MOTD 2

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
# 1
ElectroClaret
Posts: 8179
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 2152 times
Has Liked: 1124 times

MOTD 2

Postby ElectroClaret » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:08 pm

Citeh carrying on where they left off.

Usual inept rubbish from West Ham.
Early days, though. And Liverpool were good.
This user liked this post: Lord Beamish

# 2
tim_noone
Posts: 8416
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 2107 times
Has Liked: 8000 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby tim_noone » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:20 pm

They could have played without a keeper today Liverpool ....

# 3
ElectroClaret
Posts: 8179
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 2152 times
Has Liked: 1124 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby ElectroClaret » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:22 pm

Were on.

Onside. The disallowed goal was onside.

# 4
tim_noone
Posts: 8416
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 2107 times
Has Liked: 8000 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby tim_noone » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:30 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:Were on.

Onside. The disallowed goal was onside.

Goal!

# 5
FactualFrank
Posts: 12623
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 3322 times
Has Liked: 5865 times
Location: Leeds

Re: MOTD 2

Postby FactualFrank » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:32 pm

Goal incorrectly ruled offside - penalty could have been given to them.

Strange watching MOTD and seeing Joe Hart run out playing for Burnley! Will be a big player for us this season.

# 6
claretblue
Posts: 3487
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
Been Liked: 897 times
Has Liked: 783 times
Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed

Re: MOTD 2

Postby claretblue » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:33 pm

same old, same old! :roll:

I want my licence fee returned! :x

# 7
FactualFrank
Posts: 12623
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 3322 times
Has Liked: 5865 times
Location: Leeds

Re: MOTD 2

Postby FactualFrank » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:35 pm

claretblue wrote:same old, same old! :roll:

I want my licence fee returned! :x


It was 0-0 to be fair.

# 8
ElectroClaret
Posts: 8179
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 2152 times
Has Liked: 1124 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby ElectroClaret » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:36 pm

claretblue wrote:same old, same old!


The "same old" will do for me.

Seventh again is just fine.

# 9
tim_noone
Posts: 8416
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 2107 times
Has Liked: 8000 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby tim_noone » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:38 pm

FactualFrank wrote:Goal incorrectly ruled offside - penalty could have been given to them.

Strange watching MOTD and seeing Joe Hart run out playing for Burnley! Will be a big player for us this season.

Burnley should be done for theft!!

# 10
Goobs
Posts: 2120
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
Been Liked: 708 times
Has Liked: 539 times
Location: Burnley

Re: MOTD 2

Postby Goobs » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:38 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:Were on.

Onside. The disallowed goal was onside.

No it wasn't. Jack's foot and part of his ankle and calf was offside.

refs got it right unfortunately as had they missed it the lack of VAR would have given us the goal.
This user liked this post: THEWELLERNUT70

# 11
FactualFrank
Posts: 12623
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 3322 times
Has Liked: 5865 times
Location: Leeds

Re: MOTD 2

Postby FactualFrank » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:40 pm

tim_noone wrote:Burnley should be done for theft!!


Nah.

# 12
what_no_pies
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 157 times
Has Liked: 63 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby what_no_pies » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:40 pm

Disallowed goal was clearly offside, correct decision.

Ben Mee on Ings was a penalty all day long.

The one on JBG was a 50/50 ball and they were both rightly committed. No penalty.

# 13
tim_noone
Posts: 8416
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 2107 times
Has Liked: 8000 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby tim_noone » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:42 pm

FactualFrank wrote:Nah.

Joe hart is a steal.

# 14
FactualFrank
Posts: 12623
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 3322 times
Has Liked: 5865 times
Location: Leeds

Re: MOTD 2

Postby FactualFrank » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:43 pm

tim_noone wrote:Joe hart is a steal.


Ah. Thought you were on about us getting a point.

# 15
tim_noone
Posts: 8416
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 2107 times
Has Liked: 8000 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby tim_noone » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:45 pm

what_no_pies wrote:Disallowed goal was clearly offside, correct decision.

Ben Mee on Ings was a penalty all day long.

The one on JBG was a 50/50 ball and they were both rightly committed. No penalty.

And I thought mason was a twa!

# 16
tim_noone
Posts: 8416
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 2107 times
Has Liked: 8000 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby tim_noone » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:47 pm

FactualFrank wrote:Ah. Thought you were on about us getting a point.

No... Agree with you on him gonna be big for us.will win us a few points.

# 17
RingoMcCartney
Posts: 5501
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
Been Liked: 1565 times
Has Liked: 1848 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby RingoMcCartney » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:48 pm

Looking at those never ending instructions Laurent Depoitre got from the Hudd Town management, before he got on the pitch. It doesn't bode well for the Terriers.

# 18
THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 1387
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 409 times
Has Liked: 957 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby THEWELLERNUT70 » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:58 pm

So is it fair to say that Burnley could have come away with all 3 points in that 1st hour......'
.....yes The panel agreed

MOTD then proceeds to show the few chances Southampton had in the last 15 minutes and none of the multiple chances Burnley had in the 1st hour

It's no coincidence that Southamptons goalkeeper was man of the match

' Burnley feel they could have had a penalty too'

Don't show that one but highlight the Ings one for Southampton which was half the shout of that on Gudmunson
This user liked this post: lovebeingaclaret

# 19
piston broke
Posts: 5497
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1365 times
Has Liked: 1199 times
Location: Ferkham Hall

Re: MOTD 2

Postby piston broke » Mon Aug 13, 2018 12:19 am

I was expecting more coverage. You normally get 7mins on motd and with only 3 matches today I was thinking 9. We ended up with 6 and the game deserved more.

# 20
charlyt
Posts: 1013
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2016 5:39 pm
Been Liked: 49 times
Has Liked: 48 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby charlyt » Mon Aug 13, 2018 12:58 am

Ings got his ankle in the way of a genuine and fair tackle, it was not a pen.
Well done ref and assistant.

# 21
claretblue
Posts: 3487
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
Been Liked: 897 times
Has Liked: 783 times
Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed

Re: MOTD 2

Postby claretblue » Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:57 am

FactualFrank wrote:It was 0-0 to be fair.


see post 18 for what I mean Frank

...all Burnley 1st half but hardly any TV coverage to indicate our good performance! :?

# 22
jlup1980
Posts: 1917
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:01 pm
Been Liked: 732 times
Has Liked: 475 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby jlup1980 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 8:21 am

RingoMcCartney wrote:Looking at those never ending instructions Laurent Depoitre got from the Hudd Town management, before he got on the pitch. It doesn't bode well for the Terriers.


I thought the same thing. They just don't have any goals in them. Is it 3 in their last 11 PL games now? They've been found out and I can see them really struggling this season. It's a shame as I'd like them to keep punching above their weight like us, but I can't see past them for relegation this season.

I was surprised to see Glenn Murray starting up front for Brighton as well. That doesn't bode well for them at all. They were awful away from home last season yet Hughton, for all his signings, decided to go "same again" at the weekend. There's much more pressure on their home form this season, as there was for us last season. Teams are more aware of how they play and how to nullify them at the Amex. They'll need to pick up 2 or 3 more wins away from home his season in my opinion and I'm not sure they're capable of that.

Cardiff looked the same as well - absolutely zero threat! They don't look like they've got anything going forward. They'll win the odd game here and there but surely they'll spend pretty much the whole season in the bottom three? The fact Warnock praised Fraser doesn't bode well for when they come up against Sanchez, Salah, De Bruyne, Eriksen, Hazard and co.!!

# 23
BOYSIE31
Posts: 538
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:46 pm
Been Liked: 58 times
Has Liked: 389 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby BOYSIE31 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 8:52 am

what_no_pies wrote:Disallowed goal was clearly offside, correct decision.

Ben Mee on Ings was a penalty all day long.

The one on JBG was a 50/50 ball and they were both rightly committed. No penalty.


It was not a penalty as Ings had already gone over on his ankle if you watch it closely before Mee touched him.

Ref was spot on and ours was a 50 -50 ball so no penalty.

# 24
HiroshimaClaret
Posts: 3019
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:23 pm
Been Liked: 703 times
Has Liked: 795 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby HiroshimaClaret » Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:59 am

I suspect if VAR had been used for both incidents, neither would have been given. I actually think Gudmundsson`s was far worthier a call as the challenge could be seen as `out of control`and he made clear contact with the player in a goal scoring position. With Ings, he was at speed, the ball was going out of play and he did not have the ball under any kind of control.

# 25
joey13
Posts: 3725
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 831 times
Has Liked: 682 times

Re: MOTD 2

Postby joey13 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 11:28 am

I thought Gudmundssons was as much a pen as Ings regardless of it being a 50/50 ball defender caught his ankle

# 26
Rileybobs
Posts: 4470
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 1971 times
Has Liked: 503 times
Location: Leeds

Re: MOTD 2

Postby Rileybobs » Mon Aug 13, 2018 11:32 am

The JBG one is interesting because if that challenge is made on the halfway line then it's a free kick all day long, in some cases maybe a red card. Because it was a goal-line clearance it wasn't even debated. It was a dangerous challenge.
These 3 users liked this post: HiroshimaClaret Rick_Muller gawthorpe_view


Return to “The Bee Hole End”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: burnleypudding, Chester Perry, IanMcL, JarrowClaret, thatdberight and 49 guests