Scrap VAR
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1102 times
- Has Liked: 856 times
Scrap VAR
It’s every week at this stage. How many points have they done us out of now?
Re: Scrap VAR
None tonight, Trafford did that, or VK for not having a taller/stronger keeper - blame whichever.
-
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 691 times
- Has Liked: 362 times
Re: Scrap VAR
It's a definite foul. 100%. The more angles they showed, the more obvious it was
These 2 users liked this post: mkmel Anthonini
-
- Posts: 2587
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
- Been Liked: 955 times
- Has Liked: 169 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Bloody rubbish, which idiots are stuck in there?
I’m fed up with the PL
I’m fed up with the PL
Re: Scrap VAR
Not sure how it's VAR's fault. Onfield officials should have called the foul
This user liked this post: St Austell Claret
-
- Posts: 5092
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1181 times
- Has Liked: 637 times
- Location: Tibet
Re: Scrap VAR
Yep foul everyday of the week
-
- Posts: 523
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2022 9:53 pm
- Been Liked: 216 times
- Has Liked: 112 times
Re: Scrap VAR
How about we try to beat opposition by scoring more goals.Milltown1882 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:42 pmIt’s every week at this stage. How many points have they done us out of now?
-
- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
- Been Liked: 834 times
- Has Liked: 1637 times
- Location: Lincoln
Re: Scrap VAR
The onfield official may not have got a clear view as the area was packed with players and only sees it the once
-
- Posts: 6976
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1490 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Total bxxxxxxx point robbed at Villa now 2 more tonight.We are getting points deducted by VAR
This user liked this post: Anthonini
Re: Scrap VAR
its a foul, in any other game in any top league in europeRoosterbooster wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:48 pmIt's a definite foul. 100%. The more angles they showed, the more obvious it was
but as its burnley, in injury time - the guys making the decisions give it
he moves clearly into trafford to obstruct him getting the ball
saying that though tresor gave the ball away to allow them to attack
and we arent clinical enough
This user liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin
-
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 6:51 pm
- Been Liked: 70 times
- Has Liked: 386 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Lets get the hell out of this division asap!
Premier league is more bent than the f...ing post office.
Premier league is more bent than the f...ing post office.
This user liked this post: clitheroeclaret3
-
- Posts: 4405
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1467 times
- Has Liked: 997 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Scrap VAR
We're tryingoswyclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:03 pmLets get the hell out of this division asap!
Premier league is more bent than the f...ing post office.
This user liked this post: oswyclaret
Re: Scrap VAR
VAR - probably designed by the same bunch who came up with the Post Office system.
This user liked this post: oswyclaret
-
- Posts: 2165
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
- Been Liked: 771 times
- Has Liked: 10082 times
Re: Scrap VAR
We had scored more than the opposition until the ref and VAR decided otherwise.AmbleClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:52 pmHow about we try to beat opposition by scoring more goals.
-
- Posts: 7410
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2318 times
- Has Liked: 2174 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Didn’t deserve 3 points anyway to be honest
Re: Scrap VAR
It’s not really a clear and obvious error by the ref to give the goal as the keeper isn’t getting near the cross?
Also we were/are gash.
Also we were/are gash.
-
- Posts: 523
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2022 9:53 pm
- Been Liked: 216 times
- Has Liked: 112 times
Re: Scrap VAR
I meant more than one,so that bad decisions aren't game changers. This was Luton, at home, come on.Juan Tanamera wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:16 pmWe had scored more than the opposition until the ref and VAR decided otherwise.
-
- Posts: 494
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2018 8:02 pm
- Been Liked: 92 times
- Has Liked: 261 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Scrap VAR and we still draw tonight
-
- Posts: 10328
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3342 times
- Has Liked: 1964 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Scrap it altogether or at least scrap the idiots using it.
-
- Posts: 18014
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4074 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Weak keeper, im afraid. No foul.
Has to be stronger.
Has to be stronger.
-
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 728 times
- Has Liked: 515 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Scrap VAR
The number of times I've read this utter nonsense view is ridiculous already...ElectroClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:38 pmWeak keeper, im afraid. No foul.
Has to be stronger.
Have you actually watched it back? There is zero doubt that Adebayo backs into him whilst in no way attempting to go for the ball. Trafford has eyes on claiming the ball.
JJ Watt will be advising he is included in the next NFL draft he did that good a job on Trafford.
These 2 users liked this post: Stalbansclaret Rumpelstiltskin
-
- Posts: 2511
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:21 am
- Been Liked: 1666 times
- Has Liked: 2984 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Absolutely. People blaming Trafford are deluded......Adebayo blatantly and deliberately blocks Trafford who is looking to claim the ball. Thise blaming Trafford should go out tomorrow morning and attempt to run through the nearest 6 foot plus brick s***house to see what happens.
These 2 users liked this post: Lord_Bob longsidepies
-
- Posts: 2165
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
- Been Liked: 771 times
- Has Liked: 10082 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Well maybe if Amdouni's second, third and fourth touches had been somewhat better than his first we may have had a hateful.AmbleClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:19 pmI meant more than one,so that bad decisions aren't game changers. This was Luton, at home, come on.
Come on.
-
- Posts: 8996
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2013 times
- Has Liked: 2913 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Just posted this on the Trafford thread..
If a player barging forward with his back to play blocking the keeper is not obstruction at the very least, something has gone very wrong in the rules.
I’m no lover of over protection for goalkeepers, and I prefer the idea of a more robust attitude in general, but if VAR are not over ruling that then it is time they called it a day. VAR was a great idea, but it has just another layer of bad refereeing through its bonkers implementation.
If a player barging forward with his back to play blocking the keeper is not obstruction at the very least, something has gone very wrong in the rules.
I’m no lover of over protection for goalkeepers, and I prefer the idea of a more robust attitude in general, but if VAR are not over ruling that then it is time they called it a day. VAR was a great idea, but it has just another layer of bad refereeing through its bonkers implementation.
These 4 users liked this post: Somethingfishy Lord_Bob Rumpelstiltskin longsidepies
-
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2020 4:27 pm
- Been Liked: 25 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Somethingfishy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:51 pmThe number of times I've read this utter nonsense view is ridiculous already...
Have you actually watched it back? There is zero doubt that Adebayo backs into him whilst in no way attempting to go for the ball. Trafford has eyes on claiming the ball.
JJ Watt will be advising he is included in the next NFL draft he did that good a job on Trafford.
Spot on
The Luton guy just deliberately blocks off Trafford coming to claim the ball!
Can`t wait to get away from the Pl var corruption
This user liked this post: oswyclaret
-
- Posts: 1680
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:05 pm
- Been Liked: 648 times
- Has Liked: 102 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Just playing devil's advocate why then aren't free kicks awarded against us every time we kick off at the start of a game/half?
You can blatantly see 2 or 3 of our players block off the opposition forwards from chasing Trafford down and the ball isn't even in the same postcode.
Trafford had no need to come for that cross with all the bodies there and saves the header with ease if he stays put.
A real shame as I thought he had a good night between the posts tonight too, probably his best all round performance in a Clarets shirt.
You can blatantly see 2 or 3 of our players block off the opposition forwards from chasing Trafford down and the ball isn't even in the same postcode.
Trafford had no need to come for that cross with all the bodies there and saves the header with ease if he stays put.
A real shame as I thought he had a good night between the posts tonight too, probably his best all round performance in a Clarets shirt.
-
- Posts: 10328
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3342 times
- Has Liked: 1964 times
Re: Scrap VAR
They should be. Three of them did it in the first half.Andreshotboots wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 11:22 pmJust playing devil's advocate why then aren't free kicks awarded against us every time we kick off at the start of a game/half?
You can blatantly see 2 or 3 of our players block off the opposition forwards from chasing Trafford down and the ball isn't even in the same postcode.
Trafford had no need to come for that cross with all the bodies there and saves the header with ease if he stays put.
A real shame as I thought he had a good night between the posts tonight too, probably his best all round performance in a Clarets shirt.
Re: Scrap VAR
I agree we were gash but it's definitely a clear error. Adebayo doesn't go for the ball, he goes for the man. Regardless of whether Trafford is going to get to the cross or not, he's not given the opportunity because Adebayo blocks him off. It's as blatant a foul on a goalkeeper as you'll ever see NOT given!!
Re: Scrap VAR
If that was 5mins into the game at 0-0 the foul is given. Similar given in every single game you'll see. The ref bottled it, VAR bottled it
-
- Posts: 4293
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:30 pm
- Been Liked: 1030 times
- Has Liked: 1521 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Var doesn't need scrapping. The people running it do.
I was all for it
"What could we fear from var?" Oh how wrong I was
I was all for it
"What could we fear from var?" Oh how wrong I was
-
- Posts: 18014
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4074 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
-
- Posts: 2625
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 509 times
- Has Liked: 886 times
Re: Scrap VAR
It's a foul every day of the week. It has been for 20 years.ElectroClaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:38 pmWeak keeper, im afraid. No foul.
Has to be stronger.
Their lad moves in to play the keeper. It's not allowed. Quite simple.
-
- Posts: 18014
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4074 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Nope.
Like I said on another thread, Muric keeps that out
24/7.
And that's simple.
Like I said on another thread, Muric keeps that out
24/7.
And that's simple.
-
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 7:18 am
- Been Liked: 598 times
- Has Liked: 196 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Let’s be honest………
The fact we’re blaming VAR………Luton did a job……going to a back 5 invited them onto us.,…we all knew they always had a chance from balls into the box, corners etc…….
Trafford should have come through that #######
The fact we’re blaming VAR………Luton did a job……going to a back 5 invited them onto us.,…we all knew they always had a chance from balls into the box, corners etc…….
Trafford should have come through that #######
-
- Posts: 8528
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2889 times
- Has Liked: 1763 times
Re: Scrap VAR
had we have got that goal there would be radio silence. we lost because we were poor.
Re: Scrap VAR
If referees had made all decisions correct this season, we would have had (I reckon) 18 points. We'll have 2 more for the goal disallowed at Forest, 1 for the last minute penalty not given at Bournemouth, 1 for the last minute penalty given at Villa, and 2 tonight. Plus the 12 that we have earned, none of them (so far as I know) noticeably affected by bad decisions.
But refs haven't made all decisions correctly, and if VAR wasn't in existence, we would have 14 points because the refs got the Bournemouth, Villa and Luton decisions wrong off their own bat. (VAR could have corrected them but decided not to.) So we have lost 4 of our 18 points, 22% of the total, so no wonder that they want to try and make it better. This is what VAR was brought in for.
And what's the effect of VAR? It's to find an excuse to disallow our winner at Forest. A decision so blatantly wrong that they wrote and apologised. Witohut VAR, our 18 points would have been cut to 14; with VAR, it's cut to 12. 33% of our earned points gone, because of poor refereeing made worse by VAR.
I reckon if they had a poll about VAR at Turf Moor before the match, there wouldn't have been 100 people inside the ground who like it in its current form and want it to remain. And I bet you wouldn't get anywhere near a majority who would want to keep it with tweaks. I don't know any football supporter who thinks it's a good thing.
But refs haven't made all decisions correctly, and if VAR wasn't in existence, we would have 14 points because the refs got the Bournemouth, Villa and Luton decisions wrong off their own bat. (VAR could have corrected them but decided not to.) So we have lost 4 of our 18 points, 22% of the total, so no wonder that they want to try and make it better. This is what VAR was brought in for.
And what's the effect of VAR? It's to find an excuse to disallow our winner at Forest. A decision so blatantly wrong that they wrote and apologised. Witohut VAR, our 18 points would have been cut to 14; with VAR, it's cut to 12. 33% of our earned points gone, because of poor refereeing made worse by VAR.
I reckon if they had a poll about VAR at Turf Moor before the match, there wouldn't have been 100 people inside the ground who like it in its current form and want it to remain. And I bet you wouldn't get anywhere near a majority who would want to keep it with tweaks. I don't know any football supporter who thinks it's a good thing.
These 2 users liked this post: clitheroeclaret3 MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 2602
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
- Been Liked: 858 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
Re: Scrap VAR
If there was no VAR, it’s still a goal. The problem isn’t VAR, it’s **** refs.
-
- Posts: 2093
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
- Been Liked: 429 times
- Has Liked: 4571 times
- Location: COTTON TREE
Re: Scrap VAR
VAR has completely ruined any enjoyment left in watching football. I look forward to watching Championship football and pray that VAR is either scrapped completely or continues to ruin the game of football just in the Premier League.
These 2 users liked this post: dsr oswyclaret
Re: Scrap VAR
VAR has added one thing. The cheer as Luton kicked off after our goal.
Once upon a time there was a signal to know that a goal had been given (the ball hitting the back of the net was a good sign, with a glance at the linesman and ref to confirm.) Now, it's not a goal until the next kick-off.
Once upon a time there was a signal to know that a goal had been given (the ball hitting the back of the net was a good sign, with a glance at the linesman and ref to confirm.) Now, it's not a goal until the next kick-off.
This user liked this post: MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 2:46 am
- Been Liked: 46 times
- Has Liked: 23 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Just reading about whether VAR will ever be introduced in the championship. It was used in the play off finals the last two years. These lines made me laugh:
In the 2021/22 season, VAR was introduced in the Championship, League One and League Two play-off finals at Wembley.
This was the first time it was used in the play-off finals, and it was used again last season, as the EFL wanted there to be no controversy when it came to the biggest games in the EFL calendar.
In the 2021/22 season, VAR was introduced in the Championship, League One and League Two play-off finals at Wembley.
This was the first time it was used in the play-off finals, and it was used again last season, as the EFL wanted there to be no controversy when it came to the biggest games in the EFL calendar.
-
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 691 times
- Has Liked: 362 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Should have had a pen v Man Udsr wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:27 amIf referees had made all decisions correct this season, we would have had (I reckon) 18 points. We'll have 2 more for the goal disallowed at Forest, 1 for the last minute penalty not given at Bournemouth, 1 for the last minute penalty given at Villa, and 2 tonight. Plus the 12 that we have earned, none of them (so far as I know) noticeably affected by bad decisions.
But refs haven't made all decisions correctly, and if VAR wasn't in existence, we would have 14 points because the refs got the Bournemouth, Villa and Luton decisions wrong off their own bat. (VAR could have corrected them but decided not to.) So we have lost 4 of our 18 points, 22% of the total, so no wonder that they want to try and make it better. This is what VAR was brought in for.
And what's the effect of VAR? It's to find an excuse to disallow our winner at Forest. A decision so blatantly wrong that they wrote and apologised. Witohut VAR, our 18 points would have been cut to 14; with VAR, it's cut to 12. 33% of our earned points gone, because of poor refereeing made worse by VAR.
I reckon if they had a poll about VAR at Turf Moor before the match, there wouldn't have been 100 people inside the ground who like it in its current form and want it to remain. And I bet you wouldn't get anywhere near a majority who would want to keep it with tweaks. I don't know any football supporter who thinks it's a good thing.
Another pen v whu
A red card a 0-0 v CP
We were lucky against Liverpool. But it made no difference
And earlier in the season an offside goal was given against us but we still lost
We ae possibly 10 pts short
We have played well in games and got nothing, and poorly in some and got something
But are well shy of what we deserve
-
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 691 times
- Has Liked: 362 times
Re: Scrap VAR
3 things
1. It doesn't actually matter if Trafford is getting near the ball. A foul is a foul anywhere on the pitch, proximity to to the ball being irrelevant
2. He was easily getting to the area of the ball if he wasnt obstructed
3. Adebayo clearly obstructs Trafford moving towards the ball without any intention of playing the ball
It's about as blatant a foul as you will ever see. Every part of the rulebook and the simplest of interpretations at every level confirms it. Its only contentious if you deliberately bend the rules. Like VAR did
Re: Scrap VAR
The PL has invented a new game where obstructing the goalkeeper doesn't count as a foul anymore. You can man mark the goalkeeper and block him out. Even at set pieces. Utter joke.
Re: Scrap VAR
Loads of thing's to think about:
1) if no VAR - it's a goal
2) If VAR is there to change clear and obvious errors - they failed
3) anyone trying to blame Trafford has an agenda - sorry, my opinion - Muric would have done the same
4) I was angry about the decisions at Forrest, Villa, etc. etc. but this has made me FURIOUS. It was so obvious. I'm lost.
5) I'm a Burnley fan. I love my team and will support them. I believe that we are going overcome all this BS.
6) and I trust Kompany to do this.
P.S. I hope he tells Foster to go slam into Edison at the first opportunity and see what happens.
1) if no VAR - it's a goal
2) If VAR is there to change clear and obvious errors - they failed
3) anyone trying to blame Trafford has an agenda - sorry, my opinion - Muric would have done the same
4) I was angry about the decisions at Forrest, Villa, etc. etc. but this has made me FURIOUS. It was so obvious. I'm lost.
5) I'm a Burnley fan. I love my team and will support them. I believe that we are going overcome all this BS.
6) and I trust Kompany to do this.
P.S. I hope he tells Foster to go slam into Edison at the first opportunity and see what happens.
This user liked this post: longsidepies
-
- Posts: 3106
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:46 pm
- Been Liked: 1132 times
- Has Liked: 302 times
- Location: Melbourne, Australia.
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: Scrap VAR
Blocking someone is not against the rules Stalban.Stalbansclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:54 pmAbsolutely. People blaming Trafford are deluded......Adebayo blatantly and deliberately blocks Trafford who is looking to claim the ball. Thise blaming Trafford should go out tomorrow morning and attempt to run through the nearest 6 foot plus brick s***house to see what happens.
As PGMOL explained, it was a coming together of two players.
Re: Scrap VAR
You are bang on the money as alwaysNewcastleclaret93 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 7:37 amBlocking someone is not against the rules Stalban.
As PGMOL explained, it was a coming together of two players.
- Attachments
-
- IMG_2350.jpeg (80.44 KiB) Viewed 1369 times
This user liked this post: MT03ALG
-
- Posts: 11120
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1573 times
- Has Liked: 360 times