Tresor
-
- Posts: 30712
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11058 times
- Has Liked: 5663 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Tresor
Given we had apparently triggered the permanent move after 5 games and plenty of people have said that's nonsense, does the lack of him even on the bench suggest that maybe there was a 'number of performances' clause and we have decided not to trigger it ? I've not seen a single journo ask where he is, I've not heard he's injured etc. Any thoughts ? (other than the predictable 'he's crap')
-
- Posts: 9336
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4108 times
- Has Liked: 6591 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Tresor
Other than that, no.
-
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:12 pm
- Been Liked: 94 times
- Has Liked: 196 times
Re: Tresor
Ideal if we can get out of buying him somehow. I did hear that we had already signed him, but honestly I have no idea if he is our player or not.
-
- Posts: 10328
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3342 times
- Has Liked: 1964 times
Re: Tresor
He’d have fitted in nicely to today’s performance.
These 3 users liked this post: forzagranata bfcjg ervi34
-
- Posts: 3172
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 1751 times
- Has Liked: 273 times
Re: Tresor
I said to someone today that you wouldn’t be surprised if the club are looking at ways to unpick to obligation to buy (if it’s true of course).
-
- Posts: 11533
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3191 times
- Has Liked: 1872 times
- Contact:
Re: Tresor
At least him not being in the squad, means we don’t have to hear the “most assists” stat every time he’s on the ball
-
- Posts: 4073
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1507 times
- Has Liked: 581 times
Re: Tresor
Was on the bench against Fulham though. So doubtful. Probably just injured or gone to Wetherspoons or something.
Re: Tresor
He’s got Galatasaray on loan written all over him.
-
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2021 5:27 pm
- Been Liked: 100 times
- Has Liked: 89 times
Re: Tresor
He can’t be any worse than Ramsey . I am 40 year old and unfit and I’d offer more
-
- Posts: 13511
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
- Been Liked: 3114 times
- Has Liked: 3833 times
Re: Tresor
Thought the same today. Maybe the #apps needed to trigger purchase was wrong and we’ve given up on him after Luton.
Cannot argue with that, he’s been poor for us.
Cannot argue with that, he’s been poor for us.
Re: Tresor
Hes been dreadful but the decision to bring him on in games like Luton when we are defending a lead and then not give him a chance when we are chasing games is bizarre.
These 2 users liked this post: summitclaret nil_desperandum
-
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
- Been Liked: 278 times
- Has Liked: 3308 times
Re: Tresor
I'm 44 with sciatica and could do more tooBlatherwickstattoo wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2024 7:03 pmHe can’t be any worse than Ramsey . I am 40 year old and unfit and I’d offer more
-
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 12:31 pm
- Been Liked: 160 times
Re: Tresor
If its true we have triggered the clause to sign him, he should start every game for the rest of the season now.
He needs game time, I've no idea what role he played last year, but lets put him that role and see what he can do.
What the worst that can happen?
He needs game time, I've no idea what role he played last year, but lets put him that role and see what he can do.
What the worst that can happen?
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:35 pm
- Been Liked: 41 times
- Has Liked: 20 times
Re: Tresor
From The Athletic -
Should Esteve hit his appearance-related clauses to trigger his deal that will already be an initial €12million (£10.2m) spend in the summer.
Adding that to Mike Tresor’s €18million (£15m) obligation to buy, it totals a similar amount to their entire summer spend when preparing for the Championship last season.
Should Esteve hit his appearance-related clauses to trigger his deal that will already be an initial €12million (£10.2m) spend in the summer.
Adding that to Mike Tresor’s €18million (£15m) obligation to buy, it totals a similar amount to their entire summer spend when preparing for the Championship last season.
-
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 1358 times
- Has Liked: 440 times
Re: Tresor
Can anybody explain the purpose of these loan deals with obligations to buy after a number of appearances?
From our point of view I'd imagine it gives us the opportunity to take a player and if we don't like the look of them we just stop playing them before the appearance threshold is hit, meaning we no longer have to buy them.
But if the number of appearances is as low as people make out then maybe we really do want to buy these players and we're just delaying payments until the summer. So perhaps these deals are a way of dealing with cash flow issues?
I find them pretty strange, anyway.
From our point of view I'd imagine it gives us the opportunity to take a player and if we don't like the look of them we just stop playing them before the appearance threshold is hit, meaning we no longer have to buy them.
But if the number of appearances is as low as people make out then maybe we really do want to buy these players and we're just delaying payments until the summer. So perhaps these deals are a way of dealing with cash flow issues?
I find them pretty strange, anyway.
Re: Tresor
They are basically buy deals but just delaying the full payment (could be for cash flow purposes or even FFP). Seem to be getting more common.JohnMcGreal wrote: ↑Sun Feb 18, 2024 8:31 amCan anybody explain the purpose of these loan deals with obligations to buy after a number of appearances?
From our point of view I'd imagine it gives us the opportunity to take a player and if we don't like the look of them we just stop playing them before the appearance threshold is hit, meaning we no longer have to buy them.
But if the number of appearances is as low as people make out then maybe we really do want to buy these players and we're just delaying payments until the summer. So perhaps these deals are a way of dealing with cash flow issues?
I find them pretty strange, anyway.
This user liked this post: JohnMcGreal
Re: Tresor
I’d forgot about him to be honest. If we have bought him then maybe he’ll be off on loan next season. He’s another who looks technically good but doesn’t contribute. Doesn’t mean he won’t in the future though.
Re: Tresor
I'm sure at some point someone will start a thread asking to sum up this season in one word. That will be mine - Tresor.
This user liked this post: Poulton-le-Claret
Re: Tresor
Sums up the purchase of so many young bucks, with no experience and senior pros left to guide them all.
Re: Tresor
Does this mean we are obligated to pay for Tresor in July?
- Attachments
-
- IMG_8133.png (1.6 MiB) Viewed 795 times
-
- Posts: 7410
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2319 times
- Has Liked: 2174 times
Re: Tresor
I’m sure I’ll be proven wrong but I’ve seen nothing to suggest he will cut it in English football.
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 7:02 am
- Been Liked: 269 times
- Has Liked: 161 times
-
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:27 pm
- Been Liked: 398 times
- Has Liked: 432 times
- Location: Mickleover, Derby
- Contact:
Re: Tresor
Him being nowhere near the first team in recent weeks is one of the few decisions VK has made this season that makes sense. I'll be very surprised if we see him next season.
Re: Tresor
18 million down the drain……. Mike Tresor sits it out again!
Astute bit of business this.
Astute bit of business this.