Tarkowski
Tarkowski
How about he keeps his mouth shut instead of telling everyone how desperate he is to leave and instead learns to pass to his own team mates maybe?
I don’t know why he thinks he’s some ball playing Pirlo type, he’s an absolute donkey with the ball at his feet.
I don’t know why he thinks he’s some ball playing Pirlo type, he’s an absolute donkey with the ball at his feet.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Tarkowski
By all accounts on here..... If Maguire's worth £80million tarks is worth £40 million dont be silly.
-
- Posts: 10171
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Tarkowski
Anyone else remember their first shandy
More lemonade next time
More lemonade next time
These 9 users liked this post: Woodleyclaret FactualFrank DomBFC1882 Zlatan evensteadiereddie Stayingup bfcjg Bosscat MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 6978
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1490 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: Tarkowski
At fault for one goal, but the lack of challenges by our powderpuff midfield didn't do our back four any favours
The constantly drifting inside by our two full backs allowed City to play down the flanks at will leading to three goals.
The constantly drifting inside by our two full backs allowed City to play down the flanks at will leading to three goals.
Re: Tarkowski
4th and 5th goals started off with aimless clearances by Tarks as well.
This user liked this post: Dark Cloud
Re: Tarkowski
Its Man City away, if anything the last few seasons has told us, it's that regardless of personnel, tactics, formations we usually get a good thumping.
They usually get 4 or 5, they usually deserve 6 or 7.
It was absolutely another free hit where even the most deluded of fans expected nothing.
Just to add, that starting 11, and subsequent bench SHOULD be getting walloped at most grounds in the premier league.
The manager has been asked to work with 1 hand tied behind his back... again
SD is working with about 14 fit senior pros and a couple that cant even really be classed as even premier league players.
They usually get 4 or 5, they usually deserve 6 or 7.
It was absolutely another free hit where even the most deluded of fans expected nothing.
Just to add, that starting 11, and subsequent bench SHOULD be getting walloped at most grounds in the premier league.
The manager has been asked to work with 1 hand tied behind his back... again
SD is working with about 14 fit senior pros and a couple that cant even really be classed as even premier league players.
This user liked this post: DomBFC1882
Re: Tarkowski
Don’t think he will be knocking on Southgates door
any time soon he needs to wake up and don’t pass to the opposition . He just average defender nothing else .
Does not help when your fullbacks mark fresh air making
Everyone else look vulnerable against a top side .
any time soon he needs to wake up and don’t pass to the opposition . He just average defender nothing else .
Does not help when your fullbacks mark fresh air making
Everyone else look vulnerable against a top side .
-
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 5:38 pm
- Been Liked: 60 times
- Has Liked: 99 times
Re: Tarkowski
Tarkowski is no longer interested in playing for Burnley and we need to get rid as soon as possible. He seems to think he can’t get in the England team because he plays for Burnley. In reality it’s because when he did appear for England he was s*** in both games. He actually thinks he’s better than he is. He has become toxic. Get Long in and bench Tarks.
-
- Posts: 17280
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6492 times
- Has Liked: 2919 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Tarkowski
From Hero to Zero....its the Burnley way.
These 3 users liked this post: evensteadiereddie IanMcL MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 1682
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 2:21 pm
- Been Liked: 462 times
- Has Liked: 2398 times
Re: Tarkowski
Longsidebogs wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:15 amTarkowski is no longer interested in playing for Burnley and we need to get rid as soon as possible. He seems to think he can’t get in the England team because he plays for Burnley. In reality it’s because when he did appear for England he was s*** in both games. He actually thinks he’s better than he is. He has become toxic. Get Long in and bench Tarks.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tarkowski
If he has no interest in playing for Burnley then he's hardly going to purposely be lazy and put in crap performances.Longsidebogs wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:15 amTarkowski is no longer interested in playing for Burnley and we need to get rid as soon as possible. He seems to think he can’t get in the England team because he plays for Burnley. In reality it’s because when he did appear for England he was s*** in both games. He actually thinks he’s better than he is. He has become toxic. Get Long in and bench Tarks.
He wants himself in the shop window to attract as many other clubs as possible.
-
- Posts: 5797
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Tarkowski
He’s a good defender but really didn’t understand the need for him or his agent to publicly declare he wants to leave. Those conversations and thoughts should be kept in house. For as poor as his pass was for the first goal I thought he was superb on Monday night against Palace and played well at Brighton.
These 2 users liked this post: evensteadiereddie Stayingup
-
- Posts: 18106
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3875 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Tarkowski
They should be, but it will ensure he moves in January. Same with Vydra, he has kept his head down but tried to move in the last 3 windows but Dyche won't allow him. So his agents goes public and the fans will put pressure on for their player to be sold.Steve-Harpers-perm wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:45 amHe’s a good defender but really didn’t understand the need for him or his agent to publicly declare he wants to leave. Those conversations and thoughts should be kept in house. For as poor as his pass was for the first goal I thought he was superb on Monday night against Palace and played well at Brighton.
This thread starting is an example.
This user liked this post: Steve-Harpers-perm
-
- Posts: 17280
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6492 times
- Has Liked: 2919 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Tarkowski
I dont get all the hate coming Tarkowski's way,he has been Magnificent for us,you cant blame him wanting the best for himself and his family,there isn't a poster on here who wouldn't do exactly the same thing it they were given a chance to better themselves
These 2 users liked this post: IanMcL Vino blanco
Re: Tarkowski
That's a good point, keeping his head down and doing the right thing hasn't exactly done Vydra any favours has it. He'd be better doing a Gibson and getting his move, it's a short career and they have to look out for number 1.Quickenthetempo wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:54 amThey should be, but it will ensure he moves in January. Same with Vydra, he has kept his head down but tried to move in the last 3 windows but Dyche won't allow him. So his agents goes public and the fans will put pressure on for their player to be sold.
This thread starting is an example.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tarkowski
I thought Vydra had come out and said he's pleased to have signed a new contract, saying he's happy, gets on well with the players and is going to continue fighting for his place?
Re: Tarkowski
The only quotes I've seen were from his agent suggesting he wants out. Don't really blame him tbh.
-
- Posts: 18106
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3875 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Tarkowski
He might of, it was his agent on Twitter that said he wants to leave. It can be found in the new contract thread.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:58 amI thought Vydra had come out and said he's pleased to have signed a new contract, saying he's happy, gets on well with the players and is going to continue fighting for his place?
He has given a few interviews back in his homeland telling of the moves he had blocked by Burnley.
Re: Tarkowski
Tarks is a busted flush with Burnley
He needs to move on
He needs to move on
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tarkowski
Tbf I'd be amazed if Vydra was happy. He's probably worked out that under Dyche no matter what he does he'll always be 4th choice. Unless he's like Kevin Long and happy to pick up a good wage and not play.
Re: Tarkowski
Not as many teams as possible. Just one of the 4 champions League teams he wants.FactualFrank wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:38 amIf he has no interest in playing for Burnley then he's hardly going to purposely be lazy and put in crap performances.
He wants himself in the shop window to attract as many other clubs as possible.
-
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1151 times
- Has Liked: 1625 times
- Location: Worsthorne
Re: Tarkowski
FactualFrank wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:58 amI thought Vydra had come out and said he's pleased to have signed a new contract, saying he's happy, gets on well with the players and is going to continue fighting for his place?
Vydra hasn't signed a new contract though.
-
- Posts: 6978
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1490 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: Tarkowski
Vydra signed a 1 yr extension last week
-
- Posts: 4751
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
- Been Liked: 953 times
- Has Liked: 238 times
Re: Tarkowski
Not true, the club triggered a 1 year extension in their favour.
This user liked this post: Claret Till I Die
Re: Tarkowski
As said not really how it works as nobody would argue Maguire is better than VVD just because he cost more.
Do I think Maguire is worth £80m ? No - do I think he’s better than Tarks ? Definitely yes and other than a few Burnley fans I’m not sure who else would disagree.
Tarks had a pretty shocking game yesterday but I still think for Burnley he’s a very good player. To us he probably is worth £30m or £40m.
I not so sure he is worth that to another team who might not have to defend as much as us. His distribution is poor and he does not have great pace either. He doesn’t look comfortable coming out with the ball and given his height and strength in the air he is nowhere near as prolific or dangerous as people like Maguire, VVD or even the likes of Zouma, Keane, etc in the opposition box.
Re: Tarkowski
With West Ham showing signs of improvement they may be a decent move for him. I don't think he's good enough to play for an established top 6 or 7 side.
-
- Posts: 5797
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Tarkowski
He’s already proven himself good enough to be part of a team that’s finished 7th and 10th in recent seasons!
-
- Posts: 2128
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:57 am
- Been Liked: 895 times
- Has Liked: 134 times
Re: Tarkowski
we would miss Mee more than this over rated prima donna. looks very heavy for me this season.
Re: Tarkowski
He had a poor game yesterday along with others. In previous games including the last one he's played well. Players have off days. That's all.
Re: Tarkowski
Very true he's been fantastic for us. He, Mee and Pope have kept us in contention in many games. That is without much protection from a weak midfield.Steve1956 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:56 amI dont get all the hate coming Tarkowski's way,he has been Magnificent for us,you cant blame him wanting the best for himself and his family,there isn't a poster on here who wouldn't do exactly the same thing it they were given a chance to better themselves
I recall the Tarks v Keane thread. He wasn't so bad then.
Regarding his passing, yesterday who was he going to pass too. Fact is this is our weakest team in a long time and its looking like we might pay the price.
-
- Posts: 2597
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 674 times
- Has Liked: 244 times
Re: Tarkowski
Tarkowski is a superb centre half. He might have had a poor game yesterday but it sounds like he wasn’t on his own.
Drop Tarkowski? Bring Long in? Give your heads a wobble.
Pope, Mee and Tarkowski are our Holy Trinity. If we stay up all 3 of them will be a big reason for this.
Drop Tarkowski? Bring Long in? Give your heads a wobble.
Pope, Mee and Tarkowski are our Holy Trinity. If we stay up all 3 of them will be a big reason for this.
These 4 users liked this post: BurnleyFC Steve-Harpers-perm DCWat Stayingup
-
- Posts: 8528
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2889 times
- Has Liked: 1763 times
Re: Tarkowski
if we had beaten city there would be no words of criticism at all, no one suggesting he cant be bothered, or can't pass.
it was one game against a team that batter us by the same margin as regular as christmas. give the lad a break.
it was one game against a team that batter us by the same margin as regular as christmas. give the lad a break.
Re: Tarkowski
I've got to say, given the reputation he arrived with from Brentford, I've been less than impressed with Tarkowski's ability on the ball. I think his passing is rank bad at times, playing balls that Ben Mee would get absolute pelters for.
On the other hand though, his actual defending ability has been a revelation on the whole which is probably why he's been such a huge success at Burnley. We value and require good defenders way more than ball playing skills from the back.
I think he'll probably go in January, and I think it might well be best for all concerned if he does after his comments the other week. I certainly don't see him just walking into another side's back four though, unless it's Fulham.
On the other hand though, his actual defending ability has been a revelation on the whole which is probably why he's been such a huge success at Burnley. We value and require good defenders way more than ball playing skills from the back.
I think he'll probably go in January, and I think it might well be best for all concerned if he does after his comments the other week. I certainly don't see him just walking into another side's back four though, unless it's Fulham.
Re: Tarkowski
Even though he’s had a relatively poor start to the season, Tarkowski is still an excellent defender, and now his talisman and captain is back alongside him I’d imagine he’ll start to regain last season’s form.
He only said what most of the fans are thinking anyway. He’s as ****** off with the abysmal lack of investment in the first time as we are, and who can blame him?
He only said what most of the fans are thinking anyway. He’s as ****** off with the abysmal lack of investment in the first time as we are, and who can blame him?
Re: Tarkowski
From many thousands of miles away it would seem to me that the club is in total free fall. When Chairman and Manager don’t get on then it leads to situations like Tarks. Last season he was a giant. This season he just wants away. Others will be the same. If Dyche gets a decent offer he will be gone too. Even Garlick wants out. We are in a mess
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tarkowski
Could easily turn that on its head and say a new takeover next month could be a huge boost, with players and manager happy to stay.FCBurnley wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:34 amFrom many thousands of miles away it would seem to me that the club is in total free fall. When Chairman and Manager don’t get on then it leads to situations like Tarks. Last season he was a giant. This season he just wants away. Others will be the same. If Dyche gets a decent offer he will be gone too. Even Garlick wants out. We are in a mess
-
- Posts: 4406
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1259 times
- Has Liked: 1368 times
Re: Tarkowski
Unfair for people to single out Tarkowski yesterday and equally unfair to reference his decision not to sign a new contract as evidence as to why he didn't play well.
-
- Posts: 18106
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3875 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Tarkowski
Mee was just as bad yesterday. Especially for the 2nd goal.pushpinpussy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:47 amwe would miss Mee more than this over rated prima donna. looks very heavy for me this season.
-
- Posts: 10919
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5563 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: Tarkowski
I'm pretty sure that if he wanted away that much he would've made it happen.FCBurnley wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:34 amFrom many thousands of miles away it would seem to me that the club is in total free fall. When Chairman and Manager don’t get on then it leads to situations like Tarks. Last season he was a giant. This season he just wants away. Others will be the same. If Dyche gets a decent offer he will be gone too. Even Garlick wants out. We are in a mess
Re: Tarkowski
There’s some real twisting of the current goings on there.FCBurnley wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:34 amFrom many thousands of miles away it would seem to me that the club is in total free fall. When Chairman and Manager don’t get on then it leads to situations like Tarks. Last season he was a giant. This season he just wants away. Others will be the same. If Dyche gets a decent offer he will be gone too. Even Garlick wants out. We are in a mess
As FF said, you could just as easily put a more positive spin on things, particularly where the takeover is concerned.
If Tarkowski thinks his career is better suited at a bigger club, that’s not going to change even, if Garlick and Dyche are best mates. Where the Tarkowski situation has more likely caused issue, is between Garlick and Dyche themselves.
Dyche may well be much happier if the new owners are more willing / able to back him in the market.
-
- Posts: 9337
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4108 times
- Has Liked: 6591 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Tarkowski
And they are quite wrong. No way is Maguire twice as good as Tarks... so it should be more like £60m for Tarks, because Maguire IS better, but not by much.
As it is, after what’s been said, we’d be lucky to get £20m now for Tarks.
-
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
Re: Tarkowski
He, and the rest of the defence, would have performed better yesterday if they had had a midfield in front of them who knew what they were doing, especially helping out by doing their defensive jobs properly. Our current midfield is poor, although I do believe it is partly the manager's tactics, he doesn't seem to believe in playing forward through the midfield of any more.
Regarding Tarks' future, I think he will be gone in January and it might be better for all concerned: he has however been absolutely magnificent for us in a claret shirt and will remain one of my favorite all time central defenders at Turf Moor.
Regarding Tarks' future, I think he will be gone in January and it might be better for all concerned: he has however been absolutely magnificent for us in a claret shirt and will remain one of my favorite all time central defenders at Turf Moor.
-
- Posts: 7220
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2379 times
- Has Liked: 3807 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Tarkowski
He isn't interested in renewing his contract at Burnley, nothing more, nothing less.
We had 11 players yesterday struggling to match the opposition in physicality, speed of thought and speed of movement. All 11 lost that battle yet none gave up on purpose.
More a case of being outclassed than not interested yesterday. He will continue to play to the best of his ability which like most players can fluctuate.
We had 11 players yesterday struggling to match the opposition in physicality, speed of thought and speed of movement. All 11 lost that battle yet none gave up on purpose.
More a case of being outclassed than not interested yesterday. He will continue to play to the best of his ability which like most players can fluctuate.
This user liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46
-
- Posts: 7413
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2326 times
- Has Liked: 2174 times
Re: Tarkowski
My thoughts as wellJohnMac wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:16 pmHe isn't interested in renewing his contract at Burnley, nothing more, nothing less.
We had 11 players yesterday struggling to match the opposition in physicality, speed of thought and speed of movement. All 11 lost that battle yet none gave up on purpose.
More a case of being outclassed than not interested yesterday. He will continue to play to the best of his ability which like most players can fluctuate.
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret
-
- Posts: 6978
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1490 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: Tarkowski
Spot on JohnMac