Zip Merging
-
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:31 pm
- Been Liked: 96 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Zip Merging
Got stuck in the long tailback on M65 this morning-no problem **** happens-but what annoys me is wagon drivers who think they own the road and know better than every one else blocking the available lanes when the advice given in the Highway Code is to zip merge and use all the available lanes right up to the obstruction and merge-in in turn!
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:19 pm
- Been Liked: 170 times
- Has Liked: 277 times
Re: Zip Merging
i was just on my way to Burnley from Accy at about 10 15, just managed to swing a right before the slip road and head back home, a lot of traffic heading into Accy as well, hope you got through it all eventually corporal.
-
- Posts: 7066
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2240 times
- Has Liked: 1618 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Zip Merging
Pet hate on motorways - drivers who when given 10 miles prior warning to merge coming up to a road works or incident decide they are too important to take note and don't do so until they get to the front - thus causing hold ups that wouldn't otherwise happen.
Last edited by houseboy on Fri Nov 01, 2019 3:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These 6 users liked this post: IanMcL Bosscat Caballo If it be your will elwaclaret Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 9323
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 4843 times
- Has Liked: 947 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Zip Merging
My absolute pet hate is when you approach a merger and cars stop to pull in....use the whole lane and merge without stopping!
This user liked this post: houseboy
-
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:31 pm
- Been Liked: 96 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: Zip Merging
but thats the whole point-the official advice from the Highways Agency is to use all the lanes all the way and merge in turn.houseboy wrote:Pet hate on motorways - drivers who when given 10 miles prior warning to merge coming up to a road works or incident decide they are too important to take note and don't do so until they get to the front - thus causing hold ups that wouldn't otherwise happen.
This user liked this post: BFCmaj
-
- Posts: 7066
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2240 times
- Has Liked: 1618 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Zip Merging
That only works if people use common sense and don't try to get to the front - daft advice really because as we all know people will always want to 'win the race'. North Valley Road is the same in Colne. Heading away from the '65 you always get the d!ckheads trying to beat the queues by driving up the right turn only lane then trying to sneak in. R-souls.corporal jones wrote:but thats the whole point-the official advice from the Highways Agency is to use all the lanes all the way and merge in turn.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:45 pm
- Been Liked: 31 times
- Has Liked: 21 times
Re: Zip Merging
The problem is your average British driver is too territorial and drives far too close to the vehicle in front. If drivers left enough room in front of them, zip merging would work perfectly.
I don’t get this obsession with queuing unnecessarily. I also wonder is people realise that if a queue is twice as long as it needs to be (because Steady Eddie is stopping people using the half mile left until the cone taper),that other roads that would otherwise be unaffected get gridlocked as well.
I don’t get this obsession with queuing unnecessarily. I also wonder is people realise that if a queue is twice as long as it needs to be (because Steady Eddie is stopping people using the half mile left until the cone taper),that other roads that would otherwise be unaffected get gridlocked as well.
-
- Posts: 3106
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:46 pm
- Been Liked: 1132 times
- Has Liked: 302 times
- Location: Melbourne, Australia.
Re: Zip Merging
That is the most stupid advice ever. The rule is, merge early. This would then avoid anyone needing to stop to let in those who go right up to the cones before forcing their way in, thus creating the queue they think they are avoiding. The truck blocking that lane is actually speeding up the traffic. But we all know it’s more important that you get to the front rather than merge early.corporal jones wrote:Got stuck in the long tailback on M65 this morning-no problem **** happens-but what annoys me is wagon drivers who think they own the road and know better than every one else blocking the available lanes when the advice given in the Highway Code is to zip merge and use all the available lanes right up to the obstruction and merge-in in turn!
This user liked this post: IanMcL
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Zip Merging
You're just making the queue longer by merging earlier, it's no faster. It is more efficient to use the whole road available and merge in turn (zip merge) to reduce the tailback.RammyClaret61 wrote:That is the most stupid advice ever. The rule is, merge early. This would then avoid anyone needing to stop to let in those who go right up to the cones before forcing their way in, thus creating the queue they think they are avoiding. The truck blocking that lane is actually speeding up the traffic. But we all know it’s more important that you get to the front rather than merge early.
Brits in general have a poor grasp of zip merging.
If everyone actually knew how to zip merge no one would stop moving to allow it to happen.
These 2 users liked this post: Rick_Muller BFCmaj
Re: Zip Merging
If both lanes are moving, then 'zip merging' as stated, would work.
However, on our roads, you join a queue of stationary traffic and remain stationary forever.
Why?
Because the tossers who think they can just carry on right to the cones and push in, ahead of the patient lane queuers!!!!!
I applaud the lorry drivers who hold up the traffic trying to beat the queue.
I do the blocking myself on occasion. It relies on the car behind to leave my gap (usually ok) and the idiots not to try and squeeze through gravel and other detritus, to get ahead. Some take huge risks for little purpose.
However, on our roads, you join a queue of stationary traffic and remain stationary forever.
Why?
Because the tossers who think they can just carry on right to the cones and push in, ahead of the patient lane queuers!!!!!
I applaud the lorry drivers who hold up the traffic trying to beat the queue.
I do the blocking myself on occasion. It relies on the car behind to leave my gap (usually ok) and the idiots not to try and squeeze through gravel and other detritus, to get ahead. Some take huge risks for little purpose.
-
- Posts: 6142
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2635 times
- Has Liked: 6464 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Zip Merging
Anyone who blocks is a knob in my eyes (apologies IanMcL) logic and common sense dictate what deano posted above and if more people just slowed down and merged in turn there would be no need to block
-
- Posts: 1489
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 343 times
- Has Liked: 195 times
Re: Zip Merging
Whilst I do think that zip merging can work this has to be used in conjunction with road signs and amount of traffic on the road.
Normally I join the inside lane early as that is the lane that you should be in at all times unless overtaking. I have at times due to the traffic on the road gone right to the end and have in turn merged. Sometimes it works pretty much as the gif above but most of the time someone has to slow down or even stop to let you in which as we know cause a concertina effect all the way back. Far better to find an opportune moment without making people brake earlier in my book but as king as it is safe who cares?
Normally I join the inside lane early as that is the lane that you should be in at all times unless overtaking. I have at times due to the traffic on the road gone right to the end and have in turn merged. Sometimes it works pretty much as the gif above but most of the time someone has to slow down or even stop to let you in which as we know cause a concertina effect all the way back. Far better to find an opportune moment without making people brake earlier in my book but as king as it is safe who cares?
-
- Posts: 8528
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2889 times
- Has Liked: 1763 times
Re: Zip Merging
never even heard of that term, zip merging ? is it some daft americanism ?
Re: Zip Merging
I believe it comes from New Zealand where there are road signs that say merge like a zip and you can be fined for not doing it.Wile E Coyote wrote:never even heard of that term, zip merging ? is it some daft americanism ?
Edit,
Just checked and it did originate in America, but signs are in New Zealand.
-
- Posts: 838
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:55 pm
- Been Liked: 246 times
- Has Liked: 118 times
Re: Zip Merging
The traffic lights by the BMW showroom means that traffic has to stop, irrespective of what the Highway Code recommends, the right hand lane is marked for turning right for most of its length.houseboy wrote:That only works if people use common sense and don't try to get to the front - daft advice really because as we all know people will always want to 'win the race'. North Valley Road is the same in Colne. Heading away from the '65 you always get the d!ckheads trying to beat the queues by driving up the right turn only lane then trying to sneak in. R-souls.
-
- Posts: 3106
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:46 pm
- Been Liked: 1132 times
- Has Liked: 302 times
- Location: Melbourne, Australia.
Re: Zip Merging
But if everyone merged well in advance, no one would need to slowdown for anyone. Traffic would flow almost normally. But there will always be knobs going to the cones thinking they’re clever and beating the queue, when I reality they’re causing it.Rick_Muller wrote:Anyone who blocks is a knob in my eyes (apologies IanMcL) logic and common sense dictate what deano posted above and if more people just slowed down and merged in turn there would be no need to block
Edit: zip merging works really well in a graphic, get humans involved and you’ve no chance.
-
- Posts: 9474
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1185 times
- Has Liked: 779 times
Re: Zip Merging
You are right that RHS lane is intended for that purpose doesn’t stop people cutting in though if you leave gaps, the Highway Code in the main does make sense & I try to stick to it, you get some people religiously sticking to it without sometimes ignoring it & doing what’s practical in the given circumstances. That particular lane was being used as a shortcut for people not necessarily going into colne but wanting to join the LHS lane but couldn’t in heavy tailbacks & further on at the roundabout traffic lights were introduced due to that reason, the increased traffic using that route shortcutting albeit a longer route but saving time.yorkyclaret wrote:The traffic lights by the BMW showroom means that traffic has to stop, irrespective of what the Highway Code recommends, the right hand lane is marked for turning right for most of its length.
Re: Zip Merging
I only popped into this thread because I have a knackered rucksack, I'd better leave just as quickly as I came.Wile E Coyote wrote:never even heard of that term, zip merging ? is it some daft americanism ?
Re: Zip Merging
I block when the traffic is static, not when both lanes are moving and merging, which is ideal. I refuse to sit in a lane and watch a thousand cars sail pass, while my lane doesn't move!Rick_Muller wrote:Anyone who blocks is a knob in my eyes (apologies IanMcL) logic and common sense dictate what deano posted above and if more people just slowed down and merged in turn there would be no need to block
-
- Posts: 9474
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1185 times
- Has Liked: 779 times
Re: Zip Merging
It's normal to do so, I watched the merge clip graphic on this thread, when on the road things are different & replicating what should happen & what doesn't happen doesn't mirror, people have targets to hit when driving, different levels of experience driver to driver, in today's driving there's no perfect way of driving. I've noticed when people get frustrated stuck in queues when I've had my window down I've smelt the aroma of cannabis & more & more drivers are sparking up spliffs driving is becoming that stressful.IanMcL wrote:I block when the traffic is static, not when both lanes are moving and merging, which is ideal. I refuse to sit in a lane and watch a thousand cars sail pass, while my lane doesn't move!
Last edited by Jakubclaret on Sat Nov 02, 2019 8:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6142
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2635 times
- Has Liked: 6464 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Zip Merging
That’s the problem though, I’ve experienced the extremes of both and in my opinion the traffic moves faster and better when it’s merge in turn and people do it slowly and carefully. All that happens when you get a stationary lane with people who then proceed to block is incite the need to get in front at all costs which then perpetuates the animosity and makes things worse. I’ve reported HGVs who have blocked the 2 outside lanes previously and on one occasion the police intervened and cautioned them as far as I know.IanMcL wrote:I block when the traffic is static, not when both lanes are moving and merging, which is ideal. I refuse to sit in a lane and watch a thousand cars sail pass, while my lane doesn't move!
All it takes is a little consideration on all parts
-
- Posts: 10328
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3342 times
- Has Liked: 1964 times
Re: Zip Merging
I’d give an MBE to each and everyone of them.corporal jones wrote:Got stuck in the long tailback on M65 this morning-no problem **** happens-but what annoys me is wagon drivers who think they own the road and know better than every one else blocking the available lanes when the advice given in the Highway Code is to zip merge and use all the available lanes right up to the obstruction and merge-in in turn!
This user liked this post: If it be your will
-
- Posts: 12373
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5210 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: Zip Merging
A reduction in the difference in speeds between the two lanes: without the urgency to move over, the traffic is travelling at roughly the same speed in both lanes, making the merge easier and safer.
The length of queue is reduced by up to 50%, which is critical in areas where you find junctions and slip roads.
When nobody has a perceived advantage, the potential for ‘road rage’ is reduced significantly.
That's fine.
The reason why this does not work on the M6 /M5 is that often, the two lanes are not equal and travelling together. One is static and the other virtually empty...except for the cars who insist on gaining the half mile, at the expense of those there first.
There is no issue with moving traffic. It is a jam and jumping the queue, which has to be stopped.
When there is less traffic, the merging works fine.
The length of queue is reduced by up to 50%, which is critical in areas where you find junctions and slip roads.
When nobody has a perceived advantage, the potential for ‘road rage’ is reduced significantly.
That's fine.
The reason why this does not work on the M6 /M5 is that often, the two lanes are not equal and travelling together. One is static and the other virtually empty...except for the cars who insist on gaining the half mile, at the expense of those there first.
There is no issue with moving traffic. It is a jam and jumping the queue, which has to be stopped.
When there is less traffic, the merging works fine.
Re: Zip Merging
Its always a problem when some "Foreskin" jams the bloody system up thoughWile E Coyote wrote:never even heard of that term, zip merging ? is it some daft americanism ?
-
- Posts: 7066
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2240 times
- Has Liked: 1618 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Zip Merging
My point entirely bud. People driving up a clearly marked right hand lane only to try to push in at the front. Makes a bad situation even worse.yorkyclaret wrote:The traffic lights by the BMW showroom means that traffic has to stop, irrespective of what the Highway Code recommends, the right hand lane is marked for turning right for most of its length.
-
- Posts: 7066
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2240 times
- Has Liked: 1618 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Zip Merging
As I said bud in a perfect world it would be great but it isn't and there are always the d!cks who will wait till the last minute then stop the traffic as they wait to push in. Blending earlier would definitely make it better as then you would have a a (more or less) single lane of traffic all driving at the same speed instead of having to slow down/stop to let people in. It stands to reason. On a normal road single lane traffic works fine under normal circumstances and the same principal is at work on motorways...blending earlier would workdeanothedino wrote:You're just making the queue longer by merging earlier, it's no faster. It is more efficient to use the whole road available and merge in turn (zip merge) to reduce the tailback.
Brits in general have a poor grasp of zip merging.
If everyone actually knew how to zip merge no one would stop moving to allow it to happen.
-
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:12 am
- Been Liked: 500 times
- Has Liked: 509 times
Re: Zip Merging
Yep, I'm with you. All this talk of zip merging etc is a thin disguise for "I want to get in front of all the lesser beings because I'm more important".IanMcL wrote:If both lanes are moving, then 'zip merging' as stated, would work.
However, on our roads, you join a queue of stationary traffic and remain stationary forever.
Why?
Because the tossers who think they can just carry on right to the cones and push in, ahead of the patient lane queuers!!!!!
I applaud the lorry drivers who hold up the traffic trying to beat the queue.
I do the blocking myself on occasion. It relies on the car behind to leave my gap (usually ok) and the idiots not to try and squeeze through gravel and other detritus, to get ahead. Some take huge risks for little purpose.
Those blocking the lanes (i.e. me sometimes) travel at the same speed as the other lane - about 1mph until someone's brave enough stop all those pushing in - thus creating perfect conditions for an orderly and fair zip merge.
This user liked this post: IanMcL
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Zip Merging
Still, no. 'Blending' early increases the tailback. If everyone uses every available lane, as long as it is available and merges in turn then traffic will flow better and the impact of the tailback will be minimised.You shouldn't have to stop to let people in as you should be leaving adequate space. All you are doing is causing people to be unable to see why everyone is in one lane driving at the same speed because the tailback is 5 miles long.houseboy wrote:As I said bud in a perfect world it would be great but it isn't and there are always the d!cks who will wait till the last minute then stop the traffic as they wait to push in. Blending earlier would definitely make it better as then you would have a a (more or less) single lane of traffic all driving at the same speed instead of having to slow down/stop to let people in. It stands to reason. On a normal road single lane traffic works fine under normal circumstances and the same principal is at work on motorways...blending earlier would work
Is it the d!cks merging last minute or is it the d!cks who don't let people merge that are the problem?
I would agree that people who fly down the 3rd lane and then want to get in are an issue, but driving at a sensible speed and merging in turn is actually helpful.
-
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:12 am
- Been Liked: 500 times
- Has Liked: 509 times
Re: Zip Merging
That said, much that I dislike those screaming to the front to push in, I think I dislike those that slow down and give a friendly flash to wave them in just before the cones even more. Come on! At least try and stop them getting away with it!
This user liked this post: houseboy
-
- Posts: 7066
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2240 times
- Has Liked: 1618 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Zip Merging
I don't let them in and a few years ago one guy was so insistent on pushing in I actually just kept going (I think he was more proud of his car than I was) and he eventually went through the cones and had to stop. The look on his face was absolutely priceless.If it be your will wrote:That said, much that I dislike those screaming to the front to push in, I think I dislike those that slow down and give a friendly flash to wave them in just before the cones even more. Come on! At least try and stop them getting away with it!
This user liked this post: If it be your will
-
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:12 am
- Been Liked: 500 times
- Has Liked: 509 times
Re: Zip Merging
Provided the tailback is not so long it's blocking the previous junction, it makes absolutely no difference what length the queue is. I'm not interested in a queue's length, just the time required to get through it. Merging early reduces this.deanothedino wrote:Still, no. 'Blending' early increases the tailback. If everyone uses every available lane, as long as it is available and merges in turn then traffic will flow better and the impact of the tailback will be minimised.You shouldn't have to stop to let people in as you should be leaving adequate space. All you are doing is causing people to be unable to see why everyone is in one lane driving at the same speed because the tailback is 5 miles long.
Is it the d!cks merging last minute or is it the d!cks who don't let people merge that are the problem?
I would agree that people who fly down the 3rd lane and then want to get in are an issue, but driving at a sensible speed and merging in turn is actually helpful.
-
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:12 am
- Been Liked: 500 times
- Has Liked: 509 times
Re: Zip Merging
Brilliant!houseboy wrote:I don't let them in and a few years ago one guy was so insistent on pushing in I actually just kept going (I think he was more proud of his car than I was) and he eventually went through the cones and had to stop. The look on his face was absolutely priceless.
-
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:12 am
- Been Liked: 500 times
- Has Liked: 509 times
Re: Zip Merging
Driving in the empty lane at the same speed as the full lane creates the perfect conditions for this, that's why the moment someone does it, the whole thing flows better.Devils_Advocate wrote:https://www.rac.co.uk/drive/advice/driv ... p-merging/
Re: Zip Merging
Using all lanes to que (and Zip merging) is the safer method, causes less potential problems with junctions behind and under no circumstances is it slower to everyone to get through. Its also the recommend way following the highway code.
If people actually followed it, it wouldn't be seen as unfair either, as the two lanes would quickly even out in length, and reduce at the same distance, its this insistence in joining the long que and then getting annoyed at people driving past that's wrong.
If people actually followed it, it wouldn't be seen as unfair either, as the two lanes would quickly even out in length, and reduce at the same distance, its this insistence in joining the long que and then getting annoyed at people driving past that's wrong.
These 2 users liked this post: deanothedino BFCmaj
-
- Posts: 7066
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2240 times
- Has Liked: 1618 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Zip Merging
Agreed but the whole problem with it is that people DON'T work that way, if they did it would be fine. I'm not talking about the basic idea, which is great, but the fact that many will just not do it and therefore it doesn't work, only in principle. Until we can find a way of educating those who think their time is more important than anyone else's there are always going to be problems.SonofPog wrote:Using all lanes to que (and Zip merging) is the safer method, causes less potential problems with junctions behind and under no circumstances is it slower to everyone to get through. Its also the recommend way following the highway code.
If people actually followed it, it wouldn't be seen as unfair either, as the two lanes would quickly even out in length, and reduce at the same distance, its this insistence in joining the long que and then getting annoyed at people driving past that's wrong.
-
- Posts: 12373
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5210 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: Zip Merging
But if both lanes are used to the merge point both lanes go at the same pace and the whole thing flows better right up to the roadworks.If it be your will wrote:Driving in the empty lane at the same speed as the full lane creates the perfect conditions for this, that's why the moment someone does it, the whole thing flows better.
All the slow car in the outside lane is doing is moving the problem further back down the road (they become the artificial roadworks) cos as the traffic slows down people will start moving into the queue earlier until the outside lane is again going faster than the inside lane (albeit a lot further back than it was before the numpty blocked the outside lane).
What then happens is another car sticks themselves out in the outside lane and repeats the whole process even further back. Simplest and most effective way is to have both lanes full and as both lanes approach they merge they will smoothly slow down and merge into one
-
- Posts: 12373
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5210 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: Zip Merging
Youre missing the point completely. The ones not doing it right and who need education are the ones who move in to early and dont use both lanes creating the situation where someone can fly up the outside and jump the queuehouseboy wrote:Agreed but the whole problem with it is that people DON'T work that way, if they did it would be fine. I'm not talking about the basic idea, which is great, but the fact that many will just not do it and therefore it doesn't work, only in principle. Until we can find a way of educating those who think their time is more important than anyone else's there are always going to be problems.
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:45 pm
- Been Liked: 31 times
- Has Liked: 21 times
Re: Zip Merging
Those talking about fairness and queue jumping... I presume you never overtake anything on the motorway? It is queue jumping after all.
-
- Posts: 7066
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2240 times
- Has Liked: 1618 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Zip Merging
Sorry mate i don't agree totally. The ones who fly up the outside lanes to the front will do that anyway, regardless of what others do. Some people will just not queue or adhere to rules.Devils_Advocate wrote:Youre missing the point completely. The ones not doing it right and who need education are the ones who move in to early and dont use both lanes creating the situation where someone can fly up the outside and jump the queue
PS I'm getting a sneaky little cheeky feeling that some are defending it because they are maybe the ones who fly to the front. I could be wrong of course.
-
- Posts: 9474
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1185 times
- Has Liked: 779 times
Re: Zip Merging
"they will smoothly slow down and merge into one"Devils_Advocate wrote:But if both lanes are used to the merge point both lanes go at the same pace and the whole thing flows better right up to the roadworks.
All the slow car in the outside lane is doing is moving the problem further back down the road (they become the artificial roadworks) cos as the traffic slows down people will start moving into the queue earlier until the outside lane is again going faster than the inside lane (albeit a lot further back than it was before the numpty blocked the outside lane).
What then happens is another car sticks themselves out in the outside lane and repeats the whole process even further back. Simplest and most effective way is to have both lanes full and as both lanes approach they merge they will smoothly slow down and merge into one
Good luck with that 1 if you expect that to happen, you are dealing with so many variables in terms of driver to driver experiences, I've been on the road for years & always expect the unexpected, people will automatically do whatever is easiest for them at any given time without hesitating.
This user liked this post: houseboy
-
- Posts: 7066
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2240 times
- Has Liked: 1618 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Zip Merging
I think that is one of the worst analogies I have seen in quite some time. On a free flowing motorway there is no queue to jump, it is what it is, free flowing. A queue is where there is a definite waiting point or point of reduction, a bottleneck so to speak. That causes a queue.The Quattro wrote:Those talking about fairness and queue jumping... I presume you never overtake anything on the motorway? It is queue jumping after all.
-
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:12 am
- Been Liked: 500 times
- Has Liked: 509 times
Re: Zip Merging
You mean the one in the empty lane, the one that is choosing to travel at the same speed as the other lane, thus creating the perfect conditions for merging everywhere, should do this right up to the point of the the obstruction, in order to fully maximise all the available capacity?Devils_Advocate wrote:But if both lanes are used to the merge point both lanes go at the same pace and the whole thing flows better right up to the roadworks.
All the slow car in the outside lane is doing is moving the problem further back down the road (they become the artificial roadworks) cos as the traffic slows down people will start moving into the queue earlier until the outside lane is again going faster than the inside lane (albeit a lot further back than it was before the numpty blocked the outside lane).
What then happens is another car sticks themselves out in the outside lane and repeats the whole process even further back. Simplest and most effective way is to have both lanes full and as both lanes approach they merge they will smoothly slow down and merge into one
Yes I agree. That's why I do it, yes.
Re: Zip Merging
Somebody gets it!If it be your will wrote:Yep, I'm with you. All this talk of zip merging etc is a thin disguise for "I want to get in front of all the lesser beings because I'm more important".
Those blocking the lanes (i.e. me sometimes) travel at the same speed as the other lane - about 1mph until someone's brave enough stop all those pushing in - thus creating perfect conditions for an orderly and fair zip merge.
The key is to get both lanes moving, not one stationary and the other with a lot of cars all merging at the end. That just produces a 10 to 1 ratio of zipping and no zip I ever owned, fastened like that!
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:45 pm
- Been Liked: 31 times
- Has Liked: 21 times
Re: Zip Merging
Our motorways are one massive queue these days. Don’t know if you’ve noticed.houseboy wrote:I think that is one of the worst analogies I have seen in quite some time. On a free flowing motorway there is no queue to jump, it is what it is, free flowing. A queue is where there is a definite waiting point or point of reduction, a bottleneck so to speak. That causes a queue.
As I said earlier, British drivers are too territorial. I prefer to make progress safely. If there is still half a mile of lane left, why not use it? Use the full capacity of the road and people wouldn’t be able to “fly” up to the cone taper because the lane will be occupied by vehicles travelling at a slower speed, thereby reducing the speed differential and making everything flow a little better.
Moving early is fine, moving too early creates this situation where people have the opportunity to “fly” up the lane.
-
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:12 am
- Been Liked: 500 times
- Has Liked: 509 times
Re: Zip Merging
So you think those staying in their lane, in a manner that reduces the speed differential between the lanes, and not merging too early, are doing exactly the right thing, then.The Quattro wrote:Our motorways are one massive queue these days. Don’t know if you’ve noticed.
As I said earlier, British drivers are too territorial. I prefer to make progress safely. If there is still half a mile of lane left, why not use it? Use the full capacity of the road and people wouldn’t be able to “fly” up to the cone taper because the lane will be occupied by vehicles travelling at a slower speed, thereby reducing the speed differential and making everything flow a little better.
Moving early is fine, moving too early creates this situation where people have the opportunity to “fly” up the lane.
I do, too.
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:45 pm
- Been Liked: 31 times
- Has Liked: 21 times
Re: Zip Merging
Depends entirely on the conditions. If it’s done correctly, no issue. If it’s some inordinate distance down the road, thereby unreasonably restricting the capacity of the road, it is unnecessary obstruction of the highway.If it be your will wrote:So you think those staying in their lane, in a manner that reduces the speed differential between the lanes, and not merging too early, are doing exactly the right thing, then.
I do, too.
-
- Posts: 12373
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5210 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: Zip Merging
I am not sure where you are going with these accusations on my characterhouseboy wrote:Sorry mate i don't agree totally. The ones who fly up the outside lanes to the front will do that anyway, regardless of what others do. Some people will just not queue or adhere to rules.
PS I'm getting a sneaky little cheeky feeling that some are defending it because they are maybe the ones who fly to the front. I could be wrong of course.
Seriously though if everyone fills both lanes and they are both going at the same speed there is absolutely no opportunity for anyone to sneak up the outside and push in
-
- Posts: 12373
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5210 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: Zip Merging
But if you all hadn't moved into the inside lane to early and stayed in the outside lane until the roadworks they would never be an empty lane.If it be your will wrote:You mean the one in the empty lane, the one that is choosing to travel at the same speed as the other lane, thus creating the perfect conditions for merging everywhere, should do this right up to the point of the the obstruction, in order to fully maximise all the available capacity?
Yes I agree. That's why I do it, yes.
What you are doing by going slowly in the empty lane is what would happen naturally without you if everyone just filled up both lanes
-
- Posts: 7066
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2240 times
- Has Liked: 1618 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Zip Merging
But if they all go at the same speed doesn't that somewhat negate the 'zipping' (what a good word by the way)?Devils_Advocate wrote:I am not sure where you are going with these accusations on my character
Seriously though if everyone fills both lanes and they are both going at the same speed there is absolutely no opportunity for anyone to sneak up the outside and push in
*This is an interesting argument but we aren't getting anywhere. (See what I did then?)