Clarets Vs Newcastle
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 39 times
- Has Liked: 16 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Casper2 - not quite how you see a comparison of fan status from my post. Merely that, I have happily got involved in the forum for over 2 decades.
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
What do you want me to do ?JimmyRobbo wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:00 pmLots of things are perfect for me.
You never have anything sensible to add. Week after week.
Oh I know what you could just ignore my posts , is that simple enough a task for you ?
-
- Posts: 2546
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 723 times
- Has Liked: 2037 times
- Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
I would say we looked good against Forest and the majority of the United game. I was pretty happy with our performance against City, but was disappointed by how easily beaten we were against Spurs and Villa. If I took those two latter games as a measuring stick I would be extremely concerned due to our defensive frailties but today, against united and forest we’ve looked better defensively, which tells me we are growing and improving defensively and I expect this to continue to improve.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 4:57 pmOk I get your point, but from the teams we have played and our performances to date. Can you honestly say we look premier league quality?
This all may look better if we get a good win Tuesday night. But I am actually going to start worrying about VKs future if we lose against Luton.
These 4 users liked this post: Paul Waine RVclaret Colburn_Claret NewClaret
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Yes the fixtures have been tough, yes no-one was expecting a lot of points from them.
Isn't that really obvious? It's almost not worth typing, surely?
But we haven't done enough to give us a chance of coming away with a point or three. We've been slow, sloppy, naïve and to be honest, don't look to have much grit about us.
The basics are the same regardless of opposition. Fitness, pace, strength, organisation - they just haven't been there yet to the level they need to be.
Yes, we've played some immense teams. But we haven't done enough of what we can do to impact games.
Isn't that really obvious? It's almost not worth typing, surely?
But we haven't done enough to give us a chance of coming away with a point or three. We've been slow, sloppy, naïve and to be honest, don't look to have much grit about us.
The basics are the same regardless of opposition. Fitness, pace, strength, organisation - they just haven't been there yet to the level they need to be.
Yes, we've played some immense teams. But we haven't done enough of what we can do to impact games.
This user liked this post: Wo Didi
-
- Posts: 2588
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:36 pm
- Been Liked: 562 times
- Has Liked: 142 times
- Location: the ghost in the atom
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Well. A result that was probably expected what’s not expected is teams we think may be in the mix come the end of the season winning today, wolves / Luton / palace all winning
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 624 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
That’s the worst we have looked all season
-
- Posts: 5368
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Sad to say, but it was men against boys and we did well to keep it to 2 nil. It was what I expected, however I'm more concerned about Tuesday night, that will be very difficult.
-
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 547 times
- Has Liked: 51 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
That was very poor regardless of the opposition .
Men against boys. Mistakes all over the park. We never looked like scoring . Ponderous, slow, bad decision making, we made them look better than they were as well. From Ramseys stupid mistake to the horrendous defending for their second it wasn’t god enough in the slightest .
Luton is now a huge huge game midweek. If we take nothing from that then we are in deep trouble
Men against boys. Mistakes all over the park. We never looked like scoring . Ponderous, slow, bad decision making, we made them look better than they were as well. From Ramseys stupid mistake to the horrendous defending for their second it wasn’t god enough in the slightest .
Luton is now a huge huge game midweek. If we take nothing from that then we are in deep trouble
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 39 times
- Has Liked: 16 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
We have certainly improved our defensive structure. There is clearly vulnerability and we are shooting ourselves in the foot too much. But let's look at the caliber of opposition we have faced, the number of players we have brought in, and the age of our squad. It's September not January. A little balance is all I'm asking for.
These 3 users liked this post: Paul Waine NewClaret Foshiznik
-
- Posts: 9919
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2352 times
- Has Liked: 3183 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Did anyone think Luton would go to Everton and win? But many think we will go to Luton and win , get real we are weak and are up against it all season every game is a battle and pretty tippy happy football with no fight will win nowt in this league.
-
- Posts: 2625
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 509 times
- Has Liked: 886 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
It's a messageboard. You're welcome to make your senseless posts. We're all judged by our comments. Keep it up, why would I completely ignore you? I'm still waiting for you to say something sensible about football, though.
-
- Posts: 13537
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3118 times
- Has Liked: 3841 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Even that is not necessary. A draw away against those teams will be fine if we beat them at home. It’s the run of games we’ve had that makes it feel more critical.Clive 1960 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 4:56 pmwe are definitely a team in transaction. we have to pick ourselves up and go and win at Luton nothing less .
This user liked this post: JimmyRobbo
-
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:49 am
- Been Liked: 151 times
- Has Liked: 693 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Sorry but I can`t understand the tatics, I thought from our summer buying of young fast talented players that in games like these we would try and contain then hit them quickly on the break, yet we get penned in and when we win the ball we play it around slowly at the back whilst the opposition reorganise and the moment for a quick break is gone. VK seems to me to decide exactly what game he wants to play because to me he is trying to do one thing with players best suited to another.
-
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 547 times
- Has Liked: 51 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Odobert looks a player
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
I thought we played pretty well. Stats aren't a million miles off a team that beat Sheff United 8-0 last week.
Trafford looked better too, but his distribution is still woeful. None of his long balls reached a Burnley player, none. For me, Muric is the difference between losing and winning.
Trafford looked better too, but his distribution is still woeful. None of his long balls reached a Burnley player, none. For me, Muric is the difference between losing and winning.
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 624 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
We are in a very tough situation
Trafford is making saves but his distribution is nowhere near muric level
Al-dakhil is going to make mistakes due to his age, so is Beyer
Midfield not strong enough getting dominated
Trippier dominated Ramsey but couldn’t deal with Odobert, why he didn’t we start with 2 wingers
100m spent but no standouts
Trafford is making saves but his distribution is nowhere near muric level
Al-dakhil is going to make mistakes due to his age, so is Beyer
Midfield not strong enough getting dominated
Trippier dominated Ramsey but couldn’t deal with Odobert, why he didn’t we start with 2 wingers
100m spent but no standouts
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
I like Muric but we haven't seen him play against a team which pressed as well as Newcastle did today. They made it really difficult for Trafford.Steddyman wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:11 pmI thought we played pretty well. Stats aren't a million miles off a team that beat Sheff United 8-0 last week.
Trafford looked better too, but his distribution is still woeful. None of his long balls reached a Burnley player, none. For me, Muric is the difference between losing and winning.
-
- Posts: 9919
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2352 times
- Has Liked: 3183 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
We all remember Kieran Trippier, we all know how good he is. We've given debuts to James Trafford (19), Luka Koleosho (19), Aaron Ramsey (20) and Wilson Odobert (18) since the start of the season - current age, as per dob on club's website.Hedontplayforyou wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:03 pmThat was very poor regardless of the opposition .
Men against boys. Mistakes all over the park. We never looked like scoring . Ponderous, slow, bad decision making, we made them look better than they were as well. From Ramseys stupid mistake to the horrendous defending for their second it wasn’t god enough in the slightest .
Luton is now a huge huge game midweek. If we take nothing from that then we are in deep trouble
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1575 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Trafford was our best player today by some distance.Steddyman wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:11 pmI thought we played pretty well. Stats aren't a million miles off a team that beat Sheff United 8-0 last week.
Trafford looked better too, but his distribution is still woeful. None of his long balls reached a Burnley player, none. For me, Muric is the difference between losing and winning.
Not sure how adding in a keeper like Muric does anything except make us concede more
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
There’s an argument to say we really should see what Muric can do against better teams. He earned the right last year.
That’s not anything against Trafford who did well, but it’s also true to say his distribution isn’t there.
-
- Posts: 6698
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1705 times
- Has Liked: 791 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Think one of our biggest problems being that VK, and the fans, dont yet know the best starting 11 to have a chance in this league, and as a result the understanding is running at a lower level. We now move to a run of lesser opposition, and I include Chelsea, but silly mistakes need to be minimised
This user liked this post: Foshiznik
-
- Posts: 2625
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 509 times
- Has Liked: 886 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Unfortunately, we definiitely looked second best for most of the match. Amdouni had that chance and afterwards we barely got out of our half until Odebert came on.
My worry is that we looked to play passes in the wrong zones and strayed from "our" style and it could be an awful time to take on Luton at home after they've just put a few games together. We needed to play them later in the year when their injuries and routine had set in. Important we don't lose. We stayed up for those seasons by not losing to those around us.
My worry is that we looked to play passes in the wrong zones and strayed from "our" style and it could be an awful time to take on Luton at home after they've just put a few games together. We needed to play them later in the year when their injuries and routine had set in. Important we don't lose. We stayed up for those seasons by not losing to those around us.
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 3:44 pm
- Been Liked: 6 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Trafford 6
Roberts 5
Al Dakhil 5
Beyer 8*
Taylor 6
Cullen 5
Brownhill 5
Berge 6
Ramsey 4
Koleosho 5
Amdouni 6
Bruun Larsen 7
Rodriguez 6
Odobert 6
Roberts 5
Al Dakhil 5
Beyer 8*
Taylor 6
Cullen 5
Brownhill 5
Berge 6
Ramsey 4
Koleosho 5
Amdouni 6
Bruun Larsen 7
Rodriguez 6
Odobert 6
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 624 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
We aren’t keeping clean sheets with Trafford being our ‘best player’ id rather have a goalkeeper who can find a Burnley player with his feet, everyone harped on about Taylor not being able to play the system. Nobody can say Trafford is better for the system than muricNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:14 pmTrafford was our best player today by some distance.
Not sure how adding in a keeper like Muric does anything except make us concede more
-
- Posts: 2546
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 723 times
- Has Liked: 2037 times
- Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Also fair to say we only lost due to a worldie and a penalty. Overall I thought we defended much better today
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Oh well, I know it's off topic but I just noticed Blackburn are 17th in the league below
-
- Posts: 9919
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2352 times
- Has Liked: 3183 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Correction: James Trafford dob 10-Oct-2002 on wikipedia - not 10-Oct-2002 as on club player profile.Paul Waine wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:14 pmWe all remember Kieran Trippier, we all know how good he is. We've given debuts to James Trafford (19), Luka Koleosho (19), Aaron Ramsey (20) and Wilson Odobert (18) since the start of the season - current age, as per dob on club's website.
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
This. Trafford probably started more attacks last year than any other player. His distribution from the back is what let us break down stubborn teams.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:18 pmWe aren’t keeping clean sheets with Trafford being our ‘best player’ id rather have a goalkeeper who can find a Burnley player with his feet, everyone harped on about Taylor not being able to play the system. Nobody can say Trafford is better for the system than muric
Not a single long pass from Trafford reached a Burnley player today. Newcastle knew this, so pressed us at the back until he kicked it long.
This user liked this post: NewClaret
-
- Posts: 13537
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3118 times
- Has Liked: 3841 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
I don’t think we do. Against the bottom 10 we win at home, draw away, 40pts - job done.
A win would be great though.
This user liked this post: JimmyRobbo
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 624 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Muric, cork, zaroury all in the starting 11 on Tuesday please
This user liked this post: Vino blanco
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1575 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
I just don’t see it.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:18 pmWe aren’t keeping clean sheets with Trafford being our ‘best player’ id rather have a goalkeeper who can find a Burnley player with his feet, everyone harped on about Taylor not being able to play the system. Nobody can say Trafford is better for the system than muric
In fact I suspect VK and his team are not even remotely looking at the GK position.
They have got considerably bigger issues. The defence and midfield right now are miles off it. Changing the keeper does nothing at all to this team.
All I know for certain is Muric concedes more than Trafford. Trafford is a considerably better shot stopper
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Won't be happening. Traffordn will be hear until the end of the season. Clearly he has photos.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:24 pmMuric, cork, zaroury all in the starting 11 on Tuesday please
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
How do you know that? Can you provide your reasoning?Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:26 pmAll I know for certain is Muric concedes more than Trafford. Trafford is a considerably better shot stopper
Muric conceeded 35 goals in 46 matches.
Trafford has conceeded 13 goals in 5 matches.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1575 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
City lost
United lost
Everton lost
Burnley lost.
Just Liverpool to lose and a full set.
United lost
Everton lost
Burnley lost.
Just Liverpool to lose and a full set.
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 624 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Kompany and the coaching staff will 100% be looking at the keeper position along with the other positions, every good save Trafford has made this season, muric also makes those savesNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:26 pmI just don’t see it.
In fact I suspect VK and his team are not even remotely looking at the GK position.
They have got considerably bigger issues. The defence and midfield right now are miles off it. Changing the keeper does nothing at all to this team.
All I know for certain is Muric concedes more than Trafford. Trafford is a considerably better shot stopper
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
FFS We are judging Muric passing out from the back against teams like Blackpool Rotherham Cardiff Blackburn Salford etc etc etc where we dominated possession and had space and time. This is a different league we are the new boys, the undedogs and let's face it the teams apart from Forest we have played are better then us in virtually every position . End of next month judge then.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1575 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
I seriously doubt they will be. With the issues they have elsewhere the GK position won’t even be an issue for them.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:34 pmKompany and the coaching staff will 100% be looking at the keeper position along with the other positions, every good save Trafford has made this season, muric also makes those saves
-
- Posts: 5730
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 2833 times
- Has Liked: 141 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Cool heads needed. Inevitably the hyperbole of the summer - nonsense about top 10 finishes - has given way to reality. The summer business looks a little misguided because we have a surfeit of wingers and particularly left wingers, and generally have a couple too many attractive technicians and a corresponding lack of out and out physicality (the absence of Foster has exposed how essential he is to us).
But regardless, it has been tough and whilst we might have hoped to burgle a point or three more, we aren't far behind par. If those footballer can help us control the game against the lesser and mid-ranking teams (Forest was promising on this regard) we can get the points to be in the scrap. It will be a close rub thing I suspect but it was always going to be.
But regardless, it has been tough and whilst we might have hoped to burgle a point or three more, we aren't far behind par. If those footballer can help us control the game against the lesser and mid-ranking teams (Forest was promising on this regard) we can get the points to be in the scrap. It will be a close rub thing I suspect but it was always going to be.
-
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 587 times
- Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
It gives them someone behind them they're more used to, someone who suits the style of play better and someone who can pick a pass better. And sorry, it's by no means certain that Muric concedes more than Trafford at this level, that's a guess at best.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:26 pmI just don’t see it.
In fact I suspect VK and his team are not even remotely looking at the GK position.
They have got considerably bigger issues. The defence and midfield right now are miles off it. Changing the keeper does nothing at all to this team.
All I know for certain is Muric concedes more than Trafford. Trafford is a considerably better shot stopper
I'll hold my hand up, I've seen nothing from todays game; but equally I've seen nothing so far from Trafford to show me why he was straight in as first-choice this summer apart from his pricetag.
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 624 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
A defence that’s conceded 14 goals in 6 games isn’t just the back 4, it involves the keeper to.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:36 pmI seriously doubt they will be. With the issues they have elsewhere the GK position won’t even be an issue for them.
We also have a creativity issue, which again in parts starts with the keeper, Trafford at the moment doesn’t have the ability to pick a pass out like muric does
This user liked this post: Steddyman
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 624 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
And we are basing Trafford against teams like Stanley, Wycombe and burton, muric played at a higher level and was a key part of last yearbfcjg wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:35 pmFFS We are judging Muric passing out from the back against teams like Blackpool Rotherham Cardiff Blackburn Salford etc etc etc where we dominated possession and had space and time. This is a different league we are the new boys, the undedogs and let's face it the teams apart from Forest we have played are better then us in virtually every position . End of next month judge then.
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1575 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
He made arguably the save of the season today to keep us in the game.Enola Gay wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:38 pmIt gives them someone behind them they're more used to, someone who suits the style of play better and someone who can pick a pass better. And sorry, it's by no means certain that Muric concedes more than Trafford at this level, that's a guess at best.
I'll hold my hand up, I've seen nothing from todays game; but equally I've seen nothing so far from Trafford to show me why he was straight in as first-choice this summer apart from his pricetag.
I’m sorry but under that press we could have had Ederson in goal. It would have been no different at all.
Our out ball was a long ball to three players under 5.10 against massive defenders.
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
There can’t be much doubt that Trafford is much better at keeping the ball out of the net. Muric is unquestionably world class with his feet.
Given the number of shots we’re facing Trafford is the better choice
Given the number of shots we’re facing Trafford is the better choice
-
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1575 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
The problem is a large portion of our goals are coming from defensive mistakes. Your judging goals conceded like a Dyche defence, most of the goals conceded come purely from midfield and defence **** ups. There’s nothing a keeper could have done about 95% of the goals this season.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:38 pmA defence that’s conceded 14 goals in 6 games isn’t just the back 4, it involves the keeper to.
We also have a creativity issue, which again in parts starts with the keeper, Trafford at the moment doesn’t have the ability to pick a pass out like muric does
This user liked this post: Foshiznik
-
- Posts: 1680
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:05 pm
- Been Liked: 648 times
- Has Liked: 102 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
Give Vincent credit. He's clearly making sure nobody steals him from us in January before guiding us to 15 straight wins and getting us into Europe..keep the faith
This user liked this post: Carwin261
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 624 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
No I’m not I’m saying it’s a collective it’s the back 5, as you are trying to say Trafford won’t be in question, he will be as much in question as the back 4.Newcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:43 pmThe problem is a large portion of our goals are coming from defensive mistakes. Your judging goals conceded like a Dyche defence, most of the goals conceded come purely from midfield and defence **** ups. There’s nothing a keeper could have done about 95% of the goals this season.
You could argue how many times we have given the ball away from poor passes have led to goals
Re: Clarets Vs Newcastle
I’m still waiting for you to say something sensible about anything.JimmyRobbo wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:05 pmIt's a messageboard. You're welcome to make your senseless posts. We're all judged by our comments. Keep it up, why would I completely ignore you? I'm still waiting for you to say something sensible about football, though.