Tark - transfer
-
- Posts: 5163
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 2105 times
- Has Liked: 416 times
- Location: Burnley
Tark - transfer
Just heard a rumour that he’s put in a transfer request?
Anything else been mentioned about this anywhere as it’s the first I’ve heard of it and it was a bit of a surprise.
Anything else been mentioned about this anywhere as it’s the first I’ve heard of it and it was a bit of a surprise.
-
- Posts: 18087
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3863 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Sad news if true. The one player we can't afford to lose.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tark - transfer
Not sure why he would do that with a release clause already in his contract.
And wouldn't there need to be heavy interest to do it?
And wouldn't there need to be heavy interest to do it?
-
- Posts: 7172
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3603 times
- Has Liked: 1032 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Tark - transfer
Would be an absolute disaster for us so I really hope not.
He did it to Brentford though...
He did it to Brentford though...
Re: Tark - transfer
Probably just a rumour started by an attention seeker. ![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tark - transfer
It doesn't really sound believable as you would have expected massive interest prior to this happening. Like Leicester really pushing for a bid. And can you submit a transfer request, when you have £50 million in your contract?
Burnley turn around and say, "Fair enough, but you aint leaving for less than the 50" - so it kind of goes against itself.
This user liked this post: HahaYeah
-
- Posts: 6687
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1699 times
- Has Liked: 790 times
Re: Tark - transfer
May not be in the England squad, however he is a collosus for us, just like Van Dyke is for Liverpool. The very last player I would want to leave, and that includes two exceptional other players in our team
This user liked this post: Taffy on the wing
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Tark - transfer
IF Tarks has handed in a transfer request, you can only assume that he or more likely his agent have been given the nod that Leicester are genuinely interested, they may well be, but unless they or anyone else can match his release clause, he won't be going anywhere.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:46 pmIt doesn't really sound believable as you would have expected massive interest prior to this happening. Like Leicester really pushing for a bid. And can you submit a transfer request, when you have £50 million in your contract?
Burnley turn around and say, "Fair enough, but you aint leaving for less than the 50" - so it kind of goes against itself.
This user liked this post: Quicknick
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Hope not.
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 855 times
- Has Liked: 604 times
Re: Tark - transfer
If we start believing rumours that are not substantiated, we really are getting desperate for something to talk about. It's bad enough that players are linked with every team under the sun by the gutter press, let's not go down the unsubstantiated rumour route.
There is a month left before the window closes, so why don't we give the club a chance to buy and sell whoever they think fit, then chat later about whether or not it will be good for the club when we know where we are?
There is a month left before the window closes, so why don't we give the club a chance to buy and sell whoever they think fit, then chat later about whether or not it will be good for the club when we know where we are?
These 2 users liked this post: Spike Quicknick
Re: Tark - transfer
I think I am correct in saying that if any players hands in a formal transfer request they forfeit their rights to the 10% signing on fee
That seems a lot of cash to give up - however, £25k a week extra on a four year deal would put it right
We should be looking to get JT to extend his contract now but (and only a thought) if Tarks, or any other player such as Dwight, don't see ambition from the club maybe they do see it as a time to move on
That seems a lot of cash to give up - however, £25k a week extra on a four year deal would put it right
We should be looking to get JT to extend his contract now but (and only a thought) if Tarks, or any other player such as Dwight, don't see ambition from the club maybe they do see it as a time to move on
This user liked this post: Burnley1989
-
- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 10:35 pm
- Been Liked: 247 times
- Has Liked: 90 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Leicester or whoever would top that up even cover itjojomk1 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:57 pmI think I am correct in saying that if any players hands in a formal transfer request they forfeit their rights to the 10% signing on fee
That seems a lot of cash to give up - however, £25k a week extra on a four year deal would put it right
We should be looking to get JT to extend his contract now but (and only a thought) if Tarks, or any other player such as Dwight, don't see ambition from the club maybe they do see it as a time to move on
-
- Posts: 67869
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32529 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Tark - transfer
Does nothing for this message board having threads like thisGordaleman wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:53 pmIf we start believing rumours that are not substantiated, we really are getting desperate for something to talk about.
These 4 users liked this post: ngsobob KateR elwaclaret Kreuzberg
Re: Tark - transfer
Then remove itClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 2:07 pmDoes nothing for this message board having threads like this
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 6687
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1699 times
- Has Liked: 790 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Could not agree more CT. There is enough bad news around already, outside of football
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
- Been Liked: 895 times
- Has Liked: 1102 times
- Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre
Re: Tark - transfer
Damned if he does and damned if he doesn't - the joys of being a message board moderator/leader
These 3 users liked this post: summitclaret Zlatan Kreuzberg
-
- Posts: 5163
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 2105 times
- Has Liked: 416 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Tark - transfer
I’ve still not turned the heating on.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 2:07 pmDoes nothing for this message board having threads like this
These 4 users liked this post: Zlatan CFS Volvoclaret Jeremy_Bentham
-
- Posts: 67869
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32529 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 5163
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 2105 times
- Has Liked: 416 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Tark - transfer
Is a mate who has said it and as I said, it’s the first I’ve heard of it but he’s not one to just sprout rubbish loads so was just seeing if there was anything to it.
Hopefully it is just total BS.
Ps, I apologise for flooding the quiz message board with football talk.
Hopefully it is just total BS.
Ps, I apologise for flooding the quiz message board with football talk.
These 3 users liked this post: Burnley1989 Zlatan FCBurnley
Re: Tark - transfer
I understand the difficulties CT has moderating this forum. I would advise more openness when posts are removed, I would also recommend not commenting as above because it will encourage dissension.
-
- Posts: 5163
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 2105 times
- Has Liked: 416 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Tark - transfer
It’s definitely not an easy task to moderate a message board like this. I just find it odd that of all the random stuff that gets posted on here, picking a football related, Burnley related post in which I clearly said it’s nothing more than a rumour and questioning if anybody else has heard anything on the subject ....... is the post that shouldn’t be on here
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
This user liked this post: CFS
-
- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 10:35 pm
- Been Liked: 247 times
- Has Liked: 90 times
Re: Tark - transfer
hes not goin anywhere
-
- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 10:35 pm
- Been Liked: 247 times
- Has Liked: 90 times
Re: Tark - transfer
99% of most of the things you predict are incorrect
Remember a while back when you used to "guess" the starting line ups
Rod can be put firmly away. "Mate" said it... aye oreyt
-
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 546 times
- Has Liked: 51 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Remember when Tarky was knocking odd Bens missus? Oh yeh thought so - delete the thread , best option
-
- Posts: 67869
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32529 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Tark - transfer
So someone new to the board knows about that does he? As it happens the predictions were usually absolutely spot on. I know it left the club in a right state and they were threatening legal action at one point. That's a few seasons back now, 2016/17 I think, but he was usually, as I say, spot on.Wellsy1882 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 3:40 pm99% of most of the things you predict are incorrect
Remember a while back when you used to "guess" the starting line ups
Rod can be put firmly away. "Mate" said it... aye oreyt
This user liked this post: simonclaret
-
- Posts: 7213
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2379 times
- Has Liked: 3806 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Tark - transfer
New to the board
Any1 not kno who hes been b4?
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Any1 not kno who hes been b4?
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
This user liked this post: Tall Paul
-
- Posts: 4968
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1007 times
- Has Liked: 725 times
Re: Tark - transfer
https://www.brentfordfc.com/news/2016/j ... Xp4tpuF.99
He refused to play for Brentford. Two weeks later he signed for us. If he goes what goes around comes around I guess. No loyalty in football any more.
He refused to play for Brentford. Two weeks later he signed for us. If he goes what goes around comes around I guess. No loyalty in football any more.
-
- Posts: 30696
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11049 times
- Has Liked: 5658 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Tark - transfer
if someone like Leicester came in for you and offered to double your wages you would be a mug not to do it, footballers are just doing a job, nothing more.superdimitri wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 4:19 pmhttps://www.brentfordfc.com/news/2016/j ... Xp4tpuF.99
He refused to play for Brentford. Two weeks later he signed for us. If he goes what goes around comes around I guess. No loyalty in football any more.
-
- Posts: 18087
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3863 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Tark - transfer
They were spot on but not many surprises in the posts as you would expect from Dyche.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 3:58 pmSo someone new to the board knows about that does he? As it happens the predictions were usually absolutely spot on. I know it left the club in a right state and they were threatening legal action at one point. That's a few seasons back now, 2016/17 I think, but he was usually, as I say, spot on.
I think an injury to one of the centre halves might of been revealed early one week.
Re: Tark - transfer
I'm going for Fake News until there is something a little more believable than what has been presented here.
-
- Posts: 67869
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32529 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Tark - transfer
It was the Palace game when the club finally kicked off and someone went running to Dyche to tell him. I've just looked at what the changes were that day from the previous game v Man U.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 4:26 pmThey were spot on but not many surprises in the posts as you would expect from Dyche.
I think an injury to one of the centre halves might of been revealed early one week.
1. Tarkowski for Mee (injury)
2. Westwood for Barton (Barton suspended for the betting and had played his final game)
3. Arfield for Brady
4. Vokes for Gray.
Re: Tark - transfer
I remember those threads. The thing that always got me with any kind of starting 11 threads, were that other posters put what team they want to see. If we all actually put the team, we’d guess it pretty much spot on 95% of the time.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 4:36 pmIt was the Palace game when the club finally kicked off and someone went running to Dyche to tell him. I've just looked at what the changes were that day from the previous game v Man U.
1. Tarkowski for Mee (injury)
2. Westwood for Barton (Barton suspended for the betting and had played his final game)
3. Arfield for Brady
4. Vokes for Gray.
-
- Posts: 666
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2017 2:05 am
- Been Liked: 227 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: Tark - transfer
I'd say the problem with removing it (now anyway) is that lots of people will have seen it, to remove it could add fuel to the fire, people will believe that there must be something in it hence why its been removed. If he goes, he goes. BFC will still remain.
This user liked this post: Zlatan
-
- Posts: 5163
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 2105 times
- Has Liked: 416 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Tark - transfer
Strangely, we had quite a good run of games results wise at the same time too.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 4:36 pmIt was the Palace game when the club finally kicked off and someone went running to Dyche to tell him. I've just looked at what the changes were that day from the previous game v Man U.
1. Tarkowski for Mee (injury)
2. Westwood for Barton (Barton suspended for the betting and had played his final game)
3. Arfield for Brady
4. Vokes for Gray.
-
- Posts: 7172
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3603 times
- Has Liked: 1032 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Tark - transfer
Tarky didn’t play against Preston due to an injury, is that where this rumour has perhaps originated?
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Tark - transfer
Absolutely! and if Leicester want him, pay the asking price or beggar off, in other words put up or shut up, we'll see in the next month whether they are prepared to pay top dollar for Tarks or not. I don't think they will if there is cheaper options available to them in Europe.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 4:22 pmif someone like Leicester came in for you and offered to double your wages you would be a mug not to do it, footballers are just doing a job, nothing more.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tark - transfer
If Leicester offer £50 million then he can talk to them.
So not sure what the point of putting in a transfer request would be. We can't stop him from leaving if they meet the price.
So not sure what the point of putting in a transfer request would be. We can't stop him from leaving if they meet the price.
Re: Tark - transfer
The risk with such an high release fee is, if it’s not met, we simply can’t afford to offer him a new contract when his current one starts to run out.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
-
- Posts: 15254
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3163 times
- Has Liked: 6754 times
Re: Tark - transfer
There's nothing to stop Leicester putting in a lower bid though, is there?
-
- Posts: 3120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:24 am
- Been Liked: 946 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Tark - transfer
I thought the release clause was only applicable to north west clubs given a desire to be close to his mum who at the time wasn't well I believe?
Not sure if his situation was as stated above, or if it has changed but if the above is right - Leicester wouldn't be able to trigger a release fee as it's not applicable to them.
Likewise, what does worry me of late is his lack of England games and there being some views that its because of the way we play doesn't match what Southgate wants. If there is a desire to get into the England set up - maybe this could be something that has happened which has forced the situation..
Or maybe, it's all a misunderstanding and he is very happy where he is?
Not sure if his situation was as stated above, or if it has changed but if the above is right - Leicester wouldn't be able to trigger a release fee as it's not applicable to them.
Likewise, what does worry me of late is his lack of England games and there being some views that its because of the way we play doesn't match what Southgate wants. If there is a desire to get into the England set up - maybe this could be something that has happened which has forced the situation..
Or maybe, it's all a misunderstanding and he is very happy where he is?
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tark - transfer
I thought they'd already tried that one and we rejected it. The club seem pretty adamant that we won't sell for less than the release fee.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 5:22 pmThere's nothing to stop Leicester putting in a lower bid though, is there?
Re: Tark - transfer
FactualFrank wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 5:20 pmWhich probably means us selling him next summer, if his contract runs out in 2022.
So if Leicester want him, they’ll surely wait until January to tempt us to agree with a lesser fee, if not, next summer he’ll go for a fraction of £50m. That release clause is worthless come the end of this window.
These 2 users liked this post: Zlatan boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 10:35 pm
- Been Liked: 247 times
- Has Liked: 90 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Simply cant see him goin unless stupid money is thrown about
Re: Tark - transfer
Next summer teams will know we have to sell though so we're unlikely to get anywhere near what he's worth.
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
- Been Liked: 468 times
- Has Liked: 190 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Offer him a new contract, if he says no sell him.
Re: Tark - transfer
Don’t worry, we can always bring Gibbo back in from the cold.
-
- Posts: 15254
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3163 times
- Has Liked: 6754 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Well yes, but if he really has handed in a transfer request it changes everything.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 5:39 pmI thought they'd already tried that one and we rejected it. The club seem pretty adamant that we won't sell for less than the release fee.
Re: Tark - transfer
Do we really have 50 posts over an unsubstantiated rumour with no links backing it up?