No surprise
-
- Posts: 4486
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
- Been Liked: 990 times
- Has Liked: 3266 times
- Location: Burnley
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
- Been Liked: 843 times
- Has Liked: 1050 times
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Re: No surprise
Can Liverpool and London clubs in tier 2 have small, socially distanced crowds then?
A bit unfair and unjustified to my mind!?
A bit unfair and unjustified to my mind!?
Last edited by CleggHall on Thu Nov 26, 2020 12:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4486
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
- Been Liked: 990 times
- Has Liked: 3266 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: No surprise
I totally agree Clegghall I dont think this has been thought through properly.It should be all or none in my opinion.
This user liked this post: DomBFC1882
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2491 times
- Has Liked: 1477 times
- Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates
-
- Posts: 1306
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
- Been Liked: 584 times
- Has Liked: 115 times
Re: No surprise
Whilst hard on those in tier 3, we’re only talking about competitive advantage in a sporting sense. It would be ridiculous to restrict fans from returning in areas deemed safe enough to do say. It would be akin to keeping all pubs shut across the country until the whole country is deemed low risk.
Last edited by PremierLeagueClass on Thu Nov 26, 2020 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets
-
- Posts: 4486
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
- Been Liked: 990 times
- Has Liked: 3266 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: No surprise
'Liverpool, London can welcome back fans, but not Manchester'
http://www.skysports.com/share/12142794
http://www.skysports.com/share/12142794
-
- Posts: 4486
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
- Been Liked: 990 times
- Has Liked: 3266 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: No surprise
well 2000 Burnley fans could make a heck of a noise and would be a boost to our players so it would give us an advantage if we were allowed to attend.Maybe 2000 fans spread out inside an 60,000 capacity stadium would not be as effective.
Re: No surprise
I’m not sure they could make a heck of a noise spread out across the stadium.The Enclosure wrote: ↑Thu Nov 26, 2020 12:10 pmwell 2000 Burnley fans could make a heck of a noise and would be a boost to our players so it would give us an advantage if we were allowed to attend.Maybe 2000 fans spread out inside an 60,000 capacity stadium would not be as effective.
-
- Posts: 2069
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm
- Been Liked: 813 times
- Has Liked: 26 times
Re: No surprise
I would prefer to wait for full crowds personally. It will be like going on a pre-season friendly against League 1 opposition.
This user liked this post: DomBFC1882
-
- Posts: 18088
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3863 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: No surprise
Our own councillors asked for us to go in tier 3.
-
- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 10:35 pm
- Been Liked: 247 times
- Has Liked: 90 times
Re: No surprise
Just had to change plans from manc to lpool.for dec
Easily done
Easily done
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: No surprise
No surprise. But hoping that the clubs who do get fans back in can help make it safe and easy for others to follow. Its a positive step forward.
Besides, id rather someone else be the early adopter on going back to crowds!
Besides, id rather someone else be the early adopter on going back to crowds!
-
- Posts: 3957
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
- Been Liked: 1770 times
- Has Liked: 470 times
Re: No surprise
That would have been based on the level of funding they receive from Central Government dependent on which tier they are in.
-
- Posts: 5542
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:05 pm
- Been Liked: 2340 times
- Has Liked: 1405 times
- Location: Costa del Padihamos beach.
Re: No surprise
Post removed
Re: No surprise
For christ's sake stop being so selfish and just let some true, like minded fans (whoever they support) have a chance to go to a match if it is deemed by others to be safer than Burnley
These first few weeks will then hopefully be the catalyst for all clubs to have fans back in the new year
These first few weeks will then hopefully be the catalyst for all clubs to have fans back in the new year
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets
-
- Posts: 3922
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 834 times
- Has Liked: 1331 times
- Location: burnley
Re: No surprise
The sooner all people comply with the rules - the sooner we can get at least some fans back on the Turf.
These 2 users liked this post: dpinsussex Billy Balfour
Re: No surprise
Apart from anything else, I think it would be tactically foolish to reject any sort of "concession" from the government towards letting people back in. If clubs don't take what they can get, the rules may exclude them altogether next time.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
- Been Liked: 895 times
- Has Liked: 1102 times
- Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre
Re: No surprise
Post removed
Re: No surprise
Post removed
Re: No surprise
Post removed
-
- Posts: 67869
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32529 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: No surprise
I was ok with this discussing the effect on Burnley FC and it would have remained open had it done so
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie