MOTD 2
-
- Posts: 18007
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4074 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
MOTD 2
Citeh carrying on where they left off.
Usual inept rubbish from West Ham.
Early days, though. And Liverpool were good.
Usual inept rubbish from West Ham.
Early days, though. And Liverpool were good.
This user liked this post: Lord Beamish
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: MOTD 2
They could have played without a keeper today Liverpool ....
-
- Posts: 18007
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4074 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: MOTD 2
Were on.
Onside. The disallowed goal was onside.
Onside. The disallowed goal was onside.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: MOTD 2
Goal!ElectroClaret wrote:Were on.
Onside. The disallowed goal was onside.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: MOTD 2
Goal incorrectly ruled offside - penalty could have been given to them.
Strange watching MOTD and seeing Joe Hart run out playing for Burnley! Will be a big player for us this season.
Strange watching MOTD and seeing Joe Hart run out playing for Burnley! Will be a big player for us this season.
-
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
- Been Liked: 1835 times
- Has Liked: 962 times
- Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed
Re: MOTD 2
same old, same old!
I want my licence fee returned!
I want my licence fee returned!
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: MOTD 2
It was 0-0 to be fair.claretblue wrote:same old, same old!
I want my licence fee returned!
-
- Posts: 18007
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4074 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: MOTD 2
The "same old" will do for me.claretblue wrote:same old, same old!
Seventh again is just fine.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: MOTD 2
Burnley should be done for theft!!FactualFrank wrote:Goal incorrectly ruled offside - penalty could have been given to them.
Strange watching MOTD and seeing Joe Hart run out playing for Burnley! Will be a big player for us this season.
-
- Posts: 4405
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1467 times
- Has Liked: 997 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: MOTD 2
No it wasn't. Jack's foot and part of his ankle and calf was offside.ElectroClaret wrote:Were on.
Onside. The disallowed goal was onside.
refs got it right unfortunately as had they missed it the lack of VAR would have given us the goal.
This user liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: MOTD 2
Nah.tim_noone wrote:Burnley should be done for theft!!
-
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 98 times
Re: MOTD 2
Disallowed goal was clearly offside, correct decision.
Ben Mee on Ings was a penalty all day long.
The one on JBG was a 50/50 ball and they were both rightly committed. No penalty.
Ben Mee on Ings was a penalty all day long.
The one on JBG was a 50/50 ball and they were both rightly committed. No penalty.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: MOTD 2
Joe hart is a steal.FactualFrank wrote:Nah.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: MOTD 2
Ah. Thought you were on about us getting a point.tim_noone wrote:Joe hart is a steal.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: MOTD 2
And I thought mason was a twa!what_no_pies wrote:Disallowed goal was clearly offside, correct decision.
Ben Mee on Ings was a penalty all day long.
The one on JBG was a 50/50 ball and they were both rightly committed. No penalty.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: MOTD 2
No... Agree with you on him gonna be big for us.will win us a few points.FactualFrank wrote:Ah. Thought you were on about us getting a point.
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: MOTD 2
Looking at those never ending instructions Laurent Depoitre got from the Hudd Town management, before he got on the pitch. It doesn't bode well for the Terriers.
-
- Posts: 3457
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1036 times
- Has Liked: 2039 times
Re: MOTD 2
So is it fair to say that Burnley could have come away with all 3 points in that 1st hour......'
.....yes The panel agreed
MOTD then proceeds to show the few chances Southampton had in the last 15 minutes and none of the multiple chances Burnley had in the 1st hour
It's no coincidence that Southamptons goalkeeper was man of the match
' Burnley feel they could have had a penalty too'
Don't show that one but highlight the Ings one for Southampton which was half the shout of that on Gudmunson
.....yes The panel agreed
MOTD then proceeds to show the few chances Southampton had in the last 15 minutes and none of the multiple chances Burnley had in the 1st hour
It's no coincidence that Southamptons goalkeeper was man of the match
' Burnley feel they could have had a penalty too'
Don't show that one but highlight the Ings one for Southampton which was half the shout of that on Gudmunson
This user liked this post: lovebeingaclaret
-
- Posts: 5548
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1448 times
- Has Liked: 1229 times
- Location: Ferkham Hall
Re: MOTD 2
I was expecting more coverage. You normally get 7mins on motd and with only 3 matches today I was thinking 9. We ended up with 6 and the game deserved more.
Re: MOTD 2
Ings got his ankle in the way of a genuine and fair tackle, it was not a pen.
Well done ref and assistant.
Well done ref and assistant.
-
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
- Been Liked: 1835 times
- Has Liked: 962 times
- Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed
Re: MOTD 2
see post 18 for what I mean FrankFactualFrank wrote:It was 0-0 to be fair.
...all Burnley 1st half but hardly any TV coverage to indicate our good performance!
Re: MOTD 2
I thought the same thing. They just don't have any goals in them. Is it 3 in their last 11 PL games now? They've been found out and I can see them really struggling this season. It's a shame as I'd like them to keep punching above their weight like us, but I can't see past them for relegation this season.RingoMcCartney wrote:Looking at those never ending instructions Laurent Depoitre got from the Hudd Town management, before he got on the pitch. It doesn't bode well for the Terriers.
I was surprised to see Glenn Murray starting up front for Brighton as well. That doesn't bode well for them at all. They were awful away from home last season yet Hughton, for all his signings, decided to go "same again" at the weekend. There's much more pressure on their home form this season, as there was for us last season. Teams are more aware of how they play and how to nullify them at the Amex. They'll need to pick up 2 or 3 more wins away from home his season in my opinion and I'm not sure they're capable of that.
Cardiff looked the same as well - absolutely zero threat! They don't look like they've got anything going forward. They'll win the odd game here and there but surely they'll spend pretty much the whole season in the bottom three? The fact Warnock praised Fraser doesn't bode well for when they come up against Sanchez, Salah, De Bruyne, Eriksen, Hazard and co.!!
Re: MOTD 2
It was not a penalty as Ings had already gone over on his ankle if you watch it closely before Mee touched him.what_no_pies wrote:Disallowed goal was clearly offside, correct decision.
Ben Mee on Ings was a penalty all day long.
The one on JBG was a 50/50 ball and they were both rightly committed. No penalty.
Ref was spot on and ours was a 50 -50 ball so no penalty.
-
- Posts: 3221
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:23 pm
- Been Liked: 746 times
- Has Liked: 927 times
Re: MOTD 2
I suspect if VAR had been used for both incidents, neither would have been given. I actually think Gudmundsson`s was far worthier a call as the challenge could be seen as `out of control`and he made clear contact with the player in a goal scoring position. With Ings, he was at speed, the ball was going out of play and he did not have the ball under any kind of control.
Re: MOTD 2
I thought Gudmundssons was as much a pen as Ings regardless of it being a 50/50 ball defender caught his ankle
-
- Posts: 16892
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6963 times
- Has Liked: 1483 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: MOTD 2
The JBG one is interesting because if that challenge is made on the halfway line then it's a free kick all day long, in some cases maybe a red card. Because it was a goal-line clearance it wasn't even debated. It was a dangerous challenge.
These 3 users liked this post: HiroshimaClaret Rick_Muller gawthorpe_view