Cornet's Disallowed Goal
-
- Posts: 18007
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4074 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Wood a toenail offside? Or was he on? Looked marginal.
Thought they were getting rid of those close calls this season?
Thought they were getting rid of those close calls this season?
These 2 users liked this post: St Austell Claret Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 7361
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2220 times
- Has Liked: 2211 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Prior to VAR existing, the goal would have stood and no one would have complained, as Wood would have been deemed level.
Take a bow everyone who wanted VAR brought in.
Take a bow everyone who wanted VAR brought in.
Last edited by fidelcastro on Sat Oct 30, 2021 8:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: Stayingup
-
- Posts: 5900
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1771 times
- Has Liked: 359 times
- Location: The Banana Stand
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Not for Burnley
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Thought it was his eyelash that was offside !
-
- Posts: 16892
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6963 times
- Has Liked: 1483 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Only saw it on the big screen and it was tight - and the kind of call that I think most people would prefer to be classed as level, particularly when not given offside by the AR. Apparently the lines used to determine the decision have been made thicker, although the ones displayed to viewers don't appear to be.ElectroClaret wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 8:36 pmWood a toenail offside? Or was he on? Looked marginal.
Thought they were getting rid of those close calls this season?
-
- Posts: 2625
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 509 times
- Has Liked: 886 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Farcical.
Marginal, at best.
Funny how they can overturn decisions there but missed the punch by Krul on Vydra.
Said it before, and I'll say it after today: VAR gives the big clubs 2 goes at getting the decision they want.
Marginal, at best.
Funny how they can overturn decisions there but missed the punch by Krul on Vydra.
Said it before, and I'll say it after today: VAR gives the big clubs 2 goes at getting the decision they want.
These 11 users liked this post: Dark Cloud MT03ALG elwaclaret clitheroeclaret3 Cirrus_Minor bobinho bfcjg Zlatan mybloodisclaret Juan Tanamera Taffy on the wing
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Its offside
This is what VAR is good for
Offsides
We will get some that help us, and some that won't
This is what VAR is good for
Offsides
We will get some that help us, and some that won't
-
- Posts: 6729
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 1820 times
- Has Liked: 1800 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
And who thought it would be any different?
This user liked this post: nil_desperandum
-
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
There was a Manu fan in the bar watching with us and his comment was that “ if that had been Manu they wouldn’t have cancelled it”.
-
- Posts: 5878
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1695 times
- Has Liked: 2534 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Take your point but that's twice Wood has been VAR'd this season that I can instantly think of with no more than a toenail in it. Still waiting for it to balance out.Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 8:45 pmIts offside
This is what VAR is good for
Offsides
We will get some that help us, and some that won't
-
- Posts: 6729
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 1820 times
- Has Liked: 1800 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Believe me, that never happens.Silkyskills1 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 8:52 pmTake your point but that's twice Wood has been VAR'd this season that I can instantly think of with no more than a toenail in it. Still waiting for it to balance out.
But you already know that.
This user liked this post: Silkyskills1
-
- Posts: 8144
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3082 times
- Has Liked: 5063 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
I keep repeating, it isn't VAR it's the officials.fidelcastro wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 8:39 pmPrior to VAR existing, the goal would have stood and no one would have complained, as Wood would have been deemed level.
Take a bow everyone who wanted VAR brought in.
They said at the start of the season these marginal calls would be given in favour of the attacking team, but have reneged on it. No surprise really, they are doing everything they can to **** fans off, in order to have VAR ditched.
This user liked this post: Zlatan
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Mo Salah at LiverpoolSilkyskills1 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 8:52 pmTake your point but that's twice Wood has been VAR'd this season that I can instantly think of with no more than a toenail in it. Still waiting for it to balance out.
And the people saying it wouldn't have been called back for Man United, please!
-
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 98 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Cameras aren't good enough to say with any certainty whether it was off or on when it's that tight. Suprised they've scratched that one off but hey ho.
-
- Posts: 5133
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1172 times
- Has Liked: 2920 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
I thought VAR was only being used when a "clear and obvious" error had been made. That decision was neither of those things.
These 2 users liked this post: Juan Tanamera Silkyskills1
-
- Posts: 5133
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1172 times
- Has Liked: 2920 times
-
- Posts: 16892
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6963 times
- Has Liked: 1483 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
That's never been the case with offsides, I'm surprised people keep saying this.burnleymik wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 8:56 pmI thought VAR was only being used when a "clear and obvious" error had been made. That decision was neither of those things.
-
- Posts: 5133
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1172 times
- Has Liked: 2920 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Going off that pic it's woods arm that is offside, you can't score with your arm
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Thing is, I can see Wood is offside there
What is the issue?
What is the issue?
-
- Posts: 30707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11052 times
- Has Liked: 5660 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Wood is offside
Cornet doesn't do tap ins
Cornet doesn't do tap ins
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
The key word in the definition you’ve linked is ‘subjective’. Offsides aren’t subjective decisions.burnleymik wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 9:00 pmBecause it's their own definition:
https://www.premierleague.com/news/1297392
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
That’s actually ridiculous
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
I’m not sure I can, even the arbitrary lines seem to be on top of each other. Besides this whole ‘toenail offside’ thing seems to be contra to the reason the offside rule exists, to stop the attacker gaining an advantage by being in front of the last defender. I’m not sure anyone can argue Wood gained an unfair advantage.Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 9:06 pmThing is, I can see Wood is offside there
What is the issue?
These 6 users liked this post: ClaretMov Vino blanco RVclaret bobinho Juan Tanamera IanMcL
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
I'm sorry but that line is absolute ********.
Where has the thicker line for benefit of the doubt gone?
To the naked eye there, Wood is behind the defender and definitely level.
If they are taking his shoulder into consideration, then if the ball hit that part of the body, by definition it would have to be totally within the shoulder line. Bit like umpires call in cricket, so the striker loses both ways. I don't think decisions like this help the game, and it's not just us.
One look at that and the VAR should say "looks level", no need for extra examination. Not a clear and obvious error either.
Where has the thicker line for benefit of the doubt gone?
To the naked eye there, Wood is behind the defender and definitely level.
If they are taking his shoulder into consideration, then if the ball hit that part of the body, by definition it would have to be totally within the shoulder line. Bit like umpires call in cricket, so the striker loses both ways. I don't think decisions like this help the game, and it's not just us.
One look at that and the VAR should say "looks level", no need for extra examination. Not a clear and obvious error either.
These 3 users liked this post: bobinho BleedingClaret IanMcL
-
- Posts: 838
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:55 pm
- Been Liked: 246 times
- Has Liked: 118 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
That doesn't look like the moment the ball was played to me.
These 2 users liked this post: burnleymik evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 18007
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4074 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
-
- Posts: 5133
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1172 times
- Has Liked: 2920 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
This is exactly why I disagree with martin p. It absolutely is subjective. Is it the moment it leaves the foot, is it exactly as the pass is being played? Drag that back one split second of a frame and he could be onside. It depends the exact point they take the freeze frame, hence it should be as per their own definition, clear and obvious.yorkyclaret wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 9:27 pmThat doesn't look like the moment the ball was played to me.
This user liked this post: bobinho
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Really?martin_p wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 9:13 pmI’m not sure I can, even the arbitrary lines seem to be on top of each other. Besides this whole ‘toenail offside’ thing seems to be contra to the reason the offside rule exists, to stop the attacker gaining an advantage by being in front of the last defender. I’m not sure anyone can argue Wood gained an unfair advantage.
I can see both Cornet and Wood are ahead of their respective defenders
At the time me and a couple around us thought it was offside as well (but not as tight as that!)
-
- Posts: 67892
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32542 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Big difference, the punch on Vydra was a subjective decision made by people, today's objective decision was made by technology.JimmyRobbo wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 8:43 pm
Funny how they can overturn decisions there but missed the punch by Krul on Vydra.
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
It’s not really me you’re disagreeing with, it’s the laws of the game. Offside is not seen as subjective as you’re either in front of the defender or you aren’t. Fouls, etc are down to the opinion of the officials.burnleymik wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 9:59 pmThis is exactly why I disagree with martin p. It absolutely is subjective. Is it the moment it leaves the foot, is it exactly as the pass is being played? Drag that back one split second of a frame and he could be onside. It depends the exact point they take the freeze frame, hence it should be as per their own definition, clear and obvious.
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Cornet clearly is, but not relevant to the decision. From side on Wood would look level with the defender and that’ll be why the linesman didn’t give it. The lines on the picture don’t even prove anything, although that may be down to it being poor definition.
-
- Posts: 5726
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 2833 times
- Has Liked: 141 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
What you've got there is a classic case of a striker with momentum leaning forward, and a defender holding a line doing the opposite. Wood is coming from deeper and his feet ar3 behind the defender, the torso might not be. But I'll bet on the frame before wood is not offside at all and I don't suppose the kicking of the ball lines up perfectly to the freeze frame- it never does.Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 10:00 pmReally?
I can see both Cornet and Wood are ahead of their respective defenders
At the time me and a couple around us thought it was offside as well (but not as tight as that!)
For me that should not be offside, for that reason. It overstates what technology can do. Fattening the lines helps but doesn't eradicate that flaw.
This user liked this post: nil_desperandum
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Thing is, I don't have a problem with that, as long as its consistent, and tbf, it appears to be consistently appliedclaretspice wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 10:10 pmWhat you've got there is a classic case of a striker with momentum leaning forward, and a defender holding a line doing the opposite. Wood is coming from deeper and his feet ar3 behind the defender, the torso might not be. But I'll bet on the frame before wood is not offside at all and I don't suppose the kicking of the ball lines up perfectly to the freeze frame- it never does.
For me that should not be offside, for that reason. It overstates what technology can do. Fattening the lines helps but doesn't eradicate that flaw.
-
- Posts: 13509
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3114 times
- Has Liked: 3833 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Outrageous that goes against us again.
Was it a pen? Can’t find that anywhere but it looked it to me from the stand.
Was it a pen? Can’t find that anywhere but it looked it to me from the stand.
-
- Posts: 9330
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4106 times
- Has Liked: 6589 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Utter ********.Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 8:45 pmIts offside
This is what VAR is good for
Offsides
We will get some that help us, and some that won't
It is ok to say that it isn’t up for discussion, and that offside is one of the few decisions that is black and white, and maybe it is ,but it’s absolutely totally and utterly ********.
We’d scored. We’d celebrated and we’d all gone back to the start point ready to kick off. It was an absolute AGE, before anyone knows
there was anything suspect about it. The Lino was stood on the line completely perplexed by this whole thing, And even then, lines were needed to make the call. Neither clear nor obvious. It was EASILY two minutes to come to a decision. That’s utter shite. Really bad. It’s fuckin awful in fact, and it’s NOT what VAR is supposed to be about.
Simply calling it right because the “lines” showed it to be marginally offside is no longer right as far as the rules go. It may well have been “right” but it was also ********.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
If its consistently applied, and it appears to be, then its offside and I'm comfortable with thatbobinho wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 10:19 pmUtter ********.
It is ok to say that it isn’t up for discussion, and that offside is one of the few decisions that is black and white, and maybe it is ,but it’s absolutely totally and utterly ********.
We’d scored. We’d celebrated and we’d all gone back to the start point ready to kick off. It was an absolute AGE, before anyone knows
there was anything suspect about it. The Lino was stood on the line completely perplexed by this whole thing, And even then, lines were needed to make the call. Neither clear nor obvious. It was EASILY two minutes to come to a decision. That’s utter shite. Really bad. It’s fuckin awful in fact, and it’s NOT what VAR is supposed to be about.
Simply calling it right because the “lines” showed it to be marginally offside is no longer right as far as the rules go. It may well have been “right” but it was also ********.
Anytime I have doubts about VAR, I just remember various Arsenal last minute winners and I'm ok with it
Whatever we have now is better than that
-
- Posts: 11530
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3189 times
- Has Liked: 1870 times
- Contact:
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Well I’m hoping MOTD show it because Sky haven’t in their highlights
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Last season rules - it was offside
It was changed for this season - so should be allowed
Regardless - until the electronic timing of the pass is sorted it will always be open to interpretation
It was changed for this season - so should be allowed
Regardless - until the electronic timing of the pass is sorted it will always be open to interpretation
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
I think we actually benefitted from VAR more than most last season. I’m sure Sky had a chart that had us in the top 5-6 for benefitting from itSilkyskills1 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 8:52 pmTake your point but that's twice Wood has been VAR'd this season that I can instantly think of with no more than a toenail in it. Still waiting for it to balance out.
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Had we lost 1-0 or 2-1 etc I would whinge the loudest ... F**ks sake lads we bloody won ...
Lets celebrate the win ... cheer Woody's wonder goal, Cheer Lowts header (how the hell did Lowts be in that position) and cheer in the fact we have in Max Cornet a bloody wonderful player, skilful, fantastic footballer and a grand lad in interviews to boot ...
Lets have more of the same next Saturday down at Chelski
UTC
Lets celebrate the win ... cheer Woody's wonder goal, Cheer Lowts header (how the hell did Lowts be in that position) and cheer in the fact we have in Max Cornet a bloody wonderful player, skilful, fantastic footballer and a grand lad in interviews to boot ...
Lets have more of the same next Saturday down at Chelski
UTC
This user liked this post: Silverturf
-
- Posts: 10328
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3342 times
- Has Liked: 1964 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Which bit of Chris Wood is offside there?
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Apparently he forgot to cut his fingernails this morning, cost us a goal.
-
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 691 times
- Has Liked: 362 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
Why does consistency matter when it's been explained numerous times before that this method could lead to an incorrect decision? Someone who is consistently wrong is still wrong!!Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 10:21 pmIf its consistently applied, and it appears to be, then its offside and I'm comfortable with that
Anytime I have doubts about VAR, I just remember various Arsenal last minute winners and I'm ok with it
Whatever we have now is better than that
-
- Posts: 5368
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1652 times
- Has Liked: 404 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
For me that’s onside, relatively level and not gaining an advantage, which the thicker lines are meant to show.
As ClaretSpice points out above the instant of the freeze frame is a subjective moment, it cannot be definitively shown that is the moment of the pass. We’ve proven on here before that the VAR camera frame rate (the official ones not the TV ones) means a striker with momentum could gain around 10cm (from memory) between frames.
I would also change the rules and say the lino has to put the flag up as soon as the goal is scored if it is thought to be off, so at least the crowd know instantly what the officials think pending a check. It’s stupid to keep the flag down permanently, all it does is wind the fans up and ruin the moment.
As ClaretSpice points out above the instant of the freeze frame is a subjective moment, it cannot be definitively shown that is the moment of the pass. We’ve proven on here before that the VAR camera frame rate (the official ones not the TV ones) means a striker with momentum could gain around 10cm (from memory) between frames.
I would also change the rules and say the lino has to put the flag up as soon as the goal is scored if it is thought to be off, so at least the crowd know instantly what the officials think pending a check. It’s stupid to keep the flag down permanently, all it does is wind the fans up and ruin the moment.
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
That’s exactly what happens.CrosspoolClarets wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 11:32 pmI would also change the rules and say the lino has to put the flag up as soon as the goal is scored if it is thought to be off, so at least the crowd know instantly what the officials think pending a check. It’s stupid to keep the flag down permanently, all it does is wind the fans up and ruin the moment.
-
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 1:35 pm
- Been Liked: 84 times
- Has Liked: 249 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
I was sat directly in line with the players ( Bob Lord) adjacent to the away fans. Definitely onside not wishful thinking but onside.
-
- Posts: 5368
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1652 times
- Has Liked: 404 times
-
- Posts: 16892
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6963 times
- Has Liked: 1483 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
The AR called it onside in this instance though. And I think when the players are as ‘level’ as these pictures show, it would be reasonable to go with the on-field call. In fact, I would surprise if we don’t see this changed soon, unless the hawk eye system is introduced. Thankfully being on the wrong side of this fine margin didn’t cost us today.CrosspoolClarets wrote: ↑Sat Oct 30, 2021 11:32 pmFor me that’s onside, relatively level and not gaining an advantage, which the thicker lines are meant to show.
As ClaretSpice points out above the instant of the freeze frame is a subjective moment, it cannot be definitively shown that is the moment of the pass. We’ve proven on here before that the VAR camera frame rate (the official ones not the TV ones) means a striker with momentum could gain around 10cm (from memory) between frames.
I would also change the rules and say the lino has to put the flag up as soon as the goal is scored if it is thought to be off, so at least the crowd know instantly what the officials think pending a check. It’s stupid to keep the flag down permanently, all it does is wind the fans up and ruin the moment.
Last edited by Rileybobs on Sun Oct 31, 2021 12:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1007 times
- Has Liked: 725 times
Re: Cornet's Disallowed Goal
I'm personally a fan of VAR but this decision was just wrong, nothing to do with VAR itself, but a bad decision from the VAR ref.
These 2 users liked this post: Bosscat NewClaret