England v New Zealand
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
Looked to me as if it might have been going over
-
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
Re: England v New Zealand
Good captaincy to bring Wood back on then. England bowling well.
-
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1240 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: England v New Zealand
Def missing
-
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 519 times
- Has Liked: 266 times
- Location: Malaga Spain
Re: England v New Zealand
Yes same as when Bairstow went
-
- Posts: 4919
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
- Been Liked: 861 times
- Has Liked: 334 times
- Location: Halifax
Re: England v New Zealand
You got your wish MACCA, 9 runs early as well.MACCA wrote:Get them 150/4 and it's back with us.
It was a massive noise, I heard it from here.
-
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1240 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: England v New Zealand
Another bad decision but good for us for a change
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
Not out had they had their review
-
- Posts: 16763
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 3778 times
- Has Liked: 7573 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: England v New Zealand
Still think one review is wrong.
-
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1240 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: England v New Zealand
Swings and roundabouts but proof again that you can never get 100% decisions correct in live sport.
-
- Posts: 19426
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3165 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: England v New Zealand
it is on http://www.cricfree.sc" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;diamondpocket wrote:only available to UK viewers, I'm not in the UK
-
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1240 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: England v New Zealand
Tbh you can’t feel too sorry for them when Williamson doesn’t walk when he knows he’s hit it
-
- Posts: 4955
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 1087 times
- Has Liked: 996 times
Re: England v New Zealand
I quite like just the 1 review. Stops frivolous reviewing! You need to think about them!Buxtonclaret wrote:Still think one review is wrong.
Re: England v New Zealand
Buxtonclaret wrote:Still think one review is wrong.
Start having 2 or 3 and you may as well have an umpire.
I think ones enough and its upto the captain to use it wisely. NZ have been a bit sloppy with their batting one against us in both games now.
-
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1240 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: England v New Zealand
There should be some penalty for frivolous reviews. However, you want to get decisions correct.
Re: England v New Zealand
claretburns wrote:You got your wish MACCA, 9 runs early as well.
I can be greedy and ask for 190/6?
I can't see them getting 250 TBH.
These 2 users liked this post: box_of_frogs claretburns
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
Another for Plunkett
173/5
173/5
-
- Posts: 4919
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
- Been Liked: 861 times
- Has Liked: 334 times
- Location: Halifax
Re: England v New Zealand
Plunkett with another, he really is good at claiming wickets, a very much unsung hero in the squad.
-
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 519 times
- Has Liked: 266 times
- Location: Malaga Spain
Re: England v New Zealand
Still a long way to go but that's what the doctor ordered
-
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1240 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: England v New Zealand
Great stuff
Re: England v New Zealand
Another quick one here and we could limit them to 230.
-
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1240 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: England v New Zealand
Bairstow is a beast on the boundary. Great fielder
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
Every time I think NZ might be edging in front we take a wicket
-
- Posts: 1468
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:55 pm
- Been Liked: 534 times
- Has Liked: 506 times
Re: England v New Zealand
Well bowled plunks.
-
- Posts: 4955
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 1087 times
- Has Liked: 996 times
Re: England v New Zealand
Best you keep thinking it then.......!ClaretTony wrote:Every time I think NZ might be edging in front we take a wicket
-
- Posts: 16763
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 3778 times
- Has Liked: 7573 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: England v New Zealand
Superb 10 overs, Liam.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
Just reaching the point again where we need another wicket
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
Six down, de Grandhomne gone
Re: England v New Zealand
There you goClaretTony wrote:Just reaching the point again where we need another wicket
-
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 519 times
- Has Liked: 266 times
- Location: Malaga Spain
Re: England v New Zealand
That's was needed we didn't need that partnership to carry through
We can do this now
230 240 if they lucky
We can do this now
230 240 if they lucky
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
We don’t want them getting many more than 240. That would potentially be a tough target.Longside4evr wrote:That's was needed we didn't need that partnership to carry through
We can do this now
230 240 if they lucky
-
- Posts: 985
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2016 11:20 am
- Been Liked: 264 times
- Has Liked: 90 times
Re: England v New Zealand
270 is the par score at Lords.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
Not in these conditions though. 270 for me would be a frightening total to go for.claret wizard wrote:270 is the par score at Lords.
Re: England v New Zealand
Woakes just went from the Ridiculous to the Sublime ....
4 wides followed by a wicket 232-7
4 wides followed by a wicket 232-7
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: England v New Zealand
Someone who knows about cricket, why does it matter that a ball pitches outside the stumps for LBW if it would still hit the wickets anyway?
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
Interesting over with 5 wides, a wicket , free hit no ball and then nothing off the free hit.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
238 with one over to go
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
Can’t be out if it pitches outside leg stump.Imploding Turtle wrote:Someone who knows about cricket, why does it matter that a ball pitches outside the stumps for LBW if it would still hit the wickets anyway?
Re: England v New Zealand
A sloppy last 3 overs there's 20 on this total that shouldn't be.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
240/8 with 3 balls to go. First wicket for Archer.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
Brendan McCullum happy with 240.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: England v New Zealand
ClaretTony wrote:Can’t be out if it pitches outside leg stump.
Ok. yes. I understand that bit, but why? I'm trying to understand the rationale behind the rule.
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
Finished on 241/8
-
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
Re: England v New Zealand
I think the theory is that if the ball pitches outside leg stump, the trajectory of the ball is likely (possibly) to be in line to hit the leg anyway before the batsman has time to move his bat towards the ball.
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
If it was allowed it would be far to easy for a bowler to get an lbw if bowling over the wicket to a left hander or round the wicket to a right hander.Imploding Turtle wrote:Ok. yes. I understand that bit, but why? I'm trying to understand the rationale behind the rule.
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle
-
- Posts: 16763
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 3778 times
- Has Liked: 7573 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: England v New Zealand
Would just make it too easy for the bowler if out pitching outside leg stump.Imploding Turtle wrote:Ok. yes. I understand that bit, but why? I'm trying to understand the rationale behind the rule.
Makes sense really, if you think about it.
Beat me to it.
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle
-
- Posts: 4200
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:07 am
- Been Liked: 1007 times
- Has Liked: 2048 times
- Location: North Hampshire
Re: England v New Zealand
A competitive total I think; if NZ bowl well it wont be a doddle chasing that down.
England bowled OK without it being at their best; 17 wides is too many.
England are strong favourites with the bookies (1/4 cf 3/1 for Kiwis) but a few early wickets would change that. All to play for still.
England bowled OK without it being at their best; 17 wides is too many.
England are strong favourites with the bookies (1/4 cf 3/1 for Kiwis) but a few early wickets would change that. All to play for still.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: England v New Zealand
Oh. Right. So is that because of what side the bowler is bowling from? I mean, if the bowler is bowling from the left and the ball pitches to the left of the wickets the batsman can't be out, but if he's bowling from the left and pitches to the right of the wickets and comes "back" then LBW is possible?Vino blanco wrote:I think the theory is that if the ball pitches outside leg stump, the trajectory of the ball is likely (possibly) to be in line to hit the leg anyway before the batsman has time to move his bat towards the ball.
Or must it pitch in-line with the wickets no matter what side of the the bowler's bowling from?
-
- Posts: 67902
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32546 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: England v New Zealand
Doesn’t have to pitch in line, can pitch outside off stump. Then it’s where the contact takes place dependent on whether the batsman is playing a shot.Imploding Turtle wrote:Oh. Right. So is that because of what side the bowler is bowling from? I mean, if the bowler is bowling from the left and the ball pitches to the left of the wickets the batsman can't be out, but if he's bowling from the left and pitches to the right of the wickets and comes "back" then LBW is possible?
Or must it pitch in-line with the wickets no matter what side of the the bowler's bowling from?
This user liked this post: Imploding Turtle
-
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:57 pm
- Been Liked: 2147 times
- Has Liked: 3782 times
- Location: Norfolk
Re: England v New Zealand
IT, here is all you need to know -
You have two sides, one out in the field and one in. Each man that's in the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he comes in and the next man goes in until he's out. When they are all out, the side that's out comes in and the side that's been in goes out and tries to get those coming in, out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out.
When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out, and when he is out he goes in and the next man in goes out and goes in. There are two men called umpires who stay out all the time and they decide when the men who are in are out. When both sides have been in and all the men have been out, and both sides have been out twice after all the men have been in, including those who are not out, that is the end of the game
You have two sides, one out in the field and one in. Each man that's in the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he comes in and the next man goes in until he's out. When they are all out, the side that's out comes in and the side that's been in goes out and tries to get those coming in, out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out.
When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out, and when he is out he goes in and the next man in goes out and goes in. There are two men called umpires who stay out all the time and they decide when the men who are in are out. When both sides have been in and all the men have been out, and both sides have been out twice after all the men have been in, including those who are not out, that is the end of the game
This user liked this post: JTClaret
-
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 519 times
- Has Liked: 266 times
- Location: Malaga Spain
Re: England v New Zealand
Here we go come on England