Tark - transfer

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Locked
huw.Y.WattfromWare
Posts: 3393
Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 1004 times
Has Liked: 905 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by huw.Y.WattfromWare » Fri Sep 11, 2020 5:43 pm

claret2018 wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 5:03 pm
Speaking as a Burnley fan, if I played for us and West Ham came in for me offering to double my wages you wouldn't see me for dust.
Why?

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Elizabeth » Fri Sep 11, 2020 5:46 pm

Fingers crossed we get 40 million and Dawson in as a replacement

Goobs
Posts: 4399
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
Been Liked: 1462 times
Has Liked: 995 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Goobs » Fri Sep 11, 2020 5:52 pm

huw.Y.WattfromWare wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 5:43 pm
Why?
Cos he's a money whore, with no loyalty 😂

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Elizabeth » Fri Sep 11, 2020 5:57 pm

People should stop treating these players as something special. From all accounts on New Year's Day against Villa at the Turf he played like he's just rolled out of bed after a New Year's Eve bender. Putting an armband on him changes nothing

wilks_bfc
Posts: 11497
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3181 times
Has Liked: 1864 times
Contact:

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by wilks_bfc » Fri Sep 11, 2020 5:58 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 5:57 pm
People should stop treating these players as something special. From all accounts on New Year's Day against Villa at the Turf he played like he's just rolled out of bed after a New Year's Eve bender. Putting an armband on him changes nothing
After watching that game I don’t think that accusation can be against Tarky alone 😏

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Elizabeth » Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:00 pm

That doesn't exempt Tarkowski

wilks_bfc
Posts: 11497
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3181 times
Has Liked: 1864 times
Contact:

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by wilks_bfc » Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:04 pm

Never said it did, but you can probably count one hand and still have fingers to spare the number of bad games he had last season

Conroysleftfoot
Posts: 2127
Joined: Sat May 09, 2020 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 352 times
Has Liked: 294 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Conroysleftfoot » Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:04 pm

claret2018 wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 5:03 pm
Speaking as a Burnley fan, if I played for us and West Ham came in for me offering to double my wages you wouldn't see me for dust.
But would you be honest and say that was why you were leaving?

Zlatan
Posts: 5458
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2229 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Zlatan » Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:05 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:04 pm
Never said it did, but you can probably count one hand and still have fingers to spare the number of bad games he had last season
is that an East Lancs hand?
This user liked this post: wilks_bfc

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Elizabeth » Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:10 pm

Yes it is a personal opinion. I think he is over rated and is lucky to play in such a well drilled defence magnificently supported by a hard working midfield and forwards who recognise the importance of defending from the front.
I believe he tries to play like Beckenbauer but continually puts the ball out of play and turns too slowly.

huw.Y.WattfromWare
Posts: 3393
Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 1004 times
Has Liked: 905 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by huw.Y.WattfromWare » Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:10 pm

wilks_bfc wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:04 pm
Never said it did, but you can probably count one hand and still have fingers to spare the number of bad games he had last season
They were the games Southgate was in attendance.

Winstonswhite
Posts: 2542
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 608 times
Has Liked: 310 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Winstonswhite » Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:29 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:10 pm
Yes it is a personal opinion. I think he is over rated and is lucky to play in such a well drilled defence magnificently supported by a hard working midfield and forwards who recognise the importance of defending from the front.
I believe he tries to play like Beckenbauer but continually puts the ball out of play and turns too slowly.
I agree totally that’s what he was like when he first came into the team. However over the last two seasons he’s matured enormously and for the most part, has cut that out of his game.

CFS
Posts: 1848
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:46 am
Been Liked: 231 times
Has Liked: 113 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by CFS » Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:32 pm

claret2018 wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 5:03 pm
Speaking as a Burnley fan, if I played for us and West Ham came in for me offering to double my wages you wouldn't see me for dust.
I'm not even going to lie forget football if someone offered to double my wage for the same job I do now il be out in a jiffy. That's life you have to be dumb to stay.
This user liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Elizabeth » Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:43 pm

That's good to know Winston.

Still be good to take the 40 million and get in a PL experienced defender able to play with our Captain Marvel, Ben Mee, and benefit from our system in the way Tarkowski has.

Winstonswhite
Posts: 2542
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 608 times
Has Liked: 310 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Winstonswhite » Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:10 pm

40 million would be nice but do you honestly have confidence that we will find someone as good, because if we don’t, then we are regressing as a team. GK and 2 x CH are so important to the way we play.

jojomk1
Posts: 4804
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 842 times
Has Liked: 577 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by jojomk1 » Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:20 pm

Not being captain today, when playing, was a telling moment

Or, is the gaffer just showing who is the boss

NewClaret
Posts: 13436
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3087 times
Has Liked: 3808 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by NewClaret » Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:22 pm

Winstonswhite wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:10 pm
40 million would be nice but do you honestly have confidence that we will find someone as good, because if we don’t, then we are regressing as a team. GK and 2 x CH are so important to the way we play.
Apparently the sell on fee is £27.5%, so that’s £29m for us and £11m for Brentford.

Would rather keep Tarks for 2 more years. Averages out at £14.5m a year and he would more than repay that in league position £.

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by FactualFrank » Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:27 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:22 pm
Apparently the sell on fee is £27.5%, so that’s £29m for us and £11m for Brentford.

Would rather keep Tarks for 2 more years. Averages out at £14.5m a year and he would more than repay that in league position £.
Unless he wants to leave. I wouldn't want to keep a player until the end of his contract if he wanted out.

BenWickes
Posts: 2000
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2020 6:27 pm
Been Liked: 645 times
Has Liked: 470 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by BenWickes » Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:29 pm

jojomk1 wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:20 pm
Not being captain today, when playing, was a telling moment

Or, is the gaffer just showing who is the boss
Tarks isn't captain anyway so I wouldn't read much into it. Not the first time Dyche has changed captaincy or made a different player captain for a game. Mee is out for the foreseeable so why not try something different in a friendly?

NewClaret
Posts: 13436
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3087 times
Has Liked: 3808 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by NewClaret » Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:30 pm

FactualFrank wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:27 pm
Unless he wants to leave. I wouldn't want to keep a player until the end of his contract if he wanted out.
That’s a fair point but he’s got the Euros to keep him motivated this year and then the prospect of a bumper contract elsewhere the following year!

We should obviously offer him a big fat new contract so he can’t feel like we’ve mistreated him too.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Elizabeth » Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:31 pm

I think the sum owed to Brentford is not the primary consideration in this.
Tarkowski has shown his ambition overrides everything and that I think is the key to any potential move.
Burnley are still in the driving seat I believe but if that changes I would like the club to sell him next week

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Elizabeth » Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:37 pm

I think now that Mee's daughter is home we will see him back in the side very soon

NewClaret
Posts: 13436
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3087 times
Has Liked: 3808 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by NewClaret » Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:38 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:31 pm
I think the sum owed to Brentford is not the primary consideration in this.
Tarkowski has shown his ambition overrides everything and that I think is the key to any potential move.
Burnley are still in the driving seat I believe but if that changes I would like the club to sell him next week
True. But it would be hard for him to argue that WHU meet those ambitions or represent any form of progression. If WHU or any other top six team made an offer, that’s different.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Elizabeth » Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:47 pm

He will be shown as a mercenary if he takes the big wage increase that will go with any increased bid to Burnley's satisfaction that West Ham may be stupid enough to make .
Many of our fans are already dubious about the way he left Brentford so let's wait to see if that increased bid arrives.

Gordaleman
Posts: 3982
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
Been Liked: 855 times
Has Liked: 604 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Gordaleman » Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:50 pm

Tarky aside, the thing that is pleasing me is that there has been no mention of Vydra leaving during this window. It seems that he is now more settled and perhaps feels that his undoubted talent is starting to be recognised at last.

I think he offers us something completely different to normal up front and I really hope he gets used more this season.
These 3 users liked this post: randomclaret2 ewanrob KateR

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12359
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 920 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Devils_Advocate » Fri Sep 11, 2020 8:34 pm

Good news for Burnley is its not only Southgate who doesn't think Tarks is in the same class as Maguire, Cody, Gomez and Mings.

£30m is about his market value but he's worth a lot more to us so we wont sell and it doesn't look like West Ham or Leicester are prepared to be mugged off by paying more

tarkys_ears
Posts: 4270
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
Been Liked: 1024 times
Has Liked: 1516 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by tarkys_ears » Fri Sep 11, 2020 8:54 pm

Easy now.

My owner ain't goin nowhere. Heard it meself.
These 2 users liked this post: boatshed bill Zlatan

Winstonswhite
Posts: 2542
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 608 times
Has Liked: 310 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Winstonswhite » Fri Sep 11, 2020 9:33 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 8:34 pm
Good news for Burnley is its not only Southgate who doesn't think Tarks is in the same class as Maguire, Cody, Gomez and Mings.

£30m is about his market value but he's worth a lot more to us so we wont sell and it doesn't look like West Ham or Leicester are prepared to be mugged off by paying more
.... And that’s how you run a stable Premier League football club.

mill hill claret
Posts: 617
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 205 times
Has Liked: 726 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by mill hill claret » Fri Sep 11, 2020 9:34 pm

tarkys_ears wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 8:54 pm
Easy now.

My owner ain't goin nowhere. Heard it meself.
Made me laugh

Volvoclaret
Posts: 1449
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 12:45 pm
Been Liked: 664 times
Has Liked: 379 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Volvoclaret » Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:03 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:47 pm
He will be shown as a mercenary if he takes the big wage increase that will go with any increased bid to Burnley's satisfaction that West Ham may be stupid enough to make .
Many of our fans are already dubious about the way he left Brentford so let's wait to see if that increased bid arrives.
Whats with all the vitriol Liz baby, did he bang you and never rang. 🤔

AlargeClaret
Posts: 4452
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 1152 times
Has Liked: 182 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by AlargeClaret » Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:08 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:47 pm
He will be shown as a mercenary if he takes the big wage increase that will go with any increased bid to Burnley's satisfaction that West Ham may be stupid enough to make .
Many of our fans are already dubious about the way he left Brentford so let's wait to see if that increased bid arrives.
What an absolute load of rot ! Tarky has been brilliant for us as a player and investment , he’s in his peak years and of course wants international /euro football and and a top club and to max his earnings While WH are no “ top club” the money tends to talk . As for “ many of our fans “ being dubious about how he left Brentford ??While leaving a club is often a messy affair I doubt anyone gives a toss how he left them . If he goes he’ll go with many fans blessings that’s for sure
This user liked this post: Stayingup

claret2018
Posts: 2062
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm
Been Liked: 810 times
Has Liked: 26 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by claret2018 » Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:12 pm

Assuming he’s on £50k a week here, and West Ham doubled his wages he’d be clearing an extra 1.37m per year after tax.

There’s your answer as to why he’d want to move to a West Ham.

AfloatinClaret
Posts: 1842
Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 7:16 pm
Been Liked: 562 times
Has Liked: 1404 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by AfloatinClaret » Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:15 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:47 pm
He will be shown as a mercenary if he takes the big wage increase that will go with any increased bid...Many of our fans are already dubious about the way he left Brentford...
Not me. I fail to understand why football supporters get upset/annoyed at a player who moves on for a mega pay rise, when they would undoubtedly leave their own employer should a competing company in their own trade/profession offer them an identical job at twice the salary; I know I did.

jrgbfc
Posts: 8499
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 2106 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by jrgbfc » Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:50 pm

We can't afford to sell him at this stage. You'd like to think our recruitment team are fully aware he's likely to go next summer though and are already thinking about replacing him.

Cubanclaret
Posts: 1113
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:35 am
Been Liked: 286 times
Has Liked: 139 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Cubanclaret » Fri Sep 11, 2020 11:38 pm

According to BBC gossip West Ham have been priced out and won’t come back with another bid.
Well done Burnley if that’s the case.

HarryPottsDesk
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:21 am
Been Liked: 28 times
Has Liked: 2 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by HarryPottsDesk » Fri Sep 11, 2020 11:40 pm

I personally think the whole idea that Tarkowski would want a move to WHU is complete baloney. If he does want to move to a club with mediocre prospects, a mediocre manager, delusional fans, a hideous stadium and owners amongst the most contemptible in world football it can only be for the money. In which event the "want to play at the highest level" line is laughable, and his time at Burnley is up. But, personally I think it is baloney.

jojomk1
Posts: 4804
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 842 times
Has Liked: 577 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by jojomk1 » Sat Sep 12, 2020 6:57 am

Gordaleman wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:50 pm
Tarky aside, the thing that is pleasing me is that there has been no mention of Vydra leaving during this window. It seems that he is now more settled and perhaps feels that his undoubted talent is starting to be recognised at last.

I think he offers us something completely different to normal up front and I really hope he gets used more this season.
No Deeney for Watford last night

Just get that awful knot in the stomach when thinking of a swop with Vydra

BenWickes
Posts: 2000
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2020 6:27 pm
Been Liked: 645 times
Has Liked: 470 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by BenWickes » Sat Sep 12, 2020 7:05 am

jojomk1 wrote:
Sat Sep 12, 2020 6:57 am
No Deeney for Watford last night

Just get that awful knot in the stomach when thinking of a swop with Vydra
I would not be surprised at all if he rocked up at Burnley but he genuinely is still out recovering from surgery.

EarbyClaret
Posts: 1376
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:48 am
Been Liked: 498 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by EarbyClaret » Sat Sep 12, 2020 7:10 am

Deeney to West Brom according to Football Insider

Row Z
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:17 am
Been Liked: 79 times
Has Liked: 17 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Row Z » Sat Sep 12, 2020 7:57 am

Cubanclaret wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2020 11:38 pm
According to BBC gossip West Ham have been priced out and won’t come back with another bid.
Well done Burnley if that’s the case.
Hopefully is the case and shows that whilst securing specific targets can be problematic for us, we aren't selling our manager out with losing his best players on top. He's always maintained we don't need to sell and given our squad depth it shouldn't be an option unless the fee is astronomical.

I've posted a number of times that tarkys presence potentially helps secure three further years of premier league football worth hundreds of millions.

Danieljwaterhouse
Posts: 1009
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 308 times
Has Liked: 350 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Danieljwaterhouse » Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:01 am

Deeney has spoken about going out on loan and then coming back to Watford if they get promoted, not sure how I’d feel if I was a Watford fan about that kind of statement?

Danieljwaterhouse
Posts: 1009
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 308 times
Has Liked: 350 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Danieljwaterhouse » Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:02 am

West Ham is surely smoke and mirrors and they’ll be a serious offer and club working away to sign Tarks.

My fear is Newcastle and the obvious Leicester

BenWickes
Posts: 2000
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2020 6:27 pm
Been Liked: 645 times
Has Liked: 470 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by BenWickes » Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:18 am

Danieljwaterhouse wrote:
Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:01 am
Deeney has spoken about going out on loan and then coming back to Watford if they get promoted, not sure how I’d feel if I was a Watford fan about that kind of statement?
That would tally with Mourinho's interest. Spurs aren't exactly flush with money after building their stadium and the aftermath of Covid. Not sure I'd be happy if a Burnley player did that though.

Danieljwaterhouse
Posts: 1009
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 308 times
Has Liked: 350 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Danieljwaterhouse » Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:23 am

BenWickes wrote:
Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:18 am
That would tally with Mourinho's interest. Spurs aren't exactly flush with money after building their stadium and the aftermath of Covid. Not sure I'd be happy if a Burnley player did that though.
I’m trying to think how I’d feel if J Rod or Mee did it?

I think I’d be right royally annoyed!!!

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14566
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:45 am

Danieljwaterhouse wrote:
Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:01 am
Deeney has spoken about going out on loan and then coming back to Watford if they get promoted, not sure how I’d feel if I was a Watford fan about that kind of statement?
Is it any different to a Burnley player agreeing to stay for an extra season with the promise that the club would sell him if they didn't get promoted and then returning several years later when the club has been in the PL a number of years?

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14566
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:46 am

Danieljwaterhouse wrote:
Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:23 am
I’m trying to think how I’d feel if J Rod or Mee did it?

I think I’d be right royally annoyed!!!
J-Rod was sold because the club didn't get promoted and had promised to sell him if that was the case.
Then he returned after the club had been in the PL for a number of years and his then club wasn't.

Danieljwaterhouse
Posts: 1009
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 308 times
Has Liked: 350 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Danieljwaterhouse » Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:54 am

J Rod was a young lad, who wanted to play at the top and for England. Not 30 plus.

Row Z
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:17 am
Been Liked: 79 times
Has Liked: 17 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Row Z » Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:57 am

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:
Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:45 am
Is it any different to a Burnley player agreeing to stay for an extra season with the promise that the club would sell him if they didn't get promoted and then returning several years later when the club has been in the PL a number of years?
Yes completely different. In one scenario the player is willing to roll his sleeves up and commit to the cause. If it fails that season then they can continue to progress elsewhere. The Deeney scenario suggests he sees himself as being too good to scrap it out in the championship and therefore hes not willing to support the club try and achieve promotion. Given his long standing association with Watford I would have thought he'd have wanted to bring them back up, but he may see it that given his age he's got little opportunity to play in the premier league in future years, plus he may have taken a pay cut upon relegation.

NewClaret
Posts: 13436
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3087 times
Has Liked: 3808 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by NewClaret » Sat Sep 12, 2020 9:16 am

Danieljwaterhouse wrote:
Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:01 am
Deeney has spoken about going out on loan and then coming back to Watford if they get promoted, not sure how I’d feel if I was a Watford fan about that kind of statement?
Wouldn’t want Deeney within 100 miles of the Turf. Stick with our current forwards, thanks. Very happy with those guys.

Danieljwaterhouse
Posts: 1009
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 308 times
Has Liked: 350 times

Re: Tark - transfer

Post by Danieljwaterhouse » Sat Sep 12, 2020 9:18 am

NewClaret wrote:
Sat Sep 12, 2020 9:16 am
Wouldn’t want Deeney within 100 miles of the Turf. Stick with our current forwards, thanks. Very happy with those guys.
Can’t see him coming here, can’t see him wanting to go to Tottenham. West Brom seems a legit move.

Locked