I may be mistaken but Tarkowski was the nearest man to son when he started his run......he should have put him firmly on his Ars€!!
Tark - transfer
-
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
- Been Liked: 1034 times
- Has Liked: 1522 times
-
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
- Been Liked: 1034 times
- Has Liked: 1522 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Either that or 21 weeks later he still hasn't had the holes in his jeans sewed up - bless him. I know what it's like, I was 7 once!tarkys_ears wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:10 amLook on the instagram account, the same stuff they're wearing on a diff pic was posted 21 weeks ago - duno when that was - don't care.
-
- Posts: 4970
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1009 times
- Has Liked: 726 times
Re: Tark - transfer
So I was, stupid me. Although to be fair I don't use either.
Just checked on instagram and there's no way to download the original photo to get the timestamps. Hey at least I tried
Re: Tark - transfer
Apart from the fact there's no way Dyche would sanction such a trip during the season and a global pandemic. You have to wonder if we're lying about his injury if true. Looks like he's got an ouchie on his knee. Poor fella's torn his jeans and everything.
-
- Posts: 16936
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6972 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tark - transfer
I think you may be using hindsight to your advantage claiming that Tarkowski should have taken Son down 90 yards from our goal when he had about 5 Burnley players between him and the ball.
-
- Posts: 10338
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3342 times
- Has Liked: 1965 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Don’t ruin it for them!Oshkoshclaret wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 11:12 pmDefinite trolling. They’re both wearing exactly the same gear as a photo she posted in April.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Yes.....that's exactly what I saw on the day. I cant name the other 5....
-
- Posts: 8530
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2889 times
- Has Liked: 1763 times
Re: Tark - transfer
west ham sounds THE most toxic of environments to go judging by the radio this morning.
simon jordan and fans bemoaning the fact they should pay burnleys asking price for an older player who isnt worth it.
one bubbleheaded clown even added "we should be above teams like Burnley" as if that was relevant.
the owners inevitably getting tons of stick, but it doesn't seem to be a nice place in any respect.
simon jordan and fans bemoaning the fact they should pay burnleys asking price for an older player who isnt worth it.
one bubbleheaded clown even added "we should be above teams like Burnley" as if that was relevant.
the owners inevitably getting tons of stick, but it doesn't seem to be a nice place in any respect.
Re: Tark - transfer
Taken from sky sports
SULLIVAN ‘DEPRESSED’ BY WEST HAM TRANSFERS
David Sullivan has defended West Ham's lack of transfer activity after all but ruling out a renewed move for James Tarkowski.
Burnley have turned down two bids for centre-half Tarkowski, who turns 28 in November, and the cash-strapped Hammers are now looking elsewhere for defensive reinforcements.
"We've got two or three bids in, but the benchmark is very high,” co-owner Sullivan told talkSPORT. "We've got limited funds.
“If we had £400m to spend and someone said spend 10 per cent of it, £40m, on a 28-year-old centre-back from a Premier League club who will remain nameless, you'd probably get the player out.
“But to spend your entire budget on a 28-year-old centre-back, you're struggling. We're going to get no gate money, possibly all season. We've got to keep the club afloat and pay the wages.
"I can't go and sign two or three players the manager (David Moyes) doesn't want or we'd have a civil war at West Ham because I don't pick the players. Our manager is a manager, not a coach.
"I cannot say for sure we are going to sign anybody, and as each day passes, I get more depressed. There's no point saying otherwise. We'll go a little bit more, but we can't pay double what you value a player at. We haven't got the money; the club would go bankrupt. These are difficult times."
SULLIVAN ‘DEPRESSED’ BY WEST HAM TRANSFERS
David Sullivan has defended West Ham's lack of transfer activity after all but ruling out a renewed move for James Tarkowski.
Burnley have turned down two bids for centre-half Tarkowski, who turns 28 in November, and the cash-strapped Hammers are now looking elsewhere for defensive reinforcements.
"We've got two or three bids in, but the benchmark is very high,” co-owner Sullivan told talkSPORT. "We've got limited funds.
“If we had £400m to spend and someone said spend 10 per cent of it, £40m, on a 28-year-old centre-back from a Premier League club who will remain nameless, you'd probably get the player out.
“But to spend your entire budget on a 28-year-old centre-back, you're struggling. We're going to get no gate money, possibly all season. We've got to keep the club afloat and pay the wages.
"I can't go and sign two or three players the manager (David Moyes) doesn't want or we'd have a civil war at West Ham because I don't pick the players. Our manager is a manager, not a coach.
"I cannot say for sure we are going to sign anybody, and as each day passes, I get more depressed. There's no point saying otherwise. We'll go a little bit more, but we can't pay double what you value a player at. We haven't got the money; the club would go bankrupt. These are difficult times."
-
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 656 times
- Has Liked: 2899 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Think WH might be getting old feet. Sullivan was downbeat and the increased concerns that there will be no fans, further reduction in TV payments etc could scupper some big spending
-
- Posts: 3931
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 834 times
- Has Liked: 1332 times
- Location: burnley
Re: Tark - transfer
And there we have reality setting in, now we know fans are likely to be out all season. We must keep Tarks now and we will finish above West Ham for starters. We can sell him for much more when a vaccine is available next year, fingers crossed.karatekid wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:05 pmTaken from sky sports
SULLIVAN ‘DEPRESSED’ BY WEST HAM TRANSFERS
David Sullivan has defended West Ham's lack of transfer activity after all but ruling out a renewed move for James Tarkowski.
Burnley have turned down two bids for centre-half Tarkowski, who turns 28 in November, and the cash-strapped Hammers are now looking elsewhere for defensive reinforcements.
"We've got two or three bids in, but the benchmark is very high,” co-owner Sullivan told talkSPORT. "We've got limited funds.
“If we had £400m to spend and someone said spend 10 per cent of it, £40m, on a 28-year-old centre-back from a Premier League club who will remain nameless, you'd probably get the player out.
“But to spend your entire budget on a 28-year-old centre-back, you're struggling. We're going to get no gate money, possibly all season. We've got to keep the club afloat and pay the wages.
"I can't go and sign two or three players the manager (David Moyes) doesn't want or we'd have a civil war at West Ham because I don't pick the players. Our manager is a manager, not a coach.
"I cannot say for sure we are going to sign anybody, and as each day passes, I get more depressed. There's no point saying otherwise. We'll go a little bit more, but we can't pay double what you value a player at. We haven't got the money; the club would go bankrupt. These are difficult times."
-
- Posts: 3485
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
- Been Liked: 660 times
- Has Liked: 205 times
Re: Tark - transfer
He’s in the squad tonight irrespective of anything that might or might not happen.
-
- Posts: 2512
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:21 am
- Been Liked: 1667 times
- Has Liked: 2985 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Leaving aside our own need to retain Tarks I would never sell him to West Ham purely because I could not stomach the thought of that making Sullivan happier.summitclaret wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:15 pmAnd there we have reality setting in, now we know fans are likely to be out all season. We must keep Tarks now and we will finish above West Ham for starters. We can sell him for much more when a vaccine is available next year, fingers crossed.
-
- Posts: 9919
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2352 times
- Has Liked: 3183 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Chairman of a Premier League team made the following statement:
“If we had £XXm to spend and someone said spend X per cent of it, £Xm, on XXXXX from a Premier League club, you'd probably get the player out.
“But to spend your entire budget on XXXXX, you're struggling. We're going to get no gate money, possibly all season. We've got to keep the club afloat and pay the wages.
Remove the specifics about £400m, £40m and 28 years old and it could, no should, be a statement that every Chairman is making about football finances across all Premier League clubs. Maybe, Mike Garlick has already had this conversation at Burnley.
UTC
“If we had £XXm to spend and someone said spend X per cent of it, £Xm, on XXXXX from a Premier League club, you'd probably get the player out.
“But to spend your entire budget on XXXXX, you're struggling. We're going to get no gate money, possibly all season. We've got to keep the club afloat and pay the wages.
Remove the specifics about £400m, £40m and 28 years old and it could, no should, be a statement that every Chairman is making about football finances across all Premier League clubs. Maybe, Mike Garlick has already had this conversation at Burnley.
UTC
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Tark - transfer
One of the jewels in the crown is Tarks. Hope he stays put.
-
- Posts: 937
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:24 pm
- Been Liked: 196 times
- Has Liked: 11 times
-
- Posts: 11546
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3197 times
- Has Liked: 1876 times
- Contact:
Re: Tark - transfer
An hour to go before we find out
If he’s “fit” I can’t see him playing tonight if a move was imminent
If he’s “fit” I can’t see him playing tonight if a move was imminent
Re: Tark - transfer
As stated above. West Ham have joined Leicester in deciding to go for Fofana instead. Neither club prepared to go to what we want.
Re: Tark - transfer
For Fofana sounds like a sneeze (or the Scottish Football results)AshevilleNCClaret wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 4:56 pmwell.. west Ham just bid for Fofana....
https://sportslens.com/report-west-ham- ... na/315168/
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 4656
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1033 times
- Has Liked: 3194 times
Re: Tark - transfer
That's just fine by me!...........great player to have.
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 855 times
- Has Liked: 605 times
-
- Posts: 2075
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm
- Been Liked: 820 times
- Has Liked: 26 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Oh well. Bye Tarks
-
- Posts: 30735
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11063 times
- Has Liked: 5668 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Tark - transfer
bugger
Re: Tark - transfer
“Manchester United have taken an interest to Burnley’s James Tarkowksi and see him as an ideal replacement for Chris Smalling. No contact with agent or club yet but he’s on the list.“ Tweet from a Premier League ITK.
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:04 pm
- Been Liked: 855 times
- Has Liked: 605 times
Re: Tark - transfer
You know, maybe he's just injured? Why do people always assume the worst?
These 2 users liked this post: Leisure Burnleyareback2
-
- Posts: 15297
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3169 times
- Has Liked: 6775 times
Re: Tark - transfer
For info - thats an attention whore account, not a real one
Re: Tark - transfer
Fingers crossed!Gordaleman wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:15 pmYou know, maybe he's just injured? Why do people always assume the worst?
-
- Posts: 67962
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32574 times
- Has Liked: 5287 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Tark - transfer
I don't believe that Leicester have shown any interestboatshed bill wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:18 pmLeicester surely the better club for this lad. They really do scout well, buy cheapish and make a fortune.
Re: Tark - transfer
They do scout well. Apparently he had a good game against PSG the other week. They're no slouches. Half the price of Tarks and sell on to Chelsea for double/triple.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:18 pmLeicester surely the better club for this lad. They really do scout well, buy cheapish and make a fortune.
Re: Tark - transfer
If he's not 100 % fit why play him?
Re: Tark - transfer
Pope's not in the squad either.
Does that mean he's going as well?
Does that mean he's going as well?
-
- Posts: 5800
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Why on earth would we risk playing him tonight?
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tark - transfer
This user liked this post: Zlatan
-
- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3119 times
- Has Liked: 3841 times
Re: Tark - transfer
Dyche very coy about Tarks post-match: “Tarks not available, injured”. Nothing more.
That’s it, he’s off sadly.
That’s it, he’s off sadly.
-
- Posts: 67962
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32574 times
- Has Liked: 5287 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3119 times
- Has Liked: 3841 times
Re: Tark - transfer
West Ham?
-
- Posts: 67962
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32574 times
- Has Liked: 5287 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 3603
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
- Been Liked: 1338 times
- Has Liked: 757 times
- Location: Nantwich
Re: Tark - transfer
Who in their right mind would go to a rolling crash like West Ham? If he’s off, it’ll be to a Manchester club.
These 2 users liked this post: Danieljwaterhouse NewClaret
-
- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3119 times
- Has Liked: 3841 times
Re: Tark - transfer
I just find it so odd that a player who didn’t miss a game last year has got a toe injury from wearing a new pair of boots. Sounds implausible to me, even without the transfer speculation.ClaretTony wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 11:33 pmYes they did, they made two offers some time ago, both were rejected and they haven't come back despite SSN suggesting they had.
Re: Tark - transfer
What I don’t like is the media whoring him out to “big” clubs all the time - “surely Man Utd should make a move for Tarkowski” or “Leicester are still to make a move for him” I keep hearing snippets whilst listening to Sky Sports news etc, they have zero respect for our club as far as I can see
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Tark - transfer
It sounds more hopeful that we might be able to hold onto Tarks this window, however in the event that he goes, it's too be hoped we've got a ready-made replacement (Dawson?) in the works, we can't afford to play Kev Long for a full PL season I'm afraid, he's wholehearted but he's just not up to this level on a regular basis.
Re: Tark - transfer
From Nixon:
Forest. Burnley. Worrall won’t be going anywhere in a hurry. Foot injury. 5-6 week lay off.
Forest. Burnley. Worrall won’t be going anywhere in a hurry. Foot injury. 5-6 week lay off.
Re: Tark - transfer
So not content with losing a player to injury every match this season even players mentioned in the same breath as Burnley are getting injured!
These 3 users liked this post: FactualFrank Red Fox Rocks Socks summitclaret
-
- Posts: 3931
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 834 times
- Has Liked: 1332 times
- Location: burnley
-
- Posts: 3931
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 834 times
- Has Liked: 1332 times
- Location: burnley