if you can't see what Muric gave us tonight that Trafford doesn't then there is no reply anyone can give you that will help.
Positives.
-
- Posts: 30730
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11062 times
- Has Liked: 5667 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Positives.
-
- Posts: 30730
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11062 times
- Has Liked: 5667 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Positives.
so you missed that Berge and Cullen had much more time on the ball then ?Darthlaw wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:43 pmI just don’t see an argument for one which can’t be applied to the other.
Trafford concedes lots against the cream of the PL - The argument is to change him because ‘we can’t get any worse’ than Muric concedes three, despite doing little wrong.
Muric is better passing - We stick him in and have one shot on goal. I also appreciated his kick straight to Pickford at one point, although I did have a chuckle thinking I’m not sure Trafford can kick it that far.
Tonight has offered little conclusion in the Muric v Trafford debate but has certainly shown that changing the GK is merely rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
Re: Positives.
Cullen was poorVegas Claret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:39 pmso you missed that Berge and Cullen had much more time on the ball then ?
-
- Posts: 30730
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11062 times
- Has Liked: 5667 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Positives.
not Muric's fault though. Cullen has had a terrible season, dithers on the ball but maybe that's because he gets no help from anyone ? It's a huge problem for us Taio and when you look at the bench I'm struggling to see alternatives. I've seen the same from Cullen many many times when he plays for Ireland. IMHO and without wanting to come across too disrespectfully I think his maximum level (from all the games I've seen him play only) is top end Championship but that's with the above caveat of having no support
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 626 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Positives.
First time berge has come against another team with a midfield 2 so he wasn’t being over ranNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:29 pmI thought Berge looked really handy.
I actually thought Vitinho was our best attacking outlet
Tresor clearly has ability, but tactically something isn’t right with him
Tresor from the left so he can cut in on his strong foot and play through balls
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 626 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Positives.
Muric in possession of ball is 100% the biggest positive
Delcroix looked good on the ball and if he played left back with a stronger cb next to him then he could be a good player, Taylor has a much better engine than him though
Berge was very good in spells but he wasn’t playing against an extra cm
Delcroix looked good on the ball and if he played left back with a stronger cb next to him then he could be a good player, Taylor has a much better engine than him though
Berge was very good in spells but he wasn’t playing against an extra cm
Re: Positives.
People who went got 20 clarets points yay
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 626 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
-
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:35 pm
- Been Liked: 540 times
- Has Liked: 188 times
- Location: Retirement Home in Suffolk
Re: Positives.
Hopefully whoever came up with the plan that ended up with Cullen marking Tarky at corners will resign.
This user liked this post: Clive 1960
Re: Positives.
I actually thought we played quite well and limited a more or less full strength Everton team to very little, a few tweaks attacking wise and the goals will come. Defence is the obvious problem, AAD I just do not see this “potential” that others see, Iv never seen a player at any level let the ball bounce as much as he does, literally school boy stuff but he does it all the time then gets out muscled and chances come from it. He needs to learn that basics of defending and put on some healthy weight or he’s got no chance. Ekdsl is twice if not three times the defender.
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2023 12:15 pm
- Been Liked: 47 times
- Has Liked: 54 times
Re: Positives.
Our xG last night was 0.07. At least it wasn't zero.
Re: Positives.
Lost 3-0 with 1 weak effort on target , ok then .Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:38 pmif you can't see what Muric gave us tonight that Trafford doesn't then there is no reply anyone can give you that will help.
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 626 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Positives.
Have a think it’s not that difficult123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 7:47 amWhat does this reply have anything to do with the poster saying muric is clearly better right now than Trafford
Re: Positives.
In relation to the thread....
...62% possession away from home.
...62% possession away from home.
-
- Posts: 10173
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Positives.
Biggest positive from yesterday is the fact that it became November, feels like it is another month closer to May
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 626 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Positives.
Muric was still a positive123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 7:47 amWhat does this reply have anything to do with the poster saying muric is clearly better right now than Trafford
-
- Posts: 18036
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4075 times
- Has Liked: 1854 times
Re: Positives.
He was.
Massively overpaid for Trafford.
-
- Posts: 6699
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1705 times
- Has Liked: 791 times
Re: Positives.
Its getting easier each game to buy tickets for future games
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 626 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Positives.
One other potential positive I saw was that if Everton lose DCL to any kind of long term injury again then they will massively struggle
-
- Posts: 2546
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 723 times
- Has Liked: 2037 times
- Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100
Re: Positives.
- That the argument that we would have done significantly better so far this season with Muric in goal has once and for all been debunked.
- That we didn't pick up any new injuries.
- Delcroix, Redmond and Berge looked decent again. Hopefully we can build around their experience moving forward this season.
- That we didn't pick up any new injuries.
- Delcroix, Redmond and Berge looked decent again. Hopefully we can build around their experience moving forward this season.
Re: Positives.
Was just thinking that, don't think we'll hear much moaning about loyalty points or how hard it is to get away tickets for the rest of this season.warksclaret wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 10:18 amIts getting easier each game to buy tickets for future games
-
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 12:45 pm
- Been Liked: 664 times
- Has Liked: 379 times
Re: Positives.
Less than a year before stuffing Rovers again.
-
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:24 am
- Been Liked: 200 times
- Has Liked: 274 times
Re: Positives.
On a personal level I will be able to move seats next season
This user liked this post: CoolClaret
Re: Positives.
Actually, it might not be much easier as I suspect the club will start taking up much smaller away allocations if the season continues as expected.
-
- Posts: 16934
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6971 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Positives.
Berge looked a class act today.
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 626 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Positives.
We should easily be on 12 points even after playing so badly, so by law of averages it can only get better
-
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 4:08 pm
- Been Liked: 85 times
-
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 4:08 pm
- Been Liked: 85 times
Re: Positives.
We are on 3pts more than we should, Coz Luton battered us.123EasyasBFC wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2023 9:44 pmWe should easily be on 12 points even after playing so badly, so by law of averages it can only get better
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 626 times
- Has Liked: 184 times
Re: Positives.
Not true though because PGMOL have apologised for the forest decision which would have given us 2 more points, we should have been out of sight first half against Luton but we weren’t.Barlickclaret wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:18 pmWe are on 3pts more than we should, Coz Luton battered us.
My point was trying to think of positives
-
- Posts: 3095
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 710 times
- Has Liked: 619 times
Re: Positives.
Berge looks a good player and played well again- our best acquisition so far
Defence looks better with Beyer and even oShea looks better alongside him - I think yesterdays back four could settle and improve
Fans really stayed behind the team yesterday and we didn't see loads leaving on 70 mins so they clearly thought we were 'in it'
More shots and corners than recently.
There are things there to build on - keep most of that team in and maybe redmond for koleosho (I expect K will look better from the bench when players are a bit Korean tired and he is fresh)
Defence looks better with Beyer and even oShea looks better alongside him - I think yesterdays back four could settle and improve
Fans really stayed behind the team yesterday and we didn't see loads leaving on 70 mins so they clearly thought we were 'in it'
More shots and corners than recently.
There are things there to build on - keep most of that team in and maybe redmond for koleosho (I expect K will look better from the bench when players are a bit Korean tired and he is fresh)