https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SSdXtDjM4lICombatClaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 18, 2020 3:36 pmBecause they write for The Mail...
They have official duties to perform, but If these are reported on they're attention seeking?
British Press: "Why don't you both f*ck off!"
{they announce they're f*cking off to live a quiet life]
British Press: "How dare you f*ck off!"
Laurence Fox
-
- Posts: 8310
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2949 times
- Has Liked: 2063 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Laurence Fox
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 826 times
Re: Laurence Fox
Like an idiot...claretandy wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 9:39 amHe's well worth a follow, sticking it to the painfully woke brigade.
"It's so easy to throw the charge of racism at everybody and it's really starting to get boring now. I can't help what I am, I was born like this, it's an immutable characteristic, to call me a white-priviliged male is to be racist."
Unintelligent pub-bore spouts hypocritical shite on Question Time, unintelligent general population proclaim him their moronic Champion.
"Yeah, calling someone white is racist now, we win and we can be as racist as we want because we've successfully reduced it the ridiculous."
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 826 times
Re: Laurence Fox
She brought it on herself?CombatClaret wrote: ↑Sat Jan 18, 2020 11:58 amCalling out thing's that aren't there, like these?
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/el ... ards-royal
Pushy and aggressive are not racist terms, but a long running orchestrated smear of one woman who is black while you treat the white woman in the same role as above reproach. That looks racist.
She deserves it for ______?
She shouldn't have _______?
Anybody who thinks Meghan Markle's treatment by the press is anything but racism is as stupid as Laurence Fox.
Meghan Markle did everything expected of her for two years and it drove her up the wall and she was vilified in the press anyway.
Like any normal person with a speck of self-worth and ambition she's had enough of being a parasitic freeloader.
Walking away from this sham spectacle of inherited privilege in the 21st Century is the best and only decent thing anyone in the royal family has ever done.
She's left the rest of them looking like the demented old fools that they are and shown up the population as a servile, cap-doffing bunch of plebs who'd rather flog a bolted horse than actually look into the accusations of a rich men's grooming gang involving Prince Andrew.
and Prince Andrew?SussexDon1inIreland wrote: ↑Sat Jan 18, 2020 6:36 pmThe Pakistani Muslim gangs that have raped our children for the last 30 years (their not Asian by the way) should have been charged with Hate Crime and that should have been added to their crimes, meanwhile its coming out that the "Authorities" the police and the social services and Gordon Brown all turned a blind eye in case it caused Hate Crime in retribution, but those convicted have not.
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Laurence Fox
Told you he's triggered all the usual suspects.Claret-On-A-T-Rex wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 10:03 amLike an idiot...
"It's so easy to throw the charge of racism at everybody and it's really starting to get boring now. I can't help what I am, I was born like this, it's an immutable characteristic, to call me a white-priviliged male is to be racist."
Unintelligent pub-bore spouts hypocritical shite on Question Time, unintelligent general population proclaim him their moronic Champion.
"Yeah, calling someone white is racist now, we win and we can be as racist as we want because we've successfully reduced it the ridiculous."
These 2 users liked this post: Damo jrtod61
Re: Laurence Fox
Hopefully the police will be able to investigate "a rich man's grooming gang involving Prince Andrew" without being labelled as racist by the bed wetters
This user liked this post: jrtod61
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 826 times
Re: Laurence Fox
Not for long.
This thread, the argument, the messages and the posters contributing to it aren't worthy of my continued input, as your pathetic "told you so" post ably demonstrates.
-
- Posts: 8069
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3060 times
- Has Liked: 5023 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Laurence Fox
Like all snowflakes you think all racists are white. Imo Abbott is one of the biggest racists around.Claret-On-A-T-Rex wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 10:03 amLike an idiot...
"It's so easy to throw the charge of racism at everybody and it's really starting to get boring now. I can't help what I am, I was born like this, it's an immutable characteristic, to call me a white-priviliged male is to be racist."
Unintelligent pub-bore spouts hypocritical shite on Question Time, unintelligent general population proclaim him their moronic Champion.
"Yeah, calling someone white is racist now, we win and we can be as racist as we want because we've successfully reduced it the ridiculous."
Like all snowflakes the only opinion that counts, is one that agrees with you.
I hate racism, but like most people I'm getting bored of the constant racism claims that are nothing but media, snowflake inspired bullshit. Its as if there is a competition to show who is the most anti racist, by looking for racism everywhere, even where it doesn't exist.
I don't have to prove my anti racism to anybody, I do it everyday by treating everyone the same. If only the snowflakes could treat everybody the same we wouldn't need these threads.
This user liked this post: jrtod61
Re: Laurence Fox
Meghan Markle isn't even black. Okay she's dark skinned and has heritage. But if, for example, I had to describe her as a missing person I'd say she was dark/Olive skinned with a Mediterranean appearance. I find all this person of colour business a bit convenient and her ethnicity label tenuous at best.
-
- Posts: 3077
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 707 times
- Has Liked: 618 times
Re: Laurence Fox
******* hell - don;t have an apoplectic fit! I'm not sure how you are qualified to judge racism - how on earth is Abbott racist?Colburn_Claret wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 11:04 amLike all snowflakes you think all racists are white. Imo Abbott is one of the biggest racists around.
Like all snowflakes the only opinion that counts, is one that agrees with you.
I hate racism, but like most people I'm getting bored of the constant racism claims that are nothing but media, snowflake inspired bullshit. Its as if there is a competition to show who is the most anti racist, by looking for racism everywhere, even where it doesn't exist.
I don't have to prove my anti racism to anybody, I do it everyday by treating everyone the same. If only the snowflakes could treat everybody the same we wouldn't need these threads.
-
- Posts: 12345
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5202 times
- Has Liked: 920 times
Re: Laurence Fox
Colburn_Claret wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 11:04 amLike all snowflakes you think all racists are white. Imo Abbott is one of the biggest racists around.
Like all snowflakes the only opinion that counts, is one that agrees with you.
I hate racism, but like most people I'm getting bored of the constant racism claims that are nothing but media, snowflake inspired bullshit. Its as if there is a competition to show who is the most anti racist, by looking for racism everywhere, even where it doesn't exist.
I don't have to prove my anti racism to anybody, I do it everyday by treating everyone the same. If only the snowflakes could treat everybody the same we wouldn't need these threads.
Re: Laurence Fox
Claret-On-A-T-Rex wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 10:48 amNot for long.
This thread, the argument, the messages and the posters contributing to it aren't worthy of my continued input, as your pathetic "told you so" post ably demonstrates.
This user liked this post: burnleymik
-
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1768 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Laurence Fox
Interesting that Combat Claret has outed himself as the most racist person on this thread.
He’s fallen into the trap of “you’re white so your views on racism aren’t worth as much as those of a black person”.
That in itself is racist.
He’s fallen into the trap of “you’re white so your views on racism aren’t worth as much as those of a black person”.
That in itself is racist.
These 2 users liked this post: Damo jrtod61
-
- Posts: 3748
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
- Been Liked: 927 times
- Has Liked: 716 times
Re: Laurence Fox
Isn't that the truth...
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:33 pm
- Been Liked: 49 times
- Has Liked: 5 times
Re: Laurence Fox
Why don’t we all just ignore all this and focus on football . We are losing our minds with it all .
Oh hang on I’ve just done what I’m suggesting we don’t do . See it’s made me mad .
Oh hang on I’ve just done what I’m suggesting we don’t do . See it’s made me mad .
-
- Posts: 4381
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1825 times
- Has Liked: 929 times
Re: Laurence Fox
The most valuable opinions are often from people with experience.arise_sir_charge wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 12:05 pmInteresting that Combat Claret has outed himself as the most racist person on this thread.
He’s fallen into the trap of “you’re white so your views on racism aren’t worth as much as those of a black person”.
That in itself is racist.
This is why I value Dyche's opinion on if Vyrda should play over anyone's on this board.
That's not racist it's prioritizing context and experience, many on here have neither.
-
- Posts: 3748
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
- Been Liked: 927 times
- Has Liked: 716 times
Re: Laurence Fox
You're absolutely right. Laurence Fox's lived experience should not be discounted lightly.CombatClaret wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 2:20 pmThe most valuable opinions are often from people with experience.
-
- Posts: 4381
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1825 times
- Has Liked: 929 times
Re: Laurence Fox
Experience of what, white male western privilege?thatdberight wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 2:42 pmYou're absolutely right. Laurence Fox's lived experience should not be discounted lightly.
-
- Posts: 3748
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
- Been Liked: 927 times
- Has Liked: 716 times
Re: Laurence Fox
That's not how he seems to see this particular issue. I'm sorry, you seemed to be suggesting that we should accept people's perception and their "lived experience". Is that not what you meant?
-
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:12 am
- Been Liked: 500 times
- Has Liked: 509 times
Re: Laurence Fox
If you are born in BB10, attend a chaotic, overcrowded primary school, with your parent(s) on a zero-hour contract, graduate to 3rd-rate secondary school, get shunted onto a pointless college course you were promised would be useful but turned out to be completely useless, then working a zero-hour job yourself, without any realistic prospect of owning a nice house, only to be told by affluent liberals you are actually in receipt of an unfair privilege on account of being born white, and that you are actually perpetuating such white privilege by getting annoyed in response, might be somewhat irritating.
It's a rich vein for the far-right to tap into. And they do. Very successfully.
It's a rich vein for the far-right to tap into. And they do. Very successfully.
This user liked this post: jrtod61
-
- Posts: 4381
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1825 times
- Has Liked: 929 times
Re: Laurence Fox
Now says the inclusion of a Sikh solider in the film 1917 was 'incongrous' and 'forcing diversity on people'.
Despite Indian and Sikh troops serving on the Western Front from 1914 and many examples exist of them fighting in regiments or groups that were not exclusivly Sikh.
He's basically the new media go to dog whistle guy.
Despite Indian and Sikh troops serving on the Western Front from 1914 and many examples exist of them fighting in regiments or groups that were not exclusivly Sikh.
He's basically the new media go to dog whistle guy.
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Laurence Fox
He's a **** but very, very useful in getting our usual set of right-wing, gobshite arseholes out into the open again. All present and correct.
Well played, that man.
Well played, that man.
-
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:26 pm
- Been Liked: 153 times
- Has Liked: 94 times
Re: Laurence Fox
How very profound eddie. So, Lawrence Fox is a ****, and anyone who may believe his argument may have had some validity, is a 'Gobshite arsehole.'
You must come and join my debating society, we're always on the lookout for such insightful, measured voices.
You must come and join my debating society, we're always on the lookout for such insightful, measured voices.
Re: Laurence Fox
Hes triggered another one of the bed wetters I see
This user liked this post: claretandy
-
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:26 pm
- Been Liked: 153 times
- Has Liked: 94 times
Re: Laurence Fox
Triggered?' Is this a new term the youngsters are using nowadays? Care to explain sonny?
-
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1768 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Laurence Fox
More evidence of my earlier point, Combat is the list racist person on this thread.
He can’t even see it in himself.
He cites white privilege and essentially works on the assumption that if you’re white you’ve not experienced racism.
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Laurence Fox
The tolerant leftie luvvies are at it again I see. If you are a white male who’s doing reasonable in life then you are automatically the bottom of the pile according to the social warriors.
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Laurence Fox
BigRedrose wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 9:03 pmHow very profound eddie. So, Lawrence Fox is a ****, and anyone who may believe his argument may have had some validity, is a 'Gobshite arsehole.'
You must come and join my debating society, we're always on the lookout for such insightful, measured voices.
Yes.
Yes.
Er, no thanks, I'll let you hold your maths debates on your own.
-
- Posts: 5500
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2317 times
- Has Liked: 1399 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Re: Laurence Fox
There really is no hope for some of the left wing idiots on this thread. I am glad the silent majority spoke and decimated you in the latest election. Long may it continue.
*From a white privileged male *
*From a white privileged male *
-
- Posts: 4381
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1825 times
- Has Liked: 929 times
Re: Laurence Fox
Of course white people can experience racism, anyone can.arise_sir_charge wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 9:24 pmMore evidence of my earlier point, Combat is the list racist person on this thread.
He can’t even see it in himself.
He cites white privilege and essentially works on the assumption that if you’re white you’ve not experienced racism.
What we don't have is the long history of societal and sometimes institutionalized racism that people of color have had to endure for a long, long time. Racism so minor and ingrained due to our European colonialist history it might not even be recognized by some, regarding ourselfs as the normal and everyone else as the 'other'. At the same time being blind to the passive advantages that white people may not recognize they have.
So I find it very hard when large number of white people try to take ownership of the debate and dictate terms from a position of ignorance.
This user liked this post: AndrewJB
Re: Laurence Fox
That, I think, is the crux of your problem. Why do you think that we should be split into "normal" and "other"? People are just people, regardless of skin colour. "Normal" has a much wider range than you are giving it. I know there are a lot of people who want to perpetuate the differences between white and black; but I think it's time we moved on. As Martin Luther King was hoping, that his children could be judged on the content of their character rather than the colour of their skin; we can't get there until these "normal and other" prejudices are cleared.CombatClaret wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 10:50 pm... regarding ourselfs as the normal and everyone else as the 'other'. ...
How about we just treat people as people for a trial period, instead of arguing for a sort of cultural apartheid? Special awards categories for black people?
At the extreme you reach idiocies like Bristol University cancelling a proposed performance of Aida because they hadn't enough black people to play the slaves. Supposedly because they were anti-racist, though in practice because they were too stupid to realise they were being pro-racist.
Re: Laurence Fox
Combat isn't advocating seeing people as "normal or other" - but pointing out that a lot of people do this, perhaps without even thinking about it. Your last paragraph illustrates the point.dsr wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 11:49 pmThat, I think, is the crux of your problem. Why do you think that we should be split into "normal" and "other"? People are just people, regardless of skin colour. "Normal" has a much wider range than you are giving it. I know there are a lot of people who want to perpetuate the differences between white and black; but I think it's time we moved on. As Martin Luther King was hoping, that his children could be judged on the content of their character rather than the colour of their skin; we can't get there until these "normal and other" prejudices are cleared.
How about we just treat people as people for a trial period, instead of arguing for a sort of cultural apartheid? Special awards categories for black people?
At the extreme you reach idiocies like Bristol University cancelling a proposed performance of Aida because they hadn't enough black people to play the slaves. Supposedly because they were anti-racist, though in practice because they were too stupid to realise they were being pro-racist.
Quoting Martin Luther King is great, but it's not empathy, and that should be the start of your journey. There are people who lived through the "no blacks, no dogs, and no Irish" signs on pubs. And there is still racism in Britain.
Re: Laurence Fox
Please believe me,I do,until they bring up religion and politics.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Laurence Fox
Stone him,
how dare he disagree with the painfully woke bed wetters.
how dare he disagree with the painfully woke bed wetters.
This user liked this post: Damo
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Laurence Fox
"painfully woke bed wetters"
Whilst wearing their sandals, too, one assumes ?
It's a nervous little life you lead, isn't it, andy......bless.
Whilst wearing their sandals, too, one assumes ?
It's a nervous little life you lead, isn't it, andy......bless.
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Laurence Fox
Aye, I think I have. It didn't take long for one of the racist scumbags to have my criticism removed.
How very brave, how very liberal of you, Blackrod and Co. !
Truth hurts ? You must be writhing in agony, boys.
-
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:26 pm
- Been Liked: 153 times
- Has Liked: 94 times
Re: Laurence Fox
So, let me get this straight, are you now saying the moderator team on this site will actively remove anti racist posts?evensteadiereddie wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 6:58 amAye, I think I have. It didn't take long for one of the racist scumbags to have my criticism removed.
How very brave, how very liberal of you, Blackrod and Co. !
Truth hurts ? You must be writhing in agony, boys.
If so what are you implying?
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Laurence Fox
Well someone asked them to, buddy, and it wasn't me !
This is the problem with our pack of cowardly,racist brethren. Anybody challenging their view is immediately labelled as a woke, bed-wetting, liberal, remoaner, sandal-wearing snowflake(I'm sure I've missed some but I really can't be arsed).
You point out their racism and they squawk their innocence. They'll not admit to their support of racism but it's there, disguised true enough, but it's there. The OP is an excellent example of this. A snidey, cowardly way of trivialising a very real and dangerous issue.
This is the problem with our pack of cowardly,racist brethren. Anybody challenging their view is immediately labelled as a woke, bed-wetting, liberal, remoaner, sandal-wearing snowflake(I'm sure I've missed some but I really can't be arsed).
You point out their racism and they squawk their innocence. They'll not admit to their support of racism but it's there, disguised true enough, but it's there. The OP is an excellent example of this. A snidey, cowardly way of trivialising a very real and dangerous issue.
-
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:26 pm
- Been Liked: 153 times
- Has Liked: 94 times
Re: Laurence Fox
Forget your, This is the problem,' rubbish. I'll ask you again, are you accusing the mod team of ACTIVELY removing anti racist posts?
Re: Laurence Fox
“When I'm born I'm black, when I grow up I'm black, when I'm in the sun I'm black, when I'm sick I'm black, when I die I'm black, and you... when you're born you're pink, when you grow up you're white, when you're cold you're blue, when you're sick you're blue, when you die you're green and you dare call me colored”
― Oglala Lakota
― Oglala Lakota
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Laurence Fox
BigRedrose wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 5:58 pmForget your, This is the problem,' rubbish. I'll ask you again, are you accusing the mod team of ACTIVELY removing anti racist posts?
And I'll repeat ; someone removed the anti-racist post, "ACTIVELY" - whatever that means or "INACTIVELY" and it sure as hell wasn't me....so you must draw your own conclusions as to who asked for the post to be removed, what their motive was and why the mods supported the request.
I'm not a mod nor a whingeing racist so I wouldn't know.
-
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:26 pm
- Been Liked: 153 times
- Has Liked: 94 times
Re: Laurence Fox
So eddie, for the third time of asking, do you believe the mods are racist or not?
Re: Laurence Fox
Calm down Eddy. It's only a post. You have plenty more just like the one you lost