Wolves in for Tarkowski
-
- Posts: 2643
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:31 pm
- Been Liked: 895 times
- Has Liked: 328 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Tarks is probably about 30m quid worth of defender currently, should he get back in and play for England as well as playing well for us this season, his value is likely to rise toward the 50m mark. A good year will see him valued in the same bracket as Keane.
-
- Posts: 1131
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:35 pm
- Been Liked: 345 times
- Has Liked: 1571 times
- Location: Wantage
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
I thought it was pretty common knowledge that Dyche wants two players for each position. Mee and Gibson at left cb and tarks and long at right cb. Gibson has had to be patient, as has long due to the form and fitness of our main two.
Gibson was only a suspension or injury away from a run in the side(as was vydra possibly).
No real reason that two 2 left footed cb’s can’t play together either.
When Burnley were relegated to third division I’m the early 80’s my Dad was moved from lb to cb (bit like Dawson rb and cb) wracking my brains to think who he was paired with (big vince?dobbo?), maybe you could help CT? Worked out ok.
UTC
Gibson was only a suspension or injury away from a run in the side(as was vydra possibly).
No real reason that two 2 left footed cb’s can’t play together either.
When Burnley were relegated to third division I’m the early 80’s my Dad was moved from lb to cb (bit like Dawson rb and cb) wracking my brains to think who he was paired with (big vince?dobbo?), maybe you could help CT? Worked out ok.
UTC
This user liked this post: Quicknick
-
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:56 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 248 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
I wouldn’t be selling for less than 50m so hope they do one. Definitely worth 30-40m at the current rates, can’t be far behind maguire in ability
-
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:29 am
- Been Liked: 50 times
- Has Liked: 26 times
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
I’d guess it was David Holt.Noblelight wrote:Who is your dad Holty?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Holt_(footballer,_born_1952" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
These 2 users liked this post: IanMcL Holtyclaret
-
- Posts: 8996
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2013 times
- Has Liked: 2911 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Yes but at the cost of his overlapping. Did well at CH but he was a top full back.Holtyclaret wrote:I thought it was pretty common knowledge that Dyche wants two players for each position. Mee and Gibson at left cb and tarks and long at right cb. Gibson has had to be patient, as has long due to the form and fitness of our main two.
Gibson was only a suspension or injury away from a run in the side(as was vydra possibly).
No real reason that two 2 left footed cb’s can’t play together either.
When Burnley were relegated to third division I’m the early 80’s my Dad was moved from lb to cb (bit like Dawson rb and cb) wracking my brains to think who he was paired with (big vince?dobbo?), maybe you could help CT? Worked out ok.
UTC
This user liked this post: Holtyclaret
-
- Posts: 3891
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 12:57 pm
- Been Liked: 1282 times
- Has Liked: 682 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Brian Miller moved your Dad to centre-back for the second half of the '81/'82 season when we were Champions of Division Three. It worked really well but David had three partners there until the end of the season, Micky Phelan, big Vince and even Paul Dixon for 4 or 5 games.Holtyclaret wrote:I thought it was pretty common knowledge that Dyche wants two players for each position. Mee and Gibson at left cb and tarks and long at right cb. Gibson has had to be patient, as has long due to the form and fitness of our main two.
Gibson was only a suspension or injury away from a run in the side(as was vydra possibly).
No real reason that two 2 left footed cb’s can’t play together either.
When Burnley were relegated to third division I’m the early 80’s my Dad was moved from lb to cb (bit like Dawson rb and cb) wracking my brains to think who he was paired with (big vince?dobbo?), maybe you could help CT? Worked out ok.
UTC
At the start of the following season '82/'83 your Dad continued there for the first dozen or so games and was partnered in each one by Micky Phelan. Of course we ended that season relegated back into Division Three. Did your Dad retire in '83?
This user liked this post: Holtyclaret
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Wasn’t Mike Phelan played as a CH at that time?
This user liked this post: Holtyclaret
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Yes worth whatever Manchester pays for Maguire, less 10mill.Giftonsnoidea wrote:I wouldn’t be selling for less than 50m so hope they do one. Definitely worth 30-40m at the current rates, can’t be far behind maguire in ability
-
- Posts: 6138
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2634 times
- Has Liked: 6461 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Apparently Man Utd are offering £70M & Phil Jones for Maguire, Leicester are holding out for the £70M...
I’ll get my coat
Shamelessly stolen from Facebook
I’ll get my coat
Shamelessly stolen from Facebook
These 3 users liked this post: TVC15 IanMcL tim_noone
-
- Posts: 1131
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:35 pm
- Been Liked: 345 times
- Has Liked: 1571 times
- Location: Wantage
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
He did pal, mid way through the season, his business had taken over his life (and he was struggling to keep his fitness 100% to keep up with the youngsters!).Royboyclaret wrote:Brian Miller moved your Dad to centre-back for the second half of the '81/'82 season when we were Champions of Division Three. It worked really well but David had three partners there until the end of the season, Micky Phelan, big Vince and even Paul Dixon for 4 or 5 games.
At the start of the following season '82/'83 your Dad continued there for the first dozen or so games and was partnered in each one by Micky Phelan. Of course we ended that season relegated back into Division Three. Did your Dad retire in '83?
I had Micky phelan at the back of my mind. Shows what a versatile player he was!
-
- Posts: 30707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11052 times
- Has Liked: 5659 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Wan-Bisakka, 21 years old, less than 40 professional games, no England cap - 60 millionNo Ney Never wrote:Tarks is probably about 30m quid worth of defender currently, should he get back in and play for England as well as playing well for us this season, his value is likely to rise toward the 50m mark. A good year will see him valued in the same bracket as Keane.
I would hope the least we would get for Tarks will be 50 million (he's not worth it but we should try and get that given what others are going to go for)
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Wan-Bissakka is only a young lad though and is already a great player with still time to improve. Tarks is a bang average centre half who is unlikely to improve much now.Vegas Claret wrote:Wan-Bisakka, 21 years old, less than 40 professional games, no England cap - 60 million
I would hope the least we would get for Tarks will be 50 million (he's not worth it but we should try and get that given what others are going to go for)
This user liked this post: Siddo
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
If the valuations regarding Maguire and Tarkowski are reasonably accurate that would make Maguire ay least twice as good, which simply isn't the case. He may be better going forward but he certainly isn't better at defending.Vegas Claret wrote:Wan-Bisakka, 21 years old, less than 40 professional games, no England cap - 60 million
I would hope the least we would get for Tarks will be 50 million (he's not worth it but we should try and get that given what others are going to go for)
This user liked this post: Vegas Claret
-
- Posts: 3484
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
- Been Liked: 660 times
- Has Liked: 205 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Testing
-
- Posts: 1131
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:35 pm
- Been Liked: 345 times
- Has Liked: 1571 times
- Location: Wantage
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Sorry mate, just seen.Noblelight wrote:Who is your dad Holty?
This user liked this post: Darnhill Claret
-
- Posts: 16892
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6963 times
- Has Liked: 1483 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Not how it works unfortunately. Sometimes players are just better than others despite having played less games and not having a full international cap.Vegas Claret wrote:Wan-Bisakka, 21 years old, less than 40 professional games, no England cap - 60 million
I would hope the least we would get for Tarks will be 50 million (he's not worth it but we should try and get that given what others are going to go for)
-
- Posts: 30707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11052 times
- Has Liked: 5659 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
I know, I was being sarcastic and I also said he wasn't worth it - can still ask for it thoughRileybobs wrote:Not how it works unfortunately. Sometimes players are just better than others despite having played less games and not having a full international cap.
-
- Posts: 3155
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 836 times
- Has Liked: 544 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Think he was replaced at lb by the 18 year old Bacup Bulldog Andy Wharton, who himself loved an overlapelwaclaret wrote:Yes but at the cost of his overlapping. Did well at CH but he was a top full back.
These 2 users liked this post: Holtyclaret elwaclaret
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Sun reporting Newcastle and West Brom after Conor Coady for around £7m
Would gladly take him in part exchange and still only 26
Would gladly take him in part exchange and still only 26
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
As mentioned previously, it would be better to try and get a player in the deal, then the fee we need to pay Brentford would reduce I think.jojomk1 wrote:Sun reporting Newcastle and West Brom after Conor Coady for around £7m
Would gladly take him in part exchange and still only 26
If Coady is available, it might be worth enquiring as he's a good defender, captain, northern lad and is a defender who defends ( sounds obvious, but not seen him take silly risks or try to be something he isnt )
Could be a good option and no reason we can't compete for his signature.
-
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 341 times
- Has Liked: 20 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
That is a surprise - I’m pretty sure he played every minute of every premier league game for Wolves last season.jojomk1 wrote:Sun reporting Newcastle and West Brom after Conor Coady for around £7m
Would gladly take him in part exchange and still only 26
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
I think they're trying for the next level now, after all the finished 7th last season, and made a major semi final.Cheshireclaret wrote:That is a surprise - I’m pretty sure he played every minute of every premier league game for Wolves last season.
Think they had plans to be a top 4 a challenging side in 5 seasons.
An unfashionable scouse CB probably wont fit into the glitz and glamour of moving forward and trying to build the clubs profile.
How successful it will be time will tell
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Thought he was excellent for them last season and many "football" people were saying he had a chance of getting in England squad
£7m seems way too cheap for me
£7m seems way too cheap for me
-
- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Can't see Wolves thinking he is the first to be improved on. Isn't he the club captain and played every minute of the season ?
For a club that has serious backing can't see them even entertaining 7m
For a club that has serious backing can't see them even entertaining 7m
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Me too. Thought he looked excellent last year. Him and Mee or Lascelles would make a damn strong pairing.jojomk1 wrote:Sun reporting Newcastle and West Brom after Conor Coady for around £7m
Would gladly take him in part exchange and still only 26
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
jojomk1 wrote:Thought he was excellent for them last season and many "football" people were saying he had a chance of getting in England squad
£7m seems way too cheap for me
I agree, so if its anywhere near that we should be enquiring.
Is he a football playing CB though? That's what they'll be wanting, they want to evolve. An old school defender isnt usually what these fancy foreign coaches like when playing the beautiful game.
My opinion is I'd rather take Coady at 10m than Dawson at 10m. I know the premier league experience isn't the same, but the quality, leadership and defensive skills are IMO. And at a very good age too. Many years left in Coady and still time to develop and reach his peak.
-
- Posts: 6904
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2758 times
- Has Liked: 4325 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Coady is Wolves Captain...played every minute of every Premier League game in a side that finished 7th...and he's being linked with West Brom ??
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
It's all very well talking about buying younger players and thinking that they can grow into the team. Dawson for example was 25 and you'd think that is a good age, we could make money if we sell him on.
He's 27 in January and so far has made 5 appearances!
He's 27 in January and so far has made 5 appearances!
-
- Posts: 8996
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2013 times
- Has Liked: 2911 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Liked Andy Wharton, looked up to him (former pupil of same school)... but preferred Holty he was more cultured and Newton-Esque for meCharlieinNewMexico wrote:Think he was replaced at lb by the 18 year old Bacup Bulldog Andy Wharton, who himself loved an overlap
This user liked this post: Holtyclaret
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
In all the discussions about capability, am I dreaming when I think a year with SD would improve most central defender's performance and being in our defensive structure would add some more?
-
- Posts: 5543
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2340 times
- Has Liked: 1405 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
If that's true about coady I would snap wolves' hand off for him. Perhaps a cash plus player deal would suit both parties. 30m plus coady and they have a deal.
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Coady is a decent CB in a 3 ATB formation, but even as captain, he isn’t on the same level as Boly. And I think he’d be exposed in a 2.
Wolves are a ruthless club remember. Barry Douglas was a key player in their promotion campaign, but they clearly didn’t think he was capable of playing that well at a higher level, so out the door he went. Whether you agree with it or not, the idea that Wolves would be willing to simply offload Coady for a better centre half is not far-fetched.
Wolves are a ruthless club remember. Barry Douglas was a key player in their promotion campaign, but they clearly didn’t think he was capable of playing that well at a higher level, so out the door he went. Whether you agree with it or not, the idea that Wolves would be willing to simply offload Coady for a better centre half is not far-fetched.
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Generally not, they looked at the cash or the cash equivalent (which is what a player in part exchange would be). The arguments obviously come when trying to value that part-ex player ...MACCA wrote:As mentioned previously, it would be better to try and get a player in the deal, then the fee we need to pay Brentford would reduce I think.
If Coady is available, it might be worth enquiring as he's a good defender, captain, northern lad and is a defender who defends ( sounds obvious, but not seen him take silly risks or try to be something he isnt )
Could be a good option and no reason we can't compete for his signature.
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Coady has spent the large majority of his career as a midfielder i think?SGr wrote:Coady is a decent CB in a 3 ATB formation, but even as captain, he isn’t on the same level as Boly. And I think he’d be exposed in a 2.
Wolves are a ruthless club remember. Barry Douglas was a key player in their promotion campaign, but they clearly didn’t think he was capable of playing that well at a higher level, so out the door he went. Whether you agree with it or not, the idea that Wolves would be willing to simply offload Coady for a better centre half is not far-fetched.
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Yes I know, theres been a few teams shaft other teams when players are in the exchangeaggi wrote:Generally not, they looked at the cash or the cash equivalent (which is what a player in part exchange would be). The arguments obviously come when trying to value that part-ex player ...
-
- Posts: 794
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:02 am
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 36 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Now 4/5 to sign for Leicester
-
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1047 times
- Has Liked: 1187 times
- Location: Reading
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Tarks is much better at clearing the ball away from his goal line in injury timejrgbfc wrote:Wan-Bissakka is only a young lad though and is already a great player with still time to improve. Tarks is a bang average centre half who is unlikely to improve much now.
-
- Posts: 2294
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 511 times
- Has Liked: 1062 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Tarks is still under-rated. As he has been by many on here since he first signed. He will improve further and hopefully convince more doubters. I just hope he does it here rather than elsewhere.
This user liked this post: summitclaret
-
- Posts: 5793
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
What length contract do we think Coady should get? Older than Tarkowski but can play a few more positions by sound of it.
-
- Posts: 2294
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 511 times
- Has Liked: 1062 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
Don’t think Coady would come here, unless Sean could work his magic.
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
We wont sign coadySteve-Harpers-perm wrote:What length contract do we think Coady should get? Older than Tarkowski but can play a few more positions by sound of it.
-
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 546 times
- Has Liked: 51 times
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
First of all where has the Coadt stuff come from?
And secondly he wouldn’t fair well in a back two.
And secondly he wouldn’t fair well in a back two.
Re: Wolves in for Tarkowski
As has been stated above, coady is/was a centre mid when he was coming thru at Liverpool and all his loans he played there, the shift was last year to play in the middle I think of 2 proper defenders to act as a sweeper and abit of a ball player.
Not sure how he would get on in a 2, not sure if we are linked. All ifs and buts at the moment.
Not sure how he would get on in a 2, not sure if we are linked. All ifs and buts at the moment.