Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
claret2018
Posts: 2072
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm
Been Liked: 819 times
Has Liked: 26 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claret2018 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:12 pm

joey13 wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:08 pm
So you won’t miss Pope or Tarkowski then ?
Not really. I’d be happy to see a brand new starting 11.

Murger
Posts: 4276
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 1245 times
Has Liked: 847 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Murger » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:13 pm

We could do a lot worse than get someone like Gary Cahill in on a freebie.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67902
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32546 times
Has Liked: 5279 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:13 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:12 pm
I don’t blame him.

Collins, Pope and Cornet - I expected to lose all 3.
It was always going to happen once you coupled our finances with relegation

BuryClaret
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:26 am
Been Liked: 71 times
Has Liked: 37 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by BuryClaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:14 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:11 pm
Cornet’s agent is working dammed hard to make that happen.
Yep, when you consider he was playing Champions League football just a couple of seasons ago it was never likely that he would stay for the Championship.

paulatky
Posts: 1441
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:25 am
Been Liked: 220 times
Has Liked: 772 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by paulatky » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:14 pm

What is Pace doing to our club !!
Not looking forward to the next couple of years at all

ClaretTony
Posts: 67902
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32546 times
Has Liked: 5279 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:14 pm

Murger wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:13 pm
We could do a lot worse than get someone like Gary Cahill in on a freebie.
Not played since January. Think he got a bad injury.

Doubt we’d look at players of his age now in any case.

dandeclaret
Posts: 3563
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 2604 times
Has Liked: 301 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dandeclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:14 pm

claret2018 wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:05 pm
He is a talent, but I’ve said before, I wouldn’t miss any of last years team
I fear you're in for a rude awakening over the coming years, if you don't miss players from when the club is at / close to it's zenith.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:15 pm

This news is so bad. Collins is one of the only genuine premier league quality players we have.

Our chances of promotion have now significantly decreased

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Nori1958 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:15 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:13 pm
It was always going to happen once you coupled our finances with relegation
Always going to happen when there's a release clause as well
This user liked this post: RVclaret

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:15 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:13 pm
It was always going to happen once you coupled our finances with relegation
Best players usually get sold on relegation.

Bournemouth made 75m in sales when they came down and spent a grand total of 0.

Glad we aren’t doing that.

agreenwood
Posts: 3174
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1756 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by agreenwood » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:15 pm

I don’t think we were ever getting £30-40m for a defender with less than half a Prem season under his belt.

There’s bags of potential there, but I’m not sure how many Championship to Premier League transfers there have been for more than £20m. Particularly for a defender.

Us selling Keane & Bournemouth selling Ake for huge fees were anomalies really and both had played more at the top level.
This user liked this post: Quicknick

ClaretTony
Posts: 67902
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32546 times
Has Liked: 5279 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:15 pm

dandeclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:14 pm
I fear you're in for a rude awakening over the coming years, if you don't miss players from when the club is at / close to it's zenith.
Spot on Dan. Already lost three outstanding players in Pope, Tarkowski & Mee.
This user liked this post: paulatky

dandeclaret
Posts: 3563
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 2604 times
Has Liked: 301 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by dandeclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:16 pm

When do we get to ask the question legitimately on asset stripping?

The football club is going to end up the only loser in this whole sorry affair. Exciting times.
This user liked this post: paulatky

NewClaret
Posts: 13518
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3115 times
Has Liked: 3836 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by NewClaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:16 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:15 pm
Best players usually get sold on relegation.

Bournemouth made 75m in sales when they came down and spent a grand total of 0.

Glad we aren’t doing that.
That’s true

Nori1958
Posts: 3833
Joined: Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
Been Liked: 1112 times
Has Liked: 347 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Nori1958 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:16 pm

paulatky wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:14 pm
What is Pace doing to our club !!
Not looking forward to the next couple of years at all
Easily sorted, stay away :lol:

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:17 pm

dandeclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:16 pm
When do we get to ask the question legitimately on asset stripping?

The football club is going to end up the only loser in this whole sorry affair. Exciting times.
:D :D

elwaclaret
Posts: 9000
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2014 times
Has Liked: 2914 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by elwaclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:18 pm

I think the aim is get rid of as many Premier league wages, for this season an have a squad to build to such payments when necessary to tie in longer second contracts and allow a firm core to develop as a group. I had hoped Collins would be part of it, we’ll see I guess.

Elizabeth
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 1259 times
Has Liked: 1368 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Elizabeth » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:19 pm

Collins/Cornet/McNeil/Brownhill/ Roberts.

Looks like Collins can be crossed off.

Once clubs get serious about our boys they are off.

Add to Tarkowski/ Mee / Pope /Weghorst.

The exit path was laid some time ago and is irreversible

matttheclaret
Posts: 584
Joined: Mon May 04, 2020 10:17 am
Been Liked: 147 times
Has Liked: 24 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by matttheclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:19 pm

I'd say for any of these young players we are signing - don't get too attached to them. I'd say virtually all of them will have release clauses in their contracts which end up being considerably lower than we think it should be.

It's the ALK model isn't it? Sign for cheap(ish) and aim for a smallish profit. I have my doubts it's a model that will get us back into the Premier League any time soon.
This user liked this post: paulatky

taio
Posts: 11639
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by taio » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:19 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:15 pm
Best players usually get sold on relegation.

Bournemouth made 75m in sales when they came down and spent a grand total of 0.

Glad we aren’t doing that.
And that's why comparing us to Wolves rejecting a bid for one of their players is a totally different context, along with broader financial conditions of course.

BleedingClaret
Posts: 3311
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 988 times
Has Liked: 1660 times
Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by BleedingClaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:20 pm

Collins looked likely to be talented when we signed him

Stepped in by default due to injuries last season and did well

But he’s far from proven and the pressure induced mistake he made against Newcastle highlighted his immaturity

I’d like to keep him but I don’t feel like we’re necessarily losing a super talented player, just a player with all the right physical attributes and potential
These 2 users liked this post: Elizabeth Quicknick

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:21 pm

dandeclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:16 pm
When do we get to ask the question legitimately on asset stripping?

The football club is going to end up the only loser in this whole sorry affair. Exciting times.
Fair points Dande.

The better question is what have the club actually benefitted from this lot?

elwaclaret
Posts: 9000
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2014 times
Has Liked: 2914 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by elwaclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:21 pm

dandeclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:16 pm
When do we get to ask the question legitimately on asset stripping?

The football club is going to end up the only loser in this whole sorry affair. Exciting times.
Any time you want, just not on this thread as has been proved by previous threads. Though they tend not to last long as the abuse hurlers will be along shortly.

kentonclaret
Posts: 6530
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 982 times
Has Liked: 205 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by kentonclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:21 pm

It won't reflect well on Vincent Kompany as an ex central defender turned manager if he assembles a squad that can't defend for a bag of toffees.

Especially as the toffees now have Keane and Tarkowski in their ranks.

Bosscat
Posts: 25652
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8538 times
Has Liked: 18286 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Bosscat » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:22 pm

Collins ...
Attachments
20220711_172003.jpg
20220711_172003.jpg (282.4 KiB) Viewed 2039 times
Last edited by Bosscat on Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:22 pm

taio wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:19 pm
And that's why comparing us to Wolves rejecting a bid for one of their players is a totally different context, along with broader financial conditions of course.
No - my point has always been that we should keep McNeil at all costs, as I believe he will dominate this league and suddenly be a 25m+ player again (like Gibbs White now).

Jason O’Connor is usually spot on with Irish players and reported a release clause a while back around 20m, just to add some perspective.

fidelcastro
Posts: 7362
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2220 times
Has Liked: 2211 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fidelcastro » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:23 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:15 pm
This news is so bad. Collins is one of the only genuine premier league quality players we have.
Bambi on ice according to you.

claretandy
Posts: 4751
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 238 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by claretandy » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:24 pm

Nixon saying that it would have to be more than 20, Boden saying that there's nothing to stand it up at this end.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:24 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:23 pm
Bambi on ice according to you.
Well done you have taken a snippet from one match rating thread.

I also said on numerous other ones that he was top class.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4546
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2603 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by quoonbeatz » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:25 pm

A shame as Collins has the potential to be one of the best but this isn't unexpected; he all but said he was leaving weeks ago after he scored that goal for Ireland.

Zlatan
Posts: 5458
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 2229 times
Has Liked: 5739 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Zlatan » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:25 pm

Bosscat wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:22 pm
Collins ...
That’s a reference to Cullen

ClaretTony
Posts: 67902
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32546 times
Has Liked: 5279 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:25 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:22 pm
No - my point has always been that we should keep McNeil at all costs, as I believe he will dominate this league and suddenly be a 25m+ player again (like Gibbs White now).

Jason O’Connor is usually spot on with Irish players and reported a release clause a while back around 20m, just to add some perspective.
He’s virtually always spot on with Irish players. Has been with all those we’ve signed from Hendrick onwards.
This user liked this post: RVclaret

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:28 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:25 pm
He’s virtually always spot on with Irish players. Has been with all those we’ve signed from Hendrick onwards.
Yes - interesting one this as no other outlet has reported it.

Nixon still thinks we want more than 20.5m.

Bosscat
Posts: 25652
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8538 times
Has Liked: 18286 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Bosscat » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:28 pm

Zlatan wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:25 pm
That’s a reference to Cullen
I know 🤣 but couldn't edit the post and/or Delete ... hey ho tis the way of this board now ...
This user liked this post: Zlatan

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11121
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:29 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:25 pm
He’s virtually always spot on with Irish players. Has been with all those we’ve signed from Hendrick onwards.
One of the best on social media in terms of accuracy

BurnleyPaul
Posts: 510
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 158 times
Has Liked: 45 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by BurnleyPaul » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:31 pm

claretandy wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:24 pm
Nixon saying that it would have to be more than 20, Boden saying that there's nothing to stand it up at this end.
Feels to me like Wolves are trying to unsettle Nathan Collins prior to making a ‘lowball’ offer that we feel we need to accept as Collins wants to move…

Spijed
Posts: 17125
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Spijed » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:32 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:02 pm
Reality of relegation, and the reality of having cash issues unfortunately
But what happened to the idea that we sell players for a good profit after buying them?

I thought that was the business model we are supposed to be adopting?

When you take out Stoke's cut it probably won't leave us with too much profit.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:34 pm

BurnleyPaul wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:31 pm
Feels to me like Wolves are trying to unsettle Nathan Collins prior to making a ‘lowball’ offer that we feel we need to accept as Collins wants to move…
Percy is 100% accurate when he tweets

Nixon is not

Its a done deal

Juan Tanamera
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 771 times
Has Liked: 10094 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Juan Tanamera » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:35 pm

warksclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 4:53 pm
Or we are absolutely desperate and clutching at the first bid. Disappointing if thats the case
How do you know it's the first bid and who told John Percy the fee was £20m.
Genuine questions.

UpTheClaretsFCBK
Posts: 1334
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
Been Liked: 372 times
Has Liked: 14 times
Location: Blackburn

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by UpTheClaretsFCBK » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:35 pm

New policy of buying youth is only good if we keep our experienced players.

We can't expect to challenge for promotion with Hardwood-Bellis, Egan-Riley, Keving Long and Luke McNally as our centre backs.

It's just not going to happen.

Pace seems intent on accepting any offer we get for our senior pros.

Insanity.

fidelcastro
Posts: 7362
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2220 times
Has Liked: 2211 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fidelcastro » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:35 pm

Spijed wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:32 pm
But what happened to the idea that we sell players for a good profit after buying them?

I thought that was the business model we are supposed to be adopting?

When you take out Stoke's cut it probably won't leave us with too much profit.
I think you need to read the post you quoted.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:36 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:34 pm
Percy is 100% accurate when he tweets

Nixon is not

Its a done deal
Percy said they are advanced talks at that price, not that we have accepted that price, so no it’s not a done deal yet.

KRBFC
Posts: 18144
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3809 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by KRBFC » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:37 pm

truly sickening business if so, £20m? and the fkn rest. £10m for Pope was outrageous too.

How much of that £20m is gonna be reinvested? sell a truly incredible young talent for pennies profit and replace him with a freebie kid from Man City and a loan player. We must have brought in 5/6 players and spent less than £10m :lol:

£15m profit in January window, we all know which black hole that went into. It's morally wrong player sales are paying this debt, pay for your own f**king seat at the table. I said this from the very start, it's an absolute disgrace the club and team is financially suffering to pay money for new owners.

PSG spent £170m on Mbappe, Burnley FC spent £170m on Alan Pace.

burnleymik
Posts: 5139
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1176 times
Has Liked: 2922 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by burnleymik » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:37 pm

Not sure I am that keen on two very very young inexperienced CB's and Keeper. Feels like we are asking for trouble, unless Longy is going to start!

fidelcastro
Posts: 7362
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2220 times
Has Liked: 2211 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by fidelcastro » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:37 pm

UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:35 pm
New policy of buying youth is only good if we keep our experienced players.

We can't expect to challenge for promotion with Hardwood-Bellis, Egan-Riley, Keving Long and Luke McNally as our centre backs.

It's just not going to happen.

Pace seems intent on accepting any offer we get for our senior pros.

Insanity.
Collins is only 21, isn't he? Hardly what I'd describe as a senior pro.

Spijed
Posts: 17125
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Spijed » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:37 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:35 pm
I think you need to read the post you quoted.
But we are never going to get into a position of buy low sell high then if we'll always be desperate for the cash.

burnleymik
Posts: 5139
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1176 times
Has Liked: 2922 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by burnleymik » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:38 pm

fidelcastro wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:37 pm
Collins is only 21, isn't he? Hardly what I'd describe as a senior pro.
That's true, but he was a regular at Stoke in the Championship and now has Premier League experience under his belt. That would be invaluable with the players we now have in.

warksclaret
Posts: 6696
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1705 times
Has Liked: 791 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by warksclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:38 pm

agreenwood wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:15 pm
I don’t think we were ever getting £30-40m for a defender with less than half a Prem season under his belt.

There’s bags of potential there, but I’m not sure how many Championship to Premier League transfers there have been for more than £20m. Particularly for a defender.

Us selling Keane & Bournemouth selling Ake for huge fees were anomalies really and both had played more at the top level.
I wonder if the current management could have got £25m for Michael Keane

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:39 pm

RVclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:36 pm
Percy said they are advanced talks at that price, not that we have accepted that price, so no it’s not a done deal yet.
Bet you that it is

He only tweets when the deal is certain to happen

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:40 pm

Lancasterclaret wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:39 pm
Bet you that it is

He only tweets when the deal is certain to happen
He tweeted Hull had bid 3m plus add ons for Scott Twine with a deal advancing.

Post Reply