James Tarkowski in the news

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: James Tarkowski in the news

Post by FactualFrank » Thu Aug 06, 2020 4:25 pm

claretandy wrote:
Thu Aug 06, 2020 4:15 pm
It could also be us not willing to pay the fee, it costs you more in the long run, especially when you end up with a Pope or Tarkowski worth 50m + each.
And it can cost you less if the player is a flop.

I think with Brentford it's much more likely that they wanted the higher sell-on clause and wouldn't accept less, as they've done it with other players.

aggi
Posts: 8762
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2109 times

Re: James Tarkowski in the news

Post by aggi » Thu Aug 06, 2020 4:26 pm

claretandy wrote:
Thu Aug 06, 2020 4:15 pm
It could also be us not willing to pay the fee, it costs you more in the long run, especially when you end up with a Pope or Tarkowski worth 50m + each.
Well that's when players appreciate. If we'd paid extra for Hendrick, Brady, Gibson, etc to avoid a sell-on then it wouldn't be quite as good. Sell-ons are sometimes time-limited as well (length of first contract is reasonably common).

It's swings and roundabouts as to whether it works better or not plus some clubs push hard for them as part of their model (I think Brentford are one as they sell a fair few players who are fairly young and hopefully have another step on their career ladder).

Woonderbah
Posts: 606
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:03 am
Been Liked: 323 times
Has Liked: 363 times

Re: James Tarkowski in the news

Post by Woonderbah » Thu Aug 06, 2020 5:04 pm

You can't argue with Brentford's business model as a small club spotting, developing and selling players.
They'll be the envy of many.
This user liked this post: jojomk1

Burnley1989
Posts: 7345
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2272 times
Has Liked: 2153 times

Re: James Tarkowski in the news

Post by Burnley1989 » Thu Aug 06, 2020 10:32 pm

I think it’s more the fact the selling club can’t really turn down the money but know they have an absolute gem so fight for everything, like a game of poker, at the same time we aren’t sure the player is worth the huge fee

jojomk1
Posts: 4735
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 836 times
Has Liked: 574 times

Re: James Tarkowski in the news

Post by jojomk1 » Fri Aug 07, 2020 8:06 am


CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3109
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 815 times
Has Liked: 527 times

Re: James Tarkowski in the news

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Fri Aug 07, 2020 8:45 am

jojomk1 wrote:
Fri Aug 07, 2020 8:06 am
https://www.ntvspor.net/futbol/ozel-cag ... 2570b07425

The plot thickens ? 8-)

If I was Barcelona I'd just cut out the middle man and go for his replacement 😁

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: James Tarkowski in the news

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:23 am

claretandy wrote:
Thu Aug 06, 2020 4:15 pm
It could also be us not willing to pay the fee, it costs you more in the long run, especially when you end up with a Pope or Tarkowski worth 50m + each.
But it doesn’t as we have an asset that cost a couple of million who is now worth close to £50m and played the biggest part in keeping us in the £100m a year league. While also playing a part in helping our £2m keeper be worth £50m too.

Dinks
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2019 5:01 pm
Been Liked: 122 times
Has Liked: 127 times

Re: James Tarkowski in the news

Post by Dinks » Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:26 am

[/i]
cricketfieldclarets wrote:
Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:23 am
But it doesn’t as we have an asset that cost a couple of million who is now worth close to £50m and played the biggest part in keeping us in the £100m a year league. While also playing a part in helping our £2m keeper be worth £50m too.
I think Tarks & Pope would be making a mistake if they left us,kinda like Michael Keane's career has gone backwards i think theirs would also go the same way our defence is a
collective with out each other they are nothing.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: James Tarkowski in the news

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:28 am

Dinks wrote:
Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:26 am
[/i]

I think Tarks & Pope would be making a mistake if they left us,kinda like Michael Keane's career has gone backwards i think theirs would also go the same way our defence is a
collective with out each other they are nothing.
I wouldn’t say Keane has gone backwards. He’s now playing more premier league games and more england games.

He might not have hit the heights we expected. But he is one of the better players at Everton and is a regular England player now.

aggi
Posts: 8762
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2109 times

Re: James Tarkowski in the news

Post by aggi » Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:56 am

Related to this topic there was an interesting snippet in the Athletic that Brentford bought out Oldham's sell-on fee for Tarkowski for £200k.

Post Reply