Declaring on 18-1
-
- Posts: 4906
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
- Been Liked: 857 times
- Has Liked: 334 times
- Location: Halifax
Declaring on 18-1
A title deciding cricket match in Pembrokshire is drawing some attention as Carew, leading the table by 21 points, declared on 18-1 to stop Cresselly winning any extra batting or bowling points.
They chased down 18 within 2 overs but only won 20 points meaning Carew won the league. Whilst not breaking any laws within the game it has drawn criticism for breaking the "spirit of the game".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/wales/41074513" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
They chased down 18 within 2 overs but only won 20 points meaning Carew won the league. Whilst not breaking any laws within the game it has drawn criticism for breaking the "spirit of the game".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/wales/41074513" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 67811
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32417 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Declaring on 18-1
Interesting point that they have actually, in effect, deliberately lost the game. Shocking thing to do in any case.
-
- Posts: 614
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:14 pm
- Been Liked: 200 times
- Has Liked: 44 times
Re: Declaring on 18-1
Pembrokeshire you say? That's in Wales innit? Mmmmmm
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Re: Declaring on 18-1
Right ***** trick
-
- Posts: 3591
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 2596 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: Declaring on 18-1
Should possibly have batted first.
-
- Posts: 1513
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:59 pm
- Been Liked: 987 times
- Has Liked: 1056 times
- Location: Yavin 4
Re: Declaring on 18-1
Them's the rules.
Not saying I agree, but clearly it is a well-exploited loophole.
Not saying I agree, but clearly it is a well-exploited loophole.
-
- Posts: 16853
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6951 times
- Has Liked: 1479 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Declaring on 18-1
The problem is captains get criticised for declaring too late all too often. 18 is a fairly solid score to defend but clearly wasn't quite enough in this case.
This user liked this post: KippaxFifaHD
-
- Posts: 2602
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
- Been Liked: 858 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
Re: Declaring on 18-1
Just not cricket!
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
- Been Liked: 843 times
- Has Liked: 1050 times
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Re: Declaring on 18-1
What would Christopher Martin-Jenkins make of it?
-
- Posts: 3326
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 8:21 pm
- Been Liked: 1304 times
- Has Liked: 318 times
- Location: Accrington
Re: Declaring on 18-1
They would have still won with 18 if they had been playing Rawtenstall.
Re: Declaring on 18-1
The opposition won the toss and put them into bat, giving them the op to do this, certainly not cricket but could have easily been avoided.
-
- Posts: 4190
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
- Been Liked: 2320 times
- Has Liked: 2696 times
- Location: Isles of Scilly
Re: Declaring on 18-1
admirable captaincy.
i played under a captain in the bacup sunday school league back in the 70's who would have made this guy look like a philanthropist.
i played under a captain in the bacup sunday school league back in the 70's who would have made this guy look like a philanthropist.
-
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5553 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: Declaring on 18-1
I'd be interested to know the BP system and why they chose to declare on 18-1?
Presumably they could have batted longer and lost more wickets and still denied the opposition full points?
Or did they just want to get p*ssed?
Edit: just read the full story on the link; read it on the Sun story linked yesterday which didn't go into such detail, unsurprisingly.
Presumably they could have batted longer and lost more wickets and still denied the opposition full points?
Or did they just want to get p*ssed?
Edit: just read the full story on the link; read it on the Sun story linked yesterday which didn't go into such detail, unsurprisingly.
-
- Posts: 3214
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:40 pm
- Been Liked: 892 times
- Has Liked: 1170 times
- Location: Proudsville
Re: Declaring on 18-1
The team in 1st had got themselves into this position by being 21 points better than the team in 2nd over the course of the season. They are within their rights to play the final game however they choose.
Also, as someone above has said, the 2nd placed side could've batted first if they were worried about this 'trick' being used.
The only ones I feel sorry for is the supporters who had turned up for a day's entertainment in an exciting winner-takes-all battle but had to make do with 4 overs of a non-competitive knockabout.
Also, as someone above has said, the 2nd placed side could've batted first if they were worried about this 'trick' being used.
The only ones I feel sorry for is the supporters who had turned up for a day's entertainment in an exciting winner-takes-all battle but had to make do with 4 overs of a non-competitive knockabout.
-
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5553 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: Declaring on 18-1
Do you reckon Cresselly agreed to a beer match afterwards?
-
- Posts: 3326
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 8:21 pm
- Been Liked: 1304 times
- Has Liked: 318 times
- Location: Accrington
Re: Declaring on 18-1
Why didn't they just declare on 1/0 and totally take the p###
-
- Posts: 12366
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5209 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: Declaring on 18-1
Not as straightforward as it seems this one. The way the pts system works in that league it is far easier to get bonus points bowling first than batting first which is probably why Cresselly bottled it and took the easier option hoping Carew would play ball
Cresselly would have needed to get 240 runs if they batted a full innings just to gain 1 bonus point on Carew and had they been bowled out for say 100 they would have relatively lost 3 bonus points in the 1st innings and then would have had to ball Carew out for less than 40 to win the league
Cresselly would have needed to get 240 runs if they batted a full innings just to gain 1 bonus point on Carew and had they been bowled out for say 100 they would have relatively lost 3 bonus points in the 1st innings and then would have had to ball Carew out for less than 40 to win the league
Re: Declaring on 18-1
Served them right then!SonofPog wrote:The opposition won the toss and put them into bat, giving them the op to do this, certainly not cricket but could have easily been avoided.
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:03 pm
- Been Liked: 25 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: Declaring on 18-1
A similar thing happened nearly 40 years ago in the Benson and Hedges Cup. Somerset would qualify from the group stage and go into the knock out stage if the lost no wickets against Worcestershire. Brian Rose declared the Somerset innings after playing out one over at 1-0 (a no ball!). Worcestershire duly won and refunded the price of admission to all fans. Brian Rose had rung the TCCB the day before to ask if his action would be legal, he was told it would be legal but there would be repercussions. A few days later Somerset were thrown out of the competition and the name of Brian Rose disappeared from the list of those being tipped for the England captaincy, although he did continue to play for England.
As an aside I went on cricket tour with BGS in 1963 where we played Weston Super Mare GS. We had them 6 or 7 wickets down when a diminutive 13 year old, we thought we would knock him over easily but we were very wrong! Two years later we went back and the now 15 year old opened the batting. He was some player! After the game our teacher, Norman Renardson, said that we would hear a lot more of him in the future. His name- Brian Rose
As an aside I went on cricket tour with BGS in 1963 where we played Weston Super Mare GS. We had them 6 or 7 wickets down when a diminutive 13 year old, we thought we would knock him over easily but we were very wrong! Two years later we went back and the now 15 year old opened the batting. He was some player! After the game our teacher, Norman Renardson, said that we would hear a lot more of him in the future. His name- Brian Rose
Re: Declaring on 18-1
Hi to You who made this comment!
Your teacher Norman Renardson, was my dad.
Can’t believe you mentioned him here - it sounded just like the type of thing he would have said!
Your teacher Norman Renardson, was my dad.
Can’t believe you mentioned him here - it sounded just like the type of thing he would have said!
-
- Posts: 4955
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 1087 times
- Has Liked: 996 times
-
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 9:30 am
- Been Liked: 519 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Declaring on 18-1
I prefer 17-1.
That's our goal difference in the eight matches against the four teams we've done the double over this season.
That's our goal difference in the eight matches against the four teams we've done the double over this season.
-
- Posts: 10314
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3338 times
- Has Liked: 1954 times
Re: Declaring on 18-1
You mean you don’t search for your dads name on here every three years??
This user liked this post: Foulthrow
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:03 pm
- Been Liked: 25 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: Declaring on 18-1
Hi Renardson, like others I was amazed to see this thread come back.
Your dad never actually taught me but he was in charge of both the football and cricket teams. I remember him as a left arm fast bowler and a goalkeeper when we played the staff team. He was a ‘top bloke’ who was in charge when he needed to be but was always prepared to have proper conversations with us.
Apart from rating Brian Rose he also rated the Clitheroe RGS centre forward very highly, but then most of us thought Martin Dobson could play a bit!!
Your dad never actually taught me but he was in charge of both the football and cricket teams. I remember him as a left arm fast bowler and a goalkeeper when we played the staff team. He was a ‘top bloke’ who was in charge when he needed to be but was always prepared to have proper conversations with us.
Apart from rating Brian Rose he also rated the Clitheroe RGS centre forward very highly, but then most of us thought Martin Dobson could play a bit!!
Re: Declaring on 18-1
or deliberately won the league!ClaretTony wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:28 amInteresting point that they have actually, in effect, deliberately lost the game. Shocking thing to do in any case.
-
- Posts: 30629
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11035 times
- Has Liked: 5648 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Declaring on 18-1
shoud just do a Cardiff and appeal to the Welsh Cricket Association and get it all overturned
-
- Posts: 2208
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:03 pm
- Been Liked: 932 times
- Has Liked: 607 times
Re: Declaring on 18-1
I'm reminded of the late great Richie Benaud's comments after the Hansie Cronje match fixing row.
Something along the lines of "it sickens me to think that during my career I spent countless hours trying to figure out how to win a match and these bastards spend hours figuring out how to lose one"
Something along the lines of "it sickens me to think that during my career I spent countless hours trying to figure out how to win a match and these bastards spend hours figuring out how to lose one"