I reckon it’s because it was a match turning event that the Referee should’ve been made aware of.Tall Paul wrote:Why do you think VAR should have been used in that instance?
They're only using it for goals, penalties and red cards.
Match of the Day
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: Match of the Day
Re: Match of the Day
A free kick on the right hand side of the area and a yellow card for Gunn is a match turning event?Lord Beamish wrote:I reckon it’s because it was a match turning event that the Referee should’ve been made aware of.
I thought we didn't want VAR to be too intrusive and cause lots of delays. If we're reviewing every potential yellow card incident, the game would go on forever.
-
- Posts: 4452
- Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 1152 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
Re: Match of the Day
Ian Wright is up there with Garth Crooks as the bell-end of bell/ends in punditry .Not helped by him being seemingly illiterate and unable to string a sentence together . As for the little old Jewish grandmother presenting it who is she?
This user liked this post: Pimlico_Claret
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: Match of the Day
‘Keepers straying our of their box with the ball in their hands often leads to Red Cards(though I don’t think it would have in this instance), and is a fundamental rule violation of the Game.Tall Paul wrote:A free kick on the right hand side of the area and a yellow card for Gunn is a match turning event?
It could also have led to a goal, if the keeper would have properly let the ball go when he realised he was carrying it out of the area, he’d have been way out of position for the ball being picked up by one of our players.
VAR is supposed to assist Refs to make the right calls on the fundamentals of the game. It could’ve helped with this.
And don’t get me started on the non red card event.
VAR clearly saw a red card offence, put it up on the screen, and it was ignored by the Ref. An explanation of the process of this would be obliging.
-
- Posts: 11498
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3181 times
- Has Liked: 1865 times
- Contact:
Re: Match of the Day
I was sat in the JMU in line with it and although his feet were out side the area he had turned his body so his hands were inside
This user liked this post: jrtod61
Re: Match of the Day
Every foul is a fundamental rule violation of the game.Lord Beamish wrote:‘Keepers straying our of their box with the ball in their hands often leads to Red Cards(though I don’t think it would have in this instance), and is a fundamental rule violation of the Game.
It could also have led to a goal, if the keeper would have properly let the ball go when he realised he was carrying it out of the area, he’d have been way out of position for the ball being picked up by one of our players.
It's only a red card offence if it's deemed to be denying a goalscoring opportunity. There were no Burnley players anywhere near him so it couldn't be denying a goalscoring opportunity and would only have been a yellow. VAR isn't used for yellow card incidents, therefore it was correct not to refer it to VAR.
You seem to be arguing in your second paragraph that it was denying a goalscoring opportunity after saying in your first that you didn't think it was a red.
No, VAR is supposed to be used to ensure goals, red cards and penalties are awarded correctly.VAR is supposed to assist Refs to make the right calls on the fundamentals of the game. It could’ve helped with this.
Last edited by Tall Paul on Sun Aug 11, 2019 9:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 5864
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1766 times
- Has Liked: 356 times
- Location: The Banana Stand
Re: Match of the Day
VAR refs told the referee not to restart play while they checked a potential red card. But they deemed it not worthy of a sending off.Lord Beamish wrote: And don’t get me started on the non red card event. VAR clearly saw a red card offence, put it up on the screen, and it was ignored by the Ref. An explanation of the process of this would be obliging.
However in those situations refs can’t give yellow cards afterwards, so the player was unpunished.
-
- Posts: 3956
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1239 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: Match of the Day
This is one of the areas they need to work on. If the guy that followed through on Ben gets a yellow later on he stays on the pitch. He should be getting a yellow even if it is accidental so surely no reason why the VAR ref shouldn’t say no red but give him a yellow. It’s like doing half a job when they have the ability to check something.claptrappers_union wrote:VAR refs told the referee not to restart play while they checked a potential red card. But they deemed it not worthy of a sending off.
However in those situations refs can’t give yellow cards afterwards, so the player was unpunished.
This user liked this post: nil_desperandum
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: Match of the Day
I didn’t think it was a Red because it wasnt a ‘clear’ goal scoring opportunity. A player dropping the ball on the edge of the area to avoid carrying it out, or leaving it when he realises he’s going to take it out, and thus being out of position, is a potential goal scoring opportunity. Therefor, Yellow.Tall Paul wrote:Every foul is a fundamental rule violation of the game.
You seem to be arguing in your second paragraph that it was denying a goalscoring opportunity after saying in your first that you didn't think it was a red.
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: Match of the Day
Tall Paul wrote:Every foul is a fundamental rule violation of the game.
It's only a red card offence if it's deemed to be denying a goalscoring opportunity. There were no Burnley players anywhere near him so it couldn't be denying a goalscoring opportunity and would only have been a yellow. VAR isn't used for yellow card incidents, therefore it was correct not to refer it to VAR.
The fact that the ‘Keeper is the only person who can handle the ball leagally on the field of play, and only within his 18 yard box, is utterly fundamental to the Rules, Notion, and Spirit of the Game. Their ‘Keeper gained an unfair advantage against our Team by violating this most fundamental rule of the game. If VAR cannot assist the Refs in this situation, then I really don’t think it’s being used to its full potential.
-
- Posts: 3956
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1239 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: Match of the Day
There, in theory, could be goal line technology on the edges of the box to check for situations like keepers handling inside or out. This might be one of the next evolutions.
Re: Match of the Day
So you want more VAR with more stoppages and delays? Fair enough.Lord Beamish wrote:The fact that the ‘Keeper is the only person who can handle the ball leagally on the field of play, and only within his 18 yard box, is utterly fundamental to the Rules, Notion, and Spirit of the Game. Their ‘Keeper gained an unfair advantage against our Team by violating this most fundamental rule of the game. If VAR cannot assist the Refs in this situation, then I really don’t think it’s being used to its full potential.
Are there any more yellow card offences you want to review or just goalkeepers handling the ball outside the box?
I'm not sure why you think that law is so fundamental either. A goalkeeper is treated the same as any outfield player outside his penalty area, so for consistency, all handballs would need to be reviewed by VAR.
Last edited by Tall Paul on Sun Aug 11, 2019 9:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:12 pm
- Been Liked: 141 times
- Has Liked: 81 times
Re: Match of the Day
Why did I just hear Brighton fans singing ‘we’re going to win the league’ after being 2-0 up at the mighty Watford.
They are such a set of tw-ats.
They are such a set of tw-ats.
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: Match of the Day
That’s clearly not what I said. I said I want VAR to be used to discern if a ‘Keeper has handled the ball out of the box. I also explained why I thought that that was important. Carry on straw-manning me, if you wish, but this is my final word on the matter with you.Tall Paul wrote:So you want more VAR with more stoppages and delays? Fair enough.
Are there any more yellow card offences you want to review or just goalkeepers handling the ball outside the box?
-
- Posts: 1763
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:24 pm
- Been Liked: 586 times
- Has Liked: 203 times
- Location: Oldfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Match of the Day
Irony is wasted with some on here, but yes they are a set of Tw-ts
This user liked this post: LeadBelly
-
- Posts: 3956
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1239 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: Match of the Day
Delusion or just banter, take your pick. The former for me....wickdkewlclaret wrote:Why did I just hear Brighton fans singing ‘we’re going to win the league’ after being 2-0 up at the mighty Watford.
They are such a set of tw-ats.
-
- Posts: 11498
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3181 times
- Has Liked: 1865 times
- Contact:
Re: Match of the Day
wickdkewlclaret wrote:Why did I just hear Brighton fans singing ‘we’re going to win the league’ after being 2-0 up at the mighty Watford.
They are such a set of tw-ats.
For the same reason our fans were singing “Manchester City, we’re coming for you”
This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Posts: 3956
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1239 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: Match of the Day
Ours is banter and at least we have finished 7th before and then 7th best for the second half of last season.
Brighton have been bottom half for 2 seasons, lucky not to go down last season and their fan prediction was top ten in the pre season review. Delusional.
Brighton have been bottom half for 2 seasons, lucky not to go down last season and their fan prediction was top ten in the pre season review. Delusional.
Re: Match of the Day
OK.Lord Beamish wrote:That’s clearly not what I said. I said I want VAR to be used to discern if a ‘Keeper has handled the ball out of the box. I also explained why I thought that that was important. Carry on straw-manning me, if you wish, but this is my final word on the matter with you.
The original post I was replying to was asking why VAR wasn't used for that incident. Whether you think they should use it for such incidents is irrelevant, the fact is that they don't.
-
- Posts: 16844
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6951 times
- Has Liked: 1479 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Match of the Day
Brighton fan’s chant was so obviously in jest I don’t know why it’s being debated. They hadn’t won an away game for about 17 years so they were rightly in a jovial mood.
Soton’s goalkeeper kept the ball comfortably inside the box too, his feet left it but the ball was well inside.
Soton’s goalkeeper kept the ball comfortably inside the box too, his feet left it but the ball was well inside.
These 2 users liked this post: wilks_bfc Bosscat
Re: Match of the Day
It’s just a laugh. I’d rather hear that than fans being serious and signing O Burnerley is wonderful, Allez or he’s one of our own. They got off to a flyer at a difficult place to go. They had a great day out and a laugh. Good for them I say.Hibsclaret wrote:Ours is banter and at least we have finished 7th before and then 7th best for the second half of last season.
Brighton have been bottom half for 2 seasons, lucky not to go down last season and their fan prediction was top ten in the pre season review. Delusional.
These 2 users liked this post: Hibsclaret FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2018 12:20 am
- Been Liked: 261 times
- Has Liked: 21 times
Re: Match of the Day
leave them alone, they willl be fine.........................................................in the championshipLongsidebovril wrote:FAO Villa and Norwich. You really don’t have time on the ball to play out of defence like that.
This user liked this post: Bosscat
-
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2018 12:20 am
- Been Liked: 261 times
- Has Liked: 21 times
Re: Match of the Day
sense of humour maybe......just a guessHibsclaret wrote:Delusion or just banter, take your pick. The former for me....
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
Re: Match of the Day
.
Last edited by ClaretAL on Sun Aug 11, 2019 11:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Match of the Day
Tall Paul wrote:Why do you think VAR should have been used in that instance?
They're only using it for goals, penalties and red cards.
Because he was the last defender and could viewed as comiting a foul which the stopped a goal scoring opportunity.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Match of the Day
Banter. Does anybody genuinely believe that they believe they are going to win the league?wickdkewlclaret wrote:Why did I just hear Brighton fans singing ‘we’re going to win the league’ after being 2-0 up at the mighty Watford.
They are such a set of tw-ats.
Of course not. Their fans might overall be a set of cockwombles, but even they have a bit of humour too.
I can't believe anybody would suggest they might be serious.
Re: Match of the Day
Would the "Signing" of 'O Burnerley is wonderful, Allez or he’s one of our own' be for the "hard of hearing" fans thenDyched wrote:It’s just a laugh. I’d rather hear that than fans being serious and signing O Burnerley is wonderful, Allez or he’s one of our own. They got off to a flyer at a difficult place to go. They had a great day out and a laugh. Good for them I say.
Sorry m8 but someone took the p**s out of me typoing portabello in another thread
Re: Match of the Day
Bloody hell when we went 3 up our lot were singing "Manchester City we're coming for you"wickdkewlclaret wrote:Why did I just hear Brighton fans singing ‘we’re going to win the league’ after being 2-0 up at the mighty Watford.
They are such a set of tw-ats.
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1049 times
- Has Liked: 723 times
Re: Match of the Day
I only saw it once on motd but was Barnes ever offside for the wood goal? He looked onside the whole time to me...Tall Paul wrote:Why do you think VAR should have been used in that instance?
They're only using it for goals, penalties and red cards.
They never showed the replay so assume he was off.
-
- Posts: 5864
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1766 times
- Has Liked: 356 times
- Location: The Banana Stand
Re: Match of the Day
Yeah, when the long ball was played he was just offside, but the defender runs in front of him before slipping.
Great call from the linesman
Great call from the linesman
This user liked this post: Tricky Trevor
-
- Posts: 8467
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2461 times
- Has Liked: 1991 times
Re: Match of the Day
Just been covered on Goals On Sunday. Kamara comparing it to Watford player sent off last season for identical incident. He appealed twice and both were denied. He said Adams got away with it cos he touched the ball but he was so high that should be irrelevant. I called it a yellow live but having heard the whistle had already been blown, for Adams handball, it was a red.wilks_bfc wrote:Nope
And they didn’t show the “red card” incident either