Dementia warning came 54 years ago
-
- Posts: 9845
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2344 times
- Has Liked: 3164 times
Dementia warning came 54 years ago
Dementia warning came 54 years ago
Henry Winter, Chief Football Writer, Tuesday November 24 2020, 12.01am, The Times
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/aef9 ... 1360352e50
Introductory paras of lengthy article.
The pivotal point to establish in the emotive debate about dementia and football is how aware the authorities were about the dangers of heading, in the Sixties in particular. For any class action to succeed there has to be proof of negligence.
So the first piece of evidence for any lawyer considering taking on any case, should the families of those afflicted decide to call the authorities properly to account, can be found in the October 1, 1966, edition of the weekly Football League Review, the official journal of the Football League, and specifically the article on page six vividly headlined: “DANGER IN HEADING THE BALL?”
Even then, scarcely 60 days after the World Cup final, England’s greatest sporting moment, the game was discussing the very real possibilities of the risks from heading.
*********************
I know there's been other threads re footballers and dementia on mb last few days. I'm happy that this is merged, if felt appropriate.
Henry Winter, Chief Football Writer, Tuesday November 24 2020, 12.01am, The Times
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/aef9 ... 1360352e50
Introductory paras of lengthy article.
The pivotal point to establish in the emotive debate about dementia and football is how aware the authorities were about the dangers of heading, in the Sixties in particular. For any class action to succeed there has to be proof of negligence.
So the first piece of evidence for any lawyer considering taking on any case, should the families of those afflicted decide to call the authorities properly to account, can be found in the October 1, 1966, edition of the weekly Football League Review, the official journal of the Football League, and specifically the article on page six vividly headlined: “DANGER IN HEADING THE BALL?”
Even then, scarcely 60 days after the World Cup final, England’s greatest sporting moment, the game was discussing the very real possibilities of the risks from heading.
*********************
I know there's been other threads re footballers and dementia on mb last few days. I'm happy that this is merged, if felt appropriate.
-
- Posts: 3393
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 7:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1004 times
- Has Liked: 905 times
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
Without wishing to take sides on this debate I would say that heading, or mis-heading, a wet caser in the 60s is totally different to heading the coated balloon they play with now.
These 3 users liked this post: Colburn_Claret IanMcL MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 8069
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3060 times
- Has Liked: 5023 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
I would ask how many people with dementia have never headed a football in their lives.
This is putting 2 and 2 together and coming up 6.
This is putting 2 and 2 together and coming up 6.
These 2 users liked this post: Quicknick MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1180 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
Makes no difference, yes you are right in the olden days footballs were hell of a sight heavier but you couldn’t generate the same speed & velocity as you can nowadays with the lighter 1s so the danger is just offset.huw.Y.WattfromWare wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:10 pmWithout wishing to take sides on this debate I would say that heading, or mis-heading, a wet caser in the 60s is totally different to heading the coated balloon they play with now.
-
- Posts: 9845
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2344 times
- Has Liked: 3164 times
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
I know I don't remember the maths, but I think there's a lot about the trajectory of the ball and where the head is when it connects with the ball. My intuition is that a heavy ball would always be more likely to "jar" your head than the lighter balls do/did. So, you'd feel it in the back of your neck if you met a heavy ball "head on" with your forehead, but there'd be a lot more give in the lighter balls. I still played the occasional 11-a-side game when I was in my 50s. One of our subs had a great camera. He got a multi-shot series of me heading the ball away from a corner. It was surprising how much "give" the photo showed the ball had. I doubt the old leather casey would have responded that way - and I know I'd have been on the ground if I'd let one hit my head like that!Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:26 pmMakes no difference, yes you are right in the olden days footballs were hell of a sight heavier but you couldn’t generate the same speed & velocity as you can nowadays with the lighter 1s so the danger is just offset.
-
- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1133 times
- Has Liked: 1607 times
- Location: Worsthorne
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
Colburn_Claret wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:19 pmI would ask how many people with dementia have never headed a football in their lives.
This is putting 2 and 2 together and coming up 6.
Smoking causes cancer, it's been proved. My wife's sister died at the age of 7 despite never having smoked.
Perhaps 6 was the number then too ?
This user liked this post: Greenmile
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
Why should someone or some body 'be brought to account'?
I'm not denying the apparent fact that heading a football can cause dementia. The question is, should someone be held responsible for a very basic part of playing football which has been going on for a hundred years or more. This question equally applies to many sports - boxing, rugby, horse racing.... The risks can be reduced but eliminating them will radically alter the game.
I imagine if you take heading out of the game - the only solution to reduce the risks of brain damage - then a substantial portion of the players would no longer be suitable - Mee and Tarkowski for example.
The article is also poor when it claims that the Football League Review was some sort of important publication (perhaps on par with The Lancet say). It didn't actually sell 350,000 a week as most of them were free when you bought a football programme. It was a good read and was presumably used because most of the programmes at the time (ours in particular) were awful.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/20 ... -landmark/
The research is there - what is the solution?
I'm not denying the apparent fact that heading a football can cause dementia. The question is, should someone be held responsible for a very basic part of playing football which has been going on for a hundred years or more. This question equally applies to many sports - boxing, rugby, horse racing.... The risks can be reduced but eliminating them will radically alter the game.
I imagine if you take heading out of the game - the only solution to reduce the risks of brain damage - then a substantial portion of the players would no longer be suitable - Mee and Tarkowski for example.
The article is also poor when it claims that the Football League Review was some sort of important publication (perhaps on par with The Lancet say). It didn't actually sell 350,000 a week as most of them were free when you bought a football programme. It was a good read and was presumably used because most of the programmes at the time (ours in particular) were awful.
5 seems to be the answer:Colburn_Claret wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:19 pmI would ask how many people with dementia have never headed a football in their lives.
This is putting 2 and 2 together and coming up 6.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/20 ... -landmark/
The research is there - what is the solution?
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
If heading a football is a risk, where does that leave Boxing?
Like others, Old leather ball in the wet and laces, ugh! Like a rock coming your way!
Personally, I think the greater risk is the regular clash of heads.
Like others, Old leather ball in the wet and laces, ugh! Like a rock coming your way!
Personally, I think the greater risk is the regular clash of heads.
-
- Posts: 8069
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3060 times
- Has Liked: 5023 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
The problem with research like this, is it's tainted.Hipper wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:26 amWhy should someone or some body 'be brought to account'?
I'm not denying the apparent fact that heading a football can cause dementia. The question is, should someone be held responsible for a very basic part of playing football which has been going on for a hundred years or more. This question equally applies to many sports - boxing, rugby, horse racing.... The risks can be reduced but eliminating them will radically alter the game.
I imagine if you take heading out of the game - the only solution to reduce the risks of brain damage - then a substantial portion of the players would no longer be suitable - Mee and Tarkowski for example.
The article is also poor when it claims that the Football League Review was some sort of important publication (perhaps on par with The Lancet say). It didn't actually sell 350,000 a week as most of them were free when you bought a football programme. It was a good read and was presumably used because most of the programmes at the time (ours in particular) were awful.
5 seems to be the answer:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/20 ... -landmark/
The research is there - what is the solution?
IF you look for something, you are guaranteed to find it.
Wether it's finding racism in every casual remark, or seeking a link between football and dementia. IF you want it to be, then you will definitely find a link. It doesn't mean jack **** at the end of the day.
I don't know, but I doubt footballers are any more susceptible to the horrible affects of dementia than anybody else. The truth is, even if there was a link, so what? If it bothers some people, then don't play the game. There's no reason to spoil everyone else's pleasure. Boxing, motor sport, rock climbing, smoking, drinking everything we do carries a certain amount of risk. The day we wrap humanity up in bubble wrap, is the day we start evolving backwards.
-
- Posts: 8069
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3060 times
- Has Liked: 5023 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
I think in trying to mock me, you've just proved my point.Claret Till I Die wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 7:23 amSmoking causes cancer, it's been proved. My wife's sister died at the age of 7 despite never having smoked.
Perhaps 6 was the number then too ?
Thank you.
-
- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1133 times
- Has Liked: 1607 times
- Location: Worsthorne
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
I wasn't intending to mock you. All I wanted was your opinion which you freely give on dementia, a disease that my family are currently going through. If a link can be proven, then it may help other families through their own journey of dementia for which the government currently give very little help.Colburn_Claret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:49 amI think in trying to mock me, you've just proved my point.
Thank you.
Thank you
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
My auntie has dementia and never headed a ball in her life
-
- Posts: 8069
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3060 times
- Has Liked: 5023 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
Anything that can be done to help dementia sufferers or their families cope with the disease is to be applauded.Claret Till I Die wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:53 amI wasn't intending to mock you. All I wanted was your opinion which you freely give on dementia, a disease that my family are currently going through. If a link can be proven, then it may help other families through their own journey of dementia for which the government currently give very little help.
Thank you
I don't believe that this story line has anything to do with either though, it's just a headline seeking, self serving biased look at a tiny microcosm of society, imo. With the same data base I'm sure someone else could show that there is no link.
My thoughts are with you CTID, I've been fortunate not to have a family member suffer, but I know from others how heart breaking it can be to see the ones we care for suffer this awful disease.
-
- Posts: 8049
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2415 times
- Has Liked: 2115 times
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
Probably been mentioned a lot already but there's a World of difference between heading a rain sodden and mud covered ball (Pre-1970's) and heading one of the shiny light-weight, balloon types of the modern game.
Many of us will remember [sic] the sickening sensation through your upper body of catching one of the older balls square on your noggin. Ouch !
Imagine that 100 times per game. It would be like doing 10 rounds with Michael Gerard Tyson !
And, we're nicely back to a link with dementia. Common Sense says that you can't keep rattling the soft walnut inside your skull without doing some damage to it.
Many of us will remember [sic] the sickening sensation through your upper body of catching one of the older balls square on your noggin. Ouch !
Imagine that 100 times per game. It would be like doing 10 rounds with Michael Gerard Tyson !
And, we're nicely back to a link with dementia. Common Sense says that you can't keep rattling the soft walnut inside your skull without doing some damage to it.
-
- Posts: 2050
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
- Been Liked: 422 times
- Has Liked: 4481 times
- Location: COTTON TREE
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
About 54 years ago I headed a ball on a cold wintry night at Trawden Recreation Ground when training with Winewall Rangers F.C. At the end of training I apparently did not know where my clothes etc. were in the changing room. I woke up the next morning in Victoria Hospital, Burnley and asked the nurse where I was. She said I had asked her that 10 times already !! My initial reaction was to check to see if I still remembered my Latin/French/German verbs !! I have been ok since, I think, but others may dispute this !! I was thankful I played in midfield and not centre half or centre forward.
-
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 2588 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
Is anyone suggesting banning headers yet? Sport has risks, better to understand them and acknowledge them, then everyone can make up their own mind.
Boxing, rugby, cricket, NFL, motor racing.. can all occasionally be fatal. The list of long term injuries from those sports is also pretty grim but people still enjoy taking part and accept the damage they bring, now and in the future. Football needs to be the same - understand fully the risks and then let individuals and parents make their choice.
Boxing, rugby, cricket, NFL, motor racing.. can all occasionally be fatal. The list of long term injuries from those sports is also pretty grim but people still enjoy taking part and accept the damage they bring, now and in the future. Football needs to be the same - understand fully the risks and then let individuals and parents make their choice.
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
We'll see how you are progressing by counting how many times you make this post.MT03ALG wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 3:00 pmAbout 54 years ago I headed a ball on a cold wintry night at Trawden Recreation Ground when training with Winewall Rangers F.C. At the end of training I apparently did not know where my clothes etc. were in the changing room. I woke up the next morning in Victoria Hospital, Burnley and asked the nurse where I was. She said I had asked her that 10 times already !! My initial reaction was to check to see if I still remembered my Latin/French/German verbs !! I have been ok since, I think, but others may dispute this !! I was thankful I played in midfield and not centre half or centre forward.
This user liked this post: MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1180 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: Dementia warning came 54 years ago
True I don't doubt your word & I wouldn't like to find out which hurt most, a slow moving heavy object or something pinged at a crazy barbwire pullthru velocity, as an afterthought the heavier balls will generate some speed airborne coming down as gravity takes effect.Paul Waine wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:53 pmI know I don't remember the maths, but I think there's a lot about the trajectory of the ball and where the head is when it connects with the ball. My intuition is that a heavy ball would always be more likely to "jar" your head than the lighter balls do/did. So, you'd feel it in the back of your neck if you met a heavy ball "head on" with your forehead, but there'd be a lot more give in the lighter balls. I still played the occasional 11-a-side game when I was in my 50s. One of our subs had a great camera. He got a multi-shot series of me heading the ball away from a corner. It was surprising how much "give" the photo showed the ball had. I doubt the old leather casey would have responded that way - and I know I'd have been on the ground if I'd let one hit my head like that!