Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
-
- Posts: 4482
- Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 1161 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
I see XR have dug up lawns at Cambridge uni (Trinity ) literally in broad daylight just vandalised the grounds. The saddest thing is nobody did a thing no police called nothing .Though I’m guessing a bit safer than the tube ?
Cambridge's Trinity College lawn dug u ... e-51534446
Cambridge's Trinity College lawn dug u ... e-51534446
-
- Posts: 2128
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:57 am
- Been Liked: 895 times
- Has Liked: 134 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
extinction seems just about right for this group
These 2 users liked this post: DomBFC1882 MT03ALG
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
I'd forgotten about them for a minute. Thanks for bringing climate change to the front of my mind again.
You botched your link, so it's here
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-c ... e-51534446
You botched your link, so it's here
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-c ... e-51534446
-
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 656 times
- Has Liked: 2899 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Why isn’t there some sort of safeguarding investigation into these people? They are groomers!
This user liked this post: Colburn_Claret
-
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:20 pm
- Been Liked: 83 times
- Has Liked: 362 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
I don't know the details and would never countenance mindless acts of vandalism but only a fool would criticise the overall aims of Extinction Rebellion. They are trying to protect the planet for our children and our children's children. Seems more than reasonable to me.
This user liked this post: alboclaret
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
It's natural to invoke progeny when pursuing such noble causes but in all honesty they're saving their own bacon every bit as much as that of future generations. Our little corner of the world won't be the worst materially affected by climate change but there are serious political ramifications that come from the global order being upended by the migratory and economic consequences of famine and drought, and the rate and spontaneity of disaster events escalating. Those things have a bearing on our lives in Britain every bit as much as flooding and extreme heat felt here at home - probably more so when a picture of a queue of immigrants and a slogan can so terrify folks. Syria is the first true case study. It's happening now, it'll get worse, everyone reading this comment will see it escalate in their own life.
-
- Posts: 8546
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 2474 times
- Has Liked: 2011 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
********. They are attention seeking wankers. Governments, apart from Trump and China, have come to their senses and are moving in the right direction.thomaspaine wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2020 7:13 pmI don't know the details and would never countenance mindless acts of vandalism but only a fool would criticise the overall aims of Extinction Rebellion. They are trying to protect the planet for our children and our children's children. Seems more than reasonable to me.
This user liked this post: Holtyclaret
-
- Posts: 10171
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Had they received a dig or 2 themselves they could have taught their kids the dangers of damaging property that isn’t your own
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
A reduction in carbon output is the main goal, but there are other elements at play which activists focus on, such as water and land management policy. For example, Australia's climate change denying government recently made huge cuts to firies services for all the typical small-state ideology reasons. The land management was poor as a result and there was no funding for controlled burns. Well...that worked out well.Tricky Trevor wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2020 7:40 pm********. They are attention seeking wankers. Governments, apart from Trump and China, have come to their senses and are moving in the right direction.
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Damaging property that isn't your own...on a thread about climate change?claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2020 7:52 pmHad they received a dig or 2 themselves they could have taught their kids the dangers of damaging property that isn’t your own
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Its criminal damage, end of. Lock the bellends up.
These 2 users liked this post: MT03ALG Holtyclaret
-
- Posts: 4980
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 pm
- Been Liked: 2341 times
- Has Liked: 1041 times
- Location: Ightenhill,Burnley
-
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 177 times
- Has Liked: 312 times
- Location: Ribble Valley
- Contact:
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Their methodology of winding people up and damaging things will not gain them any influential followers. They undermine themselves every time they do something.
This user liked this post: Holtyclaret
-
- Posts: 1377
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:48 am
- Been Liked: 499 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Don't think they're out to win any popularity contests. The thing is, a fairly minor act of localised 'vandalism' carried out by a small group of people had them as the most read story on the BBC news website this afternoon.
Whether you agree or disagree with the way they go about what they do they're very effective when it comes to grabbing media attention.
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
One problem is that they do such stupid things. They protest about the destruction of the environment by digging up a lawn. They protest about too much use of cars by stopping public transport. You don't gain support by being idiots.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Monty python was very popular watched by Millions.they had quite a few Idiots tbh.
-
- Posts: 8530
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2889 times
- Has Liked: 1763 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
i think the clue is in the name, maybe making a point about imminent mass self destruction is worthy of a charge of criminal damage.
This user liked this post: Spiral
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
I think they should flag or pave over these areas of greenery to prevent ER digging it up in the future
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
It's undoubtedly criminal damage, and the stunt has attracted attention which is rather the point (congratulations, AlargeClaret, for bringing attention to it here) but, in spite of the confident and pithy and somewhat boneheaded proclamations intended to make folk feel righteous in their observance of the law, to believe that stating this rather obvious fact is the "end of" the conversation is quite primitive. There are people living in costal towns in Britain who might well develop some strong opinions on what constitutes 'criminal damage' when (not 'if', when) inaction, inertia, and, at worst, hostility and ignorance, prevent meaningful measures being taken to mitigate climate change, inevitably and demonstrably resulting in sea level rise, intensified weather, and thus costal erosion to the degree that their homes sink into the sea and they are rendered climate refugees. This is already playing out in Wales. 'Sell up and move, then' is hardly a solution for quite obvious reasons that I'm worried I still might need to explain on this thread. To whom do these victims of circumstance turn, because apparently they aren't to expect any form of compensation? God only knows if insurance is even viable, to say nothing of the desolation that will become of such towns and villages. "999...yes, hello, I'd like to report a crime. My home has been destroyed by a combination of corruption and government incompetence. Send the police." Do they not also have a valid argument for criminal damage - in the natural sense of the law, if not in statute - being done to them and their homes by polluters and abusers and their enablers in government? It's not exactly surprising to see activists and protestors taking actions outside the framework of the law when said framework has primarily served an authority whom those protestors believe to be perpetuating an injustice; namely, inaction (in some quarters up until very, very recently, outright denial of climate change) tantamount to the theft of the prospect of future habitable viability for themselves, their kids, and a whole lot of other life on earth. That's the essence of civil disobedience. It isn't anything new.
These 3 users liked this post: Lord Beamish LordBob longsidepies
-
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 656 times
- Has Liked: 2899 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Yet whilst their tactics get them exposure it’s negative. Civil disobedience is in essence non violent, ER are a violent group who are actually a “gateway” organisation that, within its membership, have people who deliberately target and groom impressionable young members and recruit them into more violent and extreme organisations.Spiral wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 12:18 amIt's undoubtedly criminal damage, and the stunt has attracted attention which is rather the point (congratulations, AlargeClaret, for bringing attention to it here) but, in spite of the confident and pithy and somewhat boneheaded proclamations intended to make folk feel righteous in their observance of the law, to believe that stating this rather obvious fact is the "end of" the conversation is quite primitive. There are people living in costal towns in Britain who might well develop some strong opinions on what constitutes 'criminal damage' when (not 'if', when) inaction, inertia, and, at worst, hostility and ignorance, prevent meaningful measures being taken to mitigate climate change, inevitably and demonstrably resulting in sea level rise, intensified weather, and thus costal erosion to the degree that their homes sink into the sea and they are rendered climate refugees. This is already playing out in Wales. 'Sell up and move, then' is hardly a solution for quite obvious reasons that I'm worried I still might need to explain on this thread. To whom do these victims of circumstance turn, because apparently they aren't to expect any form of compensation? God only knows if insurance is even viable, to say nothing of the desolation that will become of such towns and villages. "999...yes, hello, I'd like to report a crime. My home has been destroyed by a combination of corruption and government incompetence. Send the police." Do they not also have a valid argument for criminal damage - in the natural sense of the law, if not in statute - being done to them and their homes by polluters and abusers and their enablers in government? It's not exactly surprising to see activists and protestors taking actions outside the framework of the law when said framework has primarily served an authority whom those protestors believe to be perpetuating an injustice; namely, inaction (in some quarters up until very, very recently, outright denial of climate change) tantamount to the theft of the prospect of future habitable viability for themselves, their kids, and a whole lot of other life on earth. That's the essence of civil disobedience. It isn't anything new.
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
My apologies Spiral, I'll endeavour to align my primitive proclamations with your pompous musings in future.Spiral wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 12:18 amIt's undoubtedly criminal damage, and the stunt has attracted attention which is rather the point (congratulations, AlargeClaret, for bringing attention to it here) but, in spite of the confident and pithy and somewhat boneheaded proclamations intended to make folk feel righteous in their observance of the law, to believe that stating this rather obvious fact is the "end of" the conversation is quite primitive. There are people living in costal towns in Britain who might well develop some strong opinions on what constitutes 'criminal damage' when (not 'if', when) inaction, inertia, and, at worst, hostility and ignorance, prevent meaningful measures being taken to mitigate climate change, inevitably and demonstrably resulting in sea level rise, intensified weather, and thus costal erosion to the degree that their homes sink into the sea and they are rendered climate refugees. This is already playing out in Wales. 'Sell up and move, then' is hardly a solution for quite obvious reasons that I'm worried I still might need to explain on this thread. To whom do these victims of circumstance turn, because apparently they aren't to expect any form of compensation? God only knows if insurance is even viable, to say nothing of the desolation that will become of such towns and villages. "999...yes, hello, I'd like to report a crime. My home has been destroyed by a combination of corruption and government incompetence. Send the police." Do they not also have a valid argument for criminal damage - in the natural sense of the law, if not in statute - being done to them and their homes by polluters and abusers and their enablers in government? It's not exactly surprising to see activists and protestors taking actions outside the framework of the law when said framework has primarily served an authority whom those protestors believe to be perpetuating an injustice; namely, inaction (in some quarters up until very, very recently, outright denial of climate change) tantamount to the theft of the prospect of future habitable viability for themselves, their kids, and a whole lot of other life on earth. That's the essence of civil disobedience. It isn't anything new.
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
The overarching principle that ER stand for is the survival of the human race on this planet. Given the obstacles that we can clearly see to ensuring that doesn't happen, digging up someone lawn in Cambridge does seem pretty mild in comparison. I suppose the question we should ask is does it do any good? I was told by a Marketing friend some years ago that there is no such thing as bad publicity. I'm not so sure that's true but I got his point. And of course here we are now discussing ER and more importantly the condition of our climate.
There are however people out there who deny climate change, they should be put quite firmly in the box with holocaust deniers.
But what do we do to combat climate change. There are a whole range of views stretching from those who would like us to regress to living a life more in keeping with that of the middle ages with a few modern frills for convenience, going right the way through to those that think that science and technology hold the key and will dig us out of this vast hole that we have dug for ourselves. I'm sort of in the middle but worry that Politicians of whatever stripe are not taking it seriously enough or treating it with the urgency it deserves. This is in part due to the adversarial nature of our political system and the fact that politicians only seem able to think in chunks of 5 years, 10 is you are really lucky and then it can get really messy see HS2 for evidence.
I'll give you one example, water. According to a report from the Environmental Agency we in the UK are likely to run out by 2050. So, given the amount that has just fallen on us what happens to it. Well, given the general inertia of Government when the water has yet again damaged whole regions of the country we eventually let it run off into the sea. When was the last time we built a reservoir. Just like we need a proper integrated transport policy we also need massive investment in controlling the flow of water from our uplands down to the sea. We also, in conjunction, need to see what we can do to use less than the 140 litres daily we currently waste.
Because, yes, we have a part to play in all this as well. But will we or will we become extinct?
There are however people out there who deny climate change, they should be put quite firmly in the box with holocaust deniers.
But what do we do to combat climate change. There are a whole range of views stretching from those who would like us to regress to living a life more in keeping with that of the middle ages with a few modern frills for convenience, going right the way through to those that think that science and technology hold the key and will dig us out of this vast hole that we have dug for ourselves. I'm sort of in the middle but worry that Politicians of whatever stripe are not taking it seriously enough or treating it with the urgency it deserves. This is in part due to the adversarial nature of our political system and the fact that politicians only seem able to think in chunks of 5 years, 10 is you are really lucky and then it can get really messy see HS2 for evidence.
I'll give you one example, water. According to a report from the Environmental Agency we in the UK are likely to run out by 2050. So, given the amount that has just fallen on us what happens to it. Well, given the general inertia of Government when the water has yet again damaged whole regions of the country we eventually let it run off into the sea. When was the last time we built a reservoir. Just like we need a proper integrated transport policy we also need massive investment in controlling the flow of water from our uplands down to the sea. We also, in conjunction, need to see what we can do to use less than the 140 litres daily we currently waste.
Because, yes, we have a part to play in all this as well. But will we or will we become extinct?
-
- Posts: 6576
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1233 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
I had just read a worrying article before reading this thread.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... SApp_Other
There are if you look around and read articles such at that one changes a foot that you don’t need scientists to be ramming down our throats. Rivers levels levels went higher in than in 200 years of records this week.
If we accept as I do things are changing and we need to adapt to try to prevent things getting worse and worse than what advice do Extinction Rebellion give on their website to help the planet.
When I read it a few months back, it was none!!!!
It was all links to climate change articles and encouragement to join protest and cause criminal damage.
It’s just another extremist organisation, They are eco terrorists. Brian dead and brain washed into just causing distraction and damage with no real plan or any ideas to help the planet.
What we need is to given factual information that can help the planet s those of us who believe it’s happening can make changes . Currently no one has any real ideas, not that I have read anyway.
Palm oil, the biggest cause of rain forest destruction in the world. No one gives a sh1t about. I try my upmost to avoid products with it in but it’s now in everything.
If anyone watches extinct or alive, watch series 2 episode 9. The dracula monkey of Borneo. Just see the destruction of the forest on the programme.
It’s not going to end well, but there’s no real actions any of us can take to stop it.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... SApp_Other
There are if you look around and read articles such at that one changes a foot that you don’t need scientists to be ramming down our throats. Rivers levels levels went higher in than in 200 years of records this week.
If we accept as I do things are changing and we need to adapt to try to prevent things getting worse and worse than what advice do Extinction Rebellion give on their website to help the planet.
When I read it a few months back, it was none!!!!
It was all links to climate change articles and encouragement to join protest and cause criminal damage.
It’s just another extremist organisation, They are eco terrorists. Brian dead and brain washed into just causing distraction and damage with no real plan or any ideas to help the planet.
What we need is to given factual information that can help the planet s those of us who believe it’s happening can make changes . Currently no one has any real ideas, not that I have read anyway.
Palm oil, the biggest cause of rain forest destruction in the world. No one gives a sh1t about. I try my upmost to avoid products with it in but it’s now in everything.
If anyone watches extinct or alive, watch series 2 episode 9. The dracula monkey of Borneo. Just see the destruction of the forest on the programme.
It’s not going to end well, but there’s no real actions any of us can take to stop it.
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Unfortunately they overshadow their aims by digging up lawns and spreading them across the floors of banks because they don't have 2 brain cells between the lot of them.thomaspaine wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2020 7:13 pmI don't know the details and would never countenance mindless acts of vandalism but only a fool would criticise the overall aims of Extinction Rebellion. They are trying to protect the planet for our children and our children's children. Seems more than reasonable to me.
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Yes, Corky. You are correct. What we really need to do is modify the planet even more solely to suit our needs because that isn't how we accelerated climate change in the first place.Corky wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:13 am
I'll give you one example, water. According to a report from the Environmental Agency we in the UK are likely to run out by 2050. So, given the amount that has just fallen on us what happens to it. Well, given the general inertia of Government when the water has yet again damaged whole regions of the country we eventually let it run off into the sea. When was the last time we built a reservoir. Just like we need a proper integrated transport policy we also need massive investment in controlling the flow of water from our uplands down to the sea. We also, in conjunction, need to see what we can do to use less than the 140 litres daily we currently waste.
-
- Posts: 737
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:57 am
- Been Liked: 336 times
- Has Liked: 75 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Saying we're moving in the right direction might sound good, but an analogy I'd use is I want to go on holiday to Australia this year so I'm going to set off walking from Burnley now. We're far too selfish as a species to really make this happen. In fairness to governments they're light touch because to do what's really needed would see them out of power in the next election and policies reversed. You only need to walk outside your front door to see evidence of human selfishness. Look at all the new cars on the road that are far more powerful than needed. Look at people who drive short distances rather than walk. I live in a village and the only shop is within half a mile of pretty much every house. Loads of people drive there though. A tangent maybe, but litter is everywhere including out in the countryside. Houses lit up like it's Christmas, and yes I know some outdoor lights are solar powered but not all. Still many of us jet off all around the world looking in search of sun and tourism. Veganism is a really growing these days, but the vast majority of us are still completely opposed to it (my one off Sharwoods with Quorn in it isn't going to save the world). Those kind of examples are just the start, and in general it's difficult to criticise because these behaviors are ingrained in all of us. If the science is right though we have to change a hell of a lot of our behaviours to make a difference.
I don't particularly agree with the way XR go about things. I think they risk alienating a lot of people, but the challenge they face is not alientating people, but getting the world to change as much as is needed.
I don't particularly agree with the way XR go about things. I think they risk alienating a lot of people, but the challenge they face is not alientating people, but getting the world to change as much as is needed.
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
And veganism is often worse for the environment when you are transporting avocados etc around the world.ChorltonCharlie wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 9:06 amSaying we're moving in the right direction might sound good, but an analogy I'd use is I want to go on holiday to Australia this year so I'm going to set off walking from Burnley now. We're far too selfish as a species to really make this happen. In fairness to governments they're light touch because to do what's really needed would see them out of power in the next election and policies reversed. You only need to walk outside your front door to see evidence of human selfishness. Look at all the new cars on the road that are far more powerful than needed. Look at people who drive short distances rather than walk. I live in a village and the only shop is within half a mile of pretty much every house. Loads of people drive there though. A tangent maybe, but litter is everywhere including out in the countryside. Houses lit up like it's Christmas, and yes I know some outdoor lights are solar powered but not all. Still many of us jet off all around the world looking in search of sun and tourism. Veganism is a really growing these days, but the vast majority of us are still completely opposed to it (my one off Sharwoods with Quorn in it isn't going to save the world). Those kind of examples are just the start, and in general it's difficult to criticise because these behaviors are ingrained in all of us. If the science is right though we have to change a hell of a lot of our behaviours to make a difference.
I don't particularly agree with the way XR go about things. I think they risk alienating a lot of people, but the challenge they face is not alientating people, but getting the world to change as much as is needed.
-
- Posts: 737
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:57 am
- Been Liked: 336 times
- Has Liked: 75 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Quite possibly deanothedino. It's another issue, there's so many views and counter views. It's like Brexit, people pick a side then only want to take into account research/arguments that backs their agenda.
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Yep. At the end of the day there are too many humans for the planet to support us living the way we do. That's not just food source, that's concreting over everything.
Lots talk about needing to save the planet but at the end of the day, the planet isn't going anywhere. It will be us that disappears.
Lots talk about needing to save the planet but at the end of the day, the planet isn't going anywhere. It will be us that disappears.
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
If you read the BBC link up the top of this thread you'll find that this was a well chosen action - highlighting Cambridge Trinity College's investment in developments with a negative environmental impact, not to mention Barclays Bank.deanothedino wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:28 amUnfortunately they overshadow their aims by digging up lawns and spreading them across the floors of banks because they don't have 2 brain cells between the lot of them.
Damaging a more or less (depending how manicured it is) unnatural monoculture, which is what a lawn is, will do little harm.
This user liked this post: longsidepies
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
This user liked this post: longsidepies
-
- Posts: 6576
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1233 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
There are many reservoirs in this area that have stopped being used for cost reduction reasons. We don’t need to build more, just put back the ones we have into use.deanothedino wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:31 amYes, Corky. You are correct. What we really need to do is modify the planet even more solely to suit our needs because that isn't how we accelerated climate change in the first place.
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
And what do they expect to happen to repair the damage?Hipper wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 9:54 amIf you read the BBC link up the top of this thread you'll find that this was a well chosen action - highlighting Cambridge Trinity College's investment in developments with a negative environmental impact, not to mention Barclays Bank.
Damaging a more or less (depending how manicured it is) unnatural monoculture, which is what a lawn is, will do little harm.
You think it's well chosen. I think it's moronic. We are unlikely to get to a position where we agree.
-
- Posts: 7313
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1827 times
- Has Liked: 3965 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Which - of course- is exactly what they want the authorities to do. You can't really win with this one. Ignore it and they'll continue to look at more extreme stunts; arrest them, take them to court and punish them and it gives them the publicity that they are seeking.
There's nothing an activist wants more than to be on the front pages or all over the internet.
-
- Posts: 9003
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2017 times
- Has Liked: 2914 times
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
I take it they are taking the Suferage movement as their model... would someone like to explain to them it was just because they stopped the aggro and supported the War effort that won the vote. Not trying to pin rosettes on galloping horses.
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Forget the water issue. If the water all runs into the sea, then all we need do is get it out of the sea again. If the time comes when it's needed, the government can build desalination plants and pumping stations. (i'm not sure it's politically viable this week!)Corky wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:13 amI'll give you one example, water. According to a report from the Environmental Agency we in the UK are likely to run out by 2050. So, given the amount that has just fallen on us what happens to it. Well, given the general inertia of Government when the water has yet again damaged whole regions of the country we eventually let it run off into the sea. When was the last time we built a reservoir. Just like we need a proper integrated transport policy we also need massive investment in controlling the flow of water from our uplands down to the sea. We also, in conjunction, need to see what we can do to use less than the 140 litres daily we currently waste.
Because, yes, we have a part to play in all this as well. But will we or will we become extinct?
When you use 140 litres of water, what are you left with? 140 litres of water. There is virtually nothing we can do to water, certainly not in normal daily use, that changes water into something else. There is an issue with the energy used to clean the water, but no issue about using it.
-
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
- Been Liked: 372 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
- Location: Blackburn
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Middle class eco-warrior champagne socialist vegan PC gaggle of absolute tossers.
-
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:40 am
- Been Liked: 343 times
- Has Liked: 400 times
- Location: From Accy, Exiled in Surrey
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Hang on, you are all missing the point! Why does UTC ban '******' and not the plural 'wankers'???Tricky Trevor wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2020 7:40 pm********. They are attention seeking wankers. Governments, apart from Trump and China, have come to their senses and are moving in the right direction.
Safety in numbers?
-
- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:48 am
- Been Liked: 639 times
- Has Liked: 441 times
- Location: London
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
So Extinction Rebellion's protest about environmental change involves digging up a lawn that sequesters carbon, reduces rainwater run-off, provides habitat for invertebrates and offers a safe space for people to socialise and relax.
Absolute bellends.
Absolute bellends.
-
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2819 times
- Has Liked: 503 times
- Location: Earth
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
If you banned wankers there'd be no one left to post on the forum.Alanstevensonsgloves wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 1:09 pmHang on, you are all missing the point! Why does UTC ban '******' and not the plural 'wankers'???
Safety in numbers?
This user liked this post: AndrewJB
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
I'm not really bothered about all these stunts they do, not sure whether they are a net negative to their cause or not, they are responsible for their own optics.... but when it comes to blocking roads, re routing ambulances and such, no, that's not on. They can make a spectacle talked about the world over without blocking roads.
Re: Extinction Rebellion at it again ..mindless
Perhaps I should have also said that whilst you are correct - it is a sort of cycle in as much as the pint of water I drink will eventually find its way back into the system - this will inevitably take much longer when instead of being just you and I and a few million people it becomes billions of people. So we will require more readily available water to quench the thirst of the ever increasing population. And yes you are right this will take energy. Israel for instance have got some of the best desalination plants in the world and they are so efficient that are now reported to have a surplus of water. Indeed, one of the options to counter a rise in sea level is to have solar powered desalination plants in places like Africa producing water to irrigate the land to produce the additional food needed to go with our extra pinta.dsr wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 12:41 pmForget the water issue. If the water all runs into the sea, then all we need do is get it out of the sea again. If the time comes when it's needed, the government can build desalination plants and pumping stations. (i'm not sure it's politically viable this week!)
When you use 140 litres of water, what are you left with? 140 litres of water. There is virtually nothing we can do to water, certainly not in normal daily use, that changes water into something else. There is an issue with the energy used to clean the water, but no issue about using it.