If the clause wasn't effective in January it can't be activatedJakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 2:42 pmIt’s never been in dispute that the release clause was activated the dispute/doubt is when the contractual release clause was effective from, without being 100% sure but believing Simon Jordan & his sources I think at the earliest the clause could have been triggered is in the summer but in order for the transfer to be completed earlier we waivered that & received an excess on top. It’s never been in dispute that the clause was activated it’s when the clause was effective from.
£27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
-
- Posts: 10085
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4159 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1179 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
The waiver was the mechanism.claretonthecoast1882 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 2:44 pmIf the clause wasn't effective in January it can't be activated
-
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:51 am
- Been Liked: 288 times
- Has Liked: 310 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
So the clause wasn’t activated, NUFC just offered £5m more and we said “ok then”?
Seems much more likely that the amount they bid was what the release clause stated and thus activated, as the clubs said in the press release announcing the transfer and Dyche said in the press conference.
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1179 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
Ok then, people are just making stories up for absolutely no reason coinciding with us desperate for cash that sounds far more plausible.RicardoMontalban wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 2:50 pmSo the clause wasn’t activated, NUFC just offered £5m more and we said “ok then”?
Seems much more likely that the amount they bid was what the release clause stated and thus activated, as the clubs said in the press release announcing the transfer and Dyche said in the press conference.
-
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:51 am
- Been Liked: 288 times
- Has Liked: 310 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
So we can do away with this nonsense of mechanisms as and so on.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 3:03 pmOk then, people are just making stories up for absolutely no reason coinciding with us desperate for cash that sounds far more plausible.
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1179 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
I was referring to people telling false tales about release clauses being effectiveRicardoMontalban wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 3:11 pmSo we can do away with this nonsense of mechanisms as and so on.
-
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:51 am
- Been Liked: 288 times
- Has Liked: 310 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
Yes, I get that.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 3:15 pmI was referring to people telling false tales about release clauses being effective
But what are these false tales, and who's making them? You mean the club saying the clause had been met, then Dyche repeating as much in every press conference / interview since? How do you know these are false?
Yet you believe Simon Jordan and Talksport who have nothing to back up their own claims.
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1179 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
Well apart from SJ & the people in & about football, CW when questioned about the release clause refused to clarifyRicardoMontalban wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 3:24 pmYes, I get that.
But what are these false tales, and who's making them? You mean the club saying the clause had been met, then Dyche repeating as much in every press conference / interview since? How do you know these are false?
Yet you believe Simon Jordan and Talksport who have nothing to back up their own claims.
if it was active or summer triggered, I don’t see why anybody wouldn’t clarify if it was just a straightforward active activation but on the other hand summer triggered I can perfectly understand the refusal, dyche hasn’t mentioned anything about the release clause apart from that it was activated which hasn’t been in any dispute in any shape or form. Maybe I’ve missed SD specifically saying that the release clause wasn’t effective in the summer.
-
- Posts: 10085
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4159 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
Just accept you backed the wrong horse in Jordan.
This is as dumb as your "alleged" stance on not going to games due to kneeling to 3 seconds prior to kick off or your wish for the public to decide a criminals punishment.
This is as dumb as your "alleged" stance on not going to games due to kneeling to 3 seconds prior to kick off or your wish for the public to decide a criminals punishment.
-
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:51 am
- Been Liked: 288 times
- Has Liked: 310 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
I've not seen anything that I'd regard as conclusive from SJ or anyone else on that side of the argument, but I have seen unequivocal comments from the club that state NUFC offered an amount that triggered the clause in CW's contract that meant he could listen to them and decide, and off he popped.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 3:44 pmWell apart from SJ & the people in & about football, CW when questioned about the release clause refused to clarify
if it was active or summer triggered, I don’t see why anybody wouldn’t clarify if it was just a straightforward active activation but on the other hand summer triggered I can perfectly understand the refusal, dyche hasn’t mentioned anything about the release clause apart from that it was activated which hasn’t been in any dispute in any shape or form. Maybe I’ve missed SD specifically saying that the release clause wasn’t effective in the summer.
It's either activated or it isn't, none of this farting around with mechanisms or whatever else. It seems you absolutely are disputing this point.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
Old people not admitting they are wrong is a real problem in the Uk today it has to be said
These 2 users liked this post: RicardoMontalban Jakubclaret
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1179 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
It was activated before it should have been & waived in return for an higher fee I don’t understand what’s difficult to grasp?RicardoMontalban wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 3:55 pmI've not seen anything that I'd regard as conclusive from SJ or anyone else on that side of the argument, but I have seen unequivocal comments from the club that state NUFC offered an amount that triggered the clause in CW's contract that meant he could listen to them and decide, and off he popped.
It's either activated or it isn't, none of this farting around with mechanisms or whatever else. It seems you absolutely are disputing this point.
-
- Posts: 4488
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2560 times
- Has Liked: 757 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
I refer you to my earlier post. The club, Dyche and Wood all confirmed the release clause was activated. Here's Wood saying itJakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 3:44 pmWell apart from SJ & the people in & about football, CW when questioned about the release clause refused to clarify
if it was active or summer triggered, I don’t see why anybody wouldn’t clarify if it was just a straightforward active activation but on the other hand summer triggered I can perfectly understand the refusal, dyche hasn’t mentioned anything about the release clause apart from that it was activated which hasn’t been in any dispute in any shape or form. Maybe I’ve missed SD specifically saying that the release clause wasn’t effective in the summer.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... id-burnley
-
- Posts: 9434
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1179 times
- Has Liked: 778 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
That’s never been in dispute it’s when the release clause was effective from.quoonbeatz wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 4:12 pmI refer you to my earlier post. The club, Dyche and Wood all confirmed the release clause was activated. Here's Wood saying it
https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... id-burnley
-
- Posts: 4488
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2560 times
- Has Liked: 757 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
It was effective when he was sold. That's how it was activated. If it hadn't been activated, nobody would be talking about a release clause.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 4:14 pmThat’s never been in dispute it’s when the release clause was effective from.
-
- Posts: 10085
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4159 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
Yeah but Simon said ........quoonbeatz wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 4:17 pmIt was effective when he was sold. That's how it was activated. If it hadn't been activated, nobody would be talking about a release clause.
-
- Posts: 4488
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2560 times
- Has Liked: 757 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
Of course. Been about 40 years since I've played that game, no wonder I'm rusty.
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
The difference is this.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 2:42 pmIt’s never been in dispute that the release clause was activated the dispute/doubt is when the contractual release clause was effective from, without being 100% sure but believing Simon Jordan & his sources I think at the earliest the clause could have been triggered is in the summer but in order for the transfer to be completed earlier we waivered that & received an excess on top. It’s never been in dispute that the clause was activated it’s when the clause was effective from.
If the release clause was activated, then the release clause was met and we had no choice to sell.
If the release clause did not apply during the current window, then there was no active release clause at all. the release clause was not activated, and Burnley sold because they wanted to.
I think what you might have in mind is that Newcastle agreed to pay the sum of money mentioned in the release clause. That is irrelevant to this discussion. The point at issue is whether Burnley had a choice of whether to sell or not, and for that point, it makes no difference whether Newcastle offered £100m or half a crown.
This user liked this post: Jakubclaret
-
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:51 am
- Been Liked: 288 times
- Has Liked: 310 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
What is this absolute nonsense?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 4:10 pmIt was activated before it should have been & waived in return for an higher fee I don’t understand what’s difficult to grasp?
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
Nonsense is what it is. Best thing is just to drop it and let Jakub carry on living in his own little fantasy world.
-
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:51 am
- Been Liked: 288 times
- Has Liked: 310 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
Guess I'm just fascinated by their one-poster crusade against logic.
-
- Posts: 16681
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6891 times
- Has Liked: 1471 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
is this still going?
-
- Posts: 9585
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3146 times
- Has Liked: 10202 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
Brilliant, innit ?
-
- Posts: 10840
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5517 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: £27m for Wood - should we just pay it to MSD?
Even by Jakub's standards.