are at present upgrades on us. Everything else is largely a sideways move imo, despite many having a better season than us this time, where we had a better season than most last time.

# 36
Tricky Trevor
Posts: 1651
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 381 times
Has Liked: 428 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Tricky Trevor » Wed May 08, 2019 10:52 am

Dark Cloud wrote:It's not a position we really need to recruit tbh unless as speculated somebody (maybe more) are leaving. Most here seem to think the most likely to leave is Tarks, but realistically where would he go? He's good, but he's not top 5/ Champions League good so that leaves Everton and possibly Leicester who are at present upgrades on us. Everything else is largely a sideways move imo, despite many having a better season than us this time, where we had a better season than most last time.

Fair point but Leicester could need to replace Maguire and Everton have had a good season out of Zouma and Chelsea have said they want him back, for pre-season at least.
For mine I think he would be perfect in a back 3 but after last seasons trial I can’t see us going there again.

# 37
TVC15
Posts: 5351
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 2076 times
Has Liked: 334 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby TVC15 » Wed May 08, 2019 10:56 am

Dark Cloud wrote:It's not a position we really need to recruit tbh unless as speculated somebody (maybe more) are leaving. Most here seem to think the most likely to leave is Tarks, but realistically where would he go? He's good, but he's not top 5/ Champions League good so that leaves Everton and possibly Leicester who are at present upgrades on us. Everything else is largely a sideways move imo, despite many having a better season than us this time, where we had a better season than most last time.


Not sure about that - think there are a few teams who would be interested and have problems in the CB position. When you look round the league it’s a bit of a problem position. Just a few clubs that would blow us out of the water salary wise and have ambitions to break into top 6 or 7 include Everton, West Ham, Leicester and Palace who all need centre backs next year. You can even look at the likes of United who probably need at least 2 centre backs and Tarks could be good for them even as a 3rd choice - he’s better than Rojo and Jones. Look at Arsenal also - they are shocking in this position.

# 38
Quickenthetempo
Posts: 8110
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 1805 times
Has Liked: 1036 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Quickenthetempo » Wed May 08, 2019 11:10 am

Spijed wrote:Let's have some balance here as that's only because of the first half of the season.

Once we got everything sorted after Boxing day we are now pretty much back to our best defensively.

You want me to forget about a full half season so it looks better?

Let's hope our recruitment team aren't as daft as you.
We signed him on having a decent half season and completely ignored the other half where he was terrible.

# 39
Spijed
Posts: 9282
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 1674 times
Has Liked: 733 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Spijed » Wed May 08, 2019 11:13 am

Quickenthetempo wrote:You want me to forget about a full half season so it looks better?

Let's hope our recruitment team aren't as daft as you.
We signed him on having a decent half season and completely ignored the other half where he was terrible.


Yes, you can write off the first half of the season when it comes to our defence as everyone in football knows we are back to our best in that respect.

Games like Chelsea proved that beyond any doubt.

# 40
ClaretTony
Posts: 29045
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 13347 times
Has Liked: 2563 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby ClaretTony » Wed May 08, 2019 11:15 am

nyclaret wrote:He supports Wednesday?


He does, but he's already played for Sheffield United

# 41
Quickenthetempo
Posts: 8110
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 1805 times
Has Liked: 1036 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Quickenthetempo » Wed May 08, 2019 11:18 am

Spijed wrote:Yes, you can write off the first half of the season when it comes to our defence as everyone in football knows we are back to our best in that respect.

Games like Chelsea proved that beyond any doubt.

We defended well but still conceded two.

If you were judging a neutral teams defence you would praise when they kept a clean sheet.

# 42
nyclaret
Posts: 223
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:57 am
Been Liked: 72 times
Has Liked: 55 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby nyclaret » Wed May 08, 2019 11:36 am

I'd have thought Jagielka would move to Sheff Utd rather than Cahill

# 43
Duffer_
Posts: 1219
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
Been Liked: 390 times
Has Liked: 733 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Duffer_ » Wed May 08, 2019 12:53 pm

Quickenthetempo wrote:If you were judging a neutral teams defence you would praise when they kept a clean sheet.


You should also take into account the quality of the opposition. Would be good to see the variance to expected goals but xG is still to be refined and the defence itself plays a part in the xG metric.

UTC!

# 44
Quickenthetempo
Posts: 8110
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 1805 times
Has Liked: 1036 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Quickenthetempo » Wed May 08, 2019 12:58 pm

Duffer_ wrote:You should also take into account the quality of the opposition. Would be good to see the variance to expected goals but xG is still to be refined and the defence itself plays a part in the xG metric.

UTC!

It's judging over the whole season. Playing everyone twice bar Arsenal.

Everyone thinks are defence is brilliant but Eddie Howe's Bournemouth can't defend for toffee. It's crazy.

# 45
South West Claret.
Posts: 5005
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
Been Liked: 692 times
Has Liked: 469 times
Location: Devon

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby South West Claret. » Wed May 08, 2019 1:05 pm

He was certainly a cut above the rest when we had him on lone from Villa when he was a youngster, but signing him now I don't know unless stated above maybe one of our existing centre backs goes.

# 46
dpinsussex
Posts: 2897
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 823 times
Has Liked: 923 times
Location: Reading

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby dpinsussex » Wed May 08, 2019 1:23 pm

He's a similar age to Kompany and he isnt doing too badly

# 47
Spike
Posts: 1421
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:07 pm
Been Liked: 282 times
Has Liked: 647 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Spike » Wed May 08, 2019 1:25 pm

ksrclaret wrote:If we offload a few of the older lads (Hart, Defour, Crouch, Bardsley), then there's room in the squad for one more experienced player. Cahill would be a good signing if Tarkowski goes.

The bulk of our business must be younger players, as Rigg has alluded to.


Bardsley has already signed a one year extension -just not been announced by the club

# 48
ashtonlongsider
Posts: 1047
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 296 times
Has Liked: 74 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby ashtonlongsider » Wed May 08, 2019 2:07 pm

Still think there's plenty of football left in GC. He reads the game well and comes up with a few goals. Not sure if were interested or not, but if we were it could be a shrewd bit of business. My hunch is him ending up at somewhere like Fulham.

# 49
Quickenthetempo
Posts: 8110
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 1805 times
Has Liked: 1036 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Quickenthetempo » Wed May 08, 2019 2:10 pm

ashtonlongsider wrote:Still think there's plenty of football left in GC. He reads the game well and comes up with a few goals. Not sure if were interested or not, but if we were it could be a shrewd bit of business. My hunch is him ending up at somewhere like Fulham.

He turned Fulham down in January.

I'm not that keen on signing 33 year olds, but If Cahill is still as good as he was in his last Chelsea appearance on the Turf then I would take him all day long.

# 50
Quickenthetempo
Posts: 8110
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 1805 times
Has Liked: 1036 times

Re: G Cahill officially linked

Postby Quickenthetempo » Wed May 08, 2019 2:15 pm

Spike wrote:Bardsley has already signed a one year extension -just not been announced by the club

A little surprising seeing as Nixon reckons we're very keen on Reece James who has been on loan at Wigan from Chelsea and impressed massively.
Others are also keen and Chelsea might decide to keep if under transfer embargo.

Unless selling Lowton we must be sticking to our current options.


Return to “The Bee Hole End”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Taffy on the wing, thelaughingclaret, Vintage Claret and 37 guests